SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal

From Problems to Progress: Improving Mathematics Learning Outcomes through Problem-Solving Instruction

Minh Tuấn Nguyễn
Vietnam National University
Viet Nam
mtnguyenntuan@gmail.com
Bernard Alorgbey
University of Education ROR
Ghana
Share

  • Purpose of the study: The aim of this research is to improve students' learning outcomes in Mathematics by using the Problem Solving method.

    Methodology: The research conducted used Classroom Action Research. Data were obtained from qualitative and quantitative data. Data collection techniques included observation, testing, documentation, and interviews. The data analysis method used both qualitative and quantitative data.

    Main Findings: Based on the results of data analysis, it is known that, after using the Problem Solving method, student learning outcomes have increased. This can be seen from the results of the pre-test and post-test given to students, which always increased in each cycle. The increase in student learning outcomes in cycle 1 was 71.88% and in cycle II 87.10%. There was an increase in the completeness of student learning outcomes by 5.31%.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces a structured problem-solving instructional model implemented through classroom action research to regularly improve students' mathematics learning outcomes. Unlike previous studies, it integrates iterative reflection cycles with authentic classroom problems, providing practical evidence on how problem-solving instruction directly enhances students' engagement, conceptual understanding, and achievement.

  • How to cite

    From Problems to Progress: Improving Mathematics Learning Outcomes through Problem-Solving Instruction. (2025). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 3(2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v3i2.2519

