Teacher Efforts To Improve Science Process Skills: Observation, Classification, and Data Table Making

Keywords: Classification, Data Table Creation, Observation, Science Process Skills, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to systematically identify, analyze, and synthesize various teacher strategies used in science learning to develop students' Science Process Skills (SPS). The study focuses on developing indicators for observation, classification, and data tabulation as basic and integrated scientific skills.

Methodology: This study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, adhering to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The unit of analysis was scientific articles, not human participants. Thirty articles meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected through identification, screening, and eligibility assessment. They were then analyzed using document analysis and thematic synthesis.

Main Findings: The study results indicate that active, experiential, and inquiry-oriented learning strategies, such as Guided Inquiry, Experimentation, and Project-Based Learning (PjBL), have proven effective in improving basic Science Process Skills, particularly the observation and classification indicators. However, this systematic review also revealed significant strategic weaknesses in the data table creation indicator. These weaknesses are caused by teachers' limitations in designing learning activities that explicitly involve data processing, visualization, and representation as the basis for students' scientific argumentation.

Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this research lies in the systematic mapping of the development gaps in data table creation indicators in science learning practices. This study provides a conceptual contribution by confirming that strengthening data processing and representation skills is a crucial component that bridges basic Science Process Skills to more complex and meaningful integrated science process skills.

Author Biographies

Gita Salsabilla Nurma Yahya, Universitas Jambi

Department of Physics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia

Darmaji Darmaji, Universitas Jambi

Department of Physics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia

Dwi Agus Kurniawan, Universitas Jambi

Department of Physics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia

References

C. Dede and S. Barab, “Emerging technologies for learning science: A time of rapid advances,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 301–304, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10956-009-9172-4.

N. M. Nasri, N. Nasri, N. F. Nasri, and M. A. A. Talib, “The impact of integrating an intelligent personal assistant (IPA) on secondary school physics students’ scientific inquiry skills,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 232–242, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2023.3241058.

M. Rahman, “21 st century skill ‘Problem Solving’: Defining the concept,” Asian J. Interdiscip. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 2019, doi: doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917.

L. D. English, “Ways of thinking in STEM based problem solving,” ZDM – Math. Educ., vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1219–1230, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7.

T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject”, Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452.

J. Yao, “Exploring experiential learning: Enhancing secondary school chemistry education through practical engagement and innovation,” J. Educ. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 22, pp. 475–484, 2023, doi: 10.54097/ehss.v22i.12508.

R. Agustini, R. S. M. Meilanie, and S. I. Pujiastuti, “Enhancing critical thinking and curiosity in early childhood through inquiry-based science learning,” Aulad J. Early Child., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 734–742, 2024, doi: 10.31004/aulad.v7i3.780.

E. Susiloningsih, A. Fathurohman, S. D. Maharani, M. F. Fathurohman, and S. D. C. Nurani, “Integration of STEM approach in science education: Enhancing students’ critical thinking, creativity, and engagement in elementary schools in Palembang,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 10–19, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i4.10615.

P. N. Ariyanti, R. Madhakomala, and H. Taqiyya, “A holistic strategy for developing 21st century skills and leveraging technology to address the challenges of the digital era,” J. Educ. Relig. Instr., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 60–71, 2025, doi: 10.60046/joeri.v3i2.229.

J. Taliak, G. A. Manu, F. Hotman, and S. Damanik, “Analysis of a competency based curriculum model to improve the quality of secondary education in the era of globalization,” Qalamuna - J. Pendidikan, Sos. dan Agama, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 931–946, 2022, doi: 10.37680/qalamuna.v14i1.5078.

H. Suwono, N. L. Rofi’Ah, M. Saefi, and R. Fachrunnisa, “Interactive socio-scientific inquiry for promoting scientific literacy, enhancing biological knowledge, and developing critical thinking,” J. Biol. Educ., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 944–959, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00219266.2021.2006270.

M. T. Kassaye, D. Damtie, S. M. Mengistie, and G. Yemata, “Effect of science process skills-based teaching approach on secondary school students ’ scientific epistemological belie fs,” Bahir Dar J. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 61–83, 2025, doi: 10.4314/bdje.v25i1.5.

