SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal

Performance of Hybrid Coagulation–Adsorption as a Physicochemical Separation Process for Removal of Organic Pollutants and Heavy Metals from Chemical Laboratory Wastewater

Gang Dong
Xiamen University ROR
China
gdgangong001@gmail.com
Ermieza Sinin
Universiti of Malaysia Sabah ROR
Malaysia
Fahad Abu Mallouh
Australian University
Australia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to evaluate the performance of a hybrid coagulation and adsorption system as a physicochemical separation process for removing organic pollutants and heavy metals such as iron, manganese, and chromium from chemical laboratory wastewater, as well as to determine optimum operating conditions to improve separation efficiency.

    Methodology: The study used a batch experimental method consisting of coagulation followed by adsorption. Coagulation was carried out using aluminum sulfate, polyaluminum chloride, and commercial coagulants under controlled conditions of acidity, dosage, and mixing to promote particle destabilization and floc formation. The adsorption process used activated carbon and zeolite with controlled contact time and adsorbent dosage. Parameters analyzed included turbidity, total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, electrical conductivity, chemical oxygen demand, and metal concentrations.

    Main Findings: The coagulation process significantly improved solid–liquid separation, achieving reductions in turbidity (93.5%), Total Suspended Solids (69.13%), Total Dissolved Solids (46.95%), conductivity (72.33%), and heavy metals, including Fe (85.53%), Mn (55.84%), and Cr (43.07%). However, Chemical Oxygen Demand reduction during coagulation was limited (7.4%), indicating low removal of dissolved organic compounds. The subsequent adsorption stage enhanced Chemical Oxygen Demand removal up to 58.53% using activated carbon and 54.61% using zeolite.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study evaluates a hybrid coagulation and adsorption system as a multi-stage physicochemical separation process for complex laboratory wastewater. The novelty lies in integrating bulk separation and surface-based removal to improve overall performance and reveal process interactions affecting pollutant removal.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    G. Dong, E. . Sinin, and F. A. . Mallouh, “Performance of Hybrid Coagulation–Adsorption as a Physicochemical Separation Process for Removal of Organic Pollutants and Heavy Metals from Chemical Laboratory Wastewater”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 242–252, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v2i2.2945.

    More Citation Formats

  • 52
    Abstract views
    49
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. D. E. Co, “Treatment of common heavy metal waste liquids in chemical analysis laboratories,” Chem. Eng. Ind. Process., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–25, 2025, https://ojs.akrpp.com/index.php/ceip/article/view/44.
    2. S. P. Dhenkula, A. D. Shende, L. Deshpande, and G. R. Pophali, “An overview of heavy metals treatment & management for laboratory waste liquid (LWL),” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 12, no. 4, p. 113165, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2024.113165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.113165
    3. B. Budjav, “Evaluation of environmental pollution and waste management strategies on the ecosystem,” J. Enterp. Bus. Intell., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 223–234, 2022, doi: 10.53759/5181/jebi202202022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53759/5181/JEBI202202022
    4. K. D. Patil, J. De, V. K. Patil, and M. M. Kulkarni, “Environmental effects and threats of waste: Understanding threats and challenges to ecosystem, health, and sustainability and mitigation strategies,” in From Waste to Wealth, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp. 37–69. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-7552-5_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7552-5_3
    5. Z. Khanam, F. M. Sultana, and F. Mushtaq, “Environmental pollution control measures and strategies: An Overview of recent developments,” in Geospatial Analytics for Environmental Pollution Modeling, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 385–414. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-45300-7_15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45300-7_15
    6. J. Awewomom et al., “Addressing global environmental pollution using environmental control techniques: a focus on environmental policy and preventive environmental management,” Discov. Environ., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44274-024-00033-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00033-5
    7. A. Knap-Bałdyga and M. Żubrowska-Sudoł, “Natural organic matter removal in surface water treatment via coagulation—current issues, potential solutions, and new findings,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 18, pp. 1–24, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151813853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813853
