Analysis of High School Students' Learning Discipline in Physics Learning
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This research was conducted with the aim of finding out students' disciplinary attitudes towards physics subjects in high school.
Methodology: This research uses a mixed methods explanatory design. The sampling technique uses simple random sampling. The number of samples in this study was 120 high school students. Data collection techniques used questionnaires and interviews. Data analysis uses descriptive statistics and miles and miles model. Data analysis in this research uses a quantitative approach using the SPSS program.
Main Findings: It was found that student discipline was categorized as good and quite good. So, stimulus treatment from the teacher is needed to increase student learning discipline. The implication of this research is that it can help teachers and educational stakeholders to understand the factors that influence student learning discipline in Physics subjects. With better understanding, they can develop more effective learning strategies to increase student motivation and engagement.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of the research may provide a better understanding of the dynamics of student learning in physics, enabling the development of more effective learning strategies
References
R. M. D. Guido, “Attitude and Motivation towards Learning Physics,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 2087–2094, 2018.
J. Hyun, R. Ediger, and D. Lee, “Students’ Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms,” Int. J. Teach., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 108–118, 2017.
Yusnidar, “The Impact of Unidentified Elementary School Students ’ Character Values in the Independent Curriculum Class IV Science Science Teacher ’ s Book,” Res. J. Basic Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 112–117, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jber.v4i3.727.
A. A. Aldahdouh, A. J. Osório, and S. C. Portugal, “Understanding Knowledge Network, Learning, and Connectivism,” Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn. Oct., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 3–21, 2015.
E. Nusantari, R. Utina, A. S. Katili, Y. Tamu, and I. Damopolii, “Effectiveness of environmentally-based science learning towards environmentally-friendly character of students in coastal area,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 233–246, 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13316a.
Yusnidar, M. D. W. Ernawati, D. A. Kurniawan, M. Z. Azzahra, F. I. Putri, and N. Prameswari, “Effect Of Learning Using The Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Model With Scaffolding On Creative Thinking And Learning Independence,” J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 681–692, 2023, doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.58.5.52.
O. A. Sogunro, “Motivating Factors for Adult Learners in Higher Education,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22–37, 2014, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p22.
J. Tondeur, R. Scherer, E. Baran, F. Siddiq, T. Valtonen, and E. Sointu, “Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1189–1209, 2019, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12748.
J. C. Corbo, D. L. Reinholz, M. H. Dancy, S. Deetz, and N. Finkelstein, “Framework for transforming departmental culture to support educational innovation,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010113.
T. Tran et al., “How digital natives learn and thrive in the digital age: Evidence from an emerging economy,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1–24, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12093819.
D. Serhan, “Transitioning from Face-to-Face to Remote Learning: Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions of using Zoom during COVID-19 Pandemic,” Int. J. Technol. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 335–342, 2020, doi: 10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.148.
D. Apriana, M. Kristiawan, and D. Wardiah, “Headmaster’s competency in preparing vocational school students for entrepreneurship,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1316–1330, 2019.
Z. Y. Kalender, E. Marshman, C. D. Schunn, T. J. Nokes-Malach, and C. Singh, “Gendered patterns in the construction of physics identity from motivational factors,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, p. 20119, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020119.
G. Zhou, J. Xu, and D. Martinovic, “Developing pre-service teachers’ capacity in teaching science with technology through microteaching lesson study approach,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–103, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00605a.
K. A. Anderson, M. Crespi, and E. C. Sayre, “Linking behavior in the physics education research coauthorship network,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010121.
I. Eilks, “Science education and education for sustainable development - justifications, models, practices and perspectives,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 149–158, 2015, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a.
T. Jagušt, I. Botički, and H. ‐J. So, “A review of research on bridging the gap between formal and informal learning with technology in primary school contexts,” J Comput Assist Learn, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12252.
K. D. Hambala, E. C. G. Lopez, D. C. Cobrado, G. B. Naparan, G. L. Dela, and A. J. D. Tantog, “Exploring the Pa rents ’ Disciplinary Strategies t o Promote Children ’ s Learning Interest,” Edukasiana J. Inov. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 237–250, 2023, doi: 10.56916/ejip.v2i4.437.
Y. Supriani, H. Basri, and A. Suhartini, “Leadership Role in the Formation of Students ’ Morals,” Munaddhomah J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 528–538, 2023.
R. Hidayat, Z. Moosavi, Hermandra, Zulhafizh, and P. Hadisaputra, “Achievement goals, well-being and lifelong learning: A mediational analysis,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 89–112, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.1516a.
A. L. Traxler, X. C. Cid, J. Blue, and R. Barthelemy, “Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020114.
H. Mulang, A. Halim, and P. Kusuma, “Exploring the Implementation of Ethical and Spiritual Values in High School Education : A Case Study in Makassar , Indonesia,” Soc. Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023.
Asrial, Syahrial, Maison, Muhaimin, and D. A. Kurniawan, “E-assessment for characters independence,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 125–141, 2020, doi: 10.3991/IJIM.V14I15.12995.
Y. Ariyana, A. Pudjiastuti, R. Bestary, and Zamroni, Learning Oriented Handbook on Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jakara: Ministry of Education and Culture, 2018.
