Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education
Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

SINTA

2.396

Impact

Gscholar

11

H-Index

Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education

Advancing Physics and Physics Education Through Research and Innovation

Development of Physics Modules with Science, Environment, Technology, and Society (SETS) Approaches to Motion and Force Material

Anggi Angelia
UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
Indonesia
anggiangelia91@gmail.com
Sarvar Q. Muminov
Jizzakh State Pendagogical Institute
Uzbekistan
Deborah TA Obafemi
University of Port Harcourt ROR
Nigeria
Share

  • Purpose of the study: The goal to be achieved in this research is to produce a physics module with an approach (SETS) on motion and force material with valid, practical, and effective product quality.

    Methodology: This study uses Research and Development (R&D) development research, with a 4D development model developed by Thiagarajan Semmel and Semmel. This model consists of 4 stages of development, namely define, design, develop, disseminate, or adapted into a 4-P model, namely definition, planning, development, and deployment. The instruments used in this study were validity questionnaires, practicality questionnaires, and effectiveness questionnaires, which were analyzed using a Likert scale. The validity test includes the validity of a questionnaire by 3 lecturers. Furthermore, for the physics module with the validity SETS approach by 5 lecturers at UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. The practicality test of the physics module with the SETS approach can be seen from the practicality questionnaire sheet by 2 science educators and 29 class VIII students at Junior High School 1 Tigo Nagari. The effectiveness test included the effectiveness of the students' reading interest questionnaire on the physics module with the SETS approach which was completed by 32 class VIIIg students at Junior High School 1 Tigo Nagari.

    Main Findings: The result of this research is to produce physics modules with the SETS approach with valid, practical and effective product quality. The results of the validation of the physics module with the SETS approach in the material aspects by 2 validators obtained 81 results with very valid categories, the results of media validation by 2 validators were 98.88 with very valid categories, the results of language validation by 1 validator were 92 with very valid criteria, based on the three aspects of validity, the results of product validity are obtained, namely with very valid criteria. The results of product practicality by 2 educators were 97.14 with very practical criteria. The result of practicality by 29 class VIIIb students was 92.6 with very practical criteria. The test results for the effectiveness of use by 32 class VIIIg students were 91.24 with very effective criteria. It can be concluded that the physics module with the SETS approach to motion and force material for class VIII students meets the valid, practical, and effective criteria.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: produce physics modules with Approach (SETS) on motion and force material with valid, practical, and effective product quality.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    A. Angelia, S. Q. . Muminov, and D. T. . Obafemi, “Development of Physics Modules with Science, Environment, Technology, and Society (SETS) Approaches to Motion and Force Material”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 78–85, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i3.694.

