Edification-Based Leadership Development: Integrating Behavioral and Managerial Design Change Future-Ready Elementary Schools Principals in Urban and Rural Settings
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study investigates how elementary school principals in urban and rural settings develop future-ready leadership through integrating behavioral and managerial design change dimensions within an edification-based framework to address digital transformation challenges in Indonesian elementary education.
Methodology: A mixed exploratory qualitative design with component analysis was employed, using structured observations and interviews with contrasting questions. Ten elementary school principals from Bandung City and West Bandung Regency were selected via purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti software through systematic thematic coding of non-numerical textual data.
Main Findings: Urban schools in Bandung City demonstrated higher digital adaptability, innovative supervision, and active professional development supported by adequate infrastructure and collaborative culture. Rural schools in West Bandung Regency exhibited conventional leadership patterns constrained by limited technology access. Two integrated leadership stages emerged: Behavior Design Change (digital leadership, open-mindedness, efficacy, foresight) and Managerial Design Change (network, digital organization, transition management, digital transformation, innovation strategy).
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces an edification-based leadership development framework integrating behavioral and managerial design change dimensions specifically for elementary school principals. It advances existing knowledge by providing empirical evidence of urban–rural digital leadership disparities in Indonesia and offering a contextualized, culturally-responsive model for developing future-ready school leaders.
References
M. Will, “Educators Feel the Weight of Looming Uncertainty,” Educ. Week, vol. 41, no. 21, pp. 14–16, 2022.
S. Bridge, “Facing uncertainty: An entrepreneurial view of the future?,” J. Manag. Organ., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 312–323, 2021, doi: 10.1017/jmo.2018.65.
T. Wang, W. Lam, Z. Chen, Q. Yu, and X. Geng, “Future organizational identification: Visionary leadership gives me foresight to identify with my organization in the future,” J. Organ. Behav., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 566-579, 2024, doi: 10.1002/job.2852.
M. A. Mollah, J. H. Choi, S. J. Hwang, and J. K. Shin, “Explorando un camino hacia el desempeño organizacional sostenible de Corea del Sur en la era digital: el efecto del liderazgo digital en las capacidades de TI y el aprendizaje organizacional,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 10, 2023.
B. C. Fusarelli and L. D. Fusarelli, “Leadership for the future: enhancing principal preparation through standards and innovation,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1403, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14121403.
A. Harris, and M. S. Jones, Leading Futures: Global Perspectives on Educational Leadership, SAGE Publications Pvt. Ltd, 2016.
S. M. Ashton, T. Smeets, and C. W. E. M. Quaedflieg, “Controlling intrusive thoughts of future fears under stress,” Neurobiol. Stress, vol. 27, no. October, p. 100582, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2023.100582.
T. Nilsson and J. Damiani, “The pedagogical potential of identity work in leadership education – Controversies, confessions, and conclusions,” Leadership, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2024, doi: 10.1177/17427150231201731.
M. Elomaa, S. Eskelä-haapanen, E. Pakarinen, and L. Halttunen, “Elementary school principals’ work from the ecological systems perspective: Evidence from Finland,” Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1231-1251, 2024, doi: 10.1177/17411432221125999.
N. Van Quaquebeke and F. H. Gerpott, “The now, new, and next of digital leadership: how artificial intelligence (ai) will take over and change leadership as we know it,” J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 265–275, 2023, doi: 10.1177/15480518231181731.
M. Liu and Q. Gu, “Does shared leadership always have positive effects on employee creativity? a role conflict perspective,” J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 420–432, 2024, doi: 10.1177/15480518241287644.
A. V. Simpson, A. Rego, M. Berti, S. Clegg, and M. Pina e Cunha, “Theorizing compassionate leadership from the case of Jacinda Ardern: Legitimacy, paradox and resource conservation1,” Leadership, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 337–358, 2022, doi: 10.1177/17427150211055291.
