Improving Student Learning Outcomes in Light and Optical Instruments Using Team Teaching Methods with Crossword Puzzle Media

  • Cicilia Nuning Tiastiti Junior High School 2 Tuntang
  • Wahyu Fitria Ariyanti Institut Agama Islam Negeri Salatiga
  • Munirah Mubarak Alquaimi King Faisal University
  • Wan Long Chiong Universiti Sains Malaysia
Keywords: Crossword Puzzle, Learning Outcomes, Light and Optical, Student, Team Teaching

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research aims to determine the improvement in student learning outcomes regarding light and optical devices in class VIII junior high school through the team teaching method and crossword puzzle learning media.

Methodology: This research is a type of classroom action research. The subjects in this research were 30 students in class VIII A of Junior High School 2 Tuntang. Data collection techniques in this research used tests, observation, documentation. Data analysis in this research was carried out descriptively qualitatively and quantitatively.

Main Findings: The research results showed that cycle I produced 8 students with a percentage of 26.7% who completed the minimum completion criteria and there were 22 students who had not completed it with a percentage of 73.3%. Meanwhile, cycle II produced 26 students who completed the minimum completion criteria with a percentage of 86.7%, while there were 4 students who had not completed it with a percentage of 13.3%. This was marked by an increase in the results of classical completion criteria in cycle I which was only 26.7% to 86.7% in cycle II. The team teaching method used in combination with crossword media makes students interested in new ways of learning.

Novelty/Originality of this study: This study explores improving student learning outcomes in light and optical instruments using innovative methods, including team teaching and interactive crossword puzzles. The integration of crossword puzzles into teaching materials provides a unique and engaging learning experience, enhancing students' understanding of the subject.

References

W. Wartono, M. N. Hudha, and J. R. Batlolona, “How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview?,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 691–697, 2018, doi: 10.12973/ejmste/80632.

J. Sopacua, M. R. Fadli, and S. Rochmat, “The history learning module integrated character values,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 463–472, 2020, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v14i3.16139.

Yusnidar, M. D. W. Ernawati, D. A. Kurniawan, M. Z. Azzahra, F. I. Putri, and N. Prameswari, “Effect Of Learning Using The Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Model With Scaffolding On Creative Thinking And Learning Independence,” J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 681–692, 2023, doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.58.5.52.

P. Zhang and S. Li, “Associative cultural landscape approach to interpreting traditional ecological wisdom: A case of Inuit habitat,” Front. Archit. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 79–96, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.008.

D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, F. I. Putri, R. Perdana, and F. Fuldiaratman, “Student’s need analysis in using ordinary differential equation e-module of Mathematical Physics II,” Momentum Phys. Educ. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 107–115, 2023, doi: 10.21067/mpej.v7i1.7092.

D. Y. Pramesti and R. W. Arifin, “Metode Multimedia Development Life Cycle Pada Media Pembelajaran Pengenalan Perangkat Komputer Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. Students‘ Res. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 109–122, 2020, doi: 10.31599/jsrcs.v1i2.400.

M. Mulyati, F. I. Putri, and D. Deswalman, “Efforts to Improve Student Activities and Outcomes in Physics Learning Using the Two Stay Two Stray Technical Cooperative Learning Model at Senior High School,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i1.294.

Y. Ariyana, A. Pudjiastuti, R. Bestary, and Zamroni, Learning Oriented Handbook on Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jakara: Ministry of Education and Culture, 2018.

I. H. Arif, A. Lukman, Z. I. Tuara, D. Universitas, B. Hijrah, and M. Utara, “Penerapan Pendekatan Culturally Responsive Teaching Terintegrasi Etnokimia dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Siswa Abad 21 pada Materi Hidrolisis di MAN 1 TIKEP,” J. Ilm. Wahana Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 194–205, 2021, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4661844.

M. Muhali, “Pembelajaran Inovatif Abad Ke-21,” J. Penelit. dan Pengkaj. Ilmu Pendidik. e-Saintika, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 25–50, 2019, doi: 10.36312/e-saintika.v3i2.126.

I. Gelen Assoc, “Academicians Prediction of 21 st Century Education and Education in The 21 st Century,” Eur. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 4, pp. 165–204, 2018, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1233478.

L. S. Keiler, “Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6.

H. Sabil, D. A. Kurniawan, R. Perdana, F. I. Putri, and S. E. Septi, “The Influence of Tarompa E-Module on Peace-Loving Characters,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 283–292, 2023.

Gunawan, A. Harjono, and H. Sahidu, “Studi Pendahuluan Pada Upaya Pengembangan Laboratorium Virtual Bagi Calon Guru Fisika,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. I, no. 2, pp. 140–145, 2015, doi: 10.29303/jpft.v1i2.250.

M. Baran, A. Maskan, and S. Yasar, “Learning physics through project-based learning game techniques,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 221–234, 2018, doi: 10.12973/iji.2018.11215a.

D. Ariastika, “Penerapan Literasi Digital pada Pembelajaran IPA dalam Menghadapi Kesiapan Pendidikan di Era Society 5.0,” FORDETAK Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Inov. Pendidik. di Era Soc. 5.0, pp. 132–142, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://emea.mitsubishielectric.com/ar/products-solutions/factory-automation/index.html

S. A. Widodo, “Implementasi Team Teaching Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa SMA Kelas X Se-Kota Yogyakarta Pada Materi Trigonometri,” UNION J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/didaktis/article/view/1555/1275

K. Syauqi, S. Munadi, and M. B. Triyono, “Students’ perceptions toward vocational education on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 881–886, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20766.

