Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education
Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

SINTA

2.396

Impact

Gscholar

11

H-Index

Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

Teaching Motion Concepts through Pokemon Unite: Students’ Acceptance and Experiences

Joje Mar Sanchez ORCID
Cebu Normal University ROR
Philippines
sanchezj@cnu.edu.ph
Share

  • Purpose of this study: This study aims to improve student learning outcomes and engagement by investigating the integration of Pokémon Unite into Physics instruction..

    Methodology: In this mixed-methods study, thirty Cebu City 12th graders were taught motion-related physics principles via Pokémon Unite. The game's acceptability and efficacy were evaluated using surveys and interviews. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, guaranteeing truthful responses and data integrity.

    Main Findings: Results showed high student acceptance, bolstered by the game’s engaging gameplay and skillful use of Physics concepts. Students praised the game’s enjoyment, relevance, effectiveness, and engagement as a satisfying tool reflected in Physics teaching. Students' good experiences are further clarified through qualitative analysis, highlighting themes like immersive learning environments, collaborative problem-solving, personalized learning, enhanced motivation and interest, and real-world application of physics principles. These results highlight the potential of digital game-based learning in physics education and suggest additional studies and innovative strategies to improve student outcomes.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study showed that Pokémon Unite is a useful teaching tool for Physics and has a high student acceptance and participation level. Through digital game-based learning, it provides fresh perspectives on individualized instruction, group problem-solving, and the practical application of physics ideas.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    J. M. Sanchez, “Teaching Motion Concepts through Pokemon Unite: Students’ Acceptance and Experiences”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 98–106, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v5i3.1076.

