Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Development of Toulmin Argumentation E-Module to Improve Students’ Argumentation Ability on the Buffer Solution Concept

Yusnidar Yusnidar ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
yusnidar@unja.ac.id
Haryanto Haryanto ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Dwi Agus Kurniawan ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Wanada Siti Salsabilah ORCID
UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Indonesia
Nabila Nur Rizqiyah ORCID
University of Bengkulu ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to develop and test the effectiveness of e-modules based on Toulmin argumentation patterns in improving students’ argumentation skills on buffer solution material. This study also aims to confirm that e-modules based on Toulmin argumentation patterns effectively improve students' critical thinking skills and engagement.

    Methodology: This study uses the Research and Development (R&D) method with the ADDIE development model. The research sample was grade XI MIPA students selected purposively, consisting of an experimental class using e-modules and a control class with printed modules.

    Main Findings: The e-module was considered very feasible to use, with an average score of 90% in content, learning design, and readability. The effectiveness test showed that the post-test score of the experimental group (85.3) was significantly higher than the control group (73.1), with p < 0.05. The Toulmin pattern component increased significantly, and 92% of students responded positively despite minor technical constraints.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty in applying the Toulmin argumentation pattern as the primary approach in developing E-Modules aims to improve students’ argumentation skills in learning buffer solutions. This study shows that e-modules based on Toulmin Argumentation Patterns effectively improve students’ logical argumentation skills, critical thinking, and conceptual understanding in chemistry learning. Integrating digital technology encourages active engagement and the development of higher-order thinking skills. These implications emphasize the importance of digital innovation for transforming 21st-century learning.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Development of Toulmin Argumentation E-Module to Improve Students’ Argumentation Ability on the Buffer Solution Concept”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 17–25, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i1.1232.