H. Mulang, “The Effect of Competences, Work Motivation, Learning Environment on Human Resource Performance,” Golden Ratio Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 84–93, 2021, doi: 10.52970/grhrm.v1i2.52.

H. Wu, J. Shen, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zheng, “Examining the effect of principal leadership on student science achievement,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1017–1039, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1747664.

M. Mahmudah, “Pengelolaan Kelas: Upaya Mengukur Keberhasilan Proses Pembelajaran,” J. Kependidikan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–70, 2018, doi: 10.24090/jk.v6i1.1696.

A. Joneska, Astalini, and N. Susanti, “Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Fisika Menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran Crossword Puzzle Dan Index Card Match Pada Materi Cahaya Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 BatangHari,” J. EduFisika, vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 28–31, 2016.

J. P. Zwolak, R. Dou, E. A. Williams, and E. Brewe, “Students’ network integration as a predictor of persistence in introductory physics courses,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010113.

Y. Putri, A. Nurhuda, and A. A. S. Huda, “Konsep Dasar Penelitian Tindakan Kelas : Sebuah Pengantar dalam Metode Penelitian Pendidikan,” J. BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran dan Inov. Pendidikan), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 43–50, 2023, doi: 10.52005/belaindika.v5i2.119.

I. Awalia, A. S. Pamungkas, and T. P. Alamsyah, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Animasi Powtoon pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika di Kelas IV SD,” Kreano, J. Mat. Kreat., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2019, doi: 10.15294/kreano.v10i1.18534.

V. F. Musyadad, A. Supriatna, and S. M. Parsa, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas II SD Inpres 5/81 Latonro,” Pinisi J. PGSD, pp. 2798–9097, 2022.

P. L. Mangasi, “Implementation of SQ3R to Increase Reading Interest, Critical Thinking Skills, and Ability to Understand Indonesian Language Reading of 6th Grade Indonesia A Students,” Int. J. Theory Appl. Elem. Second. Sch. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 71–81, 2019, doi: 10.31098/ijtaese.v1i1.10.

B. Refai, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Number Heads Together Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa,” Diadik J. Ilm. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 85–95, 2022, doi: 10.33369/diadik.v12i1.21366.

N. Rahmawati, Z. Otaiwi, W. Nakkhasen, and N. P. Thãnh, “Increasing Mathematics Learning Activities Through Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Cooperative Learning Models In Students,” Interval Indones. J. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijome.v1i1.608.

Syahrial, Asrial, D. A. Kurniawan, and M. Subandiyo, “Pedagogic competence and Indonesian language competence pre-service teacher of elementary program,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 851–856, 2019.

I. Ngkoti, “Expression of Students’ Elementary School on Planting Lesson,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v2i1.112.

M. N. Wangid, A. Mustadi, and S. E. B. Mokshien, “The exploration of teachers’ efficacy in teaching: Comparative study in Indonesia and Malaysia,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 257–268, 2020, doi: 10.21831/cp.v39i2.30012.

P. Puchumni, S. Tungpradabkul, and R. Magee, “Using Information Retrieval Activities to Foster Analytical Thinking Skills in Higher Education in Thailand: A Case Study of Local Wisdom Education,” Asian J. Educ. Train., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 80–85, 2019, doi: 10.20448/journal.522.2019.51.80.85.

O. Zawacki-Richter and S. Naidu, “Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in Distance Education,” Distance Educ., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 245–269, 2016, doi: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1185079.

A. Sanova, A. Bakar, A. Afrida, D. A. Kurniawan, and F. T. Aldila, “Digital Literacy on the Use of E-Module Towards Students’ Self-Directed Learning on Learning Process and Outcomes Evaluation Cources,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 154–164, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.36509.

S. J. Seage and M. Türegün, “The effects of blended learning on STEM achievement of elementary school students,” Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 133–140, 2020, doi: 10.46328/ijres.v6i1.728.

P. Hökkä, K. Vähäsantanen, and S. Mahlakaarto, “Teacher educators’ collective professional agency and identity – Transforming marginality to strength,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 63, pp. 36–46, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.001.

K. Kleemola, H. Hyytinen, and A. Toom, “Exploring internal structure of a performance-based critical thinking assessment for new students in higher education,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 556–569, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1946482.

D. Akgunduz, “A research about the placement of the top thousand students in STEM fields in Turkey between 2000 and 2014,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1365–1377, 2016, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1518a.

W. Ng, “A partnership-designed online module on climate science: Impact on year 10 teachers and students,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/100638.

M. N. Giannakos, I. O. Pappas, L. Jaccheri, and D. G. Sampson, “Understanding student retention in computer science education: The role of environment, gains, barriers and usefulness,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2365–2382, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10639-016-9538-1.

Published
2024-03-10
How to Cite
[1]
C. Nuning Tiastiti, W. Fitria Ariyanti, M. M. Alquaimi, and W. L. Chiong, “Improving Student Learning Outcomes in Light and Optical Instruments Using Team Teaching Methods with Crossword Puzzle Media ”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 10-15, Mar. 2024.
Section
Articles