    8. S. O. Akinnawo, P. O. Ayadi, and M. T. Oluwalope, “Chemical coagulation and biological techniques for wastewater treatment,” Ovidius Univ. Ann. Chem., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2023, doi: 10.2478/auoc-2023-0003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/auoc-2023-0003
    9. H. Zeng, H. Tang, W. Sun, and L. Wang, “Strengthening solid–liquid separation of bauxite residue through the synergy of charge neutralization and flocculation,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 285, p. 120296, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120296
    10. M. Chang, X. Ma, X. Dong, Y. Fan, and R. Chen, “The Synergistic effects of al3+ and chitosan on the solid–liquid separation of coal wastewater and their mechanism of action,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/polym14193970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14193970
    11. Z. Cui, L. Huang, H. Fang, F. A. Bombardelli, D. Wang, and X. Wu, “Attachment efficiency among fine sediment considering surface heterogeneity,” J. Hydraul. Res., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 452–469, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/00221686.2023.2222095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2023.2222095
    12. A. Khazaie et al., “A review on coagulation/flocculation in dewatering of coal slurry,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 918, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/w14060918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060918
    13. Z. Zhang, L. Li, L. Xu, S. Rashid, M. Zhang, and W. Yu, “Impacts of coagulant types on the treatment efficiency of coal mine wastewater in the ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis process,” J. Water Process Eng., vol. 70, p. 106911, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106911
    14. Y. Maeda, “Fouling of Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Nanofiltration (NF) membranes by Low Molecular Weight Organic Compounds (LMWOCs), Part 1: Fundamentals and mechanism,” Membranes (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1–83, 2024, doi: 10.3390/membranes14100221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14100221
    15. A. I. Osman et al., “Membrane technology for energy saving: Principles, techniques, applications, challenges, and prospects,” Adv. Energy Sustain. Res., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1–12, May 2024, doi: 10.1002/aesr.202400011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202400011
    16. J. Shamshad and R. Ur Rehman, “Innovative approaches to sustainable wastewater treatment: a comprehensive exploration of conventional and emerging technologies,” Environ. Sci. Adv., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 189–222, 2024, doi: 10.1039/d4va00136b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4VA00136B
    17. G. Murtaza et al., “A review of mechanism and adsorption capacities of biochar-based engineered composites for removing aquatic pollutants from contaminated water,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 10, no. November, pp. 1–33, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1035865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1035865
    18. M. S. Akhtar, S. Ali, and W. Zaman, “Innovative adsorbents for pollutant removal: exploring the latest research and applications,” Molecules, vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 1–37, 2024, doi: 10.3390/molecules29184317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184317
    19. M. Arif, “Adsorptive and photocatalytic strategies for carmoisine removal: mechanisms, material innovations, and environmental implications,” RSC Adv., vol. 16, pp. 15877–15912, 202, doi: 10.1039/d6ra00148c. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D6RA00148C
    20. M. Islam et al., “Smart adsorbent frameworks enabling high-efficiency pharmaceutical degradation via adsorption,” RSC Adv., vol. 16, no. 16, pp. 14688–14727, 2025, doi: 10.1039/D5RA09289B. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA09289B
    21. J. He et al., “Understanding and characteristics of coagulation removal of composite pollution of microplastic and norfloxacin during water treatment,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 831, p. 154826, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154826
    22. T. Gunawardhana, J. G. Hong, Y. Choi, S. I. Siddiqui, H. T. Nguyen, and S. Oh, “Water quality characteristics and reuse potential using adsorption as a post-treatment option for a full-scale hydrocyclone, coagulation, flocculation, and dissolved air flotation system,” Environ. Geochem. Health, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 8585–8598, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10653-023-01738-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-023-01738-x
    23. X. Zeng, W. Zhang, R. Zou, J. Guo, K. Yang, and Z. Li, “Integrated multistage process optimization and photovoltaic electro-fenton synergy for enhanced efficiency and energy savings in wastewater treatment,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 399, p. 128640, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128640
    24. Y. Tang, T. Cui, W. Zhou, and C. Chang, “Surrogate model-based optimal design of coal chemical wastewater treatment networks with a multi-stage system,” Processes, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1–22, 2025, doi: 10.3390/pr14050806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14050806