    More Citation Formats

  • 675
    Abstract views
    358
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. Y. L. Tsai, and C. C. Tsai, “A meta-analysis of research on digital game-based science learning,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. vol. 280, pp. 280-294, 2020, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1253796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12430
    2. L. H. Wang, B. Chen, G. J. Hwang, J. Q. Guan, and Y. Q. Wang, “Effects of digital game-based STEM education on students’ learning achievement: A meta-analysis,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 9, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00344-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00344-0
    3. P. Kaimara, E. Fokides, A. Oikonomou, and I. Deliyannis, “Potential barriers to the implementation of digital game-based learning in the classroom: Pre-service teachers’ views,” Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 26, pp. 825-844, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10758-021-09512-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09512-7
    4. Y. H. Wang, “Integrating games, e-books and AR techniques to support project-based science learning,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 23, pp. 53-67, 2020. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26926426
    5. M. Prince, R. Felder, and R. Brent, “Active student engagement in online STEM classes: approaches and recommendations,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 8, pp. 1-25, 2020, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347513842_ACTIVE_STUDENT_ENGAGEMENT_IN_ONLINE_STEM_CLASSES_APPROACHES_AND_RECOMMENDATIONS
    6. T. H. Laine, and R. S. Lindberg, “Designing engaging games for education: A systematic literature review on game motivators and design principles,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 13, pp. 804-821, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2020.3018503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2020.3018503
    7. M. Thompson, C. Uz-Bilgin, M. S. Tutwiler, M. Anteneh, J. C. Meija, A. Wang, P. Tan, R. Eberhardt, D. Roy, J. Perry, and E. Klopfer, “Immersion positively affects learning in virtual reality games compared to equally interactive 2d games,” Information and Learning Sciences, vol. 122, pp. 442-463, 2020, doi: 10.1108/ILS-12-2020-0252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-12-2020-0252
    8. D. van Breukelen, “Design-based concept learning in physics education: electricity,” in Design-Based Concept Learning in Science and Technology Education, pp. 75-100, 2021, doi: 10.1163/9789004450004_005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004450004_005
    9. P. Y. Chen, G. J. Hwang, S. Y. Yeh, Y. T. Chen, T. W. Chen, and C. H. Chien, “Three decades of game-based learning in science and mathematics education: An integrated bibliometric analysis and systematic review,” Journal of Computers in Education, vol. 9, pp. 455-476, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40692-021-00210-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00210-y
    10. H. L. Chen, and C. T. Wu, “A digital role-playing game for learning: Effects on critical thinking and motivation,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, pp. 3018-3030, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1916765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1916765
    11. L. Kai, W. H. Tan, “Dimensions of interactive pervasive game design: Systematic review,” JMIR Serious Games, vol. 11, 2023, doi: 10.2196/42878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/42878
    12. E. N. Que, “Sustaining successful ICT integration in remote rural schools,” Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, vol. 29, pp. 1487-1506, 2021, doi: 10.47836/pjssh.29.3.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.3.02
    13. R. Alda, H. Boholano, and F. Dayagbil, “Teacher education institutions in the Philippines towards 4.0,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 19, pp. 137-154, 2020, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.19.8.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.8
    14. S. Umrani, S. Rajper, S. H. Talpur, I. A. Shah, and A. Shujrah, “Games based learning: a case of learning physics using Angry Birds,” Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 13, pp. 3778-3784, 2020, doi: 10.17485/IJST/v13i36.853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v13i36.853
    15. I. A. Rizki, H. V. Saphira, Y. Alfarizy, A. D. Saputri, R. Ramadani, and N. Suprapto, “Adventuring physics: Integration of adventure game and augmented reality based on android in physics learning,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 17, pp. 4-21, 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v17i01.35211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i01.35211
    16. M. Zafeiropoulou, C. Volioti, E. Keramopoulos, and T. Sapounidis, “Developing physics experiments using augmented reality game-based learning approach: a pilot study in primary school,” Computers, vol. 10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/computers10100126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10100126
    17. Z. Yıldırım, and M. Baran, “A comparative analysis of the effect of physical activity games and digital games on 9th grade students’ achievement in physics,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, pp. 543-563, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10280-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10280-7
    18. A. Cardinot, V. McCauley, and J. Fairfield, “Designing physics board games: a practical guide for educators,” Physics Education, vol. 57, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/ac4ac4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac4ac4
    19. V. Shute, S. Rahimi, G. Smith, F. Ke, R. Almond, C. Dai, R. Kuba, K. Liu, X. Yang, and C. Sun, “Maximizing learning without sacrificing the fun: Stealth assessment, adaptivity and learning supports in educational games,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 37, pp. 127-141, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12473
    20. H. Putranta, H. Kuswanto, M. Hajaroh, and S. I. A. Dwiningrum, “Strategies of physics learning based on traditional games in senior high schools during the Covid-19 pandemic,” Revista Mexicana de Física E, vol. 19, pp. 1-15, 2022, doi: 10.31349/RevMexFisE.19.010207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.19.010207
    21. J. Sjöberg, and E. Brooks, “Collaborative interactions in problem-solving activities: School children’s orientations while developing digital game designs using smart mobile technology,” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, vol. 33, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100456
    22. R. D. H. Jamalludin, and L. Nuraini, “The development of interactive learning media of parabolic motion lesson materials with patil lele traditional games,” Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 9, pp. 126-134, 2021, doi: 10.20527/bipf.v9i2.10399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i2.10399
    23. W. Rohlfs, C. H. Venner, M. Alarouri, D. J. G. Kuiphuis, and R. Kneer, “HeatQuiz: Combining flipped-classroom, game-based learning, and systematic problem analysis in heat transfer education,” International Heat Transfer Conference, vol. 17, 2023, doi: 10.1615/IHTC17.70-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1615/IHTC17.70-20
    24. K. Wattanatchariya, S. Chuchuaikam and N. Dejdumrong, "An educational game for learning wind and gravity theory on iOS: Drop donuts," 2011 Eighth International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, pp. 387-392, 2011, doi: 10.1109/JCSSE.2011.5930152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JCSSE.2011.5930152
    25. C. Liu, T. Ratanaolam, and K. Sriwisathiyakul, “Based on the learners’ needs of game based learning in Sanda teaching: a learner-centered approach”, Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, vol. 30, pp. 3995-4007, 2024, doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i6.6387.
