Quantum Learning Boosts Higher-Order Thinking: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Written Argumentation in Secondary Physics
Abstract
Learning method on critical thinking skills and written argumentation skills of high school students simultaneously in physics learning, to determine whether this student-centered approach is effective in improving higher-order thinking skills in secondary education.
Methodology: This study employed a quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group pretest–posttest design at Kandrian Secondary School. Purposive sampling was used to select 60 eleventh-grade students divided into experimental and control groups. Instruments included essay tests based on Facione’s Delphi Report and Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP), assessed using analytic rubrics. Data were analyzed using SPSS through N-gain, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Levene’s Test, independent and paired samples t-tests, and Cohen’s d.
Main Findings: The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher improvements in critical thinking and written argumentation skills compared to the control group. N-gain scores were in the moderate category for the experimental class and low for the control class. Independent samples t-test results showed significant differences (p < 0.05), while paired samples t-tests confirmed significant pretest–posttest gains. Cohen’s d indicated a large effect size of Quantum Learning on both competencies.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study is novel in empirically examining the simultaneous impact of Quantum Learning on both critical thinking and written argumentation skills at the senior high school level. It integrates cognitive and argumentative competencies within a single instructional intervention, advancing existing knowledge by providing combined evidence of effectiveness in a resource-limited secondary education context.
References
A. Okada, G. Panselinas, M. Bizoi, R. Malagrida, and P. L. Torres, “Fostering transversal skills through open schooling with the CARE-KNOW-DO framework for sustainable education,” 2024. doi: 10.3390/su16072794.
M. R. Sarita and A. W. Wisudawati, “Enhancing 21st century skills in students with special needs through STEM learning,” JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kim., vol. 9, no. 2 SE-Articles, pp. 209–219, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.15575/jtk.v9i2.38883.
C.-Y. Hsu and T.-T. Wu, “Application of business simulation games in flipped classrooms to facilitate student engagement and higher-order thinking skills for sustainable learning practices,” 2023. doi: 10.3390/su152416867.
J. Gottschling, F. Krieger, and S. Greiff, “The fight against infectious diseases: The essential role of higher-order thinking and problem-solving,” 2022. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10010014.
E. Yuwanti, S. R. Sari, and A. Rusdiani, “Innovative pedagogical strategies in education 4.0: A literature review on preparing students for the digital era,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev., vol. 14, no. 4, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i4/26692.
A. Fisher, “Robert H. Ennis (1996), Critical Thinking,” Argumentation, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 48–51, 2000, doi: 10.1023/A:1007850227823.
P. A. Facione, “Critical thinking : A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction executive summary “ The Delphi Report,” Calif. Acad. Press, vol. 423, no. c, pp. 1–19, 1990, [Online]. Available: http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/DEXadobe.PDF
R. S. Bowen, “Student perceptions of ‘critical thinking’: insights into clarifying an amorphous construct,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 725–741, 2022, doi: 10.1039/D2RP00097K.
P. Ninghardjanti, M. C. Umam, A. Subarno, W. Winarno, N. R. Langgi, and J. Widodo, “Evaluating the impact of AI on the critical thinking skills among the higher education students by combining the TAM model and critical thinking theory,” Front. Educ., vol. Volume 10, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1719625.
S. Ahzari and A. Akmam, “Analyzing students’ critical thinking as a basis for developing interactive physics multimedia with generative learning and cognitive conflict strategies,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 163–176, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.26618/jpf.v13i2.17702.
X. Ma, Y. Zhang, and X. Luo, “Students’ and teachers’ critical thinking in science education: are they related to each other and with physics achievement?,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 734–758, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2021.1944078.
V. Giri and M. U. Paily, “Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of critical thinking,” Sci. Educ., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 673–690, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y.
S. D. Kolstø, V. H. Paulsen, and I. Mestad, “Critical thinking in the making: students’ critical thinking practices in a multifaceted SSI project,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 499–530, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11422-024-10217-3.
N. J. Alsaleh, “Teaching critical thinking skills : Literature review,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 21–39, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239945.pdf
S. Hanscomb, Critical Thinking: The Basics. London: Routledge, 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781003247944.
J. Osborne, S. Erduran, and S. Simon, “Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 994–1020, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1002/tea.20035.
O. Noroozi, “The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 501–512, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2022.2092188.
L. Casas-Quiroga and B. Crujeiras-Pérez, “Epistemic operations performed by high school students in an argumentation and decision-making context: Setrocia’s alimentary emergency,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 42, no. 16, pp. 2653–2673, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1824300.
S. E. Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511840005.
S. Alsop, “Thinking and meddling with boundaries: Critical reflections on Matthew Weinstein’s narrative of street medics, red-zones and glop,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 53–63, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11422-014-9643-7.
V. Sampson and D. B. Clark, “Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions,” Sci. Educ., vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 447–472, May 2008, doi: 10.1002/sce.20276.
D. Kuhn, The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. doi: DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511571350.