    More Citation Formats

  • 272
    Abstract views
    164
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. W. Chen, “Problem-Solving Skills, Memory Power, and Early Childhood Mathematics: Understanding the Significance of the Early Childhood Mathematics in an Individual’s Life,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–25, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01557-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01557-6
    2. R. C. Torres-Peña, D. Peña-González, J. L. Lara-Orozco, E. A. Ariza, and D. Vergara, “Enhancing Numerical Thinking Through Problem Solving: A Teaching Experience for Third-Grade Mathematics,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1–27, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15060667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060667
    3. H. S. Iswara, F. Ahmadi, and D. Da Ary, “Numeracy Literacy Skills of Elementary School Students through Ethnomathematics-Based Problem Solving,” Interdiscip. Soc. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1604–1616, 2022, doi: 10.55324/iss.v2i2.316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v2i2.316
    4. S. Hwang and T. Son, “Students’ attitude toward mathematics and its relationship with mathematics achievement,” J. Educ. e-Learning Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 272–280, 2021, doi: 10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.83.272.280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.83.272.280
    5. R. Wen and A. K. Dubé, “A Systematic Review of Secondary Students’ Attitudes Towards Mathematics and its Relations With Mathematics Achievement,” J. Numer. Cogn., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 295–325, 2022, doi: 10.5964/jnc.7937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.7937
    6. I. Chang, “Early numeracy and literacy skills and their influences on fourth-grade mathematics achievement: a moderated mediation model,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40536-023-00168-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00168-6
    7. B. C. Agbata, S. Abraham, A.-M. F, P. A. Kwabi, S. O. Okpako, and S. S. Arivi, “Advancing Mathematics Education Challenges , Strategies , and Prospects in Africa :,” Sci. World J., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 808–818, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/swj.v19i3.28
    8. J. Dadzie, R. Keziah Anaan-Brew, E. Danso, and A. Strzelecki, “Gamification in Ghanaian mathematics classrooms: Examining the roles of teacher knowledge, motivation, and self-Efficacy on student engagement,” Am. J. STEM Educ., vol. 15, pp. 45–86, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://ojed.org/STEM/article/view/8164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/6b6sns36
    9. L. Zhang, J. D. Basham, R. A. Carter, and J. Zhang, “Exploring Factors associated with the implementation of student-centered instructional practices in U.S. classroomss,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 99, p. 103273, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103273
    10. N. Ramos-Vallecillo, V. Murillo-Ligorred, and R. Lozano-Blasco, “University Students’ Achievement of Meaningful Learning through Participation in Thinking Routines,” Eur. J. Investig. Heal. Psychol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1012–1027, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14040066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14040066
    11. M. Treve, “Comparative analysis of teacher-centered and student-centered learning in the context of higher education: A co-word analysis,” Iberoam. J. Sci. Meas. Commun., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.47909/ijsmc.117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.117
    12. E. Susanti, “Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills in Elemtary Students Through Realistic mathematics Education,” Sci. J. Inov. Pendidik. Mat. dan IPA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 48–59, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.4344
    13. M. Suseelan, C. M. Chew, and H. Chin, “Research on Mathematics Problem Solving in Elementary Education Conducted from 1969 to 2021: A Bibliometric Review,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1003–1029, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.46328/ijemst.2198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2198
    14. J. L. Piñeiro, E. Castro-Rodríguez, and E. Castro, “What problem-solving knowledge is required in mathematical teaching? A curricular approach,” Curric. Perspect., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s41297-021-00152-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00152-6
    15. J. Park, “Pre-Service Teachers’ Project-Based Instruction with Mathematics Problem-Solving,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12080526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080526
    16. E. Ampadu, M. Narh-Kert, and R. Yeboah, “Teachers’, Researchers’, and Educators’ Partnerships: The Effect of Co-Creation on Pupils’ Problem-Solving Performance in Mathematics,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 12, p. 1328, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14121328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121328
    17. S. Prediger, J. Dröse, R. Stahnke, and C. Ademmer, “Teacher expertise for fostering at-risk students’ understanding of basic concepts: conceptual model and evidence for growth,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 481–508, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10857-022-09538-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09538-3
    18. J. Su and W. Yang, “AI literacy curriculum and its relation to children’s perceptions of robots and attitudes towards engineering and science: An intervention study in early childhood education,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 241–253, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12867
    19. F. I. L. Pinar, A. A. E. Panergayo, R. R. Sagcal, D. P. Acut, L. S. Roleda, and M. S. Prudente, “Fostering scientific creativity in science education through scientific problem-solving approaches and STEM contexts: a meta-analysis,” Discip. Interdiscip. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s43031-025-00137-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00137-9
    20. E. Gradini, F. B. Firmansyah B, J. Noviani, and K. Ulya, “Fostering Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics Education: Strategies, Challenges, and Classroom Practices,” Prism. Sains J. Pengkaj. Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Mat. dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 135–163, 2025, doi: 10.33394/j-ps.v13i2.15099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v13i2.15099
