Strong Equivalence Principle: Violations without Failure a PPN Classroom Framework with a Brans–Dicke Counterexample
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The study aims to clarify that the Strong Equivalence Principle (SEP) is sufficient but not necessary for reproducing classical solar-system tests of gravity. The framework targets persistent student misconceptions, offering instructors a concise way to separate principles from observations.
Methodology: The analysis applies the standard parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism focusing on parameters γ and β. Worked examples from Brans–Dicke theory illustrate explicit predictions when γ ≠ 1. A concise three-stage instructional sequence, introducing γ and β, analyzing the Brans–Dicke counterexample, and interpreting the resulting parameter-space diagram, serves as the pedagogical intervention guiding students in distinguishing sufficiency from necessity within gravitational theory.
Main Findings: Results confirm that SEP enforces γ=β=1, while experimental constraints allow small deviations. Brans–Dicke theory with finite coupling demonstrates that SEP violations can still pass key solar-system tests: light deflection, Shapiro delay, and perihelion advance. Classroom diagrams and exercises show students how alternative theories succeed observationally, even when SEP is not strictly satisfied, thereby correcting misconceptions.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The study reframes established theoretical results into a compact pedagogical tool. Unlike prior treatments that present SEP as both sufficient and necessary, this approach emphasizes the logical distinction and demonstrates it with concrete counterexamples. Its originality lies in providing classroom-ready illustrations and tasks, equipping instructors to teach SEP more accurately and address misconceptions effectively.
References
A. Einstein, "Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen," Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik, vol. 4, 1907, pp. 411–462, doi: 10.1007/978-3-322-83770-7.
R. H. Dicke, "The Theoretical Significance of Experimental Relativity," in Relativity, Groups and Topology, C. DeWitt and B. DeWitt, Eds. New York: Gordon and Breach, 2019, pp. 165–313, doi: 10.1007/s10714-019-2509-2.
F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington, and C. Davidson, "A determination of the deflection of light by the Sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of 29 May 1919," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 220, 1920, pp. 291–333, doi: 10.1098/rsta.1920.0009.
D. E. Lebach, B. E. Corey, I. I. Shapiro, M. I. Ratner, J. C. Webber, A. E. E. Rogers, J. L. Davis, and T. A. Herring, "Measurement of the solar gravitational deflection of radio waves using very–long–baseline interferometry," Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, no. 8, 1995, pp. 1439–1442, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1439.
L. I. Schiff, "On experimental tests of the general theory of relativity," American Journal of Physics, vol. 28, 1960, pp. 340–343, doi: 10.1119/1.1935800.
E. F. Taylor and J. A. Wheeler, Spacetime Physics, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, 1992, https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Spacetime_Physics.html?id=PDA8YcvMc_QC&redir_esc=y.
C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993, https://inspirehep.net/literature/1700339.
C. M. Will, "The Confrontation Between General relativity and experiment," Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 9, 2006, p. 3, doi: 10.12942/lrr-2006-3.
C. M. Will, "The Confrontation Between General relativity and experiment," Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 17, 2014, article 4, doi: 10.12942/lrr-2014-4.
C. M. Will, "Theory and experiment in gravitational physics: update," Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 68, 2018, pp. 1–33, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020553.
Gaia Collaboration, "Astrometric tests of general relativity with Gaia EDR3," Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 666, 2023, A43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243473.
T. Damour, "Testing the equivalence principle: why and how?," Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 13, 1996, pp. A33–A41, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/13/11A/005.
C. Singh, "Student difficulties with relativity and spacetime reasoning," Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 17, 2021, p. 010115, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010115.
D. Hestenes, "Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction," American Journal of Physics, vol. 55, no. 5, 1987, pp. 440–454, doi: 10.1119/1.15129.
L. C. McDermott and E. F. Redish, "Resource letter: PER–1: Physics education research," American Journal of Physics, vol. 67, 1999, pp. 755–767, doi: 10.1119/1.19122.
V. Otero, "Toward a model of physics teacher knowledge development," American Journal of Physics, vol. 84, 2016, pp. 472–480, doi: 10.1119/1.4947152.
H. C. Ohanian, "What is the principle of equivalence?," American Journal of Physics, vol. 45, no. 10, 1977, pp. 903–909, doi: 10.1119/1.10903.
R. Resnick, Introduction to Special Relativity. New York, NY: Wiley, 1968, https://cas.web.cern.ch/previous-schools.
K. Nordtvedt, "Equivalence principle for massive bodies. I. Phenomenology," Physical Review, vol. 169, 1968, pp. 1014–1016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.169.1014.
T. Damour and K. Nordtvedt, "General relativity as a cosmological attractor of tensor–scalar theories," Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, 1993, pp. 2217–2219, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2217.
E. B. Fomalont and S. M. Kopeikin, "The measurement of the light deflection from Jupiter: experimental results," Astrophysical Journal, vol. 598, 2003, pp. 704–711, doi: 10.1086/378785.
I. I. Shapiro, "Fourth test of general relativity," Physical Review Letters, vol. 13, 1964, pp. 789–791, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.789.
B. Bertotti, L. Iess, and P. Tortora, "A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft," Nature, vol. 425, 2003, pp. 374–376, doi: 10.1038/nature01997.
G. M. Clemence, "The relativity effect in planetary motions," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 19, 1947, pp. 361–364, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.19.361.
J. G. Williams, S. G. Turyshev, and D. H. Boggs, "Progress in lunar laser ranging tests of relativistic gravity," Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, 2004, p. 261101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.261101.
C. M. Will, "Theoretical frameworks for testing relativistic gravity. II. Parametrized post–Newtonian hydrodynamics, and the Nordtvedt effect," Astrophysical Journal, vol. 163, 1971, pp. 611–628, doi: 10.1086/150804.
S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. New York, NY: Wiley, 1972, https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TrhCEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=%5B27%5D%09S.+Weinberg,+Gravitation+and+Cosmology:+Principles+and+Applications+of+the+General+Theory+of+Relativity.+New+York,+NY:+Wiley,+1972&ots=m3Y5mVA5w8&sig=RMkaMtMp3OMjNLieGDeFeBzMouk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, "Mach's principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation," Physical Review, vol. 124, 1961, pp. 925–935, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.925.
P. Jordan, "Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Diracschen kosmologischen Hypothesen," Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 157, 1959, pp. 112–121, doi: 10.1007/BF01375040.
M. Fierz, "On the physical interpretation of P. Jordan's extended theory of gravitation," Helvetica Physica Acta, vol. 29, 1956, pp. 128–134, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-the-physical-interpretation-of-P.Jordan's-theory-Fierz/c0ea3d552174b740ef8f28dd4b838ce8d6469683
W. Scherrer, "Über die verallgemeinerte Feldgleichung der Gravitation," Helvetica Physica Acta, vol. 14, 1941, pp. 81–83, doi: 10.1515/zna-1947-0102.
T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, "f(R) theories of gravity," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, 2010, pp. 451–497, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451.
T. Clifton, "Modified gravity and cosmology," Physics Reports, vol. 876, 2020, pp. 1–80, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.005.
T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farèse, "Tensor–multi–scalar theories of gravitation," Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 9, 1992, pp. 2093–2176, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/9/9/015.
C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, 1973, https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Gravitation.html?id=zAAuDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Y. Fujii and K. Maeda, The Scalar–Tensor Theory of Gravitation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003, https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/11590/sample/9780521811590ws.pdf.
Copyright (c) 2025 Michael Aaron Cody
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
