Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

The Influence of the Application of the Science Technology Society Approach on Students' Science Process Skills in Science Learning

Asrial Asrial ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
asrial@unja.ac.id
Syahrial Syahrial ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Husni Sabil ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Ahmad Mansur Nawahdani ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Miftahul Zannah Azzahra ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Rezwanul Alam
Bangladesh Open University ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the influence of the Science Technology Society (STS) approach on improving students’ science process skills in science learning. The focus is to evaluate the impact of STS in improving skills such as observation, classification, interpretation, and communication of scientific findings.

    Methodology: This study used a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group design. This study involved quantitative data analysis using t-test and N-Gain Score. Participants were students from selected junior high schools. The tools used included pretest and posttest instruments, along with an observation checklist.

    Main Findings: The study found a significant increase in science process skills in the experimental group using the STS approach. The experimental group had a higher mean posttest score (18.00) compared to the control group (17.00). The N-Gain score for the experimental group (0.53) was also significantly higher than the control group (0.25).

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces the systematic application of the STS approach to improve students’ science process skills. It offers new insights into how STS integration can create more engaging, relevant, and effective learning experiences. It contributes to the ongoing development of innovative context-based science education strategies.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “The Influence of the Application of the Science Technology Society Approach on Students’ Science Process Skills in Science Learning”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 230–237, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jee.v7i1.1235.

