SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

9

H-Index

Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education

an Open Access Journal


The Influence of the Student Facilitator and Explaining Type Cooperative Learning Model on Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes

Share
  • How to cite

    The Influence of the Student Facilitator and Explaining Type Cooperative Learning Model on Students’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes. (2024). Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 2(2), 124-131. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v2i2.1186
  • 240
    Abstract views
    195
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. J. Kilpatrick, “History of research in mathematics education,” Encycl. Math. Educ., pp. 349–354, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_71
    2. K. Lavidas, Z. Apostolou, and S. Papadakis, “Challenges and opportunities of mathematics in digital times: Preschool teachers’ views,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 7, p. 459, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070459
    3. T. Dahlan, D. Darhim, and D. Juandi, “How Digital Applications as Mathematics Learning Media in The Automation Era,” J. Posit. Psychol. Wellbeing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 199–211, 2022.
    4. I. Ayuwanti and D. Siswoyo, “Teacher-student interaction in mathematics learning.,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 660–667, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21184
    5. H. E. Putri, M. A. Wahyudy, A. Yuliyanto, and F. Nuraeni, “Development of instruments to measure mathematical anxiety of elementary school students,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 282–302, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.17
    6. A. Abassian, F. Safi, S. Bush, and J. Bostic, “Five different perspectives on mathematical modeling in mathematics education,” Investig. Math. Learn., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2019.1595360
    7. L. F. Jawad, “Mathematical connection skills and their relationship with productive thinking among secondary school students,” Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 421–430, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v10i1.2667
    8. D. H. Tong, B. P. Uyen, and N. V. A. Quoc, “The improvement of 10th students’ mathematical communication skills through learning ellipse topics,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 11, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08282
    9. L. L. Paroqi, M. Mursalin, and M. Marhami, “The Implementation of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to Improve Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability in Statistics Course,” Int. J. Educ. Vocat. Stud., vol. 2, no. 10, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i10.3311
    10. B. P. Uyen, D. H. Tong, and N. T. B. Tram, “Developing Mathematical Communication Skills for Students in Grade 8 in Teaching Congruent Triangle Topics.,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1287–1302, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1287
    11. J. Filgona, J. Sakiyo, D. M. Gwany, and A. U. Okoronka, “Motivation in learning,” Asian J. Educ. Soc. Stud., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 16–37, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273
    12. Y.-C. Ma, “Using Participatory Teaching in Hands-On Courses: Exploring the Influence of Teaching Cases on Learning Motivation,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 6, p. 547, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060547
    13. I. Fauzi and L. S. Sabila, “Implementation of Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) Strategies in Islamic Education Learning,” J. Islam. Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 149–158, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35719/jier.v3i2.276
    14. S. Samad and A. L. Setyabudhi, “Application of Video-Based Learning Media with Applications to Improve Learning Activities of Vocational High School Students,” Tech. Vocat. Educ. Int. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2023.
    15. E. S. Boye and D. D. Agyei, “Effectiveness of problem-based learning strategy in improving teaching and learning of mathematics for pre-service teachers in Ghana,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 100453, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100453
    16. R. Safitri, A. S. Wahyuri, and Y. Ockta, “The Impacts of the Project-Based Learning and Problem-Based Learning Models with Self-Confidence on Students’ Learning Outcomes,” Indones. Res. J. Educ. IRJE|, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 269–283, 2024.
    17. M. Pratiwi, “Student Tutoring, Facilitator and Explaining Models: A Problem Solving Metacognition towards Learning Achievements of Informatics Students,” J. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 368–379, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.3.2.p.145-154
    18. M. Gopalan, K. Rosinger, and J. Bin Ahn, “Use of Quasi-Experimental Research Designs in Education Research: Growth, Promise, and Challenges,” Rev. Res. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 218–243, 2020, doi: 10.3102/0091732X20903302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302
    19. A. Singh, “Quasi experimental design in scientific psychology,” SSRN Electron. Journal. https//doi. org/10.2139/ssrn, vol. 3793568, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793568
    20. H. J. Banda and J. Nzabahimana, “The impact of physics education technology (PhET) interactive simulation-based learning on motivation and academic achievement among malawian physics students,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 127–141, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3
    21. M. Laure and K. Habe, “Stimulating the development of rhythmic abilities in preschool children in Montessori kindergartens with music-movement activities: A quasi-experimental study,” Early Child. Educ. J., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 563–574, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01459-x
    22. H. M. Levitt, “Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research.,” Qual. Psychol., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 95, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000184
    23. A. P. Nugraha, “The effect of transformational leadership style, transactional leadership and charismatic leadership on organizational citizenship behavior (ocb) with working culture as an intervening variable,” in IAIC International Conference Series, 2021, pp. 100–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34306/conferenceseries.v3i2.469
    24. A. Wapa, “Influence of Creative Problem Solving To Study Result Social Sciences Study As Reviewed From the Multicultural Attitude of Students Class V Elementary South Kuta,” PrimaryEdu J. Prim. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 160–171, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/pej.v4i2.1774
    25. F. Nyimbili and L. Nyimbili, “Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies,” Br. J. Multidiscip. Adv. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90–99, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419
    26. G. K. Mweshi and K. Sakyi, “Application of sampling methods for the research design,” Arch. Bus. Res., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 180–193, 2020, doi: 10.14738/abr.811.9042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.811.9042
    27. E. Bakkalbasioglu, “How to access elites when textbook methods fail: Challenges of purposive sampling and advantages of using interviewees as ‘fixers.,’” Qual. Rep., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 688–699, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.3976
    28. A. Fathurohman et al., “Effectiveness of Using the Mobile Learning App for STEM-Based High School Physics Materials as Indonesian Student Learning Resources on Learning Outcomes,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1018–1023, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2991
    29. L. Parnabhakti and N. D. Puspaningtyas, “Penerapan Media Pembelajaran Powerpoint Melalui Google Classroom Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” J. Ilm. Mat. Realis., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 8–12, 2020, doi: 10.33365/ji-mr.v1i2.459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/ji-mr.v1i2.459
    30. A. R. Nasution and A. B. D. Nandiyanto, “Utilization of the google meet and quiziz applications in the assistance and strengthening process of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Indones. J. Educ. Res. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–34, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v1i1.33367
    31. O. Rahmayani, S. Ardi, and R. Nofrialdi, “The Effect of Utilization of Social Media Instagram@ Nanarfshop on Buying Interest of Fisipol Students University Ekasakti Padang,” J. Law, Polit. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 85–94, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v2i2.89
    32. D. A. Kurniawan, D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, and S. M. Husna, “A study of critical thinking skills, science process skills and digital literacy: reviewed based on the gender,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. Ipa, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1741–1752, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.1644
    33. I. Supena, A. Darmuki, and A. Hariyadi, “The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 873–892, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14351a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a
    34. E. Nurlinda, Z. Azis, and M. D. Nasution, “Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Self-Efficacy Viewed from the Application of Problem Based Learning and Contextual Teaching and Learning Models Assisted,” JMEA J. Math. Educ. Appl., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 54–61, 2024.