Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Identification of Discovery Learning Method Based on Edutainment (Zenius) to Increase Student Motivation on Business and Energy Materials

Lika Anggraini ORCID
Junior High School Guang Ming Jambi
Indonesia
lika.anggraini@gmail.com
Feliza Paramitha Sinaga ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Sri Wina Oktavia ORCID
Jambi University ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This research aims to identify the effectiveness of discovery learning methods based on edutainment, specifically using the Zenius application, to enhance student motivation in learning business and energy concepts.

    Methodology: This qualitative research employs a literature study approach, with sources obtained from books, journals, and other relevant materials. Data analysis was conducted using the Miles and Huberman model.

    Main Findings: The literature study revealed that the edutainment-based discovery learning method, exemplified by the Zenius application, significantly enhances students’ understanding of business and energy topics. This research aims to provide readers with valuable insights into the benefits of edutainment-based discovery learning methods like Zenius.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study contributes new knowledge by demonstrating the potential of edutainment-based discovery learning methods to improve student engagement and comprehension in business and energy subjects. It advances existing knowledge by highlighting the practical application of the Zenius platform in educational settings, offering a novel approach to integrating technology and learning.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Identification of Discovery Learning Method Based on Edutainment (Zenius) to Increase Student Motivation on Business and Energy Materials”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 138–143, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jee.v5i3.812.

