Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education
Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

SINTA

2.396

Impact

Gscholar

11

H-Index

Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation


Strategies in Developing Junior High School Students' Science Process Skills in the Material of Temperature, Heat, and Expansion

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to explore how teacher strategies enhance students' science process skills, particularly observation, graphing, and communication during physics learning on the topic of heat, temperature, and expansion at the junior high school level.

    Methodology: This study employs a naturalistic qualitative method aimed at exploring teachers' strategies in enhancing students' science process skills during physics lessons on temperature, heat, and expansion. Data were collected through interviews, and documentation, then analyzed descriptively to identify patterns and themes that reflect students' abilities in observation, communication, and data representation.

    Main Findings: The study found that teachers effectively foster students’ science process skills (SPS) in physics through varied strategies, including scientific approaches, step-by-step instruction, and cooperative learning. By integrating observation, graphing, and communication activities during laboratory sessions, teachers provided scaffolding, feedback, and peer collaboration. These strategies, supported by theories of Vygotsky, Bruner, and Ausubel, created an engaging and structured learning environment that promoted students’ active participation and scientific reasoning.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study presents a novelty through the use of informant triangulation involving teachers, laboratory assistants, and students, which is rarely applied in similar studies on science process skills (SPS). Three SPS indicators are systematically examined through four pedagogical strategies, supported by direct quotations that provide a contextual, comprehensive, and student-centered perspective in physics learning.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    R. P. . Wirayuda and G. Salsabilla Nurma Yahya, “Strategies in Developing Junior High School Students’ Science Process Skills in the Material of Temperature, Heat, and Expansion”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 103–116, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v6i2.1875.
  • 221
    Abstract views
    278
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. W. T. Winarti, H. Yuliani, M. Rohmadi, and N. Septiana, “Pembelajaran fisika menggunakan model discovery learning berbasis dutainment [Physics learning using edutainment-based discovery learning model],” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2021, doi: 10.20527/jipf.v5i1.2789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v5i1.2789
    2. W. A. Aripin, H. Sahidu, and M. Makhrus, “Efektivitas perangkat pembelajaran fisika berbasis model problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik [The effectiveness of physics learning devices based on problem based learning models to improve students' problem solving and critical thinking skills],” J. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Fis. Indones., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 2021, doi: 10.29303/jppfi.v3i1.120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppfi.v3i1.120
    3. A. S. Ramadhani and D. Sulisworo, “Peningkatan motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran fisika dengan model ARCS [Improving student motivation and learning outcomes in physics learning with the ARCS model],” J. Genes. Indones., vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 93–101, 2022, doi: 10.56741/jgi.v1i02.94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56741/jgi.v1i02.94
    4. A. Abaniel, “Enhanced conceptual understanding, 21st century skills and learning attitudes through an open inquiry learning model in physics,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 30–43, 2021, doi: /10.3926/jotse.1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1004
    5. D. Dinata and H. Yuliani, “Studi literatur penerapan model pembelajaran discovery learning pada mata pelajaran fisika di pembelajaran smp [Literature study on the application of the discovery learning model in physics subjects in junior high school learning],” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran IPA Indones., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 49–55, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jppii.v12i2.56551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppii.v12i2.56551
    6. S. Samadun and D. Dwikoranto, “Improvement of student’s critical thinking ability sin physics materials through the application of problem-based learning,” IJORER Int. J. Recent Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 534–545, 2022, doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v3i5.247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i5.247
    7. Z. Mustofa, “Pengaruh modeling instruction dalam mengantarkan siswa menguasai topik suhu dan kalor serta aplikasinya [The influence of modeling instruction in helping students master the topic of temperature and heat and their applications],” J. Teknodik, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 157–168, 2022, doi: 10.32550/teknodik.vi.890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.vi.890
    8. E. Hiğde and H. Aktamış, “The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 43, p. 101000, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101000
