The Impact of Digital Technology Transformation on Lecturer Performance in Higher Education: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the impact of digital technology on lecturers’ performance in higher education institutions. The analysis focuses on five key indicators: learning enhancement, teaching effectiveness, academic leadership, infrastructure readiness, and the availability of syllabi and lesson plans.
Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was adopted, involving both quantitative and qualitative data collection. Questionnaires were distributed to 64 lecturers, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with selected participants. The instruments assessed lecturers’ attitudes, behaviors, and the extent of digital technology adoption across teaching, research, and community service activities. A Likert scale was used to measure the level of digital technology acceptance.
Main Findings: The findings show that although many lecturers are still in the process of understanding and adapting to digital transformation, the use of digital technology has significantly improved their effectiveness and efficiency. It has also increased learning flexibility and student engagement through more interactive and accessible educational environments. Key supporting factors identified include institutional infrastructure, academic leadership, and supportive policies.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge by exploring the multifaceted influence of digital technology on lecturers' performance. It highlights the critical role of institutional support in facilitating sustainable digital integration in higher education, particularly in the Indonesian context.
References
K. Anubhav, A. K. Dwivedi, and K. Aashish, “Entrepreneurship education in higher education (2002–2022): A technology-empowered systematic literature review,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 22, no. 3, p. 100993, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100993.
V. J. Owan et al., “Curriculum Management and Graduate Programmes’ Viability: The Mediation of Institutional Effectiveness Using PLS-SEM Approach,” J. Curric. Teach., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 114–127, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.5430/JCT.V11N5P114.
S. Harto, F. A. Hamied, B. Musthafa, and S. Setyarini, “Exploring undergraduate students’ experiences in dealing with post-editing of machine translation,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 696–707, 2022, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v11i3.42825.
Satriani, Amiruddin, A. Sakinah, and A. Muktamar, “Problems of Implementing the Independent Learning Curriculum in the Digital Era,” ETDC Indones. J. Res. Educ. Rev., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 36–43, 2023, doi: 10.51574/ijrer.v2i4.934.
G. Fischer, J. Lundin, and O. J. Lindberg, “The challenge for the digital age: making learning a part of life,” Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJILT-04-2022-0079.
A. S. Rahmatullah, E. Mulyasa, S. Syahrani, F. Pongpalilu, and R. E. Putri, “Digital Era 4.0: The Contribution to Education and Student Psychology Azam,” Linguist. Cult. Rev., vol. 6, pp. 89–107, 2022. doi: 10.21744/lingcure.v6nS3.2064.
S. Tomy and E. Pardede, “An entrepreneurial intention model focussing on higher education,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1423–1447, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-06-2019-0370.
J. C. Sánchez, “The Impact of an Entrepreneurship Education Program on Entrepreneurial Competencies and Intention,” J. Small Bus. Manag., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 447–465, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12025.
J. Wasim, M. H. Youssef, I. Christodoulou, and R. Reinhardt, “The Path to Entrepreneurship: The Role of Social Networks in Driving Entrepreneurial Learning and Education,” J. Manag. Educ., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 459–493, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1177/10525629231219235.
G. Hägg and J. Gabrielsson, “A systematic literature review of the evolution of pedagogy in entrepreneurial education research,” vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 829–861, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0272.
H. Kassean, J. Vanevenhoven, E. Liguori, and D. E. Winkel, “Entrepreneurship education: a need for reflection, real-world experience and action,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 690–708, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-07-2014-0123.
V. Ratten and P. Usmanij, “Entrepreneurship education: Time for a change in research direction?,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 100367, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100367.
B. Murphy and T. Hassall, “Developing accountants: from novice to expert,” Account. Educ., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–31, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09639284.2019.1682628.
F. Abida and R. Kuswardani, “Developing Intercultural Awareness through Poems in EFL Classrooms,” in Proceedings of Social Sciences, Humanities and Economics Conference (SoSHEC 2017), 2018, pp. 235–239. doi: 10.2991/soshec-17.2018.47.
C. G. Iwu et al., “Entrepreneurship education, curriculum and lecturer-competency as antecedents of student entrepreneurial intention,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 100295, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2019.03.007.
I. B. Larsen and H. Neergaard, “What lies beneath: using student reflections to study the entrepreneurial mindset in entrepreneurship education,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1149–1176, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-06-2023-0578.
E. Bernadó and F. Bratzke, “Revisiting EntreComp through a systematic literature review of entrepreneurial competences. Implications for entrepreneurship education and future research,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 22, no. 3, p. 101010, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101010.
G. Aparicio, T. Iturralde, and A. Maseda, “Conceptual structure and perspectives on entrepreneurship education research: A bibliometric review,” Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 105–113, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.04.003.
C. Brush, B. Wraae, and S. Nikou, “Understanding influences on entrepreneurship educator role identity,” Educ. Train., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 1–28, 2023, doi: 10.1108/ET-01-2022-0007.
E. S. Mwasalwiba, “Entrepreneurship education: A review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators,” Educ. Train., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 20–47, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1108/00400911011017663.
J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (4th ed.), Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2016, p. 368.
Y. C. PH. and Chang, Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, vol. 4, no. June. Sage Publications, 2009.
N. Supartini, and D. Seken, “The Analysis of Communication Strategies Used by Students From Mixed Marriage Families in Attending the Teaching and Learning Process in Business Hospitality,” e-Journal Progr. Pascasarj. Univ. Pendidik. Ganesha, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2015. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/119681-EN-the-analysis-of-communication-strategies.pdf
J. A. Maxwell and L. E. Reybold, Qualitative Research, no. December 2015. 2015. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10558-6.