    More Citation Formats

  • 401
    Abstract views
    282
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. O. H. Wiza and D. S. Putra, “Sikap Implikasi Sosial, Kesenangan dan Ketertarikan Berkarir di Bidang IPA di SMPN 17 Batanghari,” Pancasakti Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2019, doi: 10.24905/psej.v4i2.1338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v4i2.11
    2. Mutmainnah, Aunurrahman, and Warneri, “Efektivitas Penggunaan E-Modul Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Pada Materi Sistem Pencernaan Manusia di Madrasah Tsanawiyah,” J. BASICEDU Res. Learn. Elem. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1625–1631, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i3.952
    3. M. Misbah et al., “The effectiveness of introduction to nuclear physics e-module as a teaching material during covid-19 pandemic The effectiveness of introduction to nuclear physics e-module as a teaching material during covid-19 pandemic,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012052
    4. S. Rahmadhani and Y. Efronia, “Penggunaan E-Modul Di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Pada Mata Pelajaran Simulasi Digital,” Jav. J. Vokasi Inform., pp. 5–9, 2021, doi: 10.24036/javit.v1i1.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/javit.v1i1.16
    5. R. Sidiq and Najuah, “Pengembangan E-Modul Interaktif Berbasis Android pada Mata Kuliah Strategi Belajar Mengajar,” J. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/jps.091.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/JPS.091.01
    6. V. Serevina and I. J. Sari, “Development of E-Module Based on Problem Based Learning ( PBL ) on Heat and Temperature to Improve Student ’ s Science Process Skill,” TOJET Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 26–36, 2018.
    7. N. Karimah, N. Ngazizah, and A. Ratnaningsih, “Pengembangan Ensiklopedia Digital Berbasis Keterampilan Proses dan Karakter pada Kelas V Tema Lingkungan Sahabat Kita,” J. Educ., vol. 3, no. 8, p. 1924, 2021, doi: 10.36418/syntax-idea.v6i8.1429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-idea.v6i8.1429
    8. Kamid, Syaiful, Y. Ramalisa, Sufri, and E. Triani, “Comparison and Correlation Between Attitude and Process Skills in School in Indonesia,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 511–528, 2022, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v12.i2.202210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i2.202210
    9. Kamid, H. Sabil, W. Syafmen, and E. Triani, “A Study of Problem Based Learning and Mathematics Process Skills in Elementary School,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 359–368, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i2.37157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i2.37157
    10. Darmaji, Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. Triani, “The effect of science process skills of students argumentation skills,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 78–88, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.49224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.49224
    11. K. Kamid, R. Rohati, H. Hobri, E. Triani, S. Rohana, and W. A. Pratama, “Process Skill and Student ’ s Interest for Mathematics Learning : Playing a Traditional Games,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 967–988, 2022, doi: . https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15352a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15352a
    12. E. Triani, Darmaji, and Astalini, “Identifikasi Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Kemampuan,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran IPA Indones., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppii.v13i1.56996
    13. Suryanti, W. Widodo, and W. Budijastuti, “Guided Discovery Problem-Posing : An Attempt to Improve Science Process Skills in Elementary School,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 75–88, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1336a
    14. A. Ekasari, “Application of E-Module to Identify Students ’ Science Process Skills in the Practicum of Refraction on Prisms,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 30–35, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i2.502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i2.502
    15. D. D. Romadona, “A Study of Science Process Skills on Simple Pendulum Materials,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.494
    16. T. Nurmadanti, “Pengaruh Minat Belajar Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMA Negeri 1 Bungo,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2021, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v2i1.452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v2i1.452
    17. A. Permanda, “Hubungan Antara Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Kelas X IPA 1 SMAN 1 Batanghari,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–19, 2021, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v2i1.456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v2i1.456
    18. I. Susanti, “Analisis Sikap Dan Minat Siswa terhadap Pembelajaran Fisika di SMA,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 117–120, 2020, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v1i4.447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v1i4.447
    19. W. R. Saputra, M. Hendri, and T. Aminoto, “Korelasi Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas VIII di SMP NEGERI Se-Kecamatan Jambi Selatan,” J. EduFisika, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/edufisika.v4i01.3996
    20. F. I. Putri, “Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswi Kelas VII C Dan VII D terhadap Mata Pelajaran IPA Fisika,” Qalam J. Ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2021, doi: 10.33506/jq.v.
    21. Astalini et al., “Identification of Student Character Values in Class X Particle Dynamics Materials,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 380–388, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v8i3.3776
    22. M. R. Pratiwi, A. Ramadhanti, E. F. Setyarini, and R. Fitriani, “Analisis Pendidikan Karakter ‘ Motivasi ’ Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v2i1.450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v2i1.450
    23. F. R. Winda and M. Shofiardin, “Describing the Ability of Science Processes in Basic Physics Practicum II Material of Ice Melting Heat Using E-Modules,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.492
    24. W. Meliza, “Perbandingan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas X , XI , dan XII Jurusan IPA terhadap Pembelajaran Fisika,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v2i3.470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v2i3.470
    25. D. D. Romadona, “A Study of Student Science Process Skills : In Formal Change Practices,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 41–46, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i2.503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i2.503
