Development of Physics Modules with Science, Environment, Technology, and Society (SETS) Approaches to Motion and Force Material
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The goal to be achieved in this research is to produce a physics module with an approach (SETS) on motion and force material with valid, practical, and effective product quality.
Methodology: This study uses Research and Development (R&D) development research, with a 4D development model developed by Thiagarajan Semmel and Semmel. This model consists of 4 stages of development, namely define, design, develop, disseminate, or adapted into a 4-P model, namely definition, planning, development, and deployment. The instruments used in this study were validity questionnaires, practicality questionnaires, and effectiveness questionnaires, which were analyzed using a Likert scale. The validity test includes the validity of a questionnaire by 3 lecturers. Furthermore, for the physics module with the validity SETS approach by 5 lecturers at UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. The practicality test of the physics module with the SETS approach can be seen from the practicality questionnaire sheet by 2 science educators and 29 class VIII students at Junior High School 1 Tigo Nagari. The effectiveness test included the effectiveness of the students' reading interest questionnaire on the physics module with the SETS approach which was completed by 32 class VIIIg students at Junior High School 1 Tigo Nagari.
Main Findings: The result of this research is to produce physics modules with the SETS approach with valid, practical and effective product quality. The results of the validation of the physics module with the SETS approach in the material aspects by 2 validators obtained 81 results with very valid categories, the results of media validation by 2 validators were 98.88 with very valid categories, the results of language validation by 1 validator were 92 with very valid criteria, based on the three aspects of validity, the results of product validity are obtained, namely with very valid criteria. The results of product practicality by 2 educators were 97.14 with very practical criteria. The result of practicality by 29 class VIIIb students was 92.6 with very practical criteria. The test results for the effectiveness of use by 32 class VIIIg students were 91.24 with very effective criteria. It can be concluded that the physics module with the SETS approach to motion and force material for class VIII students meets the valid, practical, and effective criteria.
Novelty/Originality of this study: produce physics modules with Approach (SETS) on motion and force material with valid, practical, and effective product quality.
References
O. H. Wiza and D. S. Putra, “Sikap Implikasi Sosial, Kesenangan dan Ketertarikan Berkarir di Bidang IPA di SMPN 17 Batanghari,” Pancasakti Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2019, doi: 10.24905/psej.v4i2.1338.
Mutmainnah, Aunurrahman, and Warneri, “Efektivitas Penggunaan E-Modul Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Pada Materi Sistem Pencernaan Manusia di Madrasah Tsanawiyah,” J. BASICEDU Res. Learn. Elem. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1625–1631, 2021.
M. Misbah et al., “The effectiveness of introduction to nuclear physics e-module as a teaching material during covid-19 pandemic The effectiveness of introduction to nuclear physics e-module as a teaching material during covid-19 pandemic,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012052.
S. Rahmadhani and Y. Efronia, “Penggunaan E-Modul Di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Pada Mata Pelajaran Simulasi Digital,” Jav. J. Vokasi Inform., pp. 5–9, 2021, doi: 10.24036/javit.v1i1.16.
R. Sidiq and Najuah, “Pengembangan E-Modul Interaktif Berbasis Android pada Mata Kuliah Strategi Belajar Mengajar,” J. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/jps.091.01.
V. Serevina and I. J. Sari, “Development of E-Module Based on Problem Based Learning ( PBL ) on Heat and Temperature to Improve Student ’ s Science Process Skill,” TOJET Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 26–36, 2018.
N. Karimah, N. Ngazizah, and A. Ratnaningsih, “Pengembangan Ensiklopedia Digital Berbasis Keterampilan Proses dan Karakter pada Kelas V Tema Lingkungan Sahabat Kita,” J. Educ., vol. 3, no. 8, p. 1924, 2021, doi: 10.36418/syntax-idea.v6i8.1429.
Kamid, Syaiful, Y. Ramalisa, Sufri, and E. Triani, “Comparison and Correlation Between Attitude and Process Skills in School in Indonesia,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 511–528, 2022, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v12.i2.202210.
Kamid, H. Sabil, W. Syafmen, and E. Triani, “A Study of Problem Based Learning and Mathematics Process Skills in Elementary School,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 359–368, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i2.37157.
Darmaji, Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. Triani, “The effect of science process skills of students argumentation skills,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 78–88, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.49224.
K. Kamid, R. Rohati, H. Hobri, E. Triani, S. Rohana, and W. A. Pratama, “Process Skill and Student ’ s Interest for Mathematics Learning : Playing a Traditional Games,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 967–988, 2022, doi: . https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15352a.
E. Triani, Darmaji, and Astalini, “Identifikasi Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Kemampuan,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran IPA Indones., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2023.
Suryanti, W. Widodo, and W. Budijastuti, “Guided Discovery Problem-Posing : An Attempt to Improve Science Process Skills in Elementary School,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 75–88, 2020.
A. Ekasari, “Application of E-Module to Identify Students ’ Science Process Skills in the Practicum of Refraction on Prisms,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 30–35, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i2.502.
D. D. Romadona, “A Study of Science Process Skills on Simple Pendulum Materials,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.494.
T. Nurmadanti, “Pengaruh Minat Belajar Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMA Negeri 1 Bungo,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2021, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v2i1.452.
A. Permanda, “Hubungan Antara Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Kelas X IPA 1 SMAN 1 Batanghari,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–19, 2021, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v2i1.456.
I. Susanti, “Analisis Sikap Dan Minat Siswa terhadap Pembelajaran Fisika di SMA,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 117–120, 2020, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v1i4.447.
W. R. Saputra, M. Hendri, and T. Aminoto, “Korelasi Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas VIII di SMP NEGERI Se-Kecamatan Jambi Selatan,” J. EduFisika, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2019.
