Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Microlearning Media Development for Office Management: A TPACK-Based Analysis

Tjutju Yuniarsih ORCID
Indonesia University of Education ROR
Indonesia
A Sobandi ORCID
Indonesia University of Education ROR
Indonesia
Rini Intansari Meilani ORCID
Indonesia University of Education ROR
Indonesia
intanmusthafa@upi.edu
Resti Indriarti ORCID
Indonesia University of Education ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze teachers’ proficiency in developing microlearning materials based on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPaCK) to enhance students’ access to subject matter and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of learning outcomes.

    Methodology: This research employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive survey design. The study involved 37 teachers selected through purposive sampling, representing various educational levels and subject areas relevant to the integration of technology in teaching. Data were collected using structured interviews, questionnaires, and document analysis. The questionnaires, distributed via Google Forms, assessed teachers’ TPaCK proficiency across the domains of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge in the design of microlearning materials. Interview data provided deeper insights into teachers’ practical experiences, while document analysis validated the quality of microlearning materials produced. Quantitative data from the questionnaires were analyzed using SPSS version 25 to obtain descriptive statistics, and qualitative data from interviews and document reviews were analyzed thematically to triangulate findings.

    Main Findings: The results revealed that most teachers demonstrated adequate proficiency in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPaCK), particularly in integrating technology into instructional design. However, some teachers demonstrated limited mastery in applying pedagogical principles and in effectively using technology-based tools to develop microlearning materials.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides new insights into the relationship between TPaCK proficiency and the development of microlearning materials in blended learning environments. It underscores how teachers’ integrated competence in technology, pedagogy, and content directly influences the quality, accessibility, and effectiveness of digital instructional resources.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Microlearning Media Development for Office Management: A TPACK-Based Analysis”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1365–1373, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i4.2237.