    26. T. Katanosaka, M. Khan, and K. Sakamura, “PhyGame: An interactive and gamified learning support system for secondary physics education,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, vol. 15, pp. 84-94, 2024, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150611
    27. S. A. Ishak, R. Din, N. Othman, S. Gabarre, and U. A. Hasran, “Rethinking the ideology of using digital games to increase individual interest in STEM,” Sustainability, vol. 14, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14084519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084519
    28. M. A. Neroni, A. Oti, and N. Crilly, “Virtual reality design-build-test games with physics simulation: Opportunities for researching design cognition,” International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, vol. 9, pp. 139-173, 2021, doi: 10.1080/21650349.2021.1929500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2021.1929500
    29. C. H. Chen, K. Huang, and J. H. Liu, “Inquiry-enhanced digital game-based learning: effects on secondary students’ conceptual understanding in science, game performance, and behavioral patterns,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 29, pp. 319-330, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40299-019-00486-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00486-w
    30. H. Iida and M. N. A. Khalid, "Using games to study law of motions in mind," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 138701-138709, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012597
    31. F. Chaundhry, A. Bashir, K. ul Haq, and H. Riaz, “Comparative study on the digital game and computer simulation to curtail student's misconception about heat and temperature,” European Journal of Physics Education, vol. 12, pp. 1-10, 2021, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1413723.pdf
    32. H. Zeng, S. N. Zhou, G. R. Hong, Q. Y. Li, and S. Q. Xu, “Evaluation of interactive game-based learning in physics domain,” Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 19, pp. 484-498, 2020, doi: 10.33225/jbse/20.19.484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.484
    33. J. Wang, A. Stebbins, and R. E. Ferdig, “Examining the effects of students' self-efficacy and prior knowledge on learning and visual behavior in a physics game,” Computers & Education, vol. 178, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104405
    34. U. A. Deta, F. K. Kurniawan, N. A. Lestari, M. Yantidewi, M. N. R. Jauhariyah, and B. K. Prahani, “Literature review on the use of educational physics games in improving learning outcomes,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1805, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012038
    35. J. Y. Low, B. Balakrishnan, and M. I. H. Yaacob, “Game-based learning: current practices and perceptions of secondary school physics teachers in Malaysia,” The International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, vol. 31, 2023, doi: 10.18848/2327-7971/CGP/v31i01/1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7971/CGP/v31i01/1-21
    36. M. Ullah, S. U. Amin, M. Munsif, M. M. Yamin, U. Safaev, H. Khan, S. Khan, and H. Ullah, “Serious games in science education: a systematic literature,” Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, vol. 4, pp. 189-209, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.vrih.2022.02.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2022.02.001
    37. K. Rogers, S. Karaosmanoglu, M. Altmeyer, A. Suarez, and L. E. Nacke, “Much realistic, such wow! a systematic literature review of realism in digital games,” Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-21, 2022, doi: 10.1145/3491102.3501875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501875
    38. R. Yusnanto, and A. Rahayu, “Application of learning video based on visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles to increase thermodynamics learning motivation at Grade XI in high school,” 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities, pp. 1715-1719, 2022, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220404.278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220404.278
    39. H. Hermansyah, N. Nurhairunnisah, I. M. Sentaya, I. G. M. Sulindra, N. Andriani, and G. Gunawan, “The effect of physics virtual experiments on mastery concept based on students learning style,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1933, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012079
    40. Y. Wang, “Effects of augmented reality game-based learning on students’ engagement,” International Journal of Science Education, Part B, vol. 12, pp. 254-270, 2022, doi: 10.1080/21548455.2022.2072015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2072015
    41. M. D. C. Córdova Martínez, and R. Alfonte Zapana, “Collaborative game model for teaching physics using smartphone sensors,” Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Education and E-Learning, pp. 6-10, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3439147.3439153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3439147.3439153
    42. F. C. Wibowo, H. Nasbey, L. A. Sanjaya, and D. R. Darman, “Development of game open online physics instructional (GOOPI) for improving 21st-century careers: creativity skill (21-CC: CS),” International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 2625-2631, 2020, doi: 10.30534/ijatcse/2020/20932020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/20932020
    43. C. O. Amaefule, J. Breitwieser, D. Biedermann, L. Nobbe, H. Drachsler, and G. Brod, “Fostering children’s acceptance of educational apps: the importance of designing enjoyable learning activities,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 54, pp. 1351-1372, 2023, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13314
    44. V. Braun, and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 77-101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    45. N. Barz, M. Bernick, L. Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, and F. Perels, “The effect of digital game-based learning interventions on cognitive, metacognitive, and affective-motivational learning outcomes in school: a meta-analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 94, pp. 193-227, 2024, doi: 10.3102/00346543231167795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231167795
    46. F. M. D. Abenes, D. G. Caballes, and K. B. L. San Luis, “Assessment of students in digital game-based learning in teaching physics 7,” Automation and Autonomous System, vol. 12, pp. 62-69, 2020, doi: 10.36039/AA022020001.
    47. M. Gaviño, and J. V. Aliazas, “Physics quest: digital game-based lessons for seventh grade,” International Journal for Science and Advanced Research in Technology, vol. 10, pp. 82-193, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10677644.
    48. A. C. Barton, J. Sheen, and L. K. Byrne, “Immediate attention enhancement and restoration from interactive and immersive technologies: a scoping review,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02050
    49. M. A. Amin, S. H. S. Abdullah, and H. El-Mahalawy, “Analysis of the influence of students’ attitudes on high school students’ learning motivation”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 71-77, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i3.705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i3.705
    50. S. Agustin, “Hubungan motivasi dengan hasil belajar fisika siswa kelas XII di SMA Negeri 10 Kota Jambi”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5-9, 2022, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v3i1.484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v3i1.484
    51. M. Purnomo, W. M. Aimran, and S. Prasitpong, “Implementation of learning with the problem posing method to increase activeness and learning outcomes of physics in the material of temperature and heat”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 64-70,. 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i3.696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i3.696
    52. J. Zeng, S. Parks, and J. Shang, “To learn scientifically, effectively, and enjoyably: a review of educational games,” Human Behavior and Emergent Technology, vol. 2, pp. 186-195, 2020, doi: 10.1002/hbe2.188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.188