    25. S. Arita, T. E. Agustina, N. Ilmi, V. D. W. Pranajaya, and R. Gayatri, “Treatment of laboratory wastewater by using fenton reagent and combination of coagulation-adsorption as pretreatment,” J. Ecol. Eng., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 211–221, 2022, doi: 10.12911/22998993/151074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/151074
    26. S. S. A. Amr, M. S. S. Abujazar, M. Y. D. Alazaiza, A. Albahnasawi, and F. Omer, “Heavy metals removal from industrial wastewater using date seeds powder and aluminum chloride-based hybrid natural/chemical coagulation,” Desalin. Water Treat., vol. 318, no. May, p. 100392, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100392
    27. F. El Ouadrhiri, E. A. M. Saleh, and A. Lahkimi, “From mineral salts to smart hybrids: coagulation–flocculation at the nexus of water, energy, and resources—a critical review,” Processes, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1–38, 2025, doi: 10.3390/pr13113405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13113405
    28. A. C. Bortoluzzi et al., “Combination of chemical coagulation and membrane-based separation for dairy wastewater treatment,” J. Food Sci. Technol., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 84–91, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13197-022-05590-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-022-05590-2
    29. N. Gunjyal, S. Rani, B. Asgari Lajayer, V. Senapathi, and T. Astatkie, “A review of the effects of environmental hazards on humans, their remediation for sustainable development, and risk assessment,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 195, no. 6, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11353-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11353-z
    30. S. S. Shetty et al., “Environmental pollutants and their effects on human health,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19496
    31. A. Imessaoudene et al., “Adsorption performance of zeolite for the removal of congo red dye: Factorial design experiments, kinetic, and equilibrium studies,” Separations, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.3390/separations10010057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10010057
    32. M. Getahun, P. Asaithambi, A. Befekadu, and E. Alemayehu, “Optimization of indigenous natural coagulants process for nitrate and phosphate removal from wet coffee processing wastewater using response surface methodology: In the case of Jimma Zone Mana district,” Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng., vol. 8, no. May, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100370
    33. M. Chen, J. Nan, X. Ji, F. Wu, X. Ye, and Z. Ge, “Effect of adsorption and coagulation pretreatment sequence on ultrafiltration membrane fouling: Process study and targeted prediction,” Desalination, vol. 540, p. 115967, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2022.115967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.115967
    34. S. Zahmatkesh, M. Karimian, Z. Chen, and B.-J. Ni, “Combination of coagulation and adsorption technologies for advanced wastewater treatment for potable water reuse: By ANN, NSGA-II, and RSM,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 349, p. 119429, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119429
    35. R. A. Pratiwi and A. B. D. Nandiyanto, “How to read and interpret UV-VIS spectrophotometric results in determining the structure of chemical compounds,” Indones. J. Educ. Res. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.17509/ijert.v2i1.35171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v2i1.35171
    36. K. Khalid, R. Ishak, and Z. Z. Chowdhury, “UV–Vis spectroscopy in non-destructive testing,” in Non-Destructive Material Characterization Methods, Elsevier, 2024, pp. 391–416. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91150-4.00021-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91150-4.00021-5
    37. G. E. Adjovu, H. Stephen, D. James, and S. Ahmad, “Measurement of total dissolved solids and total suspended solids in water systems: a review of the issues, conventional, and remote sensing techniques,” Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 1–43, 2023, doi: 10.3390/rs15143534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15143534
    38. A. Solmaz, Ö. S. Bölükbaşi, and Z. A. Sari, “Green industry work: production of FeCl3 from iron and steel industry waste (mill scale) and its use in wastewater treatment,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 19795–19814, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32451-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32451-6
    39. R. Hu, Y. Liu, G. Zhu, C. Chen, D. Hantoko, and M. Yan, “COD removal of wastewater from hydrothermal carbonization of food waste: Using coagulation combined activated carbon adsorption,” J. Water Process Eng., vol. 45, p. 102462, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102462
    40. B. Carlos, S. Pavlova, G. Paola, and C. Alexandra, “Zeolite and activated carbon as catalysts on leachate clarification,” Environ. Res. Eng. Manag., vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 7–16, 2022, doi: 10.5755/j01.erem.78.4.31712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.78.4.31712
