The Role of Digital Technology in the Design of Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study systematically reviews the role of digital technologies in the design of mathematics teaching and learning over the past decade. It aims to evaluate how digital tools have been integrated into task and lesson design, identifying emerging trends, challenges, and innovations.
Methodology: A systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA framework was conducted, analyzing studies published between 2014 and 2023. A total of 32 studies were included, sourced from various academic databases. These studies were examined to explore the use of digital technologies such as GeoGebra, Dynamic Geometry Environments (DGE), mobile apps, and others in mathematics instruction.
Main Findings: The review found that digital technologies, particularly GeoGebra and DGE, were frequently used to enhance mathematical exploration and conjecturing. Other tools, including mobile applications, augmented reality (AR), and AI, have contributed to innovative teaching strategies, increasing student engagement and understanding. However, challenges such as unequal access to technology and the need for teacher training in tool integration were identified.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides a unique contribution by focusing not only on the use of digital tools but also on their role within the broader teaching design context. It offers insights into how these technologies shape pedagogical strategies, helping educators design more effective and inclusive mathematics education environments.
References
E. Chung, G. Subramaniam, and L. C. Dass, “Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst Covid-19,” Asian J. Univ. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2020, doi: 10.24191/AJUE.V16I2.10294.
B. B. Lockee, “Online education in the post-COVID era,” Nat. Electron., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–6, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0.
S. L. Schneider and M. L. Council, “Distance learning in the era of COVID-19,” Arch. Dermatol. Res., vol. 313, no. 5, pp. 389–390, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00403-020-02088-9.
I. Adeoye, A. Adanikin, and A. Adanikin, “COVID-19 and E-Learning: Nigeria tertiary education system experience,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Appl. Sci. (IJRIAS), vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 2454–6194, May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://repository.elizadeuniversity.edu.ng/bitstream/20.500.12398/1063/1/researchgateEmailing28-311.pdf
M. Shahrill, M. I. Petra, L. Naing, J. Yacob, J. H. Santos, and A. B. Z. Abdul Aziz, “New norms and opportunities from the COVID-19 pandemic crisis in a higher education setting: Perspectives from Universiti Brunei Darussalam,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 700–712, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-07-2020-0347.
W. Y. Leong, Y. Z. Leong, and W. S. Leong, “Virtual reality on creative learning,” in Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. ICT and Knowledge Engineering (ICT&KE), Nov. 2024, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/ICTKE62841.2024.10787163.
J. J. Kaput and P. W. Thompson, “Technology in mathematics education research: The first 25 years in the JRME,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 676–684, 1994, doi: 10.2307/749579.
O. Viberg, Å. Grönlund, and A. Andersson, “Integrating digital technology in mathematics education: A Swedish case study,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 232–243, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1770801.
Z. Noroozi and J. D. V. III, “Teratogenic effects of ethanolic Cinnamomum burmanni leaf extract on fetal development in white mice (Mus musculus L.),” J. Acad. Biol. Biol. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jouabe.v2i1.1657.
E. N. Putri, M. Mahdavi, and M. S. Awlqadir, “An analysis of students’ motivation and their achievement in learning English at the Department of English Education,” J. Lang. Lit. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1698.
P. Drijvers, J. Boaler, S. Gravemeijer, J. Hoyles, and P. K. Noss, “Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives,” in Mathematics Education and Technology—Rethinking the Terrain, C. Hoyles and J.-B. Lagrange, Eds., New ICMI Study Series, vol. 13. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 2009, pp. 89–132, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_7.
J. Kaput, R. Noss, and C. Hoyles, “Developing new notations for a learnable mathematics in the computational era,” in Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education, 1st ed., L. D. English, Ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2002, pp. 1–26, doi: 10.4324/9781410602541-10.
A. Vasudevan et al., “Unlocking insights of fuzzy mathematics for enhanced predictive modelling,” Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 2025, doi: 10.18576/amis/190105.