    More Citation Formats

  • 467
    Abstract views
    347
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Aizinsh, S. W. Oktavia, R. Firmansyah, and R. Ruttinawati, “Explorationof the character of cooperation in physics”, EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 139–147, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.26526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.26526
    2. A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, S. W. Oktavia, F. P. Sinaga, N. Septiani, N. N. Qoidah, and M. Auzinsh, “Identification of student character values in class x particle dynamics materials”, JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 380–388, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v8i3.3776
    3. M. Ferreira, B. Martinsone, and S. Talić, “Promoting sustainable social emotional learning at school through relationship-centered learning environment, teaching methods and formative assessment”, Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 21-36, 2020, doi: 10.2478/jtes-2020-0003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0003
    4. K. Regmi, and L. Jones, “A systematic review of the factors–enablers and barriers–affecting e-learning in health sciences education”, BMC medical education, vol. 20, pp. 1-18, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6
    5. H. Helda, and S. Syahrani, “National standards of education in contents standards and education process standards in Indonesia”, Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 257–269, 2022, doi: 10.54443/injoe.v3i2.32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54443/injoe.v3i2.32
    6. S. S. Ma’rifah, “HELPER” Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling FKIP UNIPA, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 31–46, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36456/helper.vol35.no1.a1458
    7. P. Kwangmuang, S. Jarutkamolpong, W. Sangboonraung, and S. Daungtod, “The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools”, Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
    8. R. Lavi, M. Tal, and Y. J. Dori, “Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 70, 101002, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002
    9. N. I. Cintia, F. Kristin, and I. Anugraheni, “Penerapan model pembelajaran discovery learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan hasil belajar siswa [Implementation of the discovery learning model to improve creative thinking skills and student learning outcomes]”, Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 32, no.1, pp. 67–75, 2018, doi: 10.21009/pip.321.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.321.8
    10. A. R. Fauzi, Z. Zainuddin, and R. Atok, “Penguatan karakter rasa ingin tahu dan peduli sosial melalui discovery learning [Strengthening the character of curiosity and social concern through discovery learning]”, Jurnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 27–36, 2017, doi: 10.17977/um022v2i22017p079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um022v2i22017p079
    11. M. Nurdin, “Pengaruh metode discovery learning untuk meningkatkan representasi matematis dan percaya diri siswa [The influence of the discovery learning method on improving students' mathematical representation and self-confidence]”, Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Garut, vol. 9, no.1, pp. 9–22, 2013, doi: 10.52434/jp.v9i1.79.
    12. M. Nadeem, and M. Blumenstein, “Embedding online activities during lecture time: roll call or enhancement of student participation?”, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 11, 2021, doi: 10.53761/1.18.8.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.8.10
    13. G. Maimaiti, C. Jia, and K. F. Hew, “Student disengagement in web-based videoconferencing supported online learning: an activity theory perspective”, Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 4883-4902, 2023, doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v5i2.568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1984949
    14. C. E. Holbrey, “Kahoot! Using a game-based approach to blended learning to support effective learning environments and student engagement in traditional lecture theatres”, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 191-202, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737568
    15. M. Asif, G. Thomas, M. U. Awan, and A. Muhammad Din, “Enhancing student engagement through heterogeneous pedagogical approaches: action research in a university level course in Saudi Arabia”, International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1-28, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-10-2019-0375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2019-0375
    16. M. Bond, S. Bedenlier, K. Buntins, M. Kerres, and O. Zawacki-Richter, “Facilitating student engagement in higher education through educational technology: A narrative systematic review in the field of education”, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 315-368, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
    17. I. A. Ismail, F. U. Jhora, Q. Qadriati, and M. MInsani, “Enhancing science learning activities through the implementation of discovery learning and teaching at the right level method”, Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 10, no .4, pp. 1886-1895, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.7359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.7359
    18. N. C. Siregar, R. Rosli, and S. M. Maat, “The effects of a discovery learning module on geometry for improving students' mathematical reasoning skills, communication and self-confidence”, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 214-228, 2020, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.19.3.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.12
    19. Q. Wang, H. Zhao, J. Fan, and J. Li, “Effects of flipped classroom on nursing psychomotor skill instruction for active and passive learners: A mixed methods study”, Journal of Professional Nursing, vol. 39, pp. 146-155, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.01.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.01.013
    20. A. M. Martella, D. Klahr, and W. Li, “The relative effectiveness of different active learning implementations in teaching elementary school students how to design simple experiments”, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 112, no. 8, pp. 1582, 2020, doi: 10.1037/edu0000449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000449
    21. N. E. E. Olaniyi, “Threshold concepts: designing a format for the flipped classroom as an active learning technique for crossing the threshold”, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41039-020-0122-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-0122-3
    22. M. Levy, “The role of qualitative approaches to research in call contexts: Closing in on the learner’s experience”, CALICO Journal, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 554–568, 2015, doi: 10.1558/cj.v32i3.26620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.26620
    23. R. Şekerci, “Evaluation of the Turkish education system in the context of learning organisations according to the opinion of the candidate teachers”, African Educational Research Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 360–365, 2020, doi: 10.30918/aerj.8s2.20.066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.8S2.20.066
    24. N. E. Sumianingrum, “Efektivitas metode discovery learning berbantuan e-learning di SMA Negeri 1 Jepara [The effectiveness of the discovery learning method assisted by e-learning at SMA Negeri 1 Jepara]”, PEMBELAJAR: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, Dan Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17, 2017, doi: 10.26858/pembelajar.v1i1.3710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/pembelajar.v1i1.3710
    25. D. Lombardi, T. F. Shipley, and Astronomy Team, Biology Team, Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, Geography Team, Geoscience Team, and Physics Team, “The curious construct of active learning”, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 8-43, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1529100620973974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
    26. S. A. Sotiriou, A. Lazoudis, and F. X. Bogner, “Inquiry-based learning and E-learning: how to serve high and low achievers”, Smart Learning Environments, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 29, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40561-020-00130-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00130-x
    27. D. Inel-Ekici, and M. Ekici, “Mobile inquiry and inquiry-based science learning in higher education: Advantages, challenges, and attitudes”, Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 427-444, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12564-021-09729-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09729-2
    28. M. Kousloglou, E. Petridou, A. Molohidis, and E. Hatzikraniotis, “Assessing students’ awareness of 4cs skills after mobile-technology-supported inquiry-based learning”, Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 6725, 2023, doi: . DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086725
    29. A. Ardyansyah, and L. Fitriani, “Efektivitas penerapan metode discovery learning dalam pembelajaran imla’ [The effectiveness of implementing the discovery learning method in imla' learning]”, Al-Ta’rib : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab IAIN Palangka Raya, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 229–244, doi: 10.23971/altarib.v8i2.2257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/altarib.v8i2.2257
    30. Z. Feiyue, “Edutainment methods in the learning process: Quickly, fun and satisfying”, International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 19-26, 2022, doi: 10.55151/ijeedu.v4i1.41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v4i1.41
    31. K. Khadijah, A. Arlina, M. J. Addaudy, and M. Maisarah, “The effect of edutainment learning model on early childhood socio-emotional development”, Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 201-220, 2021, doi: 10.21009/JPUD.152.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/JPUD.152.01
    32. S. D. Ardianti, S. Wanabualiandari, and A. B. Tanghal, “Thematic ethno-edutainment learning to improve student’s concept understanding in science”, Asian Journal of Applied Education (AJAE), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 167-178, 2023, doi: 10.55927/ajae.v2i2.3740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v2i2.3740
    33. P. P. S. Dita, S. Utomo, and D. A. Sekar, “Implementation of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on interactive learning media”, Journal of Technology and Humanities, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 24-30, 2021, doi: 10.53797/jthkkss.v2i2.4.2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v2i2.4.2021
    34. L. Astuti, Y. Wihardi, and D. Rochintaniawati, “The development of web-based learning using interactive media for science learning on levers in human body topic”, Journal of Science Learning, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 89-98, 2020, doi: 10.17509/jsl.v3i2.19366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i2.19366
    35. S. Safaruddin, N. Ibrahim, J. Juhaeni, H. Harmilawati, and L. Qadrianti, “The effect of project-based learning assisted by electronic media on learning motivation and science process skills”, Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22-29, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su15086725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i1.5