    More Citation Formats

  • 186
    Abstract views
    136
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452
    2. N. F. Pakaya, L. Dama, and M. Ibrahim, “The assessment of science process skills in biology subject lesson plan sheets,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1786–1791, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.2877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.2877
    3. E. Purwanti and H. Heldalia, “Korelasi keterampilan proses sains dengan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi pemantulan pada cermin datar [Correlation of science process skills with students' critical thinking abilities on the material of reflection on a flat mirror],” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 143–148, 2020, doi: 10.37251/jee.v1i4.146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v1i4.146
    4. D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, T. Tanti, and S. Maryani, “Innovative learning: Gender perception of e-module linear equations in mathematics and physics,” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 92-106, 2022, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610
    5. N. Ainun and J. Jefriyanto, “Development of kirchoff’s law drawing tools to improve student’s science skills in learning process of direct flow circuits,” J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 32–37, 2023, doi: 10.61487/jiste.v1i2.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61487/jiste.v1i2.18
    6. E. Novita, “Pengembangan buku pedoman praktikum berbasis keterampilan proses dasar sains kelas iv sekolah dasar [Development of a practical guidebook based on basic science process skills for grade IV elementary school],” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2020, doi: 10.37251/jee.v1i1.38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v1i1.38
    7. S. Sudirman, B. D. Hardianti, and T. A. Safitri, “Efektivitas pembelajaran proyek kolaborasi berbasis potensi lokal pada praktikum IPA untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1556–1564, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jipp.v9i3.2442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i3.2422
    8. F. Salvetti, K. Rijal, I. Owusu-Darko, and S. Prayogi, “Surmounting Obstacles in STEM Education: An in-depth analysis of literature paving the way for proficient Pedagogy in STEM learning,” Int. J. Essent. Competencies Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 177–196, 2023, doi: 10.36312/ijece.v2i2.1614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v2i2.1614
    9. T. T. S. Strat, E. K. Henriksen, and K. M. Jegstad, “Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: a systematic review,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 191–249, 2024, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148
    10. D. W. Ramadhani and A. Setyawan, “Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan model science, technology and society peserta didik pada mata pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan sosial kelas iv sdn Tampojung Tenggina [Efforts to improve critical thinking skills with the science, technology and society model of students in the social science subject of class IV at SDN Tampojung Tenggina],” PANDU J. Pendidik. Anak dan Pendidik. Umum, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 45–49, 2023, doi: 10.59966/pandu.v1i2.143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59966/pandu.v1i2.143
    11. D. Acut and R. Antonio, “Effectiveness of Science-Technology-Society (STS) approach on students’ learning outcomes in science education: Evidence from a meta-analysis,” JOTSE, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 718–739, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2151
    12. R. Rachmadtullah, A. Pramujiono, B. Setiawan, and D. R. Srinarwati, “Teacher’s perception of the integration of science technology society (sts) into learning at elementary school,” KnE Soc. Sci., pp. 202–209, 2022, doi: 10.18502/kss.v7i19.12442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i19.12442
    13. A. F. Putri, H. B. Putri, J. J. Syaleha, N. A. Putri, and T. Kurniawan, “Learning approaches inquiry, problem solving, and science, technology & society (stm) in learning ips,” Kult. J. Soc. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–51, 2024.
    14. J. M. Sanchez, M. Picardal, S. Fernandez, and R. R. Caturza, “Socio-scientific issues in focus: A meta-analytical review of strategies and outcomes in climate change science education,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 119–132, 2024, doi: 10.33828/sei.v35.i2.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i2.6
    15. S. Jumini, S. Madnasri, E. Cahyono, and P. Parmin, “Article review: Integration of science, technology, entrepreneurship in learning science through bibliometric analysis,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1237–1253, 2022, doi: 10.36681/tused.2022.172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.172
    16. T. Tanti, D. Deliza, and S. Hartina, “The effectiveness of using smartphones as mobile-mini labs in improving students’ beliefs in physics,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 387-394, 2024, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185
    17. D. D. Gill, “An update to the technology education teaching framework: factors that support and hinder technology education teachers in Canada,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 171–187, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10798-024-09907-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09907-4
    18. J. L. de Vera, N. J. Castulo, V. M. I. Camacho, T. O. D. Ayuste, and B. C. Palomar, “Teaching science, technology and society in blended learning large classes: a qualitative study of the Normale lecture model,” Qual. Educ. All, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 341–356, 2025, doi: 10.1108/QEA-12-2024-0153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QEA-12-2024-0153
    19. J. Kruse et al., “Preparing students for the modern information landscape and navigating science–technology–society issues,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 792–824, 2025, doi: 10.1002/tea.21972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21972
    20. A. Thomas, “Digitally transforming the organization through knowledge management: A socio-technical system (STS) perspective,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 437–460, 2024, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-02-2024-0114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2024-0114
    21. J. Barrun and E. Cajurao, “Development and validation of contextualized lessons in science, technology, and society (STS): Impacts on students’ conceptual understanding, science process skills, and attitudes toward science,” Pegem J. Educ. Instr., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 30–41, 2025, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.15.02.04.
    22. M. Primastuti and S. Atun, “Science Technology Society (STS) learning approach: an effort to improve students’ learning outcomes,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2018, p. 12062. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012062
    23. P. Turiman, J. Omar, A. M. Daud, and K. Osman, “Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 59, pp. 110–116, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
    24. M. Z. Azzahra, A. M. Nawahdani, and I. Falani, “The relationship between science process skills and 21st century skills in science learning: Systematic literature review,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 297–305, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v9i3.38451
