Uncovering the Veil: Overcoming Challenges in Science Teaching Standards
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study examines the challenges faced by junior high school teachers in implementing science teaching standards, with a particular focus on issues related to instructional guidance, continuous assessment, and the provision of resources. It aims to identify gaps and offer strategies to enhance science education quality in Indonesian schools.
Methodology: A mixed-method approach was employed, combining classroom observations, structured interviews, and questionnaires. Data were collected from 160 participants, including teachers and students from junior high schools in Mantikulore District, Central Sulawesi. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative insights were drawn from thematic coding of interviews and observations.
Main Findings: The findings reveal that while teachers demonstrate competence in providing guidance and conducting assessments, significant challenges remain in creating conducive learning environments. These include insufficient access to modern teaching resources, limited training in continuous assessment methods, and overcrowded classrooms that hinder effective science instruction. Students reported that practical activities and hands-on experiments were often constrained by a lack of laboratory materials, impacting their engagement and understanding of scientific concepts.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This research provides localized insights into the systemic and practical challenges faced by Indonesian schools in implementing science teaching standards. It uniquely highlights the interplay between resource availability, teacher development, and classroom practices. The study proposes innovative strategies for resource allocation, capacity building, and the integration of technology to address these gaps, contributing to evidence-based policy recommendations.
References
R. Ependi, “Menakar permasalahan pendidikan islam dalam presfektif islam transitif [Measuring the problems of islamic education from a transitive islamic perspective],” Hikmah, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 34–45, 2020, doi: 10.53802/hikmah.v17i1.78.
H. Habibi, A. Anekawati, and L. Fazat Azizah, “Permasalahan pembelajaran IPA SMP/MTs DI Kabupaten Semenep Tahun Ajaran 2010-2011 [Science learning problems in junior high schools/islamic junior high schools in Semenep Regency in the 2010-2011 Academic Year],” LENSA (Lentera Sains) J. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 2020, doi: 10.24929/lensa.v2i1.100.
Y. Ary Pratama, M. Jamhari, and R. Agni, “Application of the Group Investigation (GI) Type Cooperative Learning Model to Increase Students’ Interest in Learning in Class X-J of SMA Negeri 1 Torue,” Equator Sci. J, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2024, doi: 10.61142/esj.v2i1.123.
A. Almagfira, L. Alibasyahi, and R. Agni, “The effect of cooperative learning model of teams game tournament type on motivation and learning outcomes of junior high school students in Palu,” Sci. J, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 20–26, 2024, doi: 10.61142/esj.v2i2.126.
K. Hidayati, “Comparison of science learning outcome between using and do not using picture media on state islamic elementary students,” INSECTA Integr. Sci. Educ. Teach. Act. J, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 69, 2020, doi: 10.21154/insecta.v1i1.2092.
S. Zainal and R. Agni, “Memahami Kurikulum 2013: Perspektif Guru IPA untuk Pengajaran yang Efektif,” Jakarta Barat: Mega Press Nusantara, 2024.
M. Bobrowsky, “The Process of Science ... and its Interaction with Non-Scientific Ideas,” Am. Astron. Soc., 2007.
R. Astuti, W. Sunarno, and S. Sudarisman, “Pembelajaran IPA dengan pendekatan ketrampilan proses sains menggunakan metode eksperimen bebas termodifikasi dan eksperimen terbimbing [Science learning with a science process skills approach using modified free experiment methods and guided experiments],” Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 339–345, 2015, doi: 10.21154/jtii.v1i2.145.
A. Rahmah, S. Titah, W. Fadly, E. R. Faradisya, and F. U. Nur, “Pengaruh model sains teknologi masyarakat dan pendekatan esd dalam meningkat kepedulian lingkungan [The influence of the science-technology-society model and the ESD approach in increasing environmental awareness],” Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 68–72, 2021, doi: 10.21154/jtii.v1i2.145.
M. D. Insani, “Studi pendahuluan identifikasi kesulitan dalam pembelajaran pada guru IPA SMP Se-Kota Malang [Preliminary study of identification of learning difficulties in junior high school science teachers throughout Malang City],” J. Pendidik. Biol, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 81–93, 2016, doi: 10.17977/um052v7i2p81-93.
S. Olson and S. L. Horsley, “Inkuiri dan Standar-standar Pendidikan Sains Nasional, Sebuah Panduan untuk Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Terjemahan INQUIRY AND THE NATIONAL SCIENCE EDUCATION STANDARDS, A Guide for Teaching and Learning,” Bandung: SEAMEO QITEP in Science, 2000.
A. W. Wisudawati and E. Sulistyowati, “Metodologi Pembelajaran IPA [Science Learning Methodology]”. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offsite, 2014.
A. S. Wahyuni, “Literature review: Pendekatan berdiferensiasi dalam pembelajaran IPA [Literature review: Differentiated approach in science learning],” J. Pendidik. Mipa, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 118–126, 2022, doi: 10.37630/jpm.v12i2.562.