D. Hahn, T. Minola, G. Bosio, and L. Cassia, “The impact of entrepreneurship education on university students’ entrepreneurial skills: a family embeddedness perspective,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 257–282, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11187-019-00143-y.
A. Harima, J. Gießelmann, V. Göttsch, and L. Schlichting, “Entrepreneurship? Let us do it later: procrastination in the intention–behavior gap of student entrepreneurship,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1189–1213, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-09-2020-0665.
S. Martínez-Gregorio, L. Badenes-Ribera, and A. Oliver, “Effect of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship intention and related outcomes in educational contexts: a meta-analysis,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, p. 100545, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100545.
A. Carpenter and R. Wilson, “A systematic review looking at the effect of entrepreneurship education on higher education student,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, p. 100541, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100541.
R. Bell and H. Bell, “Applying educational theory to develop a framework to support the delivery of experiential entrepreneurship education,” J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 987–1004, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JSBED-01-2020-0012.
M. I. Abdullah, Sudirman, R. Masdar, M. Din, and M. F. Firman, “Antecedents of the accountability in indonesian local government financial reporting,” Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., vol. 7, no. 5, p. e0709, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i5.e709.
I. Craib and S. Clarke, The Foundations of Structuralism: A Critique of Levi-Strauss and the Structuralist Movement, vol. 34, no. 2. 1983. doi: 10.2307/590738.
S. Aghaei, Y. Shahbazi, M. Pirbabaei, and H. Beyti, “A hybrid SEM-neural network method for modeling the academic satisfaction factors of architecture students,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 4, no. January, p. 100122, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100122.
S. Debarliev, A. Janeska-Iliev, O. Stripeikis, and B. Zupan, “What can education bring to entrepreneurship? Formal versus non-formal education,” J. Small Bus. Manag., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 219–252, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/00472778.2019.1700691.
G. Boldureanu, A. M. Ionescu, A.-M. Bercu, M. V. Bedrule-Grigoruță, and D. Boldureanu, “Entrepreneurship education through successful entrepreneurial models in higher education institutions,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 1267, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12031267
J. M. Martins, M. F. Shahzad, and S. Xu, “Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention to initiate new ventures : evidence from university students,” J. Innov. Entrep., 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13731-023-00333-9.
M. J. González-López, M. C. Pérez-López, and L. Rodríguez-Ariza, “From potential to early nascent entrepreneurship: the role of entrepreneurial competencies,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1387–1417, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11365-020-00658-x.
M.-A. Georgescu and E. Herman, “The impact of the family background on students’ entrepreneurial intentions: an empirical analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 11. 2020. doi: 10.3390/su12114775.
A. Janowski and A. Szczepańska – Przekota, “Entrepreneurship education in Poland: Contemporary problems and future opportunities,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, p. 100931, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100931.
P. Bari, J. Iqbal, M. Z. Asghar, and A. Asghar, “Impact of entrepreneurial curriculum on entrepreneurial competencies among students : The mediating role of the campus learning environment in higher education,” no. September, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950440.
D. N. Ezenwanne, “Entrepreneurial Intention and Skills Needed by Today ’ s Youths for Sustainable Development,” pp. 170–181, 2023. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.4120232303
M. Orisa, A. Faisol, and M. I. Ashari, “Teaching Product Design Through The CANVA Application To Enhance The Brand Image Of The Company,” Brill. Res. Artif. Intell., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2024, doi: 10.47709/brilliance.v4i1.3775.
I. Keshta and A. Odeh, “Security and privacy of electronic health records: Concerns and challenges,” Egypt. Informatics J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 177–183, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eij.2020.07.003.
I. Muthahharah and I. Fatwa, “Modeling the types of online learning media using multiple linear regression analysis,” J. Varian, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2021, doi: 10.30812/varian.v5i1.1459.
T. Yigitcanlar et al., “Digital Technologies of Transportation-Related Communication: Review and the state-of-the-art,” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 23, no. October 2023, p. 100987, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100987.
H. Saeed et al., Blockchain Technology in Healthcare: A Systematic Review, vol. 17, no. 4 April. 2022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266462.
S. A. Rani, Zikriati, A. Muhammady, S. Syukran, and B. Ali, “Arabic Language Learning Based on Technology (Opportunities and Challenges in the Digital Era),” Int. J. Educ. Lang. Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2023.
A. D. Anggraeni and H. J. Pentury, “Empowering Students’ 21st Century Skills through Canva Application,” J. Kependidikan J. Has. Penelit. dan Kaji. Kepustakaan di Bid. Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 50, 2022, doi: 10.33394/jk.v8i1.4391.
O. Wijayanti and A. Andriani, “The Form of Character Education in Learning Dance at Sanggar Dance Students of Banyumas District,” J. Stud. Huru dan Pembelajaran, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 377–382, 2020. https://e-journal.my.id/jsgp/article/view/347
J. Friska, I. Pramuaniati, and Mahriyuni, “Effectiveness of using Canva Application to Improve Learning Outcomes of Tenth Grades Students,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 421–427, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jppp.v7i3.67879.
C. Decker-Lange, K. Lange, and A. Walmsley, “How does entrepreneurship education affect employability? Insights from UK higher education,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1249–1269, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-08-2023-0856.
G. Linton and M. Klinton, “University entrepreneurship education : a design thinking approach to learning,” 2019.
R. Feola, C. Crudele, and R. Celenta, “Developing cross-cultural competence in entrepreneurship education: What is the role of the university,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 22, no. 3, p. 101055, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101055.
M. Obschonka, M. Goethner, R. K. Silbereisen, and U. Cantner, “Social identity and the transition to entrepreneurship: The role of group identification with workplace peers,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 137–147, 2012. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.007
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Hamid, Tjutju Yuniarsih, Disman Disman, Budi Santoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
