Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education
Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

SINTA

2.396

Impact

Gscholar

11

H-Index

Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

Teachers' Perceptions of the Physics Learning Process Using the Direct Instruction Model in Junior High Schools

Resky Yani
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Massassar
Indonesia
reskyyani1@gmail.com
Ismail Ismail
Senior High School 1 Jeneponto
Indonesia
Sing Huat Poh
University of Brunei Darussalam ROR
Brunei Darussalam
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to identify teachers' perceptions of the physics learning process using the direct instruction model at senior high school 1 Jeneponto.

    Methodology: This research is a qualitative research that produces data presented in narrative form and describes what is from a variable, symptom or condition and does not intend to test the hypothesis. The data sources in this study were three physics teachers at senior high school 1 Jeneponto.

    Main Findings: The results of the study showed that students and physics teachers of senior high school 1 Jeneponto have a positive perception of the Direct Instruction learning model. Teachers apply the Direct Instruction learning model according to the steps in the theory, while some teachers do not implement the steps of the direct instruction learning model in the practical section because there are no practical tools for class XII material, teachers have prepared the things needed in learning, teachers have the ability to teach according to the existing theory. By using this direct instruction learning model, students have been able to achieve several achievements and have played an active role in learning.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in revealing physics teachers' contextual perceptions of the Direct Instruction model through a qualitative approach. Despite limited practical tools, teachers strive to follow the model, positively impacting student engagement and achievement. This offers a fresh perspective on its real-world implementation rarely explored in prior studies.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    R. Yani, . I. Ismail, and S. H. Poh, “Teachers’ Perceptions of the Physics Learning Process Using the Direct Instruction Model in Junior High Schools”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 129–134, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v6i2.1824.