OECD, “PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education,” Paris, 2023. doi: 10.1787/53f23881-en.
E. J. Theobald et al., “Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 6476–6483, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916903117.
S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
L. Darling-Hammond, L. Flook, C. Cook-Harvey, B. Barron, and D. Osher, “Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development,” Appl. Dev. Sci., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 97–140, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
A. Carvalho, S. J. Teixeira, L. Olim, S. de Campanella, and T. Costa, “Pedagogical innovation in higher education and active learning methodologies – a case study,” Educ. + Train., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 195–213, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1108/ET-05-2020-0141.
V. L. Dara and C. Kesavan, “Analyzing the concept of participatory learning: Strategies, trends and future directions in education,” Kybernetes, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 3882–3915, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1108/K-12-2023-2581.
J. Osborne, “Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse,” Science (80-. )., vol. 328, no. 5977, pp. 463–466, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1126/science.1183944.
J. A. Fredricks, P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, “School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 59–109, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059.
L. Mebert et al., “Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions,” High. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30–51, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306.
N. Sartania, S. Sneddon, J. G. Boyle, E. McQuarrie, and H. P. de Koning, “Increasing collaborative discussion in case-based learning improves student engagement and knowledge acquisition,” Med. Sci. Educ., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1055–1064, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01614-w.
D. Kuhn, “Critical thinking as discourse,” Hum. Dev., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 146–164, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1159/000500171.
P. J. A. C. van der Zanden, E. Denessen, A. H. N. Cillessen, and P. C. Meijer, “Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education to prepare students for university: teacher perceptions and practices,” Res. Post-Compulsory Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 394–419, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/13596748.2020.1846313.
C. Morris, J. Deehan, and A. Macdonald, “Written argumentation research in English and science: a scoping review,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, May 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2356983.
M. Aarar and C. Pérez Valverde, “Enhancing evidence-based writing and critical thinking skills of high school students by implementing a debating-via-zoom approach,” 2025. doi: 10.3390/educsci15091204.
Y. E. Loaiza, J. R. Zona, and M. F. Rios, “Critical thinking and teacher training in secondary education,” 2025. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13030037.
C. Saiz and S. F. Rivas, “Critical thinking, formation, and change,” 2023. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11120219.
M. Bulus, “Sample size determination and optimal design of randomized/non-equivalent pretest-posttest control-group designs,” Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilim. Derg., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 48–69, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.17984/adyuebd.941434.
N. Kohan, N. Navabi, M. K. Motlagh, and F. Ahmadinia, “Designing and evaluating ECG interpretation software for undergraduate nursing students in Iran: a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design,” BMC Nurs., vol. 23, no. 1, p. 827, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02472-0.
S. Syahrial et al., “Content analysis of student learning videos for teacher professional education programs based on Gagne’s learning theory,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Profesi Guru, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 552–563, 2024, doi: 10.23887/jippg.v7i3.84354.
K. Kamid, R. Rohati, H. Hobri, E. Triani, S. Rohana, and W. A. Pratama, “Process skill and student’s interest for mathematics learning: Playing a traditional games,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 967–988, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15352a.
K. Kamid, S. Winarni, R. Rohati, W. A. Pratama, and E. Triani, “Student team achievement division learning model and student process skills,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 6, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.23887/jisd.v6i1.42456.
T. N. Trisahid, D. Kijkosol, and C. Corrales, “Optimization of biology learning on excretory system material through contextual teaching and learning approach,” J. Acad. Biol. Biol. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 82–91, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jouabe.v1i2.1165.
N. Harefa and L. S. L. Purba, “Problem solving skills improvement and the impact on students’ learning outcomes: Learning based e-project,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1567, no. 2, p. 022038, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022038.
I. Wayan Distrik, Z. A. Imam Supardi, B. Jatmiko, and Yuberti, “The effects of multiple representations-based learning in improving concept understanding and problem-solving ability,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1796, no. 1, p. 012044, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012044.
S. A. Khozaei, N. V. Zare, H. K. Moneghi, T. Sadeghi, and M. M. Taraghdar, “Effects of quantum-learning and conventional teaching methods on learning achievement, motivation to learn, and retention among nursing students during critical care nursing education,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 18, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00198-7.
K. H. Gülkesen, F. Bora, N. Ilhanli, E. Avsar, and N. Zayim, “Cohen’s d and physicians’ opinion on effect size: a questionnaire on anemia treatment,” J. Investig. Med., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 814–819, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1136/jim-2021-002031.
P. J. Woods and Y. Copur-Gencturk, “Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 138, p. 104415, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415.
Q. Wang and G. E. Newell, “Teaching and learning argumentative writing as critical thinking in an EFL composition classroom,” Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 51, p. 100891, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2025.100891.
C. Rapanta, “Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curriculum?,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 105, p. 103404, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103404.
Copyright (c) 2026 Andrew David, Kaia Eguta, Kim A Gargar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
