Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Problem-Based Learning Model in Elementary School Students: Learning Activity and Learning Outcomes

Indun Krisdianto ORCID
Universitas PGRI Madiun ROR
Indonesia
indun@gmail.com
Sudarmiani Sudarmiani ORCID
Universitas PGRI Madiun ROR
Indonesia
Nurhadji Nugraha ORCID
Universitas PGRI Madiun ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study investigates the effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model in improving learning activity and learning outcomes of elementary school students in IPAS (Science and Social Studies) learning within the context of the Merdeka Curriculum implementation.

    Methodology: A quantitative approach was employed using a quasi-experimental posttest non-equivalent control group design. The participants consisted of 22 third-grade students at SDN 02 Nambangan Lor, Madiun City, divided into an experimental class (n = 11) taught using the PBL model and a control class (n = 11) taught using a traditional learning model. Data were collected through learning activity observation sheets and learning outcome tests, then analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent sample t-tests with a significance level of 0.05.

    Main Findings: The results show that students in the experimental class demonstrated significantly higher learning activity and learning outcomes compared to those in the control class. The independent sample t-test revealed a significant difference in learning activity (t = 4.129, p < 0.05) and learning outcomes (t = 5.744, p < 0.05) between the two groups. These findings indicate that the PBL model is more effective than traditional learning in fostering active student participation and improving academic achievement.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides empirical evidence supporting the integration of Problem-Based Learning as an instructional strategy to enhance the quality of IPAS learning in elementary schools, particularly in alignment with the student-centered principles of the Merdeka Curriculum.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Problem-Based Learning Model in Elementary School Students: Learning Activity and Learning Outcomes”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 390–398, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jee.v7i2.2655.