    21. T. T. H. Duong, T. T. H. Nguyen, and T. M. Hoang, “Exploring Teachers’ Perspectives on Adaptive Learning in Undergraduate Programs, Vietnam National University, Hanoi,” Int. J. TESOL Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 110–129, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.54855/ijte.24437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24437
    22. Y. Ofosu-Asare, “Developing classroom ICT teaching techniques, principles and practice for teachers in rural Ghana without access to computers or internet: a framework based on literature review,” Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 262–279, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJILT-04-2023-0045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2023-0045
    23. S. Darwin and M. Barahona, “Making research (more) real for future teachers: a classroom-based research model for initial teacher education,” Educ. Action Res., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 745–761, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1080/09650792.2021.1980073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1980073
    24. O. V. Barna, O. H. Kuzminska, and S. O. Semerikov, “Enhancing digital competence through STEM-integrated universal design for learning: a pedagogical framework for computer science education in Ukrainian secondary schools,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 357, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00821-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00821-y
    25. T. Rabgay and G. Kidman, “Multiple iterations and messiness in the implementation of action research by Bhutanese secondary science teachers,” Discov. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s44217-023-00077-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00077-4
    26. M. Muslimin, “Enhancing Teachers’ Competence in Developing Lesson Plans through Continuous Guidance: A School Action Research,” Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 83–98, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.30863/didaktika.v17i1.5099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30863/didaktika.v17i1.5099
    27. M. G. R. Lugo, “Enhancing technology research capacity in technical-vocational education: a participatory action research study of faculty development in Davao Oriental, Philippines,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 509, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00959-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00959-9
    28. T. Musengimana, L. L. Yadav, J. Uwamahoro, and G. Nizeyimana, “Instructional strategies for enhancing students’ problem-solving skills in physics: a systematic review,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 380, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00733-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00733-x
    29. T. T. Le, T. T. Pham, and T. T. Tran, “Exploring the Impact of Lesson Study in Vietnamese Primary Education: Perspectives of EFL Lecturers,” J. Innov. Res. Prim. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–30, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.56916/jirpe.v3i1.583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v3i1.583
    30. D. Olivares, J. L. Lupiáñez, and I. Segovia, “Roles and characteristics of problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: a review,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1079–1096, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1738579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1738579
    31. F. Borgonovi, S. W. Han, and S. Greiff, “Gender differences in collaborative problem-solving skills in a cross-country perspective.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 747–766, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1037/edu0000788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000788
    32. M. A. Adeoye, “Review of Sampling Techniques for Education,” ASEAN J. Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed
    33. F. Mulisa, “Sampling techniques involving human subjects: Applications, pitfalls, and suggestions for further studies,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 74–83, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.17985/ijare.1225214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.1225214
    34. A. Yundayani and F. Alghadari, “Reframing multifaceted roles of teachers through developing educational research method design: design-based classroom action research,” Int. J. Math. Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 60–81, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.59965/ijmsed.v2i2.134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59965/ijmsed.v2i2.134
    35. K. Ahmed, A. Sharif, S. Perween, and A. Akram, “Implementing Improvisation Techniques to Teach Spoken English at Undergraduate Level: A Classroom Action Research,” Int. J. Linguist. Cult., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 347–362, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.52700/ijlc.v4i2.209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52700/ijlc.v4i2.209
    36. C. Qi, C. Cao, and R. Huang, “Teacher Learning Through Collaboration Between Teachers and Researchers: a Case Study in China,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 93–112, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10763-021-10241-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10241-7
    37. O. A. Saka, “Can Teacher Collaboration Improve Students’ Academic Achievement in Junior Secondary Mathematics?,” Asian J. Univ. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 33–46, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v17i1.8727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.8727
    38. E. Evendi and N. N. S. P. Verawati, “Evaluation of Student Learning Outcomes in Problem-Based Learning: Study of Its Implementation and Reflection of Successful Factors,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 7, no. SpecialIssue, pp. 69–76, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1099
    39. I. Azizah and D. Mardiana, “Learning Transformation: Increasing Student Achievement through Discovery Learning,” Dirasah Int. J. Islam. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 155–166, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.59373/drs.v2i2.42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v2i2.42
    40. P. Rana, M. K. Dubey, L. R. Gupta, and A. K. Thakur, “A model to combine qualitative and quantitative measures in education for better assessment of learning outcomes,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 5947–5977, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2243291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2243291