    25. Z. Koyunlu Ünlü and İ. Dökme, “A systematic review of 5E model in science education: proposing a skill-based STEM instructional model within the 21-st century skills,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 2110–2130, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2022.2114031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2114031
    26. C. Baker, “Quantitative research designs: Experimental, quasi-experimental, and descriptive,” Evidence-based Pract. An Integr. approach to Res. Adm. Pract., vol. 2, pp. 155–183, 2017.
    27. J. Rogers and A. Revesz, “Experimental and quasi-experimental designs,” in The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics, Routledge, 2019, pp. 133–143. doi: 10.4324/9780367824471-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471-12
    28. N. Rai and B. Thapa, “A study on purposive sampling method in research,” Kathmandu Kathmandu Sch. Law, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2015.
    29. K. Kamid, D. Iriani, and A. M. Nawahdani, “Scientific Learning and Process Skills Mathematics: Comparison and Relationship,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 228–239, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i2.43582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i2.37158
    30. K. Kamid, D. A. Kurniawan, and A. M. Nawahdani, “Scientific Learning Model: Analytical Thinking and Process Skills in Mathematics,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 238–249, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jere.v6i3.49159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i3.49159
    31. A. Kurniawati, “Science process skills and its implementation in the process of science learning evaluation in schools,” J. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 16–20, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v5i2.44269
    32. G. Gizaw and S. Sota, “Improving science process skills of students: A review of literature,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 216–224, 2023, doi: 10.33828/sei.v34.i3.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i3.5
    33. L. A. P. Gavidia, and J. Adu, “Critical narrative inquiry: An examination of a methodological approach,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 21, pp. 16094069221081594, 2022, doi: 10.1177/16094069221081594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221081594
    34. K. Kamid, K. Anwar, D. Iriani, and A. M. Nawahdani, “Analysis of interest and process skills in learning mathematics,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 244–258, 2021, doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.42640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.42640
    35. M. D. W. Ernawati, Asrial, D. A. Kurniawan, A. M. Nawahdani, and R. Perdana, “Gender analysis in terms of attitudes and self-efficacy of science subjects for junior high school students,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 7, no. SpecialIssue, pp. 84–95, 2021, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.828
    36. P. R. Grzanka, J. D. Brian, and R. Bhatia, “Intersectionality and science and technology studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 50(4), 713-743, 2025, doi: 10.1177/01622439231201707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439231201707
    37. G. Hatem, J. Zeidan, M. Goossens, and C. Moreira, “Normality testing methods and the importance of skewness and kurtosis in statistical analysis,” BAU Journal-Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 7, 2022, doi: 10.54729/KTPE9512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54729/KTPE9512
    38. C. M. Vrbin, “Parametric or nonparametric statistical tests: Considerations when choosing the most appropriate option for your data,” Cytopathology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 663-667, 2022, doi: 10.1111/cyt.13174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.13174
    39. S. E, “Meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains dengan pembelajaran berbasis teknologi dan kontekstual,” J. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 56–63, 2016.
    40. B. A. Muhasabah, S. Supeno, and F. Yusmar, “Real-world in science learning: An science, technology, society (STS)-Based science e-module to enhance critical thinking skills,” J. Paedagogy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 346–357, 2025, doi: 10.33394/jp.v12i2.14771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i2.14771
    41. R. R. Hake, “Analyszing Change/Gain Score Woodland Hills,” 1999, Dept. of Physics: Indiana University.
    42. H. I. Umam and S. H. Jiddiyyah, “Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis proyek terhadap keterampilan berpikir kreatif ilmiah sebagai salah satu keterampilan abad 21 [The influence of project-based learning on scientific creative thinking skills as one of the 21st century skills],” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 350–356, 2020, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.645
    43. S. Demirçalı, “The impact of STS-Oriented nature education programs on middle school students’ creativity,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 11, p. 1556, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15111556.
    44. S. E. Bibri, “The social shaping of the metaverse as an alternative to the imaginaries of data-driven smart Cities: A study in science, technology, and society,” Smart Cities, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 832-874, 2022, doi: 10.3390/smartcities5030043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030043
    45. M. C. Wang and C. C. Tsai, “Improving scientific inquiry skills and motivation through the Science-Technology-Society (STS) approach,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1101–1121, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09731-1.
    46. J. Yoon and K. Koo, “Enhancing early childhood teacher candidates’ perception of teaching science-technology-society (sts) through a project-based interdisciplinary approach.,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.46328/ijemst.4333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4333
    47. R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1998, doi: 10.1119/1.18809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
    48. L. Yin, S. Wu, and L. Zhang, “The impact of the Science-Technology-Society approach on students’ critical thinking and learning motivation,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 355–373, 2017, doi: 10.1002/tea.21315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21315
    49. Ş. M. Pala, and A. Başıbüyük, “The predictive effect of digital literacy, self-control and motivation on the academic achievement in the science, technology and society learning area,” Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 369-385, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10758-021-09538-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09538-x
    50. B. Akcay and H. Akcay, “Effectiveness of science-technology-society (sts) instruction on student understanding of the nature of science and attitudes toward science,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.50889
    51. S. Demirçalı, “The impact of sts-oriented nature education programs on middle school students’ creativity,” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1556, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15111556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111556