Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education
Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

SINTA

2.396

Impact

Gscholar

11

H-Index

Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

Rethinking Work and Energy: A Cross-Context Phenomenological Inquiry in Physics Classrooms

Siti Nurqualbiah Mat Karim
National University of Malaysia ROR
Malaysia
sitinur@gmail.com
Fajriani Jamalulai
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ROR
Indonesia
Kim A Gargar
Science High School-Main Campus
Philippines
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to explore and analyze the lived experiences of students and teachers in learning the work and energy topic using a phenomenological approach across Indonesian and Malaysian contexts, in order to understand how conceptual understanding is constructed within different pedagogical and socio-cultural settings.

    Methodology: This study employed a qualitative phenomenological design with purposive sampling. Data were collected using validated in-depth interview guidelines (content validity index = 0.81), classroom observations, and document analysis. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through phenomenological procedures (horizontalization, coding, thematic clustering, textural–structural description, cross-case analysis) with triangulation, member checking, audit trail, and researcher reflexivity.

    Main Findings: Students in both Indonesia and Malaysia predominantly experienced work–energy learning as formula-based and computational. Conceptual understanding was fragmented, with weak causal integration between work, kinetic energy, potential energy, and conservation principles. Procedural competence exceeded qualitative reasoning ability. Mathematical ability strongly influenced confidence and performance. Pedagogical practices in both contexts emphasized numerical problem-solving, reinforcing algorithmic thinking over reflective and conceptually integrated understanding.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces a cross-context phenomenological analysis of work–energy learning in Indonesia and Malaysia, moving beyond diagnostic measurement of misconceptions toward exploring students’ and teachers’ lived experiences. It advances existing knowledge by revealing how pedagogical structures and socio-cultural classroom dynamics systematically shape computational-dominant understanding, offering a deeper interpretive framework for conceptual reform in physics education.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    S. N. M. Karim, F. Jamalulai, and K. A. Gargar, “Rethinking Work and Energy: A Cross-Context Phenomenological Inquiry in Physics Classrooms ”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 32–41, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v7i1.2840.