    41. D. Harefa, M. Sarumaha, K. Telaumbanua, T. Telaumbanua, B. Laia, and F. Hulu, “Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 240–246, 2023, doi: 10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614
    42. A. K. Melaku, A. Y. Ali, and T. M. Tesfaye, “Teachers’ and students’ perception, practices, and challenges of active learning strategy utilization in primary schools of North Wollo Zone, Ethiopia,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 51, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40561-025-00391-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00391-4
    43. S. Feng and D. Yang, “Teachers’ Perceived Value, Challenges, and Advice for Implementing Computational Thinking in Elementary Classrooms,” J. Technol. Teach. Educ., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 293–320, 2022, doi: 10.70725/048319epkkuu. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70725/048319epkkuu
    44. G. C. Bayarcal and D. A. Tan, “Students’ Achievement and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics through Open-Ended Approach,” Am. J. Educ. Res. Vol. 11, 2023, Pages 183-190, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 183–190, 2023, doi: 10.12691/education-11-4-2.
    45. S. Rahayuningsih, S. Sirajuddin, and M. Ikram, “Using Open-ended Problem-solving Tests to Identify Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability,” Particip. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 285–299, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.17275/per.21.66.8.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.66.8.3
    46. A. Alam, “Mapping a Sustainable Future Through Conceptualization of Transformative Learning Framework, Education for Sustainable Development, Critical Reflection, and Responsible Citizenship: An Exploration of Pedagogies for Twenty-First Century Learning,” ECS Trans., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 9827–9840, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1149/10701.9827ecst. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.9827ecst
    47. M. Qorib, “Analysis the Impact of Differentiated Instruction on Critical Diversity Literacy in Inclusive Education,” Aksaqila Int. Humanit. Soc. Sci. [AIHSS] J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2024, doi: 10.30596/aihss.v3i1.502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/aihss.v3i1.502
    48. F. Almasri, “Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning of Science: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 977–997, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3
    49. M. P. Simanjuntak, J. Hutahaean, N. Marpaung, and D. Ramadhani, “Effectiveness of problem-based learning combined with computer simulation on students’ problem-solving and creative thinking skills,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 519–534, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14330a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14330a
    50. J. Nilimaa, “New Examination Approach for Real-World Creativity and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics,” Trends High. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 477–495, 2023, doi: 10.3390/higheredu2030028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu2030028
    51. S. Salwi, A. Wahid, and J. N, “Effectiveness Of Problem Solving Based Learning Model In The 21st Century In Improving Creativity and Science Learning Outcomes Of Grade IV Students,” ALENA J. Elem. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 245–256, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.59638/jee.v3i2.414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59638/jee.v3i2.414
    52. M. Mukhlisin, M. S. Alayubi, Bintang Zein Al-Hazmi, and A. Hayani, “Increasing Cognitive Abilities Through Problem Solving-Based Learning,” Akhlaqul Karimah J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 13–18, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.58353/jak.v3i01.153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58353/jak.v3i01.153
    53. M. Masjudin, “Strengthening 21st Century Skills Through an Independent Curriculum in Mathematics Education in Indonesia: Challenges, Potential, And Strategies,” Int. J. Appl. Sci. Sustain. Dev., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 92–113, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.36733/ijassd.v6i2.9087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36733/ijassd.v6i2.9087
    54. D. Mariani, M. Mustaji, and U. Dewi, “Literature Study: The Effect of The Problem-Based Learning Model Assisted by The Flipped Classroom on Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.59141/japendi.v6i1.6668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v6i1.6668
    55. Y. Zhu, A. Nankhantee, and N. Jantharajit, “An Experimental Study on Improving First-Grade Students’ Mathematical Learning Achievement and Social Awareness Through an Instructional Approach Based on Constructivist Theory and Collaborative Learning,” High. Educ. Stud., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1, 2024, doi: 10.5539/hes.v14n3p1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v14n3p1
    56. E. Oppong-Gyebi, E. Bonyah, and L. J. Clark, “Constructive instructional teaching and learning approaches and their mathematical classroom teaching practices: A junior high school perspective,” Contemp. Math. Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. ep23002, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.30935/conmaths/12541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12541
    57. N. Che Mat and K. A. Jamaludin, “Effectiveness of Practices and Applications of Student-Centered Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev., vol. 13, no. 3, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/21733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/21733
    58. M. Arafah, S. Rijal, S. Sumarni, S. Satar, and B. Sulfiana, “The Study of Constructivistic Learning Experience, Democratic Attitude, Learning Independence & Learning Motivation of Senior High School Students at Wajo Regency South Sulawesi,” J. Iqra’ Kaji. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 213–227, May 2025, doi: 10.25217/ji.v10i1.4905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v10i1.4905
    59. C. Choirudin, M. Lubis, and M. A. Masuwd, “Enhancing High School Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills through Interactive Media: A Classroom Action Research Approach,” J. Teach. Learn. Math., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 104–121, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.22219/jtlm.v2i2.31685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jtlm.v2i2.31685
    60. S. Dolapcioglu and A. Doğanay, “Development of critical thinking in mathematics classes via authentic learning: an action research,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1363–1386, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573