Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education
Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

SINTA

2.396

Impact

Gscholar

11

H-Index

Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

A Computational Revisit of the Variational Principle: Estimating Ground State Energies of the 1D Harmonic Oscillator via Python

Bikash Kumar Naik
Government Polytechnic, Darlipali, Dist-Sundargarh
India
bknaik999@gmail.com
Share

  • Purpose of the study:To estimate the ground state energy of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using the variational principle and Python-based numerical methods.

    Methodology:Python 3.11 was used with NumPy, SciPy, and Matplotlib libraries. The variational method was applied using multiple trial wavefunctions. Integrals were computed via Simpson’s rule, and optimization was done through parameter scanning.

    Main Findings:The Gaussian trial wavefunction produced a ground state energy of 0.5003 ℏω, showing 0.06% error. Other trial functions were less accurate. The results confirm that the choice of trial function critically affects the energy estimate, and Python effectively supports variational computations in quantum systems.

    Novelty/Originality of this study:This study integrates computational tools with the variational principle, presenting an accessible approach to energy estimation in quantum mechanics. It demonstrates how Python can facilitate variational analysis, making the method replicable and educationally useful for students and researchers.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    B. K. Naik, “A Computational Revisit of the Variational Principle: Estimating Ground State Energies of the 1D Harmonic Oscillator via Python”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 43–63, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v6i2.1680.