    41. S. K. Pereira, S. Kini, B. Prabhu, and G. P. Jeppu, “A simplified modeling procedure for adsorption at varying pH conditions using the modified Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm,” Appl. Water Sci., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13201-022-01800-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01800-6
    42. M. Mabuza, K. Premlall, and M. O. Daramola, “Modelling and thermodynamic properties of pure CO2 and flue gas sorption data on South African coals using Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and extended Langmuir isotherm models,” Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40789-022-00515-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-022-00515-y
    43. T. Aydogdu, J. A. O’Mahony, and N. A. McCarthy, “pH, the Fundamentals for Milk and Dairy Processing: A Review,” Dairy, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 395–409, 2023, doi: 10.3390/dairy4030026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4030026
    44. R. S. Sinsinwar and M. Verma, “Analysis of pH value of water for treatment plant of kekri and surajpura (Rajasthan) India,” Evergreen, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 324–328, 2023, doi: 10.5109/6781087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5109/6781087
    45. R. Malkawi, W. I. Malkawi, Y. Al-Mahmoud, and J. Tawalbeh, “Current trends on solid dispersions: Past, present, and future,” Adv. Pharmacol. Pharm. Sci., vol. 2022, pp. 1–17, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/5916013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5916013
    46. L. Yan, H. Liu, Y. Yang, L. Dai, and C. Si, “Lignin‐derived carbon fibers: A green path from biomass to advanced materials,” Carbon Energy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1002/cey2.662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.662
    47. M. U. Shakeel, S. Z. J. Zaidi, A. Ahmad, A. A. M. Abahussain, and M. H. Nazir, “Benchmarking of key performance factors in textile industry effluent treatment processes for enhanced environmental remediation,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72851-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72851-9
    48. A. S. Mahmoud, E. Khamis, M. S. Mahmoud, and N. Y. Mohamed, “Multistage treatment of industrial ethylene glycol (EG) effluent: integrating chemical extraction, coagulation/precipitation, and decolouration for enhanced wastewater remediation,” Sci. Rep., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-35153-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35153-w
    49. J. Luo et al., “Millifluidic nanogenerator lab-on-a-chip device for blood electrical conductivity monitoring at low frequency,” Adv. Mater., vol. 36, no. 32, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.1002/adma.202403568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202403568
    50. M. Mizuhata, “Electrical conductivity measurement of electrolyte solution” Electrochemistry, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.5796/electrochemistry.22-66111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5796/electrochemistry.22-66111
    51. Sugiarti, D. Rohaningsih, and S. Aisyah, “Study of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) in estuaries in Banten Bay Indonesia,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2023, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1201/1/012045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1201/1/012045
    52. G. E. Adjovu, H. Stephen, and S. Ahmad, “Spatiotemporal variability in total dissolved solids and total suspended solids along the colorado river,” Hydrology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1–27, 2023, doi: 10.3390/hydrology10060125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060125
    53. A. Asrani et al., “Sustainable advances in activated carbon for environmental and industrial applications,” Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1002/ep.70176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.70176
    54. G. Sharma et al., “Activated carbon as superadsorbent and sustainable material for diverse applications,” Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., vol. 2022, pp. 1–21, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/4184809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4184809
    55. W. Lu et al., “Research progress of modified natural zeolites for removal of typical anions in water,” Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 2170–2189, 2022, doi: 10.1039/D2EW00478J. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EW00478J
    56. I. Khatrin, A. J. McCue, I. Abdullah, and Y. K. Krisnandi, “Structural and surface modifications of zeolite to tailor its catalytic properties,” ChemistrySelect, vol. 10, no. 38, pp. 1–15, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1002/slct.202504324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202504324
    57. G. Beggio, W. Peng, F. Lü, A. Cerasaro, T. Bonato, and A. Pivato, “Chemically enhanced solid–liquid separation of digestate: suspended solids removal and effects on environmental quality of separated fractions,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1029–1041, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12649-021-01591-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-021-01591-y