    More Citation Formats

  • 127
    Abstract views
    101
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. G. Abo-Khalil, “Integrating sustainability into higher education challenges and opportunities for universities worldwide,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 9, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29946
    2. D. R. Adhikari, and P. Shrestha, “Knowledge management initiatives for achieving sustainable development goal 4.7: higher education institutions’ stakeholder perspectives,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1109-1139, 2023, doi: 10.1108/JKM-03-2022-0172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2022-0172
    3. I. Hasanah, H. Hefniy, A. W. Zaini, “Strengthening brand identity: Embracing local wisdom through character education management,” Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83-94, 2023, doi: 10.33650/ijess.v2i2.3435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/ijess.v2i2.3435
    4. H. M. Hsbollah, and H. Hassan, “Creating meaningful learning experiences with active, fun, and technology elements in the problem-based learning approach and its implications,” Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 147-181, 2022, doi: 10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.6
    5. M. D. Soto-González, R. Rodríguez-López, and S. Renovell-Rico, “Transdisciplinarity and reflective and creative thinking through art in teacher training,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1003, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13101003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101003
    6. K. Lee, E. Kang, and E. J. Park, “Storytelling as a learning tool in creative education: A case study in an architecture design studio,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 48, pp. 101274, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101274
    7. P. Ye, and X. Xu, “A case study of interdisciplinary thematic learning curriculum to cultivate “4C skills”,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, pp. 1080811, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080811
    8. V. Rana, B. Verhoeven, and M, Sharma, “Generative AI in design thinking pedagogy: Enhancing creativity, critical thinking, and ethical reasoning in higher education,” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1-22, 2025, doi: 10.3316/informit.T2025090900004290816631094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/tjse2f36
    9. Y. Xu, and J. Du, “What participation types of learners are there in connectivist learning: An analysis of a cMOOC from the dual perspectives of social network and concept network characteristics,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 5424-5441, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.2007137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2007137
    10. M. A. Alafnan, “Enhancing educational outcomes using AlAfnan taxonomy: integrating cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 2419-2437, 2025, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v14i3.33147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i3.33147
    11. B. Anand, I. Mishra, G. Beri, and K. L. Chaudhary, “Types of learning: Domains of learning–Cognitive, affective, and psychomotor, learning theories, experiential learning,” Extension methods, ICT and educational technology, pp. 53-82, 2024.
    12. S. Mukherjee, and J. Kittur, “Learning through cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains: Understanding undergraduate engineering students’ perspectives in the United States,” Engineering Education Review, vol. 3, 2025, doi: 10.54844/eer.2025.0916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2025.0916
    13. M. Abbasi, M. Shirazi, H. Torkmandi, S. Homayoon, and M, Abdi, “Impact of teaching, learning, and assessment of medical law on cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills of medical students: A systematic review,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 703, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04695-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04695-2
    14. S. Limbu, “Fostering peer evaluation and cognitive, affective, and psychomotor (cap) domains in school level science education: A critical reflection on the STEAM approach,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 10(2), 446-472, 2024, doi: 10.46328/ijres.3403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3403
    15. K. H. D. Tang, “Student-centered approach in teaching and learning: What does it really mean?,” Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 72-83, 2023, doi: 10.53623/apga.v2i2.218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218
    16. E. Balla, “Teacher centered method vs student centered method of teaching in teaching english: Critical study,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 60-60, 2023, doi: 10.56345/ijrdv10n309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv10n309
    17. M. Treve, “Comparative analysis of teacher-centered and student-centered learning in the context of higher education: A co-word analysis,” Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-12, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.117
    18. A. Joshua, Q. Xusheng, E. O. Adjei, and Z. Xinyu, “Effect of teaching method and teachers’ self efficacy and students’ learning outcome in the Accra Metropolis of Ghana,” Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 163-191, 2023.
    19. H. Hasfiana, “Islamic religious education learning innovation: the role and challenges of the joyful learning approach,” ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1168-1180, 2025, doi: 10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3764
    20. Z. Y. Wong, and G. A. D. Liem, “Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 107-138, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
    21. T. H. van Dulmen, T. C. Visser, B. Pepin, and S. McKenney, “Teacher and student engagement when using learning materials based on the context of cutting-edge chemistry research,” Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1617-1638, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2022.2070147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2070147
    22. J. I. Chisunum, and C. Nwadiokwu, “Enhancing student engagement through practical production and utilization of instructional materials in an educational technology class: A multifaceted approach,” NIU Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 81-89, 2024, doi: 10.58709/niujed.v10i2.2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58709/niujed.v10i2.2002
    23. H. Yaseen, A. S. Mohammad, N. Ashal, H. Abusaimeh, A. Ali, and A. A. A. Sharabati, “The impact of adaptive learning technologies, personalized feedback, and interactive AI tools on student engagement: The moderating role of digital literacy,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1133, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17031133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031133
    24. D. Thüs, S. Malone, and R. Brünken, “Exploring generative AI in higher education: a RAG system to enhance student engagement with scientific literature,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 1474892, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474892
    25. E. J. Vermeulen, and M. L. Volman, “Promoting student engagement in online education: Online learning experiences of Dutch university students,” Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 941-961, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10758-023-09704-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09704-3
    26. M, Huang, “Student engagement and speaking performance in AI-assisted learning environments: A mixed-methods study from Chinese middle schools,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 7143-7165, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12989-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12989-1
    27. M. Rehman, X. Huang, A. Mahmood, M. A. AlGerafi, and S. Javed, “Project-based learning as a catalyst for 21st-Century skills and student engagement in the math classroom,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 23, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988
    28. I. A. M. S. Widiastuti, I. B. N. Mantra, I. L. P. Utami, N. L. Sukanadi, and I. N. A. Susrawan, “Implementing problem-based learning to develop students' critical and creative thinking skills,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 658-667, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i4.63588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i4.63588