    9. S. A. Andriani, M. Masykuri, and S. Sukarmin, “Development of electronic modules (e-modules) based on guided inquiry on temperature and heat materials to improve students’ science literacy,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 7, no. Special Issue, pp. 281–287, 2021, doi: : 10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1234.
    10. I. A. Restu, T. Ariani, and W. Arini, “Respon siswa terhadap lks fisika berbasis contextual teaching and learning materi suhu dan kalor,” Sci. Phys. Educ. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2021, doi: 10.31539/spej.v5i1.3173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/spej.v5i1.3173
    11. I. P. Y. S. Permana and E. Purwaningsih, “Penerapan simulasi virtual pembelajaran fisika terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa materi suhu dan kalor di masa pandemi covid-19 [Application of virtual simulation of physics learning on students' motivation and learning outcomes on temperature and heat material during the Covid-19 pandemic],” JPF (Jurnal Pendidik. Fis. FKIP UM Metro, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 2022, doi: 10.24127/jpf.v10i1.4292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v10i1.4292
    12. I. H. Iswanto, A. Y. R. Wulandari, D. B. R. A. Putera, M. C. Sutarja, and Huzairi, “Identifikasi pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi suhu dan kalor di mts agung mulia [Identification of students' conceptual understanding of temperature and heat material at MTS Agung Mulia],” J. Nat. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 129–137, 2022, doi: 10.21107/nser.v5i2.17588.
    13. S. Santiawati, M. Yasir, Y. Hidayati, and W. P. Hadi, “Analisis keterampilan proses sains siswa smp negeri 2 Burneh [Analysis of science process skills of students of SMP Negeri 2 Burneh],” Nat. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 222–230, 2022, doi: 10.21107/nser.v4i3.8435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v4i3.8435
    14. I. A. Wulandari, M. B. Mu’min, and M. G. Firdaus, “Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis (KBKr) melalui pembelajaran biologi berbasis keterampilan proses sains [Improving critical thinking skills (KBKr) through biology learning based on science process skills],” J. BIOEDUIN Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2021, doi: 10.15575/bioeduin.v11i1.12081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/bioeduin.v11i1.12081
    15. N. Mitrakas, C. Tsihouridis, and D. Vavougios, “Using mixed reality in the educational practice: an inquiry-based process of the fluid expansion–contraction phenomena by pre-service teachers,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1–26, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14070754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070754
    16. N. I. Zuniari, A. Wiyarsi, I. Wilujeng, and L. Rahmawati, “Integration of batik in science learning to overcome students ’ low critical thinking skills in junior high school : teacher ’ s perspective,” Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 15, no. 148, pp. 149–162, 2025, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v15i1.26717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v15i1.26717
    17. A. Wiratman, “Transformasi keterampilan proses sains melalui kooperatif numbered head together untuk siswa madrasah ibtidaiyah,” J. Kependidikan, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1041–1050, 2023, doi: 10.58230/27454312.257.
    18. Z. Zulyusri, I. Elfira, L. Lufri, and T. A. Santosa, “Literature study: utilization of the PjBL model in science education to improve creativity and critical thinking skills,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 133–143, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2555
    19. I. W. Syafiqah, A. A. Arsyad, and Ramlawati, “Analisis keterampilan proses sains peserta didik kelas viii smp ter-akreditasi A se-Kecamatan Rappocini [Analysis of science process skills of grade VIII students of junior high schools accredited A in Rappocini District],” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.62388/jpdp.v4i1.408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62388/jpdp.v4i1.408
    20. F. Fatmawati, W. Wahyudi, and A. Harjono, “Pengambangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis proyek untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains peserta didik [Development of project-based learning tools to improve students' science process skills],” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 4b, pp. 2563–2568, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jipp.v7i4b.983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i4b.983
    21. B. Nabila, S. Zainuri, A. Harjono, and S. Rahayu, “Validity of PBL e-modules integrated with local wisdom in improving students ’ literacy and science process skills,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 60–67, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v11i1.8741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v11i1.8741
    22. N. Uriyah, Z. A. I. Supardi, and Suryanti, “Effectiveness of POE learning model on science process skills in temperature and heat of elementary students,” Stud. Philos. Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 66–76, 2023, doi: 10.46627/sipose.v4i2.283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v4i2.283