    More Citation Formats

  • 880
    Abstract views
    384
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. P. N. Iwuanyanwu, “Nature of problem-solving skills for 21st Century STEM Learners: What teachers need to know,” J. STEM Teach. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.30707/jste55.1/mmdz8325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE55.1/MMDZ8325
    2. N. Gültepe and Z. Kılıç, “The effects of scientific argumentation on high school students’ critical thinking skills,” Int. J. Progress. Educ., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 183–200, 2021, doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.382.13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.382.13
    3. I. L. L. Ping, L. Halim, and K. Osman, “Explicit teaching of scientific argumentation as an approach in developing argumentation skills, science process skills and biology understanding,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 276–288, 2020, doi: 10.33225/jbse/20.19.276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.276
    4. K. D. Liani, I. N. Suardana, I. Bagus, and P. Mardana, “Effectiveness of a STEM-based high school chemistry textbook with scaffolding strategy to improve students ’ critical thinking skills,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 8671–8678, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.7181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.7181
    5. Martini, W. Widodo, A. Qosyim, M. A. Mahdiannur, and B. Jatmiko, “Improving undergraduate science education students’ argumentation skills through debates on socioscientific issues,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 428–438, 2021, doi: 10.15294/JPII.V10I3.30050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30050
    6. J. Sun, S. Motevalli, and N. N. Chan, “A systematic review of the EFL writing module development and implementation,” J. Posit. Sch. …, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 675–692, 2022.
    7. R. Hilala, L. A. R. Laliyo, J. La Kilo, J. S. Tangio, E. Mohamad, and M. Sihaloho, “Measuring students’ scientific argumentation skills in explaining phenomena related to acid-base concepts,” J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 360–378, 2023, doi: 10.24815/jpsi.v11i2.27822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i2.27822
    8. A. Hakim, I. Sahmadesti, and S. Hadisaputra, “Promoting students’ argumentation skill through development science teaching materials based on guided inquiry models,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1521, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042117
    9. A. I. K. Dewi, S. Suyono, and E. Erman, “Effectiveness of socioscientific issues (SSI) based learning to improve argumentation skills,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 279–283, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2866
    10. K. Lenggogeni and M. Mawardi, “Effectiveness of a flipped classroom based on guided inquiry learning system on acid-base solutions,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2168–2175, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1909
    11. R. A. Mashami, S. Suryati, B. M. Harisanti, and Y. Khery, “Identification of local wisdom of the sasak tribe in chemistry learning as an effort to strengthen student character,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 337–345, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2434
    12. A. Supriyadi, “Improving students’ critical thinking by employing toulmin pattern of argumentation,” Educ. English as A Foreign Lang., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 130–144, 2023, doi: 10.21776/ub.educafl.2023.006.02.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.educafl.2023.006.02.03
    13. D. Dwikoranto, “Using toulmin’s argument pattern on problem solving model to improve problem-solving analysis ability: learning alternatives during the covid-19 pandemic,” IJORER Int. J. Recent Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 200–209, 2022, doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v3i2.211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i2.211
    14. M. R. Jiménez-Liso, L. López-Banet, and J. Dillon, “Changing how we teach acid-base chemistry: A proposal grounded in studies of the history and nature of science education,” Sci. Educ., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1291–1315, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11191-020-00142-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00142-6
    15. A. Lembens, S. Hammerschmid, S. Jaklin-Farcher, C. Nosko, and K. Reiter, “Textbooks as source for conceptional confusion in teaching and learning ‘acids and bases’ in lower secondary school,” Chem. Teach. Int., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.1515/cti-2018-0029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2018-0029
    16. C. Lathwesen and N. Belova, “Acid base global - an escape room to teach the chemistry of acids and bases,” Action Res. Innov. Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.51724/arise.57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51724/arise.57
    17. D. C. Anisah and H. Nasrudin, “Development of guided inquiry-oriented e-worksheets to improve students’ science process skills in acid-base material,” J. Pijar Mipa, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 449–458, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v18i4.5073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v18i4.5073
    18. A. Anita, A. Afandi, A. B. Tenriawaru, and D. A. Putra, “Profile of argumentation skills using toulmin’s argumentation pattern (TAP) in senior high school students in biology learning: preliminary research,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1842, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012065
    19. N. Imanuella and I. Wayan Redhana, “Argument patterns in redox reaction and electrochemistry topics in a high school textbook,” KnE Soc. Sci., vol. 2024, pp. 110–128, 2024, doi: 10.18502/kss.v9i13.15912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.15912
    20. M. Reza, N. Nurdin, N. Naila, and W. P. Sari, “Evaluation of chemistry learning videos from online learning applications in Indonesia,” Chim. Didact. Acta, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2023, doi: 10.24815/jcd.v11i1.32026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jcd.v11i1.32026
    21. H. Sundari and R. H. Febriyanti, “The analysis of indonesian EFL argumentative writing using toulmin’s model: the structure and struggles from the learners,” Scope J. English Lang. Teach., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 67, 2021, doi: 10.30998/scope.v5i2.8544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v5i2.8544
    22. M. H. Effendi-Hasibuan, A. Bakar, and Harizon, “Skills to argue: Using argument-based learning (ABL) and socio-scientific issues to promote university students’ argumentation skills in chemistry,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1567, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022042
    23. N. A. Qotrunnada, “Analysis of the difficulties of high school students ini improving problem solving ability in physics learning,” Int. J. Curr. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84–101, 2022, doi: 10.53621/ijocer.v1i1.141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53621/ijocer.v1i1.141
    24. N. Hasnunidah, E. Dwiyanti, B. Yolida, N. Meriza, and D. Maulina, “Optimizing discovery learning to enhance HOTS : Why use argumentative worksheets ?,” J. Penelit. Pendidkan IPA, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 10348–10358, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9412
    25. S. Rahayu, Munawaroh, and F. Amri, “Efektifitas model pembelajaran domar dalam mengingkatkan keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah pada pembelajaran fisika,” JPE (Jurnal Pendidik. Edutama), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 83–92, 2023, doi: 10.30734/jpe.v10i2.3285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v10i2.3285
    26. A. Z. Maulidiyah, T. W. Agustina, and T. Kurniati, “Does the creative problem-solving model improve students’ argumentation skills ?,” Pedago. J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 08, no. 02, pp. 126–131, 2024, doi: 10.55215/pedagonal.v8i2.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v8i2.12
    27. D. Sulisworo and I. Safitri, “Online student-worksheet based on toulmin argumentation pattern in physics learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2394, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2394/1/012033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2394/1/012033
