Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Scope of Learning Evaluation in Science Subject in Junior High School Students: A Systematic Review

Riska Fitriani ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
riskafitriani912@gmail.com
Lega Anatri
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Okta Saputra Joint
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Risnita Risnita
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This assessment provides space for students with non-academic weaknesses in science subject skills. This research was used to obtain information related to the scope of evaluation of junior high school students' natural science learning: A Systematic Review.

    Methodology: The review method was chosen to obtain research journals with keywords in the scope of evaluation of junior high school science learning on Google reference sources scholar, science direct, and research gates. Twenty journals were reviewed based on author (year), sample, study design, the scope of the evaluation, and findings.

    Main Findings: The results of the review show that the scope of learning evaluation can be carried out based on the context to be assessed, such as the scope of the cognitive domain, affective domain, and psychomotor domain. The scope of learning evaluation in the cognitive domain can be in the form of observation and understanding, the affective domain can be in the form of responses given by students as long as the teacher provides knowledge, and the psychomotor domain is in the form of a skills assessment rubric such as doing practicum after being given theory by the teacher.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This research can contribute to the world of education, especially in evaluating science learning.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Scope of Learning Evaluation in Science Subject in Junior High School Students: A Systematic Review”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 08–16, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i1.307.

    More Citation Formats

  • 735
    Abstract views
    644
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. S. E. F. Rini et al., “Pengaruh Karakter Kerja Keras Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMA Negeri 1 Kota Jambi,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 256–261, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.2.256-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.2.256-261
    2. Tanti, D. A. Kurniawan, W. Sukarni, E. Erika, and R. Hoyi, “Description of Student Responses Toward the Implementation of Problem-Based Learning Model in Physics Learning,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2021, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1787
    3. R. Fitriani et al., “Analisis Karakter Kerja Keras Siswa Kelas XI IPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 188–194, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.2.188-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.2.188-194
    4. T. aprilini Tiara, A. Hamidah, and R. Risnita, “Pengaruh Penerapan Instrumen Penilaian Unjuk Kerja Pada Materi Organisasi Kehidupan Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP,” Biodik, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2022, doi: 10.22437/bio.v8i1.14455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i1.14455
    5. R. Fitriani, W. A. Putri, E. F. S. Rini, N. H. Sehab, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Pengaruh kerja keras terhadap hasil belajar siswa ipa di sman 1 kota jambi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 213–220, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v5i3.7750
    6. S. Agustiani, I. P. Diani, R. Fitriani, and A. Farradlla, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sma Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berdasarkan Gender Dan Geogebrathe,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–97, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i1.5330
    7. I. Mardi, “Peningkatan Kegiatan Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Scientific Di Kelas Iv Sd,” J. Pelangi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–74, 2015, doi: 10.22202/jp.2015.v8i1.387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22202/jp.2015.v8i1.387
    8. A. Ramadhanti, N. Natalia, E. Febri, and R. Fitriani, “Deskripsi Motivasi Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–86, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i3.245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i3.245
    9. A. Ramadhanti, K. Kholilah, R. Fitriani, E. F. S. Rini, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Kelas X MIPA di SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 60–65, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i2.246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i2.246
    10. R. Fitriani, Astalini, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Studi Ekploratif: Pengembangan Modul Elektronik pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Matematika 1,” Al Ulum Sains dan Teknol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.31602/ajst.v7i1.5462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31602/ajst.v7i1.5462
    11. Tanti, Astalini, Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, and R. Fitriani, “Student Perception Review from Gender : Electronic Moduls of Mathematical Physics,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 125–132, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i1.35107
