Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education
Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

SINTA

2.396

Impact

Gscholar

11

H-Index

Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

Strong Equivalence Principle: Violations without Failure a PPN Classroom Framework with a Brans–Dicke Counterexample

Michael Aaron Cody
Independent Theorist
United States
Mac92contact@gmail.com
Share

  • Purpose of the study: The study aims to clarify that the Strong Equivalence Principle (SEP) is sufficient but not necessary for reproducing classical solar-system tests of gravity. The framework targets persistent student misconceptions, offering instructors a concise way to separate principles from observations.

    Methodology: The analysis applies the standard parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism focusing on parameters γ and β. Worked examples from Brans–Dicke theory illustrate explicit predictions when γ ≠ 1. A concise three-stage instructional sequence, introducing γ and β, analyzing the Brans–Dicke counterexample, and interpreting the resulting parameter-space diagram, serves as the pedagogical intervention guiding students in distinguishing sufficiency from necessity within gravitational theory.

    Main Findings: Results confirm that SEP enforces γ=β=1, while experimental constraints allow small deviations. Brans–Dicke theory with finite coupling demonstrates that SEP violations can still pass key solar-system tests: light deflection, Shapiro delay, and perihelion advance. Classroom diagrams and exercises show students how alternative theories succeed observationally, even when SEP is not strictly satisfied, thereby correcting misconceptions.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The study reframes established theoretical results into a compact pedagogical tool. Unlike prior treatments that present SEP as both sufficient and necessary, this approach emphasizes the logical distinction and demonstrates it with concrete counterexamples. Its originality lies in providing classroom-ready illustrations and tasks, equipping instructors to teach SEP more accurately and address misconceptions effectively.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    M. A. Cody, “Strong Equivalence Principle: Violations without Failure a PPN Classroom Framework with a Brans–Dicke Counterexample ”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 240–247, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v6i4.2174.