    29. L. Luthfiana, and P. D. Purwati, “A flipbook on waste recycling based on the problem-based learning model: An effort to improve students’ understanding of explanatory texts,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1008-1019, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i3.1706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i3.1706
    30. K. Smith, N. Maynard, A. Berry, T. Stephenson, T. Spiteri, D. Corrigan, J. Mansfield, P. Ellerton, and T. Smith, “Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice,” Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 728, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12100728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
    31. L. Wang, J. Sitthiworachart, and J. Morris, “Enhancing problem-solving and autonomous learning in mature students through Tech-Blended PBL,” International Journal of Lifelong Education, pp. 1-21, 2025, doi: 10.1080/02601370.2025.2505430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2025.2505430
    32. J. N. Sari, N. Hiqma, N. A. Rafiki, N. A. F. Harahap, N. Damayanti, and N. Azizah, “Innovations in 21st century education: An experimental investigation of the effect of problem based learning on students’ learning autonomy,” Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1492-1506, 2025, doi: 10.61227/arji.v7i3.416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61227/arji.v7i3.416
    33. O. Omelianenko, and N. Artyukhova, “Project-based learning: Theoretical overview and practical implications for local innovation-based development,” Economics and Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35-41, 2024, doi: 10.30525/2500-946X/2024-1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2024-1-6
    34. M. A. Almulla, “Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education,” Cogent Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 2172929, 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
    35. L. Gavrilas, and K. T. Kotsis, “Integrating learning theories and innovative pedagogies in STEM education: A comprehensive review,” Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11-17, 2025, doi: 10.30935/ejsee/16538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/16538
    36. F. Siska, A. Asnimawati, N. Sulkaisi, and J. Z. Morales, “Philosophical foundations of project based learning: Perspectives on constructivism and contextualism theory,” SOSEARCH: Social Science Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 48-56, 2024, doi: 10.26740/sosearch.v5n1.p48--56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/sosearch.v5n1.p48--56
    37. R. Bou Saad, A. L. Garcia, and J. M. C. Garcia, “Mapping constructivist active learning for STEM: toward sustainable education,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 6225, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17136225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136225
    38. F. Al-Kamzari, and N. Alias, “A systematic literature review of project-based learning in secondary school physics: theoretical foundations, design principles, and implementation strategies,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04579-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04579-4
    39. B. M. Suryonegoro, and I. Hidayah, “The influence of ethnomathematics based problem based learning (pbl) model on gedongsongo temple objects on the creative thinking ability of junior high school students in view of self-confidence,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 120-124, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i3.430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i3.430
    40. J. Lee, T. Park, and R. O. & Davis, “What affects learner engagement in flipped learning and what predicts its outcomes?,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 211-228, 2022, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12717
    41. S. Gomes, L. Costa, C. Martinho, J. Dias, G. Xexéo, and A. M. Santos, “Modeling students’ behavioral engagement through different in-class behavior styles,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 10(1), 21, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40594-023-00407-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00407-w
    42. A. H. S. Dzaiy, and S. A. Abdullah, “The use of active learning strategies to foster effective teaching in higher education institutions,” Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 328-351, 2024, doi: 10.21271/zjhs.28.4.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.4.18
    43. D. Singh, and R. Rajendran, “Cognitive engagement as a predictor of learning gain in Python programming,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 58, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40561-024-00330-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00330-9
    44. J. Lim, J. W. Yang, M. H. Song, and J. Park, “Self-study and discussion promote students’ science learning,” Science & Education, 34(4), 2459-2477, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11191-024-00562-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00562-8
    45. R. Shadiev, X. Wang, and S. Shen, “Effects of immersion and interactive strategies on students’ intercultural competence in virtual learning environments,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 5883-5919, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13030-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13030-1
    46. K. Tammets, K. Kollom, T. Ley, P. J. Sillat, and M. Khulbe, “The role of training design and individual characteristics in influencing teachers’ intention to adopt learning analytics,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. e70143, 2025, doi: 10.1111/jcal.70143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70143
    47. W. Wagino, H. Maksum, W. Purwanto, W. Simatupang, R. Lapisa, and E. Indrawan, “Enhancing learning outcomes and student engagement: Integrating e-learning innovations into problem-based higher education,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 18, no. 10, pp. pp. 106–124, 2024, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v18i10.47649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i10.47649
    48. T. Apriani, M. Somantri, M. Kristiawan, and Z. Hussin, “Evaluating the effectiveness of the learning community program in improving educators’ pedagogical competence,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1159-1175, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i4.2092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i4.2092
    49. R. Tirado-Morueta, Y. Ceada-Garrido, A. J. Barragán, J. M. Enrique, and J. M. Andujar, “The association of self-determination with student engagement moderated by teacher scaffolding in a Project-Based Learning (PBL) case,” Educational Studies, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 806-827, 2024, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2021.2003185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.2003185
    50. N. Sartania, S. Sneddon, J. G. Boyle, E. McQuarrie, and H. P. de Koning, “Increasing collaborative discussion in case-based learning improves student engagement and knowledge acquisition,” Medical science educator, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1055-1064, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01614-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01614-w
    51. E. Yuniati, “Assessing the effectiveness of problem-based learning on the academic performance of grade XII students,” English Language and Literature in Education Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 59-73, 2024, doi: 10.63011/2yrbf166.
    52. Z. Pei, “Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry-based learning (IBL) on students’ academic achievement,” Research Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 469-482, 2025, doi: 10.62583/rseltl.v3i3.89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v3i3.89
    53. M. Chaojing, “A study on strategies for cultivating higher-order thinking skills in primary and secondary school students,” Frontiers in Educational Research, vol. 6, no. 20, pp. 67-71, 2023, doi: 10.25236/FER.2023.062011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.062011
    54. W. Zhang, Y. Guan, and Z. Hu, “The efficacy of project-based learning in enhancing computational thinking among students: A meta-analysis of 31 experiments and quasi-experiments,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 14513-14545, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2