    More Citation Formats

  • 186
    Abstract views
    167
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Suliani, “Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Penggunaan Alat Peraga dalam Pembelajaran Matematika [Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Teaching Aids in Mathematics Learning],” SJME (Supremum J. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 92–100, 2020, doi: 10.35706/sjme.v4i1.3143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v4i1.3143
    2. T. Noor, “Rumusan Tujuan Pendidikan Nasional Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional No 20 Tahun 2013 Melalui Pendekatan Nilai-Nilai Yang Terkandung Dalam Ayat 30 Surah Ar-Ruum dan Ayat 172 Surah Al-‘Araaf [Formulation of National Education Goals Article 3,” Univ. Singaperbangsa Karawang, no. 20, pp. 123–144, 2018.
    3. F. Berthalita Pujaningsih, J. Lestari Tambunan, I. Sakti, and T. Haryanto Wibowo, “Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap lembar kerja berbasis proyek pada materi struktur kristal [Student perceptions of project-based worksheets on crystal structure material],” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Ter., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2022, doi: 10.46918/karst.v5i2.1565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46918/karst.v5i2.1565
    4. D. W. S. Rahadiyani, P. A. Rivani, and F. Untari, “Implementation of problem based learning model as an effort to improve student activities and outcomes in temperature and heat materials,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i1.292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i1.292
    5. R. Lee, K. Hoe Looi, M. Faulkner, and L. Neale, “The moderating influence of environment factors in an extended community of inquiry model of e-learning,” Asia Pacific J. Educ., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1758032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1758032
    6. A. M. Alzoebi, M. A. Ghunaimat, and E. A. Alawneh, “The effects of flipped classroom strategy based on ‘ADDIE model’ for algebraic skill development,” Anatol. J. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 141–158, 2023, doi: 10.29333/aje.2023.8110a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2023.8110a
    7. H. Sofyan, E. Anggereini, and J. Saadiah, “Development of e-modules based on local wisdom in central learning,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1137–1143, 2019, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1139
    8. S. Lestari, S. Mursali, and I. Royani, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran langsung berbasis praktikum terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa [The influence of the direct learning model based on practical work on students’ science process skills and critical thinking ab,” J. Ilm. Biol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 2018, doi: 10.33394/bioscientist.v6i1.2367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/bjib.v6i1.2367
    9. S. W. Octavia, N. Septiani, F. Sinaga, and N. N. Qoidah, “Analysis of the relationship in learning interest to learning outcomes static fluid material in senior high school,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 87, no. 1,2, pp. 149–200, 2023, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v7i1.26696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v7i1.26696
    10. Astalini, Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, S. W. Oktavia, E. Triani, and M. Z. Azzahra, “The exploration of character values in physics learning on momentum, impulse, and collision materials,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 277–284, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jere.v7i2.52381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i2.52381
    11. E. Kuswanto, “Peranan guru PAI dalam pendidikan akhlak di sekolah [The role of Islamic religious education teachers in moral education in schools],” MUDARRISA J. Islam. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 194, 2015, doi: 10.18326/mdr.v6i2.194-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/mdr.v6i2.764
    12. M. D. W. Ernawati, Sudarmin, Asrial, D. Muhammad, and Haryanto, “Creative thinking of chemistry and chemistry education students in biochemistry learning through problem based learing with scaffolding strategy,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 282–295, 2022, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v11i2.33842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.33842
    13. A. Astalini et al., “Identification of student character values in class X particle dynamics materials,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 380–388, 2023, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v8i3.3776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v8i3.3776
    14. T. Carmi and E. Tamir, “An emerging taxonomy explaining mentor-teachers’ role in student-teachers’ practicum: What they do and to what end?,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 128, p. 104121, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104121
    15. L. M. Hodgson and K. J. Wilkie, “Modelling lessons for more than imitation: investigating teachers’ reactions and decompositions of unfamiliar practices,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 749–775, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10857-021-09516-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09516-1
    16. R. Frei-Landau, L. Orland-Barak, and Y. Muchnick-Rozonov, “What’s in it for the observer? Mimetic aspects of learning through observation in simulation-based learning in teacher education,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 113, p. 103682, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103682
    17. M. Chu, “A preliminary study of model-generated speech,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 3104, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ app14073104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14073104
    18. M. G. Fiorentino and A. Montone, “Learning the Mathematical Discussion ( MD ) Pedagogical Model in and from Practice : The Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers in a Technological Environment,” no. Md, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060653
    19. G. M. Tinungki et al., “Exploring the team-assisted individualization cooperative learning to enhance mathematical problem solving, communication and self-proficiency in teaching non-parametric statistics,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2381333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2381333