    More Citation Formats

  • 278
    Abstract views
    209
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. Einstein, "Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen," Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik, vol. 4, 1907, pp. 411–462, doi: 10.1007/978-3-322-83770-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83770-7
    2. R. H. Dicke, "The Theoretical Significance of Experimental Relativity," in Relativity, Groups and Topology, C. DeWitt and B. DeWitt, Eds. New York: Gordon and Breach, 2019, pp. 165–313, doi: 10.1007/s10714-019-2509-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-019-2509-2
    3. F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington, and C. Davidson, "A determination of the deflection of light by the Sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of 29 May 1919," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 220, 1920, pp. 291–333, doi: 10.1098/rsta.1920.0009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1920.0009
    4. D. E. Lebach, B. E. Corey, I. I. Shapiro, M. I. Ratner, J. C. Webber, A. E. E. Rogers, J. L. Davis, and T. A. Herring, "Measurement of the solar gravitational deflection of radio waves using very–long–baseline interferometry," Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, no. 8, 1995, pp. 1439–1442, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1439
    5. L. I. Schiff, "On experimental tests of the general theory of relativity," American Journal of Physics, vol. 28, 1960, pp. 340–343, doi: 10.1119/1.1935800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1935800
    6. E. F. Taylor and J. A. Wheeler, Spacetime Physics, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, 1992, https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Spacetime_Physics.html?id=PDA8YcvMc_QC&redir_esc=y.
    7. C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993, https://inspirehep.net/literature/1700339.
    8. C. M. Will, "The Confrontation Between General relativity and experiment," Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 9, 2006, p. 3, doi: 10.12942/lrr-2006-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2006-3
    9. C. M. Will, "The Confrontation Between General relativity and experiment," Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 17, 2014, article 4, doi: 10.12942/lrr-2014-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2014-4
    10. C. M. Will, "Theory and experiment in gravitational physics: update," Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 68, 2018, pp. 1–33, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020553.
    11. Gaia Collaboration, "Astrometric tests of general relativity with Gaia EDR3," Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 666, 2023, A43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243473
    12. T. Damour, "Testing the equivalence principle: why and how?," Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 13, 1996, pp. A33–A41, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/13/11A/005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/13/11A/005
    13. C. Singh, "Student difficulties with relativity and spacetime reasoning," Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 17, 2021, p. 010115, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010115
    14. D. Hestenes, "Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction," American Journal of Physics, vol. 55, no. 5, 1987, pp. 440–454, doi: 10.1119/1.15129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15129
    15. L. C. McDermott and E. F. Redish, "Resource letter: PER–1: Physics education research," American Journal of Physics, vol. 67, 1999, pp. 755–767, doi: 10.1119/1.19122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19122
    16. V. Otero, "Toward a model of physics teacher knowledge development," American Journal of Physics, vol. 84, 2016, pp. 472–480, doi: 10.1119/1.4947152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4947152
    17. H. C. Ohanian, "What is the principle of equivalence?," American Journal of Physics, vol. 45, no. 10, 1977, pp. 903–909, doi: 10.1119/1.10903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.10744
    18. R. Resnick, Introduction to Special Relativity. New York, NY: Wiley, 1968, https://cas.web.cern.ch/previous-schools.
    19. K. Nordtvedt, "Equivalence principle for massive bodies. I. Phenomenology," Physical Review, vol. 169, 1968, pp. 1014–1016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.169.1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.169.1014
    20. T. Damour and K. Nordtvedt, "General relativity as a cosmological attractor of tensor–scalar theories," Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, 1993, pp. 2217–2219, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2217
    21. E. B. Fomalont and S. M. Kopeikin, "The measurement of the light deflection from Jupiter: experimental results," Astrophysical Journal, vol. 598, 2003, pp. 704–711, doi: 10.1086/378785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/378785
    22. I. I. Shapiro, "Fourth test of general relativity," Physical Review Letters, vol. 13, 1964, pp. 789–791, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.789
    23. B. Bertotti, L. Iess, and P. Tortora, "A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft," Nature, vol. 425, 2003, pp. 374–376, doi: 10.1038/nature01997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01997
    24. G. M. Clemence, "The relativity effect in planetary motions," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 19, 1947, pp. 361–364, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.19.361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.19.361
    25. J. G. Williams, S. G. Turyshev, and D. H. Boggs, "Progress in lunar laser ranging tests of relativistic gravity," Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, 2004, p. 261101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.261101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.261101
    26. C. M. Will, "Theoretical frameworks for testing relativistic gravity. II. Parametrized post–Newtonian hydrodynamics, and the Nordtvedt effect," Astrophysical Journal, vol. 163, 1971, pp. 611–628, doi: 10.1086/150804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/150804
    27. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. New York, NY: Wiley, 1972, https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TrhCEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=%5B27%5D%09S.+Weinberg,+Gravitation+and+Cosmology:+Principles+and+Applications+of+the+General+Theory+of+Relativity.+New+York,+NY:+Wiley,+1972&ots=m3Y5mVA5w8&sig=RMkaMtMp3OMjNLieGDeFeBzMouk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
    28. C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, "Mach's principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation," Physical Review, vol. 124, 1961, pp. 925–935, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.124.925
    29. P. Jordan, "Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Diracschen kosmologischen Hypothesen," Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 157, 1959, pp. 112–121, doi: 10.1007/BF01375040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01375155
    30. M. Fierz, "On the physical interpretation of P. Jordan's extended theory of gravitation," Helvetica Physica Acta, vol. 29, 1956, pp. 128–134, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-the-physical-interpretation-of-P.Jordan's-theory-Fierz/c0ea3d552174b740ef8f28dd4b838ce8d6469683
    31. W. Scherrer, "Über die verallgemeinerte Feldgleichung der Gravitation," Helvetica Physica Acta, vol. 14, 1941, pp. 81–83, doi: 10.1515/zna-1947-0102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1947-0102
    32. T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, "f(R) theories of gravity," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, 2010, pp. 451–497, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451
    33. T. Clifton, "Modified gravity and cosmology," Physics Reports, vol. 876, 2020, pp. 1–80, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.005
    34. T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farèse, "Tensor–multi–scalar theories of gravitation," Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 9, 1992, pp. 2093–2176, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/9/9/015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/9/9/015
    35. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, 1973, https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Gravitation.html?id=zAAuDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
    36. Y. Fujii and K. Maeda, The Scalar–Tensor Theory of Gravitation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003, https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/11590/sample/9780521811590ws.pdf.