    23. N. Logo, M. Akbar, B. Y. Boy, A. Silaban, and S. Hajar, “Analisis keterampilan proses sains peserta didik pada materi suhu dan kalor [Analysis of students' science process skills on temperature and heat material],” PHYDAGOGIC J. Fis. dan Pembelajarannya, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 2023, doi: 10.31605/phy.v6i1.3121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31605/phy.v6i1.3121
    24. S. N. Rohman, D. Purbaningrum, and A. Sungkowo, “Upaya meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains (kps) siswa kelas v pada materi suhu dan kalor di MI Cokroaminoto 02 Tribuana [Efforts to improve the science process skills (KPS) of class V students on the topic of temperature and heat at MI Cokroaminoto 02 Tribuana],” J. Ibtida, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 33–42, 2024, doi: 10.58410/ibtida.v5i2.849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58410/ibtida.v5i2.849
    25. H. E. Haryono and K. N. Aini, “Diagnosis misconceptions of junior high school in Lamongan on the heat concept using the three-tier test,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012002
    26. A. Kusmawan, R. Rahman, N. Anis, and O. Arifudin, “The relationship between teacher involvement in curriculum development and student learning outcomes,” Int. J. Educ. Elem. Psychol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2025, doi: 10.70177/ijeep.v2i1.1890.
    27. P. Lameras and S. Arnab, “Power to the teachers: an exploratory review on artificial intelligence in education,” Inf., vol. 13, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13010014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010014
    28. D. Harefa and F. Hulu, “Mathematics learning strategies that support pancasila moral education : practical approaches for teachers,” AFORE J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 51–60, 2024, doi: 10.57094/afore.v3i2.2299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57094/afore.v3i2.2299
    29. P. Kwangmuang, S. Jarutkamolpong, W. Sangboonraung, and S. Daungtod, “The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 6, p. e07309, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
    30. S. Park and S. Kim, “Identifying world types to deliver gameful experiences for sustainable learning in the metaverse,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031361
    31. F. Rohmi and S. Wahyuni, “English teacher’s strategy in teaching writing using discovery learning,” J. Pendidik. Bhs. Ingg. undiksha, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 122–128, 2024, doi: 10.23887/jpbi.v11i2.50812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v11i2.50812
    32. R. Hakim, M. Ritonga, K. Khodijah, Z. Zulmuqim, R. Remiswal, and A. R. Jamalyar, “Learning strategies for reading and writing the quran: improving student competence as preservice teachers at the faculty of tarbiyah and teacher training,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/3464265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3464265
    33. A. R. Hayati, Z. L. Afriani, and A. Akbarjono, “Teacher’s teaching strategies in EFL class anrems,” adila J. Dev. Innov., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.52690/jadila.v1i3.126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v1i3.126
    34. D. S. Makateng and N. T. Mokala, “Understanding qualitative research methodology : a systematic review,” E-Journal Humanit. Arts Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 327–335, 2025, doi: 10.38159/ehass.2025637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2025637
    35. W. M. Lim, “What Is qualitative research? an overview and guidelines,” Australas. Mark. J., vol. 33, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.1177/14413582241264619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
    36. H. H. Chai, S. S. Gao, K. J. Chen, D. Duangthip, E. C. M. Lo, and C. H. Chu, “A concise review on qualitative research in dentistry,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030942
    37. S. A. Dzogovic and V. Bajrami, “Qualitative research methods in science and higher education,” Hum. Res. Rehabil., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 156–166, 2023, doi: 10.21554/hrr.042318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.042318
    38. I. G. A. A. O. Dewi, “Understanding data collection methods in qualitative research: the perspective of interpretive accounting research,” J. Tour. Econ. Policy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 2022, doi: 10.38142/jtep.v1i1.105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38142/jtep.v1i1.105
    39. Q. Ainiyah, D. D. Mirrota, and M. Khasanah, “Religious moderation: a model for internalizing inclusive islamic values in student education,” Urwatul Wutsqo J. Stud. Kependidikan dan Keislam., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 86–101, 2025, doi: 10.54437/juw. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54437/urwatulwutsqo.v14i1.2031
    40. F. Yanto, N. Meliana, S. Rosodor, R. Saifullah, and N. Etikoh, “The effectiveness of internalizing moral values through qur’anic learning at children’s boarding school,” Ngaos J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2025, doi: 10.59373/ngaos. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59373/ngaos.v3i1.93
    41. A. Alimron, S. Syarnubi, and M. Maryamah, “Character education model in islamic higher education,” Al-Ishlah J. Pendidik., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 3334–3345, 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.1452