    28. R. F. Roslina, Herpratiwi, “Interactive multimedia based on problem-based learning to improve students concept understanding in physics subject,” J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 41–54, 2015, doi: 10.24114/jtp.v8i2.3329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jtp.v8i2.3329
    29. F. Fakhriyah et al., “The scientific argumentative skill analysis reviewed from the science literacy aspect of pre-service teacher,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2129–2139, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22847
    30. W. A. Pertiwi, S. Kusairi, A. D. Kusumawati, A. P. K. Shanthie, and L. D. Haeruman, “Profile of scientific argumentation of elementary school teachers using Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) in Physics concept of potable water sources,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2596, no. 1, pp. 0–6, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012077
    31. D. K. Shinta and Filia, “Improving students’ arguments through collaborative learning,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 349–358, 2020, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28602
    32. D. Melta, M. Azhar, Y. Yohandri, F. Arsih, and A. Razak, “Argument-driven inquiry learning model to improve students’ argumentation skills in science learning: systematic literature review,” Edu Sains J. Pendidik. Sains Mat., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2024, doi: 10.23971/eds.v12i1.5843.
    33. M. Popova and T. Jones, “Chemistry instructors’ intentions toward developing, teaching, and assessing student representational competence skills,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 733–748, 2021, doi: 10.1039/d0rp00329h. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00329H
    34. H. Ashel, I. Hamidah, and S. Anwar, “Research trends and opportunities of argumentation based learning for solving problems in physics learning: A bibliometric analysis,” JEP (Jurnal Eksakata Pendidikan), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 99–114, 2024, doi: 10.24036/jep/vol8-iss2/941.
    35. R. D. Agustina and R. P. Putra, “Sophisticated thinking blended laboratory (STB-LAB) learning model: implications on virtual and real laboratories for increasing undergraduate student’s argumentation skills,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 657–671, 2022, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v11i4.38772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.38772
    36. Y. Ramadani, P. Pujiriyanto, S. Suwartia, and M. Minarni, “Developing students’ worksheets based on the inquiry-flipped classroom learning model to improve argumentation skills,” AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 972–980, 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2459
    37. S. A. Muhammad Agung Satriya, “The effect of argument driven inquiry learning models on scientific argumentation skills and higher order students on the topics of acid base,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2663–2673, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6834
    38. E. S. Elinda Budinarianti, “Pembelajaran IPA berbasis socioscientific issue global warming untuk meningkatkan argumentasi siswa SMP,” BIOCHEPHY J. Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 585–591, 2024, doi: 10.52562/biochephy.v4i2.1211.
    39. A. S. Septi Nur Chayani, “Improving cognitive learning outcomes of science lessons through problem based learning models assisted by puzzles,” Tjyybjb.Ac.Cn, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 635–637, 2021, doi: 10.175xx/maktab.v1i1.470.
    40. Irwan, C. L. Zahari, and A. Mujib, “Profil kemampu representasi matematis siswa Mts Muallimin UNIVA Medan,” J. Ilm. Mat. Realis., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 260–266, 2023, doi: 10.23971/eds.v12i1.5843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v12i1.5843
    41. E. J. Arif Rifan Hidayat, “Pengaruh gadget terhadap prestasi siswa SMK yayasan Islam Tasikmalaya,” J. Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163–173, 2017, doi: 10.31294/ji.v4i2.2096.
    42. C. Andrade, “The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples,” Indian J. Psychol. Med., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 86–88, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0253717620977000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000
    43. D. Hossan, Z. Dato’ Mansor, and N. S. Jaharuddin, “Research population and sampling in quantitative study,” Int. J. Bus. Technopreneursh., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 209–222, 2023, doi: 10.58915/ijbt.v13i3.263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58915/ijbt.v13i3.263
    44. I. Etikan, “Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling,” Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
    45. I. Lenaini, “Teknik pengambilan sampel purposive dan snowball sampling,” Hist. J. Kajian, Penelit. Pengemb. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2021, doi: 10.31764/historis.vXiY.4075.
    46. A. C. Pritasari and Jumadi, “Development of science learning tool based on problem based learning with google classroom to improve argumentation skill,” Biosaintifika, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 348–355, 2018, doi: 10.15294/biosaintifika.v10i2.14320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v10i2.14320
    47. H. B. Y. Azidin Prayogi, “Struktur argumentasi ustaz menachem Ali dalam siniar berjudul "Nalar Islam Protestan dari Ponpes Az-Zaytun,” J. Komun. dan Penyiaran Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 211–228, 2024, doi: 10.55372/bilhikmahjkpi.v2i1.30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55372/bilhikmahjkpi.v2i1.30
    48. A. Haruna and Nahadi, “Menjelajahi hubungan level argumentasi dengan kemampuan berfikir kritis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal ikatan kimia,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 2686–2694, 2021, doi: 10.15294/jipk.v15i1.24156.
    49. A. F. E. Wati, M. S. Sari, and S. Suhadi, “Improving undergraduate students’ argumentation skills through problem-based e-module with socio-scientific issues topics,” Bioedukasi, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 87, 2023, doi: 10.19184/bioedu.v21i2.39596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/bioedu.v21i2.39596
    50. D. E. Liana, M. Muzzazinah, and M. Indrowati, “Development of science e-modules based of guided inquiry to improve students’ critical thinking ability,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1368–1375, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1668
    51. P. A. C. Dinata, Rasidah, and V. W. Wardhana, “The validity of electronic practicum module based on scientific argumentation for practicum media during covid-19 pandemic,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1805, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012022
    52. S. M. M. Loyens, J. E. van Meerten, L. Schaap, and L. Wijnia, Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review, vol. 35, no. 2. Springer US, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x
    53. Z. Abidin et al., “Gifted children’s mathematical reasoning abilities on problem-based learning and project-based learning literacy,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1720, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1720/1/012018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1720/1/012018
    54. A. Suradika, H. I. Dewi, and M. I. Nasution, “Project-based learning and problem-based learning models in critical and creative students,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 153–167, 2023, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39713
    55. P. Arabloo, F. Hemmati, A. Rouhi, and F. Khodabandeh, “Publisher: Imam Khomeini International University 126,” J. Mod. Res. English Lang. Stud., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 125–150, 2022, doi: 10.30479/jmrels.2020.14077.1730.
    56. D. Kurniawan, S. Masitoh, B. S. Bachri, T. Wahyuningsih, W. G. Mulawarman, and A. Vebibina, “Evaluation of digital project based blended learning model to improve students’ critical thinking and problem solving skills,” J. Ecohumanism, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1875–1895, 2024, doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i8.4847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4847
    57. N. P. Saylendra et al., “The effect of project-based learning on improving students,” Asian Conf. Soc. Sci. 2024 Off. Conf. Proc., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 417–423, 2024, doi: 10.22492/issn.2186-2303.2024.36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-2303.2024.36