D. L. Naryatmojo, “Internalization the Concept of Local Wisdom for Students in the Listening Class,” SSRN Electron. J., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 382–394, 2019, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3367656.
S. M. Shaharudin, N. A. Rajak, N. W. M. Junus, and N. A. Samat, “Development and validation of early childhood care and education pre-service lecturer instrument,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 188–194, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20415.
B. Nor, E. T. Djatmika, S. U. M. Widjaja, and H. Wahyono, “Development of Economic Learning Model Based on Pancasila Values,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 259–276, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15115a.
A. Madsen, S. B. McKagan, and E. C. Sayre, “How physics instruction impacts students’ beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2015, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010115.
Harun, A. Jaedun, Sudaryanti, and A. Manaf, “Dimensions of early childhood character education based on multicultural and community local wisdom,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 365–380, 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13225a.
R. S. Barthelemy, B. Van Dusen, and C. Henderson, “Physics education research: A research subfield of physics with gender parity,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2015, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020107.
J. Musengimana, E. Kampire, and P. Ntawiha, “Factors Affecting Secondary Schools Students ’ Attitudes toward Learning Chemistry : A Review of Literature,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/9379.
S. Levent, “Analysis of 5 th Grade Science Learning Outcomes and Exam Questions According to Revised Bloom Taxonomy,” J. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 2020, doi: 10.5296/jei.v6i1.16197.
B. R. Wilcox and H. J. Lewandowski, “Students’ views about the nature of experimental physics,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020110.
T. Tamrongkunanan and T. Tanitteerapan, “Development of required knowledge and skills among students through applied learning modules,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 695–714, 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13443a.
M. J. Camasso and R. Jagannathan, “Nurture thru Nature: Creating natural science identities in populations of disadvantaged children through community education partnership,” J. Environ. Educ., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 30–42, 2018, doi: 10.1080/00958964.2017.1357524.
C. Sin, “Student-centred learning and disciplinary enculturation: an exploration through physics,” Educ. Stud., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 351–368, 2015, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2015.1007925.
A. R. Samadov, “Problems of forming and developing person’s aesthetic ideal,” Int. J. Integr. Educ., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 132–137, 2019, doi: 10.31149/ijie.v2i6.222.
R. Bellová, D. Melicherčíková, and P. Tomčík, “Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., pp. 1–18, 2017, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656.
J. Wang, Z. Hazari, C. Cass, and R. Lock, “Episodic memories and the longitudinal impact of high school physics on female students’ physics identity,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 1543–1566, 2018, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1486522.
D. H. Halek, S. Budijanto, and D. H. Utomo, “Examination Improving Character towards Environment Care Through Their Creativity and Innovation at School (A Case Study at the Senior High School 3 Ternate City),” Eurasian J. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 96, pp. 82–101, 2021, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2021.96.6.
A. Sun and X. Chen, “Online education and its effective practice: A research review,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 15, no. 2016, pp. 157–190, 2016, doi: 10.28945/3502.
E. Istiyono, B. Kartowagiran, H. Retnawati, H. Cahyo Adi Kistoro, and H. Putranta, “Effective Teachers’ Personality in Strengthening Character Education.,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 512–521, 2021.
N. D. S. Chetty et al., “Learning styles and teaching styles determine students’ academic performances,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 610–615, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i3. 20345.
I. Hermawan, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed Method). Kuningan: Hidayatul Qur’an Kuningan, 2019.
J. W. Creswell, Research Design Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.
T. R. Tretter, Y. Ardasheva, J. A. Morrison, and A. Karin Roo, “Strengthening science attitudes for newcomer middle school english learners: visually enriched integrated science and language instruction,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1015–1037, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1585993.
L. Huang, F. Huang, and P. T. Oon, “Constructs Evaluation of Student Attitudes towards Science,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 15, no. 12, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109168.
O. Kosenchuk, O. Shumakova, A. Zinich, S. Shelkovnikov, and A. Poltarykhin, “The development of agriculture in agricultural areas of Siberia: Multifunctional character, environmental aspects,” J. Environ. Manag. Tour., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 991–1001, 2019, doi: 10.14505/jemt.v10.5(37).06.
G. Toli and M. Kallery, “Enhancing Student Interest to Promote Learning in Science : The Case of the Concept of Energy,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 220, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050220.
Z. B. Takaoğlu, “Energy concept understanding of high school students: A cross-grade study,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 653–660, 2018, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2018.060409.
K. C. Margot and T. Kettler, “Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.
M. B. Weissman, “Policy recommendations from causal inference in physics education research,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 20118, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020118.
A. J. Gonsalves, A. Danielsson, and H. Pettersson, “Masculinities and experimental practices in physics: The view from three case studies,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020120.
L. S. Keiler, “Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6.
G. Ocak, “A Model for Determining Students ’ and Teachers ’ Perspectives on the Turkish 11 th Grade English Language Curriculum in Terms of Achieved Learning Outcomes,” J. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 184–200, 2021, doi: 10.5296/jei.v7i1.18313.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ria Ambarwati, Elwells B. Ulla, Mehdi Tajaddini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