    More Citation Formats

  • 635
    Abstract views
    219
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. S. Gevorkyan and A. V. Bogdanov, “Time-dependent 4D quantum harmonic oscillator and reacting hydrogen atom,” Symmetry, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 252, 2023, doi: 10.3390/sym15010252.
    2. M. Calvanese Strinati and C. Conti, “Non-Gaussianity in the quantum parametric oscillator,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 109, no. 6, Art. no. 063519, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.109.063519.
    3. J.-M. Lihm and C.-H. Park, “Gaussian time-dependent variational principle for the finite-temperature anharmonic lattice dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Research, vol. 3, no. L032017, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032017.
    4. S. S. Coelho, L. Queiroz, and D. T. Alves, “Exact solution of a time-dependent quantum harmonic oscillator with two frequency jumps via the Lewis–Riesenfeld dynamical invariant method,” Entropy, vol. 24, no. 12, p. 1851, 2022, doi: 10.3390/e24121851.
    5. J. S. Kottmann, S. Alperin-Lea, T. Tamayo-Mendoza, et al., “Tequila: A platform for rapid development of quantum algorithms,” Quantum Sci. Technol, vol. 6, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1088/2058-9565/abe567.
    6. W. Li, J. Allcock, L. Cheng, et al., “TenCirChem: An efficient quantum computational chemistry package for the NISQ era,” J. Chem. Theory Comput, vol. 19, no. 13, 2023, doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00319 .
    7. D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.
    8. Python Software Foundation, "Python Language Reference, Version 3.10," available online: https://docs.python.org/3/, 2024.
    9. B. Kumar Naik, “Solution for simple classical systems using SCILAB,” Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1142/S2661339522500147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2661339522500147
    10. S. V. R. Raghavan and V. Iyer, " Implementation details of a variational method to solve the time independent Schrödinger equation," Revista Mexicana de Física E, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 201-206, 2017.
    11. N. Yuki, "Quantum Mechanics with Python: Solving the 1D Time Independent Schrödinger Equation," Medium, 2020.
    12. S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, “Quantum computational chemistry,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 92, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015003.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015003
    13. G. Devillanova, F. G., and F. and Maddalena, “Variational functionals for the driven quantum harmonic oscillator,” Complex Var. Elliptic Equations, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 312–335, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1080/17476933.2020.1720006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17476933.2020.1720006
    14. L.-X. Cheng and D.-B. Zhang, “Variational quantum simulation of ground states and thermal states for lattice gauge theory with multi-objective optimization,” Phys. Lett. A, vol. 546, p. 130516, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130516
    15. B. K. Naik, "Understanding oscillation using Scilab graphs," Phys. Teach, vol. 62, pp. 58–61, 2024, doi: 10.1119/5.0123308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0123308
    16. S. Chowdhury, “Variational Monte Carlo Method Applied to Ground State of Simple Harmonic Oscillator Using Acceptance-Rejection Sampling Utilizing Mathematica BT - Monte Carlo Methods Utilizing Mathematica®: Applications in Inverse Transform and Acceptance-Rejection Sampling,” S. Chowdhury, Ed., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 111–131. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-23294-7_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23294-7_5
    17. H. Singh, S. Majumder, and S. Mishra, “Benchmarking of different optimizers in the variational quantum algorithms for applications in quantum chemistry,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 159, no. 4, p. 44117, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0161057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0161057
    18. D. Bertram, “Numerical Methods in Quantum Propagation,” Fisica.Uniud.It, no. 19, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://www.fisica.uniud.it/~giannozz/Corsi/MQ/LectureNotes/mq.pdf
    19. J. R. Trail, “Heavy-tailed random error in quantum Monte Carlo,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 77, no. 1, p. 16703, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.016703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.016703
    20. N. Moll et al., “Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices,” Quantum Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.1088/2058-9565/aab822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aab822
    21. T. A. Walker and S. L. Braunstein, “Five-wave-packet linear optics quantum-error-correcting code,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 81, no. 6, p. 62305, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.062305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.062305
    22. M. J. Koh, R. K. M. Khan, S. Torker, M. Yu, M. S. Mikus, and A. H. Hoveyda, “High-value alcohols and higher-oxidation-state compounds by catalytic Z-selective cross-metathesis,” Nature, vol. 517, no. 7533, pp. 181–186, 2015, doi: 10.1038/nature14061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14061
    23. J.-M. Lihm and C.-H. Park, “Gaussian time-dependent variational principle for the finite-temperature anharmonic lattice dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, p. L032017, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L032017
    24. A. S. Gevorkyan and A. V. Bogdanov, “Time-dependent 4D quantum harmonic oscillator and reacting hydrogen atom,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 252, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/sym15010252.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010252
    25. M. Calvanese Strinati and C. Conti, “Non-Gaussianity in the quantum parametric oscillator,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 109, no. 6, p. 63519, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.109.063519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.063519
    26. S. S. Coelho, L. Queiroz, and D. T. Alves, “Exact solution of a time-dependent quantum harmonic oscillator with two frequency jumps via the lewis–riesenfeld dynamical invariant method,” Entropy, vol. 24, no. 12, p. 1851, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/e24121851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e24121851
    27. J. S. Kottmann et al., “TEQUILA: a platform for rapid development of quantum algorithms,” Quantum Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 24009, 2021, doi: 10.1088/2058-9565/abe567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abe567
    28. W. Li et al., “TenCirChem: An Efficient Quantum Computational Chemistry Package for the NISQ Era,” J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 3966–3981, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00319
    29. W. van Dijk and F. M. Toyama, “Accurate numerical solutions of the time-dependent Schr"odinger equation,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 75, no. 3, p. 36707, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.036707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.036707
    30. G. K. Krasin, S. I. Kudryashov, P. A. Danilov, N. A. Smirnov, A. O. Levchenko, and M. S. Kovalev, “Correction to: ultrashort-laser electron–hole plasma and intragap states in diamond,” Eur. Phys. J. D, vol. 75, no. 9, p. 254, 2021, doi: 10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00257-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00257-7
    31. M. Reh, M. Schmitt, and M. Gärttner, “Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Open Quantum Systems with Artificial Neural Networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 127, no. 23, p. 230501, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.230501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.230501
    32. P. Bermejo and R. Orús, “Variational quantum non-orthogonal optimization,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 9840, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37068-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37068-2