    42. P. C. Susanto, L. Yuntina, E. Saribanon, and J. P. Soehaditama, “Qualitative method concepts : literature review, focus group discussion, ethnography and grounded theory,” Siber J. Adv. Multidiscip., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 262–275, 2024, doi: 10.38035/sjam.v2i2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/sjam.v2i2.207
    43. S. Bhangu, F. Provost, and C. Caduff, “Introduction to qualitative research methods - Part i,” Perspect. Clin. Res., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 2023, doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_253_22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_253_22
    44. S. A. Bhat and S. Alyahya, “Infographics in educational settings: a literature review,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, no. December 2023, pp. 1633–1649, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3348083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3348083
    45. M. Naeem, W. Ozuem, K. Howell, and S. Ranfagni, “Demystification and actualisation of data saturation in qualitative research through thematic analysis,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 23, pp. 1–17, 2024, doi: 10.1177/16094069241229777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241229777
    46. S. Rahimi and M. Khatooni, “Saturation in qualitative research: an evolutionary concept analysis,” Int. J. Nurs. Stud. Adv., vol. 6, no. December 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100174
    47. S. E. Aditiyas and H. Kuswanto, “Analisis implementasi keterampilan proses sains di indonesia pada pembelajaran fisika: literatur review [Analysis of the implementation of science process skills in Indonesia in physics learning: literature review],” J. Penelit. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 153–166, 2024, doi: 10.26877/jp2f.v15i2.15912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v15i2.15912
    48. B. Setiawan, S. H. Apri Irianto, and S. H. Rusminati, Dasar-Dasar Pendidikan: Kajian Teoritis Untuk Mahasiswa PGSD [Basics of Education: A Theoretical Study for PGSD Students]. CV Pena Persada, 2021.
    49. E. Rahmadini, D. A. Soleh, and U. N. Jakarta, “Penerapan model react untuk pemahaman konsep ipa pada siswa sekolah dasar [Application of the react model for understanding science concepts in elementary school students],” caXra J. Pendidik. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 05, no. 01, pp. 166–180, 2025, doi: 10.31980/caxra.v5i1.2711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/caxra.v5i1.2711
    50. I. P. Syahri, “Penerapan media audio visual dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran pai kelasIV SDN 09 Lanai Sinuangon [Application of audio visual media in improving student learning outcomes in PAI learning for grade IV SDN 09 Lanai Sinuangon],” EduSpirit J. Pendidik. Kolaborati, vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 417–423, 2024, doi: 10.0.223.167/eduspirit.v1i1.17.
    51. R. S. Q. Ayuna, A. Cahyaningrum, S. Zakira, S. Baen, and A. Tjalla, “Penerapan metode discovery learning menurut teori Kognitivisme bruner dalam pemberian layanan bimbingan konseling di sekolah menengah atas [Application of the discovery learning method according to Bruner's Cognitivism theory in providing guidance and counseling services in high schools],” J. Mhs. BK An-Nur Berbeda, Bermakna, Mulia, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 189–196, 2022, doi: 10.31602/jmbkan.v8i3.8904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31602/jmbkan.v8i3.8904
    52. H. B. Safitri and L. V. Putra, “Pengaruh metode Science Literacy Circles (SLC) berbasis literasi sains dengan pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa [The influence of the science literacy circles (SLC) method based on scientific literacy with a scientific approach to improve students' problem solving abilities],” ALPEN J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 70–84, 2022, doi: 10.24929/alpen.v6i2.125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24929/alpen.v6i2.125
    53. N. Nurhayati, “Laboratorium sebagai sarana pembelajaran ipa dalam meningkatkan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan kerja ilmiah [The laboratory as a means of learning science to improve scientific knowledge and work skills],” J. Literasiologi, vol. 144, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.47783/literasiologi.v8i1.351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47783/literasiologi.v8i1.351
    54. R. Nuriana and I. H. Hotimah, “Penerapan meaningful learning dalam pembelajaran sejarah [Application of meaningful learning in history learning],” Jambura Hist. Cult. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.37905/jhcj.v5i2.20479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jhcj.v5i2.20479
    55. S. Sundari and E. Fauziati, “Implikasi teori belajar Bruner dalam model pembelajaran kurikulum 2013 [Implications of Bruner's learning theory in the 2013 curriculum learning model],” J. Papeda J. Publ. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 128–136, 2021, doi: 10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v3i2.1206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v3i2.1206
    56. H. N. Insani, “Strategi efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berbahasa pada anak usia dini pemalu melalui pendekatan teori zona perkembangan proksimal (ZPD) Vygotsky [Effective strategies to improve language skills in shy early childhood through Vygotsky's zone of proximal development (ZPD) theory approach],” J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2025, doi: 10.47134/paud.v2i2.1272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47134/paud.v2i2.1272