T. Tanti, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, D. Darmaji, T. O. Puspitasari, and I. Wardhana, “Attitude for physics: The condition of high school students,” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 126-132, 2021, doi: 10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.18919.

A. Agongo and T. N. Tindan, “The psychomotor domain: The role of manipulative skills in science mastery,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Growth Eval., vol. 06, no. 06, pp. 990–994, 2025, doi: 10.54660/.IJMRGE.2025.6.6.990-994.

A. Amit, S. Mentser, S. Arieli, and N. Porzycki, “Distinguishing deliberate from systematic thinking.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 120, no. 3, p. 765, 2021, doi: 10.1037/pspp0000284.

P. Y. A. Dewi and K. H. Primayana, “Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts,” Int. J. Educ. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2019, doi: 10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26.

M. Lin, H. Chen, and K.-S. Liu, “A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 8223, no. 7, pp. 3553–3564, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a.

J. Singh, K. Steele, and L. Singh, “Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world,” J. Educ. Technol. Syst., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 40–71, 2021, doi: 10.1177/00472395211047865.

K. H. D. Tang, “Student-centered approach in teaching and learning: What does it really mean?,” Acta Pedagog. Asiana, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 72–83, 2023, doi: 10.53623/apga.v2i2.218.

T. Tanti, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, and R. Fitriani, “Student perception review from gender: Electronic moduls of mathematical physics,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 125-132, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i1.35107.

I. Piotrowska, M. Cichoń, J. Sypniewski, and D. Abramowicz, “Application of inquiry-based science education, anticipatory learning strategy, and project-based learning strategies in the context of environmental problems of the contemporary world,” in Didactic Strategies and Resources for Innovative Geography Teaching, IGI Global, 2022, pp. 23–50. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9598-5.ch002.

G. Gorghiu, L. M. Drăghicescu, S. Cristea, A. Petrescu, and L. M. Gorghiu, “Problem-based learning-an efficient learning strategy in the science lessons context,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 191, pp. 1865–1870, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.570.

N. Kerimbayev, Z. Umirzakova, R. Shadiev, and V. Jotsov, “A student centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning : a systematic review of the literature,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 10, no. 61, pp. 1–28, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8.

P. Kwangmuang, S. Jarutkamolpong, W. Sangboonraung, and S. Daungtod, “The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 6, p. e07309, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309.

E. Sriwahyuni, “Penggunaan flashcard sistem periodik unsur terhadap keterampilan proses sains dasar peserta didik kelas x sma [The use of periodic table flashcards for the basic science process skills of grade X high school students],” J. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 6, pp. 136–146, 2022, doi: 10.19109/ojpk.v6i2.14045.

T. Mulyeni, M. Jamaris, and Y. Supriyati, “Improving basic science process skills through inquiry-based approach in learning science for early elementary students,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 187–201, 2019, doi: 10.12973/tused.10274a.

A. D. Inayah, R. H. Ristanto, D. V. Sigit, and M. Miarsyah, “Analysis of science process skills in senior high school students,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 15–22, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081803.

P. O. Ngozi, “Enhancing science process skills acquisition in chemistry among secondary school students through context-based learning,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 323–330, 2021, doi: 10.33828/sei.v32.i4.7.

A. Yılmaz, “The effect of technology integration in education on prospective teachers’ critical and creative thinking, multidimensional 21 st century skills and academic achievements,” Particip. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 163–199, 2021, doi: 10.17275/per.21.35.8.2.

R. Raja and P. C. Nagasubramani, “Impact of modern technology in education,” J. Appl. Adv. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–35, 2018, doi: 10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.165.

R. Herak, “Character education in the digital age: Challenges and opportunities amidst technological developments,” Major. Sci. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 245–252, 2025, doi: 10.61942/msj.v3i2.367.

H. Rapsanjani and R. A. Yohanes, “Contextual science learning based on local wisdom: An effort to improve science process skills in primary schools hafsemi,” Lensa J. Kependidikan Fis., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 203–212, 2025, doi: 10.33394/j-lkf.v13i1.16514.