    58. A. A. Joaquin, S. Sivamani, and N. Gnanasundaram, “Statistical experimental design and analysis of mixed natural-synthetic coagulants for the reduction of total suspended solids and turbidity in sewage wastewater treatment,” Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 4583–4590, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13399-022-02566-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02566-2
    59. H. Tahraoui et al., “Evaluating the effectiveness of coagulation–flocculation treatment using aluminum sulfate on a polluted surface water source: A year-long study,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 400, pp. 1–39, 2024, doi: 10.3390/w16030400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030400
    60. Z. Deng, D. Huang, Q. He, and C. Chassagne, “Review of the action of organic matter on mineral sediment flocculation,” Front. Earth Sci., vol. 10, no. September, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.965919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.965919
    61. F. Mohamed et al., “Activated carbon derived from sugarcane and modified with natural zeolite for efficient adsorption of methylene blue dye: experimentally and theoretically approaches,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22421-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22421-8
    62. O. Abdelwahab and W. M. Thabet, “Natural zeolites and zeolite composites for heavy metal removal from contaminated water and their applications in aquaculture Systems: A review,” Egypt. J. Aquat. Res., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 431–443, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ejar.2023.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2023.11.004
    63. M. Macena, H. Pereira, L. Cruz-Lopes, L. Grosche, and B. Esteves, “Adsorcion competitiva de iones metalicos: Una revision de aplicaciones, mecanismos y factores influyentes,” Separations, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–17, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/12/3/70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12030070
    64. R. Jin, C. Zhao, Y. Song, X. Qiu, C. Li, and Y. Zhao, “Competitive adsorption of sulfamethoxazole and bisphenol A on magnetic biochar: Mechanism and site energy distribution,” Environ. Pollut., vol. 329, p. 121662, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121662
    65. K. O. Iwuozor, H. K. Okoro, A. G. Adeniyi, C. Zvinowanda, J. C. Ngila, and E. C. Emenike, “Sugarcane bagasse adsorbents: Bibliometric insights and the influence of chemical treatment on adsorption performance in aqueous solution,” Sugar Tech, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 333–351, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12355-024-01371-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-024-01371-7
    66. J. Saleem, Z. K. B. Moghal, S. Pradhan, and G. McKay, “High-performance activated carbon from coconut shells for dye removal: study of isotherm and thermodynamics,” RSC Adv., vol. 14, no. 46, pp. 33797–33808, 2024, doi: 10.1039/d4ra06287f. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA06287F
    67. S. Zahmatkesh, F. Gholian-Jouybari, J. J. Klemeš, A. Bokhari, and M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, “Sustainable and optimized values for municipal wastewater: The removal of biological oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand by various levels of geranular activated carbon- and genetic algorithm-based simulation,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 417, p. 137932, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137932
    68. A. S. Kovo et al., “Column adsorption of biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand and total organic carbon from wastewater by magnetite nanoparticles-zeolite A composite,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–25, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13095
    69. S. Choi, H. Son, Y. M. Kim, and Y. Lee, “Abatement efficiencies of organic matter and micropollutants during combined coagulation and powdered activated carbon processes as an alternative primary wastewater treatment option,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107619
    70. E. Can-Güven, M. E. Bayat, S. Yazici Guvenc, and G. Varank, “Refractory pollutants removal from industrial wastewater by a coupled process of coagulation-flocculation and alternative electrochemical advanced oxidation processes,” Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 707, p. 135916, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135916
    71. S. P. Bera, M. Godhaniya, and C. Kothari, “Emerging and advanced membrane technology for wastewater treatment: A review,” J. Basic Microbiol., vol. 62, no. 3–4, pp. 245–259, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1002/jobm.202100259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202100259
    72. B. T. Akinyemi, O. D. Ogundele, and A. B. Afolabi, “Advancements in sustainable membrane technologies for enhanced remediation and wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review,” Acadlore Trans. Geosci., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 196–207, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.56578/atg020402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56578/atg020402