    26. Prayekti, “The Influence of Cognitive Learning Style and Learning Independence on the Students’ Learning Outcomes,” High. Educ. Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 37, 2018, doi: 10.5539/hes.v8n2p37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v8n2p37
    27. A. Karacop, “The Effects of Using Jigsaw Method Based on Cooperative Learning Model in the Undergraduate Science Laboratory Practices,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 420–434, 2017, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050314
    28. F. R. Winda and R. Firmansyah, “Pengaruh Kegemaran Membaca Saintifik Terhadap Sikap Terhadap IPA di Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 73–81, 2021, doi: 10.37251/jee.v2i2.155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v2i2.155
    29. D. Prambanan, Dila Yathasya, and P. S. A. Anwar, “Analysis of Cognitive Learning Outcomes of Compliance Personality Students in Solving Mathematical Problems,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i1.285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v4i1.285
    30. L. Hasibuan and A. Nugraha, “Development of Scientific and Constructivism-Based Handouts on Social Arithmetic Materials,” Indones. J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 28–31, 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v4i2.578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/ijoer.v4i2.578
    31. A. Akbar, “Correlation Study of Student Learning Motivation in Civics Subjects in High School,” J. Soc. Knowl. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jske.v4i2.428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v4i2.428
    32. S. H. Hamdo, “Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 26 Makassar,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 35–39, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v3i2.626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jpaii.v3i2.626
    33. M. Imaduddin and Z. Khafidin, “Ayo Belajar IPA dari Ulama: Pembelajaran Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issues di Abad ke-21,” Thabiea J. Nat. Sci. Teach., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 102, 2018, doi: 10.21043/thabiea.v1i2.4439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i2.4439
    34. I. A. Hayati, D. Rosana, and S. Sukardiyono, “Pengembangan Modul Potensi Lokal Berbasis SETS untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses IPA,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 248–257, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.27519
    35. R. E. Sugiharti and T. Z. Sukowati, “Pendekatan Science Environment Technology Society (Sets) Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ipa Pada Materi Cahaya Di Sekolah Dasar,” PEDAGOGIK, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 10–15, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33558/pedagogik.v8i2.3176
    36. S. Susilowati, “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terintegrasi Nilai Islam untuk Meningkatkan Sikap dan Prestasi Belajar IPA Siswa,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 78, 2017, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v3i1.13677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i1.13677
    37. L. Ho and I. P. Devi, “Students ’ Understanding of Interest in Learning Science,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 60–64, 2020, doi: 10.37251/isej.v1i2.72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v1i2.72
    38. A. N. Fauziyah, M. Ramadan, P. R. Gumede, and I. N. Udosen, “Development of Physics Learning Media Using Kvisoft Flipbook : Bilingual Digital Books,” J. Educ. Technol. Learn. Creat., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jetlc.v1i1.618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v1i1.618
    39. Murniati and Erika, “Attitudes of Students : Adoption of Scientific Attitudes and Interest in Increasing Study,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.491
    40. A. Sugiana, “Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Implementasinya Di Mts Nurul Ummah Yogyakarta,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 2019, doi: 10.14421/jpai.jpai.2019.161-02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.jpai.2019.161-02
    41. R. Diani, N. S. Hartati, and C. A. Email, “Flipbook berbasis literasi Islam : Pengembangan media pembelajaran fisika dengan 3D pageflip professional Flipbook based on Islamic literacy : The development of physics learning media using 3D pageflip professional,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 234–244, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i2.20819
    42. A. W. Nuayi, S. Supartin, and T. J. Buhungo, “Stimulation of Pressure on Liquid Concept in Stad Learning Model to Improve Rational Thinking Skills and Learning Outcomes of Students,” J. Pendidik. Fis. Indones., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 83–91, 2018, doi: 10.15294/jpfi.v14i2.11990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v14i2.11990
    43. R. Siski Fitriani and T. Lasdi Irmansyah, “Identifikasi Adopsi Sikap Ilmiah dan Kesenangan Belajar Fisika di SMAN 10 Batanghari,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2021, doi: 10.37251/isej.v2i1.125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v2i1.125
    44. N. N. A. S. Widiantini, M. Putra, and I. W. Wiarta, “Model Pembelajaran Sets (Science, Environment, Technology, Society) Berbantuan Virtual Lab Berpengaruh Terhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan Ipa,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 141, 2017, doi: 10.23887/jet.v1i2.11776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v1i2.11776
    45. R. Fauziah, Hadiyanto, Y. Miaz, and Y. Fitria, “Pengaruh Model Sains Teknologi Masyarakat terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar,” J. basicedu, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 3203–3215, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1315
    46. Nur Khasanah, “SETS (Science, Environmental, Technology and Society ) sebagai Pendekatan Pembelajaran IPA Modern pada Kurikulum 2013,” in Seminar Nasional Konservasi dan Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam, 2015, pp. 270–277.
    47. M. D. W. Ernawati, S. Sudarmin, A. Asrial, H. Haryanto, M. Z. Azzahra, and E. Triani, “A study of attitude and interest in the student’s lessons,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1901–1913, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7484
    48. A. Syamsuddin, R. Babo, Sulfasyah, and S. Rahman, “Mathematics learning interest of students based on the difference in the implementation of model of thematic learning and character-integrated thematic learning,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 581–591, 2021, doi: 10.12973/EU-JER.10.2.581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.581
    49. M. I. A. Umar, D. W. Fitri, and N. Lizelwati, “Pengembangan Modul Gejala Pemanasan Global Berbasis Pendekatan SETS untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Fisika Kelas XI SMAN 7 Sijunjung,” SAINSTEK J. SAINS DAN Teknol., vol. 12, no. 2, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31958/js.v12i2.2625