Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Realistic Mathematics Education and Learning Interest as Simultaneous Predictors of Mathematics Achievement: Evidence from a Teacher-Perspective SEM-PLS Study

Fitri Kania ORCID
Indonesia University of Education ROR
Indonesia
efkania82@upi.edu
Asep Dikdik ORCID
Indonesia University of Education ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: Despite widespread recognition of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and student learning interest as critical factors in mathematics learning, their simultaneous contribution to performance, as perceived by classroom teachers, remains insufficiently examined. This study investigates the concurrent relationships between RME implementation quality and student learning interest with teacher-rated mathematics learning performance in elementary schools.

    Methodology: A quantitative cross-sectional survey involved n = 55 purposively selected elementary school mathematics teachers. Using validated questionnaires with 5-point Likert scales, teachers rated RME practices, student interest, and mathematics performance across nine competency dimensions based on year-long classroom observations. Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) with bootstrapping (5,000 resamples) was employed. The measurement model demonstrated robust psychometric properties (AVE > 0.70, CR > 0.93, HTMT < 0.90).

    Main Findings: RME implementation significantly predicted teacher-rated performance (β = 0.468, p < 0.001, f² = 0.312, medium-to-large effect), as did student learning interest (β = 0.382, p < 0.001, f² = 0.198, medium effect). Both predictors jointly explained 58.4% of performance variance (R² = 0.584, Q² = 0.398), indicating substantial explanatory and predictive capacity.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study uniquely integrates pedagogical and psychological predictors within a single SEM-PLS framework from the practitioner perspective, addressing a methodological gap in Indonesian elementary mathematics research that has predominantly relied on separate, small-scale analyses. Findings carry direct implications for teacher professional development and curriculum design, particularly in advancing RME adoption and interest-fostering strategies within Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum context.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Realistic Mathematics Education and Learning Interest as Simultaneous Predictors of Mathematics Achievement: Evidence from a Teacher-Perspective SEM-PLS Study”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 377–389, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jee.v7i2.2417.