M. C. Borba, P. Askar, J. Engelbrecht, G. Gadanidis, S. Llinares, and M. S. Aguilar, “Digital technology in mathematics education: Research over the last decade,” in Proc. 13th Int. Congr. Mathematical Education, G. Kaiser, Ed., ICME-13 Monographs. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 205–228, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_14.
J. S. Barrot, I. I. Llenares, and L. S. del Rosario, “Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7321–7338, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x.
C. Rodríguez-Jiménez, J. C. de la Cruz-Campos, M. N. Campos-Soto, and M. Ramos-Navas-Parejo, “Teaching and learning mathematics in primary education: The role of ICT—A systematic review of the literature,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.3390/math11020272.
L. Verschaffel, F. Depaepe, and Z. Mevarech, “Learning mathematics in metacognitively oriented ICT-based learning environments: A systematic review of the literature,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/3402035.
M. H. Hussein, S. H. Ow, M. M. Elaish, and E. O. Jensen, “Digital game-based learning in K–12 mathematics education: A systematic literature review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, pp. 2859–2891, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10721-x.
M. Bulut and R. B. Ferri, “A systematic literature review on augmented reality in mathematics education,” Eur. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 556–572, 2023, doi: 10.30935/scimath/13124.
D. M. Tang et al., “Mobile learning in mathematics education: A systematic literature review of empirical research,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 19, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/13162.
M. Z. bin Mohamed, R. Hidayat, N. N. binti Suhaizi, N. binti M. Sabri, M. K. H. bin Mahmud, and S. N. binti Baharuddin, “Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic literature review,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 17, no. 3, p. em0694, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iejme/12132.
J. Engelbrecht and M. C. Borba, “Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education,” ZDM – Math. Educ., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 281–292, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2.
S. Hwang, E. Flavin, and J.-E. Lee, “Exploring research trends of technology use in mathematics education: A scoping review using topic modeling,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 10753–10780, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11603-0.
A. Yohannes and H.-L. Chen, “GeoGebra in mathematics education: A systematic review of journal articles published from 2010 to 2020,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 5682–5697, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.2016861.
A. Sierpinska and J. Kilpatrick, Mathematics Education as a Research Domain: A Search for Identity, vol. 4. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
H. Jacinto and S. Carreira, “Mathematical problem solving with technology: The techno-mathematical fluency of a student with GeoGebra,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1115–1136, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10763-016-9728-8.
Z. Shao, “Task design in mathematics classrooms,” in The 21st Century Mathematics Education in China, Y. Cao and F. Leung, Eds., New Frontiers of Educational Research. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018, pp. 145–162, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-55781-5_11.
A. M. Canonigo, “Leveraging AI to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and confidence in mathematics,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 3215–3229, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jcal.13065.
H. S. Almarashdi, A. M. Jarrah, O. A. Khurma, and S. M. Gningue, “Unveiling the potential: A systematic review of ChatGPT in transforming mathematics teaching and learning,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 20, no. 12, p. em2555, 2024.
M. U. Gusteti, E. Musdi, I. Dewata, and A. M. Rasli, “A ten-year bibliometric study on augmented reality in mathematical education,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 723–741, May 2025, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.14.3.723.
S. Mohammad, Y. N., K. I. Al-Daoud, N. Raja, M. C. R., R. M. H., A. Vasudevan, N. Alshdaifat, and M. F. A. Hunitie, “A mathematical fuzzy model for syntax–pragmatics interface,” Forum for Linguistic Studies, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 26–41, 2025, doi: 10.30564/fls.v7i6.9618.
R. D. Siswanto, A. Wahyuni, and R. A. Sholikhakh, “Between innovation and imitation: A phenomenological inquiry into middle school mathematics teachers’ credulity in instructional design for quality education,” Lit. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 58–74, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.52005/literate.v3i1.17.
A. Bakker, Design Research in Education: A Practical Guide for Early Career Researchers. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 2018.
R. Cantoral and R. M. Farfán, “Mathematics education: A vision of its evolution,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 255–270, 2003, doi: 10.1023/A:1026008829822.
J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 7th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2012.
