Scope of Learning Evaluation in Science Subject in Junior High School Students: A Systematic Review

Keywords: Evaluation, Learning, Natural Sciences

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This assessment provides space for students with non-academic weaknesses in science subject skills. This research was used to obtain information related to the scope of evaluation of junior high school students' natural science learning: A Systematic Review.

Methodology: The review method was chosen to obtain research journals with keywords in the scope of evaluation of junior high school science learning on Google reference sources scholar, science direct, and research gates. Twenty journals were reviewed based on author (year), sample, study design, the scope of the evaluation, and findings.

Main Findings: The results of the review show that the scope of learning evaluation can be carried out based on the context to be assessed, such as the scope of the cognitive domain, affective domain, and psychomotor domain. The scope of learning evaluation in the cognitive domain can be in the form of observation and understanding, the affective domain can be in the form of responses given by students as long as the teacher provides knowledge, and the psychomotor domain is in the form of a skills assessment rubric such as doing practicum after being given theory by the teacher.

Novelty/Originality of this study: This research can contribute to the world of education, especially in evaluating science learning.

Author Biography

Riska Fitriani, Universitas Jambi

Postgraduate students in Science Education of Pascasarjana Universitas Jambi

References

S. E. F. Rini et al., “Pengaruh Karakter Kerja Keras Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMA Negeri 1 Kota Jambi,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 256–261, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.2.256-261.

Tanti, D. A. Kurniawan, W. Sukarni, E. Erika, and R. Hoyi, “Description of Student Responses Toward the Implementation of Problem-Based Learning Model in Physics Learning,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2021, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1787.

R. Fitriani et al., “Analisis Karakter Kerja Keras Siswa Kelas XI IPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 188–194, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.2.188-194.

T. aprilini Tiara, A. Hamidah, and R. Risnita, “Pengaruh Penerapan Instrumen Penilaian Unjuk Kerja Pada Materi Organisasi Kehidupan Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP,” Biodik, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2022, doi: 10.22437/bio.v8i1.14455.

R. Fitriani, W. A. Putri, E. F. S. Rini, N. H. Sehab, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Pengaruh kerja keras terhadap hasil belajar siswa ipa di sman 1 kota jambi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 213–220, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7750.

S. Agustiani, I. P. Diani, R. Fitriani, and A. Farradlla, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sma Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berdasarkan Gender Dan Geogebrathe,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–97, 2021.

I. Mardi, “Peningkatan Kegiatan Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Scientific Di Kelas Iv Sd,” J. Pelangi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–74, 2015, doi: 10.22202/jp.2015.v8i1.387.

A. Ramadhanti, N. Natalia, E. Febri, and R. Fitriani, “Deskripsi Motivasi Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–86, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i3.245.

A. Ramadhanti, K. Kholilah, R. Fitriani, E. F. S. Rini, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 60–65, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i2.246.

R. Fitriani, Astalini, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Studi Ekploratif: Pengembangan Modul Elektronik pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Matematika 1,” Al Ulum Sains dan Teknol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.31602/ajst.v7i1.5462.

Tanti, Astalini, Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, and R. Fitriani, “Student Perception Review from Gender : Electronic Moduls of Mathematical Physics,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 125–132, 2022.

Astalini et al., “A Study for Student Perception of Mathematical Physics E-Module Based on Gender,” vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 911–936, 2022.

D. A. Astuti, S. Haryanto, and Y. Prihatni, “Evaluasi implementasi kurikulum 2013,” Wiyata Dharma J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 7, 2018, doi: 10.30738/wd.v6i1.3353.

M. D. W. Ernawati et al., “How Scaffolding Integrated With Problem Based Learning Can Improve,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1349–1361, 2021.

A. Nurkholis, “Melalui Metode Eksperimen Dan Poe Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Menggunakan Alat Ukur,” J. Inkuiri, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 216–227, 2013.

I. P. Suardipa and K. H. Primayana, “Peran Desain Evaluasi Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran,” Widyacarya, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 88–100, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.stahnmpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/widyacarya/article/view/796

A. S. Wandini and F. Y. Lubis, “Jurnal basPelaksanaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran secara Daring pada Belajar dari Rumah (BDR) jenjang Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP),” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1985–1997, 2021.

T. Hidayat and A. Asyafah, “Konsep Dasar Evaluasi Dan Implikasinya Dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah,” Al-Tadzkiyyah J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 159–181, 2019, doi: 10.24042/atjpi.v10i1.3729.

I. Magdalena, F. Mulyani, N. Fitriyani, and A. H. Delvia, “Konsep Dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Di Sd Negeri Bencongan 1,” J. Pendidik. dan Ilmu Sos., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2020.

W. F. Firmansyah, A. Kristiyandaru, and A. Widodo, “Instrumen Penilaian Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan Pada Siswa SMP: A Systematic Review,” J. Ilm. Mandala Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 162–167, 2021, doi: 10.36312/jime.v7i2.2023.

Y. Wahyudin and D. N. Rahayu, “Analisis Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Berbasis Website: A Literatur Review,” J. Interkom J. Publ. Ilm. Bid. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 26–40, 2020, doi: 10.35969/interkom.v15i3.74.

D. Chen, R. Fitriani, S. Maryani, E. F. Setiya Rini, W. A. Putri, and A. Ramadhanti, “Deskripsi Keterampilan Proses Sains Dasar Siswa Kelas VIII Pada Materi Cermin Cekung,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2020, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.1.50-55.

E. I. Sari, C. Wiarsih, and D. Bramasta, “Strategi Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman Pada Peserta Didik di Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar,” J. Educ. FKIP UNMA, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 74–82, 2021, doi: 10.31949/educatio.v7i1.847.

M. Sari, “Penelitian Kepustakaan ( Library Research ) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA,” J. Penelit. Bid. IPA dan Pendidik. IPA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2020.

Kholilah, A. Ramadhanti, R. Fitriani, E. Febri, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Kerja Keras Dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Di Sma Negeri 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Sci. Educ. Pract., vol. 4, pp. 41–48, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jsep

H. Syiarah, E. D. Novista, F. L. Agatha, N. N. Simamora, H. Safitri, and R. Fitriani, “Sebaran Tingkat Pemahaman Pembelajaran Fisika Kelas XI Sma Negeri 4 Kota Jambi,” no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2021.

M. Sidi and Mukminin, “Penggunaan Media Audiovisual untuk Meningkatkan Hasil belajar IPS di SMP,” SOCIA J. Ilmu-Ilmu Sos., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 53–72, 2016, doi: 10.21831/socia.v13i1.9903.

H. Huda, “Humantech jurnal ilmiah multi disiplin indonesia,” J. Ilm. Multi Diisiplin Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 217–231, 2022.

M. A. S. Amin, “Peran Guru Dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Sosial Siswa Di Sdn 1 Jatipamor,” J. Cakrawala Pendas, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 195–202, 2022.

Y. S. Periadi, F. Yahya, and M. Erfan, “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar IPA Fisika pada Materi Bunyi Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Labuhan Badas Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017,” Quark J. Inov. Pembelajaran Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2018, doi: 10.31227/osf.io/dwh5e.

Published
2023-01-31
How to Cite
[1]
R. Fitriani, L. Anatri, O. S. Joint, and R. Risnita, “Scope of Learning Evaluation in Science Subject in Junior High School Students: A Systematic Review”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 08-16, Jan. 2023.
Section
Articles