    57. N. D. Damayanti, M. A. Putri, A. Hafizah, D. F. Sinaga, and M. A. Batubara, “Kontribusi teori belajar Robert Mills Gagne dalam meningkatkan kompetensi pedagogik pendidik [Contribution of Robert Mills Gagne's learning theory in improving the pedagogical competence of educators],” El-Mujtama J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 595–605, 2023, doi: 10.47467/elmujtama.v3i3.2817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v3i3.2817
    58. M. Azzahra, A. Khoiri2, and B. Sugiyanto, “Efektivitas model pembelajaran predict observe explain (POE) dengan metode demonstrasi untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa [The effectiveness of the predict observe explain (POE) learning model with the demonstration method to improve students' critical thinking skills],” BIOCHEPHY J. Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 358–365, 2024, doi: 10.52562/biochephy.v4i1.1152.
    59. N. A. Azzahra, “Strategi pembelajaran aktif untuk meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa dalam pembelajaran di kelas [Active learning strategies to increase student engagement in classroom learning],” BESTARI J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 19–26, 2024, doi: 10.11791/bestari.v99i1.paperID.
    60. K. Anak, S. Dasar, D. I. Mi, and U. Pare, “Implementasi bahasa jawa krama dalam pembentukan karakter anak sekolah dasar di MI ’Ulumiyah Pare [Implementation of Javanese krama language in character formation of elementary school children at MI 'Ulumiyah Pare],” J. Penelitian, Agama, dan Kebud., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2025, doi: 0.55148/inovatif.v11i1.1274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55148/inovatif.v11i1.1274
    61. M. S. Basyir, Aqimi Dinana, and A. Diana Devi, “Kontribusi teori belajar kognitivisme David P. Ausubel dan Robert M. Gagne dalam proses pembelajaran [The contribution of David P. Ausubel and Robert M. Gagne's cognitive learning theory to the learning process],” J. Pendidik. Madrasah, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2022, doi: 10.14421/jpm.2022.71.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2022.71.12
    62. H. Sanulita, S. Syamsurijal, W. Ardiansyah, V. Wiliyanti, and R. Megawati, Strategi Pembelajaran: Teori & Metode Pembelajaran Efektif [Learning Strategy: Theories & Methods of Effective Learning]. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2024.
    63. Surahman, L. Hayati, U. Lu’luilmaknun, and S. Subarinah, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa pada siswa kelas XI [The influence of the jigsaw type cooperative learning model on students' mathematical communication skills in grade XI students],” FARABI J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 66–70, 2022, doi: 10.47662/farabi.v5i1.324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47662/farabi.v5i1.324
    64. Chintya Dwi Fitriyani and N. K. Umam, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran moody terhadap keterampilan menulis puisi pada siswa kelas v sd [The influence of the moody learning model on poetry writing skills in grade V elementary school students],” J. Mimb. PGSD Univ. Pendidik. Ganesha, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 260–265, 2025, doi: 10.54371/jiip.v8i1.6914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i1.6914
    65. H. Z. Z. S, B. Prilliano, and M. Y. A. Bakar, “Pendalaman teori mazhab kognitivistik dalam pembelajaran bahasa arab [Deepening the theory of the cognitive school of thought in learning Arabic],” J. Ilm. Nusant. ( JINU), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 441–450, 2025, doi: 10.61722/jinu.v2i3.4501.
    66. S. Lay, P. K. Ndoa, and A. K. Hutapea, “Penerapan teori belajar kognitif dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama katolik menurut David Ausubel [Application of cognitive learning theory in Catholic religious education learning according to David Ausubel],” J. Serunai Adm. Pendidik., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 81–92, 2024, doi: 10.37755/jsap.v13i1.1279.
    67. Y. R. Salsabila and Muqowim, “Korelasi antara teori belajar konstruktivisme Lev Vygotsky dengan model pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) [Correlation between Lev Vygotsky's constructivist learning theory and the problem based learning (PBL) learning model],” Learn. J. Inov. Penelit. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 813–827, 2024, doi: 10.51878/belajar.v4i3.3185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v4i3.3185
    68. P. Y. A. Dewi et al., Teori dan aplikasi pembelajaran IPA SD/MI [Theory and application of elementary school science learning]. Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini, 2021.
    69. H. Aminuddin, D. Afkarina, A. D. Lesmono, and L. Nuraini, “Analisis keterampilan komunikasi ilmiah siswa sma melalui pembelajaran project based learning pada materi energi alternaltif [Analysis of high school students' scientific communication skills through project based learning on alternative energy material],” J. Ilmu Fiisika dan Pembelajarannya, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 119–126, 2024, doi: 10.19109/h67afz33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/h67afz33
    70. N. J. Nasution, “Kurikulum matematika yang responsif terhadap perkembangan kognitif anak: pendekatan teoritis dan praktis [A mathematics curriculum responsive to children's cognitive development: theoretical and practical approaches],” PeTeKa (Jurnal Penelit. Tindakan Kelas dan Pengemb. Pembelajaran), vol. 8, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.31604/ptk.v8i2.658-674.