    20. Endang Indarini, “Dampak Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Abad 21 (4 C) di Sekolah Dasar,” Satya Widya, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 73–87, 2024, doi: 10.24246/j.sw.2024.v40.i1.p73-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2024.v40.i1.p73-87
    21. T. Aytaç and S. S. Kula, “The Effect of Student-Centered Approaches on Students’ Creative Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis Study.,” Int. J. Contemp. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 62–80, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.723894
    22. M. S. Sarumaha and R. E. Laiya, “Teachers ’ Ability to Construct Learning Through the Scramble Learning Model Approach in Schools,” Tafkir Interdiscip. J. Islam. Educ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 577–589, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v4i4.709
    23. H. M. Asim, A. Vaz, A. Ahmed, and S. Sadiq, “A review on outcome based education and factors that impact student learning outcomes in tertiary education system,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 1, 2021, doi: 10.5539/ies.v14n2p1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n2p1
    24. A. Hidayatulloh, “Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Fisika Materi Elastisitas Dan Hukum Hooke Dalam Penyelesaian Soal – Soal Fisika,” Kappa J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 2020, doi: 10.29408/kpj.v4i1.1636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/kpj.v4i1.1636
    25. Nadirah, A. D. R. Pramana, and N. Zari, “METODOLOGI PENELITIAN Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Mix Method (Mengelola,” 2022.
    26. S. W. Oktavia, H. Mansur, and M.Hidayat, “Investigasi Keterampilan Mengajar Guru Fisika di SMA N 9 Kerinci,” J. Relativ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/relativitas.v6i1.7110
    27. J. Jalwis and N. Habibi, “Konstruk Pendidikan Multikultural (Studi Urgensi Integrasi Nilai-nilai Multikultural dalam Kurikulum Pendidikan),” Tarbawi J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233–247, 2019, doi: 10.32939/tarbawi.v15i02.453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32939/tarbawi.v15i02.453
    28. E. F. S. Rini and F. T. Aldila, “Practicum activity: analysis of science process skills and students’ critical thinking skills,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–61, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i2.322
    29. C. Andrade, “The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples,” Indian J. Psychol. Med., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 86–88, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0253717620977000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000
    30. A. Abbas and M. Yusuf Hidayat, “Faktor-Faktor Kesulitan Belajar Fisika Pada Peserta Didik Kelas IPA Sekolah Menengah Atas,” JPF (Jurnal Pendidik. Fis. Univ. Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 2018, doi: 10.24252/jpf.v6i1a8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v6i1a8
    31. S. Saharuddin and M. Wahab, “Analisis Kesulitan Dalam Pemebelajaran Ipa Di Smp Negeri Limboro,” J. IPA Terpadu, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 75–83, 2019, doi: 10.35580/ipaterpadu.v2i2.11148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35580/ipaterpadu.v2i2.11148
    32. A. Baltacı, “Nitel Veri Analizinde Miles-Huberman Modeli,” Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sos. Bilim. Enstitüsü Derg., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2017.
    33. S. Ahn, M. Choi, J. Lee, J. Kim, and S. Chung, “Non-Contact Fall Detection System Using 4D Imaging Radar for Elderly Safety Based on a CNN Model,” pp. 1–21, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202504.0809.v1
    34. R. Hiyasat and L. Luyten, “Integrating Virtual Reality to Enhance Thermal Comfort in Educational Spaces : A Pilot Study Towards Sustainable Learning Environments,” pp. 1–28, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115033
    35. I. Kliziene, G. Cizauskas, S. Sipaviciene, R. Aleksandraviciene, and K. Zaicenkoviene, “Effects of a physical education program on physical activity and emotional well-being among primary school children,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147536
    36. J. G. Djokoto, P. Pomeyie, and C. A. Wongnaa, “Foreign direct investment in food manufacturing and stages of human development,” Cogent Econ. Financ., vol. 11, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2023.2267738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2267738
    37. Y. Liu, Q. Wei, W. Wang, L. Zhao, and N. Hu, “Multiscale modeling and data-driven life prediction of kinematic interface behaviors in mechanical drive systems,” Coatings, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1–33, 2025, doi: 10.3390/coatings15060660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15060660
    38. E. Hasanah, A. Destya, I. Kusumawati, and A. Limba, “The Mediating Role of Student Independence on Graduate Quality in Distributed Learning Enung,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 61–82, 2022, doi: 10.4135/9781483318332.n114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1524a
    39. A. Nigam, R. Pasricha, T. Singh, and P. Churi, “A systematic review on ai-based proctoring systems: past, present and future,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 6421–6445, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10597-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10597-x
    40. R. Bellová, D. Melicherčíková, and P. Tomčík, “Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., pp. 1–18, 2017, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656
    41. H. T. Thuy and H. D. Thuy-Ha, “STEM education in non-formal learning institutions in ethnic monority and mountainous areas: A look from Ha Giang city’s community learning centre,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1340, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012033
    42. E. W. Simamora, “The effect of student team achievement division cooperative learning on the concept understanding ability of mathematic,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Humanit. Res., vol. 104, no. 22, pp. 407–411, 2017, doi: 10.2991/aisteel-17.2017.87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-17.2017.87
    43. E. Yanti, D. Hermon, E. Barlian, I. Dewata, and I. Umar, “Directions for sanitation-based environmental structuring using ahp for the prevention of diarrhea in Pagar Alam city - Indonesia,” Int. J. Manag. Humanit., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 25–29, 2020, doi: 10.35940/ijmh.i0848.054920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.I0848.054920