T. T. T. Linh, T. T. M. Huong, and N. Thammachot, “Sustainable nutrient management for NFT hydroponic lettuce: Integrating Tithonia diversifolia liquid organic fertilizer with AB-mix,” Integrated Science Education Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 240–248, 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i3.2118.
K. Sehularo, J. Mbogua, and K. Kanifa, “Cardiometabolic effects of Sus barbatus meat consumption: Analysis of blood cholesterol levels and cardiac histopathological alterations in Mus musculus,” J. Acad. Biol. Biol. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jouabe.v2i1.1661.
M. A. Simon, “Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 114–145, 1995.
J. Mata-Pereira and J. P. da Ponte, “Enhancing students’ mathematical reasoning in the classroom: Teacher actions facilitating generalization and justification,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 169–186, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10649-017-9773-4.
N. S. Mohd Rasid and S. Sahara, “Tech-enabled inclusive math education: Reimagining learning for marginalized Indonesian learners in Malaysia,” Lit. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 155–177, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.52005/literate.v3i1.49.
A. Jatmiko, N. Armita, Irwandani, T. Saputro, and M. Aridan, “Development of science learning videos with the Canva application on socioscientific issues content,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 482, p. 05004, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202448205004.
R. Masykur, I. Irwandani, A. Pricillia, and M. Aridan, “Development of science e-modules with the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) approach for Islamic schools,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 404, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v7i2.20835.
M. Falakhi, T. Khamyod, and M. Jlassi, “Social criticism in Seno Gumira Ajidarma’s short stories and its implication for literary learning,” J. Lang. Lit. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1703.
M. S. Rahajo and A. Kumyat, “Analysis of driving factors for the implementation of clean technology to optimize green manufacturing in the Wiradesa batik small and medium enterprises (SMEs),” Integrated Science Education Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 258–268, 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i3.2115.
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement,” Int. J. Surg., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 336–341, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.
L. Benton, C. Hoyles, I. Kalas, and R. Noss, “Bridging primary programming and mathematics: Some findings of design research in England,” Digit. Exp. Math. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115–138, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40751-017-0028-x.
L. Barman and S. Kjällander, “Playful and meaningful learning of programming: What does it take to integrate an app-based game promoting digital mathematics into early childhood education?,” Des. Learn., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 165–178, 2022, doi: 10.16993/dfl.203.
M. Fahlgren and M. Brunström, “A model for task design with focus on exploration, explanation, and generalization in a dynamic geometry environment,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 287–315, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10758-014-9213-9.
C. Guerrero-Ortiz and M. Camacho-Machín, “Characterizing tasks for teaching mathematics in dynamic geometry system and modelling environments,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/math10081239.
A. Leung, “An epistemic model of task design in dynamic geometry environment,” ZDM – Int. J. Math. Educ., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 325–336, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11858-011-0329-2.
F. Ferri, P. Grifoni, and T. Guzzo, “Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations,” Societies, vol. 10, no. 4, art. no. 86, 2020, doi: 10.3390/soc10040086.
N. Ishartono, A. Nurchayo, M. Waluyo, R. A. Razak, S. Suliadi, and M. Hanifah, “GeoGebra-based flipped learning model: An alternative panacea to improve students’ learning independency in online mathematics learning,” J. Res. Adv. Math. Educ., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 178–195, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v7i3.18141.
F. Nursyahida, I. U. Alibab, and I. U. Alibab, “Learning design on surface area and volume of cylinder using Indonesian ethnomathematics of traditional cookie maker assisted by GeoGebra,” Math. Teach. Res. J., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 79–98, Winter 2021. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1332350
M. N. Kholid, L. N. Pradana, S. Maharani, and A. Swastika, “GeoGebra in project-based learning (Geo-PjBL): A dynamic tool for analytical geometry course,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 184–193, 2020, doi: 10.3926/jotse.1267.
J. Y. Ahn and A. Edwin, “An e-learning model for teaching mathematics on an open source learning platform,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 256–267, 2018, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3733.