A. M. Scallon, T. J. Bristol, and J. Esboldt, “Teachers’ perceptions of principal leadership practices that influence teacher turnover,” J. Res. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 80–102, 2023, doi: 10.1177/19427751211034214.
H. L. Leroy et al., “Walking our evidence-based talk: the case of leadership development in business schools,” J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2022, doi: 10.1177/15480518211062563.
C. L. Guarana and B. J. Avolio, “Unpacking Psychological Ownership: How Transactional and Transformational Leaders Motivate Ownership,” J. Leadersh. & Organ. Stud., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 96–114, 2022, doi: 10.1177/15480518211066072.
A. Phillips, J. Barnatt, and K Viesca, “Linguistically responsive leaders: Working with multilingual students and their families,” J. Res. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 301–321, 2022, doi: 10.1177/19427751221078039.
S. Wollscheid, C. E. Tomte, G. C. Egeberg, H. Karlstrom, and L. W. Fossum, Research trends on digital school leadership over time: Science mapping and content analysis, vol. 30, no. 1. Springer US, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12909-3.
T. Karakose, H. Polat, and S. Papadakis, “Examining teachers’ perspectives on school principals’ digital leadership roles and technology capabilities during the covid-19 pandemic,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 23, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132313448.
U. Detthamrong, L. T. Nguyen, and W. Chansanam, “Leadership and group management: Key success factors for microfinance institutions in Chaiyaphum Province, Thailand,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151411192.
T. Janovac et al., “Assessment and ranking of the behavioural leadership model in the process of implementing reforms in public sector of the Republic of Serbia Using the PIPRECIA Method,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151310315.
A. M. Langer, Information technology and organizational learning: Managing behavioral change in the digital age. CRC Press, 2017.
A. Tasker-Mitchell and Prince A Attoh, “The mediating effect of faculty trust in principals on the relationship between servant leadership practices and organizational health,” J. Sch. Leadersh., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 297–336, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1052684619884784.
P. Hallinger, R. Hosseingholizadeh, N. Hashemi, and M. Kouhsari, “Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 800–819, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1741143217700283.
F. M. Abunaser, N. S. M. S. El-Din, and R. Al-Fahadi, “Core competencies for school leaders: Insights from educational experts,” Frontiers (Boulder)., 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1638252.
M. P. Godoy, C. Rusu, F. Hatibovic, T. Granollers, and J. Ugalde, “Addressing information consumer experience through a user-centered information management system in a Chilean University,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 22, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152215998.
D. Mastrogiovanni and A. Freidus, “‘Deeper than a lesson’: New jersey school superintendents’ approaches to culturally relevant education,” J. Res. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 483–508, 2023, doi: 10.1177/19427751231215776.
D. B. Reid and Benjamin M Creed, “Visible at night: US school principal nontraditional work-hour activities and job satisfaction,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1123–1140, 2021, doi: 10.1177/17411432211027645.
C. S. Ugwuanyi and M. Pietsch, “Promoting leadership for learning in Nigeria: The interplay of leadership mastery experience and leader self-effi cacy,” pp. 1–21, 2024, doi: 10.1177/17411432241282488.
D. A. Bryant and A. Walker, “Principal-designed structures that enhance middle leaders’ professional learning,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 435–454, 2024, doi: 10.1177/17411432221084154.
K. Liu, R. Tschinkel, and R. Miller, “Digital equity and school leadership in a post-digital world,” ECNU Review of Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 762-783. 2024. doi: 10.1177/20965311231224083.
Y. Liu, M. Ş. Bellibaş, and S. Gümüş, “The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 430–453, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1741143220910438.
S. Yang, L. Zhang, and L. Wang, “Key factors of sustainable development of organization: Bibliometric analysis of organizational citizenship behavior,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 10, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15108261.
H. Hanbury, C. Bader, and S. Moser, “Reducing working hours as a means to foster low(er)-carbon lifestyles? An exploratory study on Swiss employees,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 7, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11072024.