S. Y. Ungirwalu, Z. K. Prasetyo, and M. Jannah, “The use of discovery learning-assistedks to improve science process skills and scientific attitudes,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 168–176, 2025, doi: 10.23887/jpiundiksha.v14i1.79839.

J. Boetje, B. Sichterman, S. Van Ginkel, M. Smakman, and J. Versendaal, “Design principles for developing information problem solving competence in higher education: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 20, no.10, pp. 1–43, 2025, doi: 10.3102/00346543251338057.

J. Fielding, K. Makar, and D. Ben Zvi, “Developing students’ reasoning with data and data-ing,” ZDM – Math. Educ., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11858-025-01671-6.

M. S. Amrulloh and A. Galushasti, “Professional development teacher to improve skills of science process and creativity of learners,” J. Educ. Learn. (EduLearn, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 299–307, 2022, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v16i3.20404.

M. Mushani, “Science process skills in science education of developed and developing countries: Literature review,” Unnes Sci. Educ. J., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2021, doi: 10.15294/usej.v10i1.42153 Graduate.

A. Sholahuddin, L. Yuanita, Z. A. I. Supardi, and B. K. Prahani, “Applying the cognitive style-based learning strategy in elementary schools to improve students’ science process skills,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 289–301, 2020, doi: 10.36681/tused.2020.27.

A. M. Setiawan and Sugiyanto, “Science process skills analysos of science teacher on professional teacher program in Indonesia,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 241–247, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23817.

D. Priharsari, “Systematic literature review in information systems and computer engineering: A guideline,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 263–268, 2022, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.202293884.

M. Yildirim, D. S. Acarli, and M. Y. Kasap, “Investigation of in-service and pre-service science teachers’ perceptions of scientific process skills,” Asian J. Univ. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 104–115, 2020, doi: 10.24191/AJUE.V16I2.10302.

A. Widowati, S. Nurohman, and P. Anjarsari, “Developing science learning material with authentic inquiry learning approach to improve problem solving and scientific attitude,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 2017, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v6i1.4851.

S. E. Honig, R. Dunkin, T. Ball, and L. Hunter, “Adapting undergraduate Biology to include science practices by teaching students to generate scientific explanations,” J. Biol. Educ., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 374–389, 2025, doi: 10.1080/00219266.2024.2320114.

M. T. Kassaye, D. Damtie, S. Melesse, and G. Yemata, “Effect of using science process skills-integrated inquiry-based approach on grade nine students’ cell biology academic achievement,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00699-w.

M. Tawil, “An assessment of science process skills in junior high school education: Perspectives of students and teachers in Indonesia,” J. Penelit. Pengemb. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 305–322, 2024, doi: 10.21009/1.10209.

R. Maulidia, D. Jaenudin, and V. I. Chemistry, “Needs analysis of gamification models in the digestive system lesson to improve students’ critical thinking skills and science process skill,” J. Sci. Educ. Pract., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 133–148, 2024, doi: 10.33751/jsep.v8i2.8909.

S. Sarıoğlu, “Development of Online science process skills test for 8th grade pupils,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 418–432, 2023, doi: 10.36681/tused.2023.024.

H. Tekerci and A. Kandir, “Effects of the Sense‐Based Science Education Program on Scientific Process Skills of Children Aged 60–66 Months,” Eurasian J. Educ. Res., vol. 68, no. October, pp. 85–114, 2017, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2017.68.13.

A. Tinapay, S. Tirol, J. A. Cortes, and M. Punay, “Attitude of learners towards science and their science process skills in the case of the spiral curriculum: A literature review,” Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ., vol. 10, no. 15, pp. 13–24, 2021, doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2021.a106.

D. Yener, N. Köklü, R. Z. Yamaç, and S. Yalçin, “Analysis of the studies done on laboratories in Turkey,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 162–179, 2020, doi: 10.36681/tused.2020.19.