M. K. Pedersen, C. C. Bach, R. M. Gregersen, I. H. Højsted, and U. T. Jankvist, “Mathematical representation competency in relation to use of digital technology and task design—A literature review,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–25, 2021, doi: 10.3390/math9040444.
C. Hoyles, R. Noss, P. Vahey, and J. Roschelle, “Cornerstone mathematics: Designing digital technology for teacher adaptation and scaling,” ZDM – Int. J. Math. Educ., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1057–1070, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11858-013-0540-4.
M. Tezer, E. P. Yildiz, S. Bozkurt, and H. Tangul, “The influence of online mathematics learning on prospective teachers’ mathematics achievement: The role of independent and collaborative learning,” World J. Educ. Technol. Curr. Issues, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 257–265, 2019, doi: 10.18844/wjet.v11i4.4361.
P. Fernandez, M. del C. Rodríguez-Ponce, G. Vega-Cruz, and M. L. Oliveras, “Didactic innovative proposal for mathematic learning at the university by the blended model,” Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 152, pp. 796–801, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.323.
S. Waiyakoon, J. Khlaisang, and P. Koraneekij, “Development of an instructional learning object design model for tablets using game-based learning with scaffolding to enhance mathematical concepts for mathematic learning disability students,” Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 174, pp. 1489–1496, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.779.
A. Papadimitriou and G. Gyftodimos, “The role of learner characteristics in the adaptive educational hypermedia systems: The case of the MATHEMA,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 55–68, 2017, doi: 10.5815/ijmecs.2017.10.07.
I. F. Al-Mashaqbeh, “iPad in elementary school math learning setting,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 48–52, 2016, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v11i02.5053.
Ü. Çakıroğlu and N. Taşkın, “Teaching numbers to preschool students with interactive multimedia: An experimental study,” Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/47753738/Cukurova2016-libre.pdf
K. Komatsu and K. Jones, “Task design principles for heuristic refutation in dynamic geometry environments,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 801–824, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10763-018-9892-0.
F. Barrera-Mora and A. Reyes-Rodriguez, “Learning technology for education in cloud – The changing face of education,” in Learning Technology for Education in Cloud, vol. 620, pp. 168–180, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42147-6.
C. Hoyles, “Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology,” Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 209–228, 2018, doi: 10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799.
N. Ishartono, A. Nurcahyo, and I. D. Setyono, “Guided discovery: An alternative teaching method to reduce students’ rote learning behavior in studying geometric transformation,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1265, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1265/1/012019.
N. Sinclair and M. Yerushalmy, “Digital technology in mathematics teaching and learning: A decade focused on theorising and teaching,” in The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Brill, 2016, pp. 235–274.
J. F. Molina-Toro, P. A. Rendón-Mesa, and J. A. Villa-Ochoa, “Research trends in digital technologies and modeling in mathematics education,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 15, no. 8, Art. no. em1736, 2019, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/108438.
M. S. Alabdulaziz, “COVID-19 and the use of digital technology in mathematics education,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7609–7633, 2021.
Y. Helsa and S. Yulianti, “Technology liberating or controlling? A critical educational philosophy review of digital systems-based learning,” Literature International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 90–106, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.52005/literate.v3i1.20.
U. Hijriyah, R. N. Edi, M. Aridan, H. U. Hashim, Erlina, and G. C. Kesuma, “How effective is SUNO.AI in enhancing Arabic listening skills? An evaluation of AI-based personalized learning,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 391–407, 2025, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.2.2251.
R. Pierce and K. Stacey, “Mapping pedagogical opportunities provided by mathematics analysis software,” International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10758-010-9158-6.
N. Arya, A. Bansal, R. Kumar, K. Intaratat, and K. T. Ng, “Exploring digital tools utilizing generative AI in healthcare,” in Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2025, pp. 54–69, doi: 10.1201/9781003488255-4.
M. Kondratieva, “Geometrical constructions in dynamic and interactive mathematics learning environment,” Online Mevlana International Journal of Education, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 50–63, 2013, doi: 10.13054/mije.si.2013.06.
N. N. Le and M. Z. Aye, “The effect of integrating green sustainable science and technology into STEM learning on students’ environmental literacy,” Integrated Science Education Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 232–239, 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i3.2116.