    12. Astalini et al., “A Study for Student Perception of Mathematical Physics E-Module Based on Gender,” vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 911–936, 2022.
    13. D. A. Astuti, S. Haryanto, and Y. Prihatni, “Evaluasi implementasi kurikulum 2013,” Wiyata Dharma J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 7, 2018, doi: 10.30738/wd.v6i1.3353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v6i1.3353
    14. M. D. W. Ernawati et al., “How Scaffolding Integrated With Problem Based Learning Can Improve,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1349–1361, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1349
    15. A. Nurkholis, “Melalui Metode Eksperimen Dan Poe Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Menggunakan Alat Ukur,” J. Inkuiri, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 216–227, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v2i03.9778
    16. I. P. Suardipa and K. H. Primayana, “Peran Desain Evaluasi Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran,” Widyacarya, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 88–100, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.stahnmpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/widyacarya/article/view/796
    17. A. S. Wandini and F. Y. Lubis, “Jurnal basPelaksanaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran secara Daring pada Belajar dari Rumah (BDR) jenjang Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP),” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1985–1997, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1113
    18. T. Hidayat and A. Asyafah, “Konsep Dasar Evaluasi Dan Implikasinya Dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah,” Al-Tadzkiyyah J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 159–181, 2019, doi: 10.24042/atjpi.v10i1.3729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v10i1.3729
    19. I. Magdalena, F. Mulyani, N. Fitriyani, and A. H. Delvia, “Konsep Dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Di Sd Negeri Bencongan 1,” J. Pendidik. dan Ilmu Sos., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2020.
    20. W. F. Firmansyah, A. Kristiyandaru, and A. Widodo, “Instrumen Penilaian Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan Pada Siswa SMP: A Systematic Review,” J. Ilm. Mandala Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 162–167, 2021, doi: 10.36312/jime.v7i2.2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v7i2.2023
    21. Y. Wahyudin and D. N. Rahayu, “Analisis Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Berbasis Website: A Literatur Review,” J. Interkom J. Publ. Ilm. Bid. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 26–40, 2020, doi: 10.35969/interkom.v15i3.74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35969/interkom.v15i3.74
    22. D. Chen, R. Fitriani, S. Maryani, E. F. Setiya Rini, W. A. Putri, and A. Ramadhanti, “Deskripsi Keterampilan Proses Sains Dasar Siswa Kelas VIII Pada Materi Cermin Cekung,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2020, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.1.50-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.50-55
    23. E. I. Sari, C. Wiarsih, and D. Bramasta, “Strategi Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman Pada Peserta Didik di Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar,” J. Educ. FKIP UNMA, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 74–82, 2021, doi: 10.31949/educatio.v7i1.847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i1.847
    24. M. Sari, “Penelitian Kepustakaan ( Library Research ) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA,” J. Penelit. Bid. IPA dan Pendidik. IPA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/nsc.v6i1.1555
    25. Kholilah, A. Ramadhanti, R. Fitriani, E. Febri, and M. R. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Kerja Keras Dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Di Sma Negeri 1 Kota Jambi,” J. Sci. Educ. Pract., vol. 4, pp. 41–48, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jsep DOI: https://doi.org/10.33751/jsep.v4i1.2829
    26. H. Syiarah, E. D. Novista, F. L. Agatha, N. N. Simamora, H. Safitri, and R. Fitriani, “Sebaran Tingkat Pemahaman Pembelajaran Fisika Kelas XI Sma Negeri 4 Kota Jambi,” no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v17i2.15673
    27. M. Sidi and Mukminin, “Penggunaan Media Audiovisual untuk Meningkatkan Hasil belajar IPS di SMP,” SOCIA J. Ilmu-Ilmu Sos., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 53–72, 2016, doi: 10.21831/socia.v13i1.9903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v13i1.9903
    28. H. Huda, “Humantech jurnal ilmiah multi disiplin indonesia,” J. Ilm. Multi Diisiplin Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 217–231, 2022.
    29. M. A. S. Amin, “Peran Guru Dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Sosial Siswa Di Sdn 1 Jatipamor,” J. Cakrawala Pendas, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 195–202, 2022.
    30. Y. S. Periadi, F. Yahya, and M. Erfan, “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar IPA Fisika pada Materi Bunyi Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Labuhan Badas Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017,” Quark J. Inov. Pembelajaran Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2018, doi: 10.31227/osf.io/dwh5e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/dwh5e