    More Citation Formats

  • 302
    Abstract views
    193
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. R. Gerbaudo, R. Gaspar, and R. Gonçalves Lins, “Novel online video model for learning information technology based on micro learning and multimedia micro content,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 5637-5665, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10537-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10537-9
    2. J. C. Désiron, M.-L. Schmitz, and D. Petko, “Teachers as creators of digital multimedia learning materials: Are they aligned with multimedia learning principles,” Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 637–653, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10758-024-09770-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09770-1
    3. S. Suryanti, D. Sutaji, T. Nusantara, and Subanji, “An assessment of teachers’ readiness for online teaching”, J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1933, no. 1, p. 012117, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012117
    4. Y. Li, X. Chen, Y. Chen, F. Zhang, and M. H. Sallam, ‘Investigation of college teachers’ TPACK level during the epidemic situation: taking chu kochen honors college, Zhejiang University as an Example’, in 2021 IEEE 24th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), IEEE, May 2021, pp. 480–484. doi: 10.1109/CSCWD49262.2021.9437867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD49262.2021.9437867
    5. J. R. Corbeil, B. H. Khan, and M. E. Corbeil, Microlearning in the Digital Age. Routledge, 2021. doi: 10.4324/9780367821623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821623
    6. G. P. A. Arimbawa, N. N. Parwati, K. Agustini, I. K. A. Suartama, I. K. Sudarma, “The effectiveness of microlearning-based e-modules in improving critical thinking abilities of vocational high school students,” JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 235-247, 2025, doi: 10.17977/um038v8i32025p235-247.
    7. L. Dewi, Menyusun RPS untuk Pembelajaran Daring [Preparing RPS for Online Learning], Bandung, 2020.
    8. L. Giurgiu, “Microlearning an evolving elearning trend,” Scientific Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2017, doi: 10.1515/bsaft-2017-0003.
    9. D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, T. Tanti, and S. Maryani, “Innovative learning: Gender perception of e-module linear equations in mathematics and physics,” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), vol. 4, no. 2, pp, 92-106, 2022, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610
    10. D. Kamilali and C. Sofianopoulou, ‘Lifelong learning and Web 2.0: Microlearning and self directed learning’, Proceedings of EDULEARN13 Conference - 5th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, no. July, pp. 361–366, 2013.
    11. I. Buchem and H. Hamelmann, ‘Microlearning: A strategy for ongoing professional development microcontent and microlearning,” eLearning Papers, vol. 21, 2010, pp. 1–15, 2010.
    12. D. Kovachev, Y. Cao, R. Klamma, and M. Jarke, ‘Learn-as-you-go: New ways of cloud-based micro-learning for the mobile web’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 7048 LNCS, pp. 51–61, 2011, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_6
    13. M. S. Shail, ‘Using Micro-learning on mobile applications to increase knowledge retention and work performance: A review of literature,” Cureus, vol. 11, no. 8, 2019, doi: 10.7759/cureus.5307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5307
    14. W. K. Monib, A. Qazi, and R. A. Apong, “Microlearning beyond boundaries: A systematic review and a novel framework for improving learning outcomes,” Heliyon, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. e41413, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41413.
    15. H. Hamzah, M. I. Hamzah, and H. Zulkifli, “Systematic literature review on the elements of metacognition-based higher order thinking skills (HOTS) teaching and learning modules,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 813, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14020813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020813
    16. P. Kwangmuang, S. Jarutkamolpong, W. Sangboonraung, and S. Daungtod, “The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 6, p. e07309, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
    17. T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452
    18. M. Ramli, Media dan Teknologi Pembelajaran [Learning Media and Technology]. Banjarmasin: IAIN Antasari Press, 2012.
    19. A. Cahyadi, Pengembangan Media Dan Sumber Belajar: Teori dan Prosedur [Media and Learning Resource Development: Theory and Procedures]. Serang: Laksita Indonesia, 2019.
    20. T. Tanti, D. Deliza, and S. Hartina, “The effectiveness of using smartphones as mobile-mini labs in improving students’ beliefs in physics,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 387-394, 2024, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185
    21. A. Alshehri, ‘The Effectiveness of a Micro-Learning Strategy in Developing the Skills of Using Augmented Reality Applications among Science Teachers in Jeddah’, International Journal of Educational Research Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 176–183, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.24331/ijere.869642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.869642
    22. D. Salleh, N. Khairudin, and M. Ibrahim, Micro Learning: Motivating Students’ Learning Interests, 2022.
    23. M. Mali, S. Sonawane, and V. Jadhav, “Micro-learning (ML): An effective way of learning in teacher education,” Zeichen Journal, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 101-108, 2021.
    24. L. Giurgiu, ‘Microlearning an evolving elearning trend,” Scientific Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 18–23, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1515/bsaft-2017-0003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bsaft-2017-0003
    25. T. Tanti, D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and M. Iqbal, “Analysis of user responses to the application of web-based assessment on character assessment,” Journal of education technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 356-364, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590
    26. F. Karataş, and B. A. Ataç, “When TPACK meets artificial intelligence: Analyzing TPACK and AI-TPACK components through structural equation modelling,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 8979-9004, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13164-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13164-2
    27. P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, ‘Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge’, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
    28. M. Schmid, E. Brianza, S. Y. Mok, and D. Petko, “Running in circles: A systematic review of reviews on technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK),” Computers & education, vol. 214, pp. 105024, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105024
    29. I. Istiningsih, ‘Impact of ICT integration on the development of vocational high school teacher TPACK in the digital age 4.0.’, World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 103–116, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.18844/wjet.v14i1.6642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i1.6642
    30. T. Yuniarsih, A. Sobandi, R. I. Meilani, E. Supardi, R. Indriarti, and R. Faldesiani, ‘Analysis of Microlearning-Based Learning Media Needs: A Retrospective Study at Vocational High School’, in 6th Global Conference on Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2021), Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 220, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220701.002
    31. Y. M. Lee, I. Jahnke, and I. Austin, “Mobile microlearning design and effects on learning efficacy and learner experience,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 885-915, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09931-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09931-w
    32. T. N. Fitria, “Microlearning in teaching and learning process: A review,” CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa Dan Pendidikan, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 114-135, 2022, doi: 10.55606/cendikia.v2i4.473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/cendikia.v2i4.473
    33. A. D. Taylor, and W. Hung, “The effects of microlearning: A scoping review,” Educational technology research and development, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 363-395, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11423-022-10084-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10084-1
    34. T. Javorcik, K. Kostolanyova, and T. Havlaskova, “Microlearning in the education of future teachers: Monitoring and evaluating students’ activity in a microlearning course,” Electronic Journal of E-learning, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13-25, 2023, doi: 10.34190/ejel.21.1.2623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.1.2623
    35. Nikkhoo, I., Ahmadi, Z., Akbari, M., Imannezhad, S., Anvari Ardekani, S., & Lashgari, H. (2023). Microlearning for today’s students: A rapid review of essentials and considerations. Medical Education Bulletin, 4(1), 673-685, 2023, doi: 10.22034/meb.2022.355659.1066.
    36. Nitiasih, P. K., Santosa, M. H., Suarcaya, P., & Ratnaya, G. (2023). Micro Learning Media for Teaching English at Junior High School Students. Journal of Education Technology, 7(4), 629-635, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jet.v7i4.69627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i4.69627
    37. Mostrady, A., Sanchez-Lopez, E., & Gonzalez-Sanchez, A. F. (2025). Microlearning and its effectiveness in modern education: A mini review. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4(1), 33-42, 2025, doi: 10.53623/apga.v4i1.496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v4i1.496
    38. T. Tanti, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, D. Darmaji, T. O. Puspitasari, and I. Wardhana, “Attitude for physics: The condition of high school students,” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 126-132, 2021, doi: 10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.18919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.18919
    39. Robles, H., Jimeno, M., Villalba, K., Mardini, I., Viloria-Nuñez, C., & Florian, W. (2023). Design of a micro-learning framework and mobile application using design-based research. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1223, 2023, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1223
    40. Silva, E. S., Costa, W. P. D., Lima, J. C. D., & Ferreira, J. C. (2025). Contribution of microlearning in basic education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 15(3), 302, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15030302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030302
    41. Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., & Apong, R. A. (2025). Microlearning beyond boundaries: A systematic review and a novel framework for improving learning outcomes. Heliyon, 11(2), 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41413