A. A. Kambuna, Q.-U. Jatoi, and M. Jlassi, “Language function of selected cosmetics advertisement in online media,” Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–84, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1836.
J.-B. Ndagijimana et al., “Contributions of GeoGebra software within the socio-cultural proximity on enhancing students’ conceptual understanding of mathematics,” Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2436296, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2436296.
A. A. Cuoco and E. P. Goldenberg, “A role for technology in mathematics education,” Journal of Education, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 15–32, 1996.
R. Muslim and E. D. Ariyanto, “Digital literacy as a catalyst for future workforce: Enhancing vocational high school graduates’ employability in the evolving digital economy,” Literature International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 2025, doi: 10.52005/literate.v3i1.29.
M. H. Al-Obaidy, Z. Abdulah, and P. Ratti, “Preventive insights: The role of education in enhancing hypertension patients’ knowledge on heart disease,” Journal of Health Innovation and Environmental Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jhiee.v2i1.1722.
A. Alhikma, I. D. Owoeye, and F. K. Kiara, “Mothers and traditional birth attendants: A phenomenological exploration of childbirth experiences,” Journal of Health Innovation and Environmental Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jhiee.v2i1.1725.
A. K. Erbas, S. D. Ledford, C. H. Orrill, and D. Polly, “Promoting problem solving across geometry and algebra by using technology,” Mathematics Teacher, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 599–603, 2005.
E. Ningsih, “Increasing student learning motivation using inquiry methods in chemistry lessons,” Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v1i1.1017.
K. Khaeratunnafisah and K. Lizbeth, “Utilization of telehealth in improving the quality of health services during the pandemic: A systematic review,” Journal of Health Innovation and Environmental Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jhiee.v2i1.1723.
V. Shurygin, T. Anisimova, R. Orazbekova, and N. Pronkin, “Modern approaches to teaching future teachers of mathematics: The use of mobile applications and their impact on students’ motivation and academic success in the context of STEM education,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2884–2898, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2162548.
P. Galbraith, P. Renshaw, and V. Geiger, “Integrating technology in mathematics learning: What some students say,” in Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), 2001, pp. 238–247.
V. Geiger, H. Forgasz, H. Tan, N. Calder, and J. Hill, “Technology in mathematics education,” in Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2008–2011, Brill, 2012, pp. 111–141.
K. Thorne, Blended Learning: How to Integrate Online and Traditional Learning, London: Kogan Page, 2003.
N. Islaihah, “Application of cooperative learning methods through sending speeches and questions to improve chemistry learning,” Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v1i1.1028.
S. Charlize, G. R. Semilla, and M. E. Hossain, “Reserving cultural heritage through traditional Filipino games,” Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, Hospitality, Sport and Physical Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 76–82, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jthpe.v2i1.1915.
H.-G. Weigand, J. Trgalova, and M. Tabach, “Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age,” ZDM – Mathematics Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 525–541, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9.
K. E. Mishra, K. Wilder, and A. K. Mishra, “Digital literacy in the marketing curriculum: Are female college students prepared for digital jobs?,” Industry and Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 204–211, 2017.
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, Sage Publications, 2016.
R. Lesh, “Research design in mathematics education: Focusing on design experiments,” in Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education, 2002, pp. 27–49.
T. Reeves, “Design research from a technology perspective,” in Educational Design Research, Routledge, 2006, pp. 64–78.
J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen, Educational Design Research, 1st ed., London, U.K.: Routledge, 2006, doi: 10.4324/9780203088364.
J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, and S. McKenney, “Introducing educational design research,” in Educational Design Research, 1st ed., London, U.K.: Routledge, 2006, pp. 1–5. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203088364-9/introducing-educational-design-research-jan-van-den-akker-koeno-gravemeijer-susan-mckenne.
Copyright (c) 2025 Laila Fitriana, Agus Hendriyanto, Sani Sahara, Lukman Hakim Muhaimin, Atik Wintarti, Tomi Listiawan, Anip Dwi Saputro, Deshinta A Dewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
