Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow the Focus Scope and Author Guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must fulfill scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope of this journal. All manuscripts submitted to this journal must be written in good English. Authors for whom English is not their native language are encouraged to have their papers checked before submission for grammar and clarity. The work must not have been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors can recommend potential reviewers when submitting submissions (Comments to the Editor) or in the cover letter.
All submitted manuscripts must be free from plagiarism content (All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking). All authors are advised to use plagiarism detection software to check for similarity (please use Turnitin or iThenticate to check for similarity). Editors will also check the similarity of manuscripts in this journal using Turnitin or iThenticate software. The submitted manuscripts to this journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The reviewers give valuable scientific comments, improving the contents of the manuscript. Sometimes (if required), a third peer-reviewer must critically comment on the submitted manuscript. The review process used in this journal is a Double-Blind review system.
Final decision of article acceptance will be made by the Editors according to reviewers' comments. Publication of accepted articles, including the sequence of published articles, will be made by the Editor-in-Chief by considering the sequence of accepted dates, the geographical distribution of authors, and the thematic issue.