N. Cansız and M. Cansız, “Enhancing preservice teachers’ observation and inference skills,” İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 362–373, 2018, doi: 10.17679/inuefd.335762.

R. Andriyani, K. Shimizu, and A. Widiyatmoko, “The effectiveness of Project-based Learning on students’ science process skills: A literature review,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1321, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032121.

G. Harman, A. Cokelez, B. Dal, and U. Alper, “Pre-service science teachers’ views on laboratory applications in science education: the effect of a two-semester course,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 12–25, 2016, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040103.

S. B. B. Behera, “Enhancing science process skills through inquiry-bBased learning: A comprehensive literature review and analysis,” Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1583–1589, 2023, doi: 10.21275/sr23817121415.

E. Novianto, “Improving students’ science process skills through PjBL learning assisted by collaborative project LKPD,” Reflect. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 88–95, 2023, doi: 10.36312/rj.v3i2.1849.

M. B. Panjaitan and A. Siagian, “The effectiveness of inquiry based learning model to improve science process skills and scientific creativity of junior high school students,” J. Educ. e-Learning Res., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 380–386, 2020, doi: 10.20448/journal.509.2020.74.380.386.

R. P. Wirayuda and G. S. N. Yahya, “Strategies in developing junior high school students’ science process skills in the material of temperature, heat, and expansion,” Schrödinger J. Phys. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 103–116, 2025, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v6i2.1875.

G. G. Gizaw, S. S. Sota, S. A. Zinabu, and D. W. Adamu, “Effects of explicit science process skill instructions on pre-service science teachers professional science teaching attitudes and science teaching behavioral intention,” J. Sci. Teacher Educ., pp. 1–24, 2025, doi: 10.1080/1046560X.2025.2527431.

Z. F. Chaerunisa, M. Ramli, and B. Sugiharto, “Students’ inquiry skills progression based on STEM approach and inquiry lab,” JPBI (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol. Indones., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 206–216, 2023, doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v9i2.25698.

N. K. Rapi, R. Sujanem, L. P. B. Yasmini, and K. Setemen, “Science process skills and critical thinking skills in inquiry-based learning model with project-based assessment,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 938–946, 2025, doi: 10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.5393.

D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, R. Perdana, K. Kuswanto, and M. Ikhlas, “Do a science process skills affect on critical thinking in science? Differences in urban and rural,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 874–880, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20687.

N. L. Choirunnisa, P. Prabowo, and S. Suryanti, “Improving science process skills for primary school students through 5e instructional model-based learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 947, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012021.

L. F. Zulueta and J. F. D. Panoy, “Scenario-based microlearning strategy for improved basic science process skills in self-directed learning,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Eng. Math., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 54–73, 2022, doi: 10.53378/352932.

S. Karamustafaoğlu, “Improving the science process skills ability of science student teachers using i diagrams,” Int. J. Phys. Chem. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–38, 2011, doi: 10.51724/ijpce.v3i1.99.

M. K. Wazni and B. Fatmawati, “Study of science process skills student using worksheet based on science process skills,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 436–443, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1281.

S. T. Aslan and H. E. Kılıç, “Explicit teaching of science process skills: learning outcomes and assessments of pre-service science teachers,” Mimb. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 446–465, 2022, doi: 10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i3.45795.

Restiana and Djukri, “Effectiveness of learning models for improving science process skills: A review study,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1788, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1788/1/012046.

R. Agustini, “Analysis of science process skills of chemical education students through self-project based learning (sjbl) in the covid-19 pandemic era,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 371–387, 2021, doi: 10.3926/jotse.1288.

K. A. Wray and S. McDonald, “Teacher talk supporting student progressive discourse in science,” Sci. Educ., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 3639–3666, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11191-025-00633-4.

G. G. Gizaw and S. S. Sota, “Improving science process skills of students: A review of literature,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 216–224, 2023, doi: 10.33828/sei.v34.i3.5.

Published
2026-03-26
How to Cite
[1]
G. S. N. Yahya, D. Darmaji, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Teacher Efforts To Improve Science Process Skills: Observation, Classification, and Data Table Making”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 319-331, Mar. 2026.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>