    More Citation Formats

  • 118
    Abstract views
    104
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. R. Y. Utami and P. Rohmi, “The effectiveness of SETS learning model toward the misconception decrease of tenth graders on work and energy materials,” Impuls. J. Res. Innov. Phys. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2 SE-Articles, pp. 100–112, 2023, doi: 10.14421/impulse.2023.32-04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/impulse.2023.32-04
    2. G. Ozkan and U. Umdu Topsakal, “Investigating the effectiveness of STEAM education on students’ conceptual understanding of force and energy topics,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 441–460, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2020.1769586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1769586
    3. M. Naeem Sarwar et al., “Concept mapping and conceptual change texts: a constructivist approach to address the misconceptions in nanoscale science and technology,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1339957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1339957
    4. J. B. Pitts, “Conservation of energy: Missing features in its nature and justification and why they matter,” Found. Sci., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 559–584, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10699-020-09657-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09657-1
    5. T. Maudlin, E. Okon, and D. Sudarsky, “On the status of conservation laws in physics: Implications for semiclassical gravity,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., vol. 69, pp. 67–81, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.10.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.10.004
    6. Q. Hernández, A. Badías, D. González, F. Chinesta, and E. Cueto, “Structure-preserving neural networks,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 426, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109950
    7. R. Utama, D. A. Kusumaningtyas, M. Toifur, O. Mustava, and A. N. Salamah, “Qualitative analysis of students’ misconceptions on energy conservation in mechanical systems,” Kasuari Phys. Educ. J., vol. 8, no. 2 SE-Articles, pp. 487–499, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.37891/kpej.v8i2.1045.
    8. G. Liu and N. Fang, “The effects of enhanced hands-on experimentation on correcting student misconceptions about work and energy in engineering mechanics,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 462–481, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2021.1909555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1909555
    9. Gaguk Resbiantoro, R. Setiani, and Dwikoranto, “A review of misconception in physics: The diagnosis, causes, and remediation: Research Article,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2 SE-Articles, pp. 403–427, doi: 10.36681/.
    10. K. Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, H. Pol, A. Brinkman, and W. van Joolingen, “Prior knowledge of potential energy and the understanding of quantum mechanics,” Phys. Educ., vol. 57, no. 2, p. 025012, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/ac3d3a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac3d3a
    11. D. Tong et al., “Assessment of student knowledge integration in learning work and mechanical energy,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 10127, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010127
    12. N. R. Sangkala, Y. Yusal, S. Annam, A. Rahmadani, and A. N. Alfatih, “Analyzing conceptual understanding of work and energy: insights for improving physics instruction,” J. Authentic Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1758–1765, 2025, doi: 10.36312/enaz2g29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36312/enaz2g29
    13. M. Colombo and C. Wright, “First principles in the life sciences: the free-energy principle, organicism, and mechanism,” Synthese, vol. 198, no. 14, pp. 3463–3488, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-01932-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01932-w
    14. K. El Kharki, K. Berrada, and D. Burgos, “Design and implementation of a virtual laboratory for physics subjects in Moroccan universities,” 2021. doi: 10.3390/su13073711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073711
    15. B. Gajdzik, R. Wolniak, R. Nagaj, B. Žuromskaitė-Nagaj, and W. W. Grebski, “The influence of the global energy crisis on energy efficiency: A comprehensive analysis,” 2024. doi: 10.3390/en17040947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040947
    16. M. Arifuddin, A. Muis, S. Mahtari, and S. Suyidno, “Misconception analysis of high school students with certainty of response index on work and energy materials,” in AIP Conf. Proc., 2024, p. 020017. doi: 10.1063/5.0201466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0201466
    17. A. Bittermann, D. McNamara, B. A. Simonsmeier, and M. Schneider, “The landscape of research on prior knowledge and learning: A bibliometric analysis,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 35, no. 2, p. 58, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9
    18. M. B. Mufti and T. Sunarti, “Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa materi usaha dan energi menggunakan five tier diagnostic test [Identification of student misconceptions regarding work and energy using the five tier diagnostic test],” Inov. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 13, no. 3 SE-Asesmen Pembelajaran Fisika, pp. 191–200, Oct. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/62372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v13n3.p191-200
    19. N. Diamond-Smith et al., “The development and feasibility of a group-based household-level intervention to improve preconception nutrition in Nawalparasi district of Nepal,” BMC Public Health, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 666, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12980-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12980-w
    20. F. La Braca and C. S. Kalman, “Comparison of labatorials and traditional labs: The impacts of instructional scaffolding on the student experience and conceptual understanding,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 10131, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010131
    21. S. Soeharto and B. Csapó, “Exploring Indonesian student misconceptions in science concepts,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1–10, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10720
    22. F. Guerra-Reyes, E. Guerra-Dávila, M. Naranjo-Toro, A. Basantes-Andrade, and S. Guevara-Betancourt, “Misconceptions in the learning of natural sciences: A systematic review,” 2024. doi: 10.3390/educsci14050497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050497
    23. A. Suhandi et al., “Altering misconceptions: How e-rebuttal texts on Newton’s laws reconstructs students’ mental models,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1472385, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1472385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1472385
    24. I. P. A. A. Payadnya, I. G. A. P. A. Wulandari, K. R. Puspadewi, and S. Saelee, “The significance of ethnomathematics learning: a cross-cultural perspectives between Indonesian and Thailand educators,” J. Multicult. Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 508–522, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1108/JME-05-2024-0049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-05-2024-0049
    25. H. Van Le, “Silence in the classroom: Unraveling the cultural dynamics affecting participation and critical thinking in Malaysian and Vietnamese engineering education,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2404780, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2404780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2404780
    26. Mutmainna, E. Istiyono, Haryanto, H. Retnawati, and C. Setiawan, “Physics teachers’ perceptions about diagnostic assessment of students’ physics misconception: a phenomenological study,” Qual. Rep., vol. 30, no. 11, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2025.6938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2025.6938
    27. S. McLeod, “Phenomenology in qualitative,” Int. J. Philos. Stud., pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25457.90725.
    28. P. Berghofer, “Phenomenological Approaches to Physics BT - The Justificatory Force of Experiences: From a Phenomenological Epistemology to the Foundations of Mathematics and Physics,” P. Berghofer, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 283–344. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-96113-8_15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96113-8_15
    29. J. Guisasola, E. Campos, K. Zuza, and G. Zavala, “Phenomenographic approach to understanding students’ learning in physics education,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 2, p. 20602, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020602
    30. A. Samsudin et al., “Reconstructing students’ misconceptions on work and energy through the PDEODE*E tasks with think-pair-share,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 118–144, 2021, doi: 10.36681/tused.2021.56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.56
    31. A. N. Aini and N. Untoro, “The three-tier test approach to measuring misconceptions in high school physics: focus on work and energy,” Impuls. J. Res. Innov. Phys. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 114–126, 2025, doi: 10.14421/impulse.2025.52-03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/impulse.2025.52-03
    32. M. Mustari, S. Anggereni, Sodikin, Fitria, and A. D. Yusandika, “Identification of students’ misconceptions using the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) from work and energy material,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1572, no. 1, p. 012038, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012038
    33. J. Nii Akai Nettey, R. Osei Mensah, R. Asafo-Adjei, and P. Adiza Babah, “Analyzing the challenges basic school teachers face in integrating Information and Communication Technology into teaching and learning activities in a developing country,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2364544, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2364544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2364544
    34. S. Campbell et al., “Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples,” J. Res. Nurs., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 652–661, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1744987120927206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
    35. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches,” Couns. Psychother. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2021, doi: 10.1002/capr.12360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
    36. M. U. Rashid and Q. A. Mowla, “The systematic procedure of the phenomenological approach of qualitative research to reconstruct the generic settlement pattern of a specific context,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. IX, no. II, pp. 2356–2369, 2025, doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9020185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9020185
    37. M. C. Martin, A Phenomenological Study of Pre-Service Teachers’ Subject Knowledge in Secondary Design and Technology. East Eisenhower Parkway: ProQuest LLC, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/openview/b691cc547a22195a0549fd07ea2a5351/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=51922
    38. C. Singh and D. Rosengrant, “Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 607–617, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1119/1.1571832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1571832
    39. M. J. Brundage, A. Maries, and C. Singh, “Using the energy and momentum conceptual survey to investigate progression in student understanding from introductory to advanced levels,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 2, p. 20132, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020132
    40. Rahmadhani, F. Ufit, Hidayati, and Emiliannur, “Understanding concepts and causes of student misconceptions on work and energy,” vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119–128, 2025, doi: 10.24036/17072171074.