    More Citation Formats

  • 86
    Abstract views
    81
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. OECD, “PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education,” Paris, 2023. doi: 10.1787/53f23881-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
    2. R. C. I. Prahmana and S. Hadi, “The implementation of realistic mathematics education in indonesian elementary schools: From theoretical to practical,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2019, p. 12103. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012103
    3. R. K. Sembiring, S. Hadi, and M. Dolk, “Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesian classrooms through RME,” in ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 42, Springer, 2010, pp. 927–939. doi: 10.1007/s11858-010-0283-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0125-9
    4. D. H. Clements and J. Sarama, Learning and Teaching Early Math: The Learning Trajectories Approach, 3rd ed. Routledge, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9781315150994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003083528
    5. S. Revina and F. K. S. Leung, “How the same flowers grow in different soils: The implementation of realistic mathematics education in Utrecht and Jakarta classrooms,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 106, pp. 101744, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101744
    6. S. Satriani, K. Kristiawati, M. R. Usman, and W. Wahyuddin, “Needs analysis for developing interactive learning resources assisted by geogebra through the spada unismuh learning management system to improve students’ mathematical visualization skills,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 916-923, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i3.1630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i3.1630
    7. N. Nurwijaya and S. Suparman, “The effect of realistic mathematics education approach on students’ mathematical representation ability,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1385–1398, 2019, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12189a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12189a
    8. U. Cahyaningsih and D. S. Nahdi, “The effect of realistic mathematics education on elementary students ’ critical thinking skills,” Purp. Publ., 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012127
    9. H. Freudenthal, Revisiting Mathematics Education: China Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
    10. A. Treffers, Three Dimensions: A Model of Goal and Theory Description in Mathematics Instruction-The Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1987.
    11. M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and P. Drijvers, Realistic Mathematics Education, 2nd ed. Cham: Springer, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170
    12. A. Wijaya, M. Van Den Heuvel-panhuizen, and D. Michiel, “Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks,” pp. 41–65, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1
    13. T. Laurens, F. A. Batlolona, J. R. Batlolona, and M. Leasa, “How does realistic mathematics education (rme) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement?,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 569–578, 2017, doi: 10.12973/ejmste/76959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959
    14. N. Listiawati and S. S. Sabon, “Analysis of implementing realistic mathematics education principles to enhance mathematics competence of slow learner students,” vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 683–700, 2023, doi: 10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp683-700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp683-700
    15. J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
    16. M. Sarstedt, J. F. Hair, M. Pick, B. D. Liengaard, L. Radomir, and C. M. Ringle, “Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade,” WILEY, no. September 2021, pp. 1035–1064, 2022, doi: 10.1002/mar.21640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21640
    17. C. Öksüz, M. T. Eser, and G. Genç, “The review of the effects of realistic mathematics education on students’ academic achievement in Turkey: A meta-analysis study,” Ijcer, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 662–677, 2022, doi: 10.33200/ijcer.1053578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1053578
    18. M. Tamur, D. Juandi, and A. M. G. Adem, “Realistic mathematics education in Indonesia and recommendations for future implementation: A meta-analysis study,” JTAM, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2020, doi: 10.31764/jtam.v4i1.1786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i1.1786
    19. S. Revina and F. K. S. Leung, “Issues involved in the adoption of realistic mathematics education in Indonesian culture,” Comp. A J. Comp. Int. Educ., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 631–650, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03057925.2019.1650636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1650636
    20. R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, p. 101860, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
    21. S. Schukajlow, K. Rakoczy, and R. Pekrun, “Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Where we are today and where we need to go,” ZDM – Math. Educ., no. 2023, pp. 249–267, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11858-022-01463-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01463-2
    22. J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, pp. 101859, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
    23. E. Oppong-gyebi, Y. A. Dissou, W. A. Brantuo, V. Maanu, F. O. Boateng, and B. Adu-obeng, “Improving STEM mathematics achievement through self-efficacy, student perception, and mathematics connection: The mediating role of student interest,” vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 186–202, 2023, doi: 10.33902/JPR.202321085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202321085
    24. K. A. Renninger and S. E. Hidi, “The power of interest for motivation and engagement,” in The Routledge Handbook of Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning, New York: Routledge, 2016, pp. 432–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771045
    25. S. Hidi and K. A. Renninger, “The four-phase model of interest development,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 111–127, 2006, doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
    26. G. Garon-Carrier et al., “Intrinsic motivation and achievement in mathematics in elementary school: A longitudinal investigation of their association,” Child Dev., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 165–175, 2016, doi: 10.1111/cdev.12458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12458
    27. U. Schiefele, A. Krapp, and A. Winteler, “Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research,” Role Interes. Learn. Dev., pp. 183–212, 1992.
    28. J. Guo, H. W. Marsh, P. D. Parker, A. J. S. Morin, and A. S. Yeung, “Expectancy-value in mathematics, gender and socioeconomic background as predictors of achievement and aspirations: A multi-cohort study,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 37, pp. 161–168, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.008
    29. J. E. Kihwele, “Promoting students’ interest and achievement in mathematics through‘ king and queen of mathematics’ initiative,” 2022, doi: 10.1108/JRIT-12-2021-0083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2021-0083
    30. Y. Zhu and G. Kaiser, “Impacts of classroom teaching practices on students’ mathematics learning interest, mathematics self‑efficacy and mathematics test achievements: a secondary analysis of Shanghai data from the international video study Global Teaching InSights,” ZDM – Math. Educ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 581–593, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11858-022-01343-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01343-9
    31. P. Zheng, Ya You, and Guozhong Luo, “Math interest on primary school students’ mathematics achievement: Self-control/resilience chain mediation,” J. Psychoeduc. Assess., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 488–501, 2025, doi: 10.1177/07342829251326435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829251326435
    32. T. T. H. Phan and L.-H. T. Dang, “Teacher professional development on STEM education: A systematic review,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, p. 1021517, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1021517.
    33. C. Ariati, V. Anzani, D. Juandi, and A. Hasanah, “Meta-analysis study: Effect of realistic mathematics education (rme) approach on student’s mathematical literacy skill,” AKSIOMA, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2953–2963, 2022, doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.6182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.6182
    34. J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 2–24, 2019, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
    35. C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker, “SmartPLS 4,” 2022.
    36. World Economic Forum, “The Future of Jobs Report 2020,” Geneva, 2020.
    37. N. Kania, Y. Kusumah, J. Dahlan, E. Nurlaelah, and Z. Arifin, “Research trends in higher-order thinking skills in the journal mathematics education in Indonesia: From design to data analysis,” Int. J. Math. Math., pp. 193–206, 2024, doi: 10.56855/ijmme.v2i3.1048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v2i3.1048
    38. J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed. Sage Publications, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
    39. S. Zamir, Z. Yang, H. Wenwu, and U. Sarwar, “Assessing the attitude and problem-based learning in mathematics through PLS-SEM modeling,” pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266363
    40. K. Gravemeijer and M. Doorman, “Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 111–129, 1999, doi: 10.1023/A:1003799406835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
    41. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, “Principles and Standards for School Mathematics,” Reston, VA, 2000.
    42. N. S. I. Gunarti, F. M. Firdaus, and Budiawan, “The influence of Indonesian realistic mathematics approach to improve concept understanding and critical thinking skills of fourth grade elementary school students,” vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 273–281, 2023, doi: 10.23887/ijee.v7i2.60530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i2.60530
    43. W. Gunawan and S. Hadi, “The effect of a Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach and reasoning ability on students’ conceptual and procedural understanding,” vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 90–102, 2024, doi: 10.18844/cerj.v14i2.9318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v14i2.9318
    44. M. Rusmiati, “Realistic mathematics education (rme) on student self-efficacy,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 97-101, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jee.v3i3.265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v3i3.265
    45. S. K. Boadu and F. O. Boateng, “Enhancing students’ achievement in mathematics education in the 21 st century through technology integration, collaborative learning, and student motivation: The mediating role of student interest,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 11, 2024, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/15622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15622
    46. S. Prediger, D. Götze, L. Holzäpfel, B. Rösken-winter, and C. Selter, “Five principles for high-quality mathematics teaching: Combining normative, epistemological , empirical, and pragmatic perspectives for specifying the content of professional development,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, no. October, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.969212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.969212
    47. L. Huang, M. Doorman, and W. Van Joolingen, “Inquiry-Based Learning Practices in Lower-Secondary Mathematics Education Reported by Students from China and the Netherlands,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1505–1521, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10122-5
    48. E. Edwar, R. I. I. Putri, Z. Zulkardi, and D. Darmawijoyo, “Developing a workshop model for high school mathematics teachers constructing HOTS questions through the Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia approach,” Journal on Mathematics Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 603–626, 2023, doi: 10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp603-626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp603-626
    49. A. Akorede, A. Sondlo, and A. T. O, “Impact of interest and motivation on academic achievement of junior secondary school students in mathematics,” Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 275–284, 2024, doi: 10.58421/misro.v3i3.269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v3i3.269
    50. A. Südkamp, J. Kaiser, and J. Möller, “Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 743–762, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0027627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027627