D. Febriyanti, S. Sjaifuddin, and L. T. Biru, “Analisis proses pembelajaran IPA terpadu dalam pelaksanaan kurikulum 2013 di SMP Kecamatan Sumur-Banten [Analysis of the integrated science learning process in the implementation of the 2013 curriculum at Junior High Schools in Sumur District, Banten],” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 218–225, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.6.1.218-225.
National Academy of Sciences, National Science Education Standards, vol. 52, no. 44. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
Z. Williams et al., “Comprehensive profiling of circulating microRNA via small RNA sequencing of cDNA libraries reveals biomarker potential and limitations,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 4255–4260, 2013, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214046110.
National Research Council, A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press., 2012.
Next Generation Science Standards, “Read The Standards,” Next Generation Science Standards.
H. Aktamiş, E. Hiğde, and B. Özden, “Effects of the inquiry-based learning method on students’ achievement, science process skills and attitudes towards science: A meta-analysis science,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 248–261, 2016, doi: 10.12973/tused.10183a.
D. K. Capps, B. A. Crawford, and M. A. Constas, “A Review of Empirical Literature on Inquiry Professional Development: Alignment with Best Practices and a Critique of the Findings,” J. Sci. Teacher Educ., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 291–318, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2.
L. Florian and K. Black-Hawkins, “Exploring inclusive pedagogy,” Br. Educ. Res. J, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 813–828, 2011, doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.501096.
W. Wiliam, “Embedded formative assessment”. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press, 2018.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, “The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. The Future We Want,” OECD france.
R. W. Bybee et al., “The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness,” Color. Springs, Co BSCS, vol. 5, no. 88–98, 2014.
E. S. Indrawati and Y. Nurpatri, “Problematika pembelajaran IPA terpadu (Kendala Guru Dalam Pengajaran IPA Terpadu) [Problems of integrated science learning (Teacher Obstacles in Integrated Science Teaching)],” Educ. J. Pendidik, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 226–234, 2022, doi: 10.56248/educativo.v1i1.31.
R. Agni and S. Zainal, “Exploring the relationship between visual learning styles and learning outcomes in limnology course: A quantitative descriptive study,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2023, doi: 10.61142/esj.v1i1.5
D. Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D [Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods]”. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
Sugiyono, “Statistika Untuk Penelitian [Statistics For Research]”. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2023.
R. Agni, A. Rede, and M. Jamhari, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dipadukan media animasi pembelajaran terhadap kreatifitas dan hasil belajar siswa [The influence of the STAD type cooperative learning model combined with animated learning media on student creativity and learning outcomes],” J. Kreat. Online, vol. 8, no. 3, 2020.
R. V Hogg, J. W. McKean, and A. T. Craig, Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. Boston: Pearson, 2019.
A. P. Field, “Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock “n” roll (2nd Edition)”. London: Sage Publication, 2009.
Permendikbud, “Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang standar kualifikasi akademik dan kompetensi guru [Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 16 of 2007 concerning academic qualification standards and teacher competencies],” in Permendikbud, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Jakarta, 2007.
R. Miski, “Pengaruh sarana dan prasarana terhadap hasil belajar siswa [The influence of facilities and infrastructure on student learning outcomes],” Tadbir Muwahhid, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 69–73, 2015, doi: 10.30997/jtm.v4i2.341.
I. Siregar and A. Farida, “Pengaruh sarana dan prasarana terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas VIII SMPI Islam Luqman Al Hakim Batam [The influence of facilities and infrastructure on science learning outcomes of class VIII students at SMPI Islam Luqman Al Hakim Batam],” TADRIBUNA J. Islam. Educ. Manag, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 107–116, 2023, doi: 10.61456/tjiec.v1i1.83.
N. I. Yusuf, I. N. Karma, and S. Istiningsih, “Pengaruh sarana dan prasarana belajar sekolah terhadap motivasi belajar siswa SDN 7 Ampenan Kota Mataram [The influence of school learning facilities and infrastructure on students' learning motivation at SDN 7 Ampenan, Mataram City],” Konstr. J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2023, doi: 10.35457/konstruk.v15i1.2605.
M. Morton and T. Mcmenamin, “Learning together: Collaboration to develop curriculum assessment that promotes belonging,” Support Learn, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 109–114, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9604.2011.01488.x.
S. Kanatouri, “Emerging perspectives,” Digit. Coach, pp. 115–154, 2020, doi: 10.4324/9780429022753-4.
P. Oppi and E. Eisenschmidt, “Developing a professional learning community through teacher leadership: A case in one Estonian school,” Teach. Teach. Educ. Leadersh. Prof. Dev, vol. 1, no. April, p. 100011, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tatelp.2022.100011.
M. B. Ogunniyi, “The development of science education in Botswana,” Sci. Educ, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 95–109, 2004, doi: 10.1002/sce.3730790107.
N. Bandara and R. Chathurika, “The impact of classroom environment on students’ learning,” E-Journal Soc. Work, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 12–19, 2022, doi: 10.47205/plhr.2021(5-ii)2.17.
L. M. Desimone, “Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures,” Educ. Res, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 181–199, 2009, doi: 10.3102/0013189X08331140.
Copyright (c) 2024 Raya Agni, Aan Febriawan, Syech Zainal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