A. Assarroudi, F. H. Nabavi, M. R. Armat, A. Ebadi, and M. Vaismoradi, “Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process,” J. Res. Nurs., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 42–55, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1744987117741667.
E. Rasdiana, Fitrawati, M. W. Jasman, K. Reski, A. Anwar, and Enaldi, “How does principal’s instructional leadership shape teacher performance mediated by teacher self-efficacy in Indonesian education context?,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, p. 1401394, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1401394.
U. N. Sharma, “Basic stages of analyzing qualitative documents using ATLAS.ti,” Access An Int. J. Nepal Libr. Assoc., vol. 3, pp. 112–132, 2024, doi: 10.3126/access.v3i1.69427.
B. Smit and V. Scherman, “Computer-Assisted qualitative data analysis software for scoping reviews: A case of ATLAS.ti,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 20, p. 160940692110191, 2021, doi: 10.1177/16094069211019140.
S. Prayogi, M. R. Bilad, N. N. S. P. Verawati, and M. Asy’ari, “Inquiry vs. Inquiry-Creative: Emphasizing critical thinking skills of prospective STEM teachers in the context of STEM learning in Indonesia,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14060593.
P. O. Gilchrist, A. B. Alexander, A. J. Green, F. E. Sanders, A. Q. Hooker, and D. M. Reif, “Development of a pandemic awareness stem outreach curriculum: Utilizing a computational thinking taxonomy framework,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11030109.
C. Anwar, A. Aznem, L. T. Payung, Azainil, and D. N. Hidayanto, “Empowering education through digital leadership: the evolving role of school principals,” vol. 04, no. 05, pp. 2402–2413, 2025, doi: 10.61987/jemr.v4i5.1243.
Q. Lin, “Digital leadership: a systematic literature review and future research agenda,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2469–2488, 2024, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-07-2023-0522.
P. He, F. Guo, and G. A. Abazie, “School principals’ instructional leadership as a predictor of teacher’s professional development,” Asian-Pacific J. Second Foreign Lang. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0.
T. Karakose, A. Kardas, S. Kanadlı, T. Tülüba, and B. Yildirim, “How collective efficacy mediates the association between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy: Findings from a meta-analytic structural equation modeling,” Behav. Sci. (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 85, 2024, doi: 10.3390/bs14020085.
M. L. Donaldson, M. Mavrogordato, P. Youngs, and S. M. Dougherty, “Principals’ priorities, teacher evaluation, and instructional leadership,” Educ. Res., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 487–495, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3102/0013189X241273903.
F. B. Tigre, P. L. Henriques, and C. Curado, The digital leadership emerging construct: a multi-method approach, vol. 75, no. 1. Springer International Publishing, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11301-023-00395-9.
V. Gordon and D. Martin, “The 21st-Century CEO: Intrinsic attributes, worldview, and communication capabilities,” J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 141–149, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1548051818793338.
B. C. Fusarelli, Lance D Fusarelli, and Fran Riddick, “Planning for the future: Leadership development and succession planning in education,” J. Res. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 286–313, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1942775118771671.
A. Tamadoni, R. Hosseingholizadeh, and M. S. Bellibas, “A systematic review of key contextual challenges facing school principals: Research-informed coping solutions,” vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 116–150, 2024, doi: 10.1177/17411432211061439.
L. Aleksieva, “Preparing pre-service teachers for the digital transformation of education: Exploring university teacher educators’ views and practical strategies,” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 404, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15040404.
T. Karakose, T. Tülübaş, S. Papadakis, and R. Yirci, “Evaluating the intellectual structure of the knowledge base on transformational school leadership: a bibliometric and science mapping analysis,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13070708.
Copyright (c) 2026 Asep Suryana, Sururi Sururi, Suryadi Suryadi, Nugraha Suharto, Asep Dikdik, Iqbal Nugraha Barlian, Siti Nurjannah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