F. I. Putri, “Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswi Kelas VII C Dan VII D terhadap Mata Pelajaran IPA Fisika,” Qalam J. Ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2021, doi: 10.33506/jq.v.
Astalini et al., “Identification of Student Character Values in Class X Particle Dynamics Materials,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 380–388, 2023.
M. R. Pratiwi, A. Ramadhanti, E. F. Setyarini, and R. Fitriani, “Analisis Pendidikan Karakter ‘ Motivasi ’ Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMAN 1 Kota Jambi,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v2i1.450.
F. R. Winda and M. Shofiardin, “Describing the Ability of Science Processes in Basic Physics Practicum II Material of Ice Melting Heat Using E-Modules,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.492.
W. Meliza, “Perbandingan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas X , XI , dan XII Jurusan IPA terhadap Pembelajaran Fisika,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v2i3.470.
D. D. Romadona, “A Study of Student Science Process Skills : In Formal Change Practices,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 41–46, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i2.503.
Prayekti, “The Influence of Cognitive Learning Style and Learning Independence on the Students’ Learning Outcomes,” High. Educ. Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 37, 2018, doi: 10.5539/hes.v8n2p37.
A. Karacop, “The Effects of Using Jigsaw Method Based on Cooperative Learning Model in the Undergraduate Science Laboratory Practices,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 420–434, 2017, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050314.
F. R. Winda and R. Firmansyah, “Pengaruh Kegemaran Membaca Saintifik Terhadap Sikap Terhadap IPA di Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 73–81, 2021, doi: 10.37251/jee.v2i2.155.
D. Prambanan, Dila Yathasya, and P. S. A. Anwar, “Analysis of Cognitive Learning Outcomes of Compliance Personality Students in Solving Mathematical Problems,” J. Eval. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i1.285.
L. Hasibuan and A. Nugraha, “Development of Scientific and Constructivism-Based Handouts on Social Arithmetic Materials,” Indones. J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 28–31, 2023, doi: 10.37251/ijoer.v4i2.578.
A. Akbar, “Correlation Study of Student Learning Motivation in Civics Subjects in High School,” J. Soc. Knowl. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jske.v4i2.428.
S. H. Hamdo, “Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 26 Makassar,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 35–39, 2022, doi: 10.37251/jpaii.v3i2.626.
M. Imaduddin and Z. Khafidin, “Ayo Belajar IPA dari Ulama: Pembelajaran Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issues di Abad ke-21,” Thabiea J. Nat. Sci. Teach., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 102, 2018, doi: 10.21043/thabiea.v1i2.4439.
I. A. Hayati, D. Rosana, and S. Sukardiyono, “Pengembangan Modul Potensi Lokal Berbasis SETS untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses IPA,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 248–257, 2019.
R. E. Sugiharti and T. Z. Sukowati, “Pendekatan Science Environment Technology Society (Sets) Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ipa Pada Materi Cahaya Di Sekolah Dasar,” PEDAGOGIK, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 10–15, 2020.
S. Susilowati, “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terintegrasi Nilai Islam untuk Meningkatkan Sikap dan Prestasi Belajar IPA Siswa,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 78, 2017, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v3i1.13677.
L. Ho and I. P. Devi, “Students ’ Understanding of Interest in Learning Science,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 60–64, 2020, doi: 10.37251/isej.v1i2.72.
A. N. Fauziyah, M. Ramadan, P. R. Gumede, and I. N. Udosen, “Development of Physics Learning Media Using Kvisoft Flipbook : Bilingual Digital Books,” J. Educ. Technol. Learn. Creat., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2023, doi: 10.37251/jetlc.v1i1.618.
Murniati and Erika, “Attitudes of Students : Adoption of Scientific Attitudes and Interest in Increasing Study,” SchrödingerJournal Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.491.
A. Sugiana, “Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Implementasinya Di Mts Nurul Ummah Yogyakarta,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 2019, doi: 10.14421/jpai.jpai.2019.161-02.
R. Diani, N. S. Hartati, and C. A. Email, “Flipbook berbasis literasi Islam : Pengembangan media pembelajaran fisika dengan 3D pageflip professional Flipbook based on Islamic literacy : The development of physics learning media using 3D pageflip professional,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 234–244, 2018.
A. W. Nuayi, S. Supartin, and T. J. Buhungo, “Stimulation of Pressure on Liquid Concept in Stad Learning Model to Improve Rational Thinking Skills and Learning Outcomes of Students,” J. Pendidik. Fis. Indones., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 83–91, 2018, doi: 10.15294/jpfi.v14i2.11990.
R. Siski Fitriani and T. Lasdi Irmansyah, “Identifikasi Adopsi Sikap Ilmiah dan Kesenangan Belajar Fisika di SMAN 10 Batanghari,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2021, doi: 10.37251/isej.v2i1.125.
N. N. A. S. Widiantini, M. Putra, and I. W. Wiarta, “Model Pembelajaran Sets (Science, Environment, Technology, Society) Berbantuan Virtual Lab Berpengaruh Terhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan Ipa,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 141, 2017, doi: 10.23887/jet.v1i2.11776.
R. Fauziah, Hadiyanto, Y. Miaz, and Y. Fitria, “Pengaruh Model Sains Teknologi Masyarakat terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar,” J. basicedu, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 3203–3215, 2021.
Nur Khasanah, “SETS (Science, Environmental, Technology and Society ) sebagai Pendekatan Pembelajaran IPA Modern pada Kurikulum 2013,” in Seminar Nasional Konservasi dan Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam, 2015, pp. 270–277.
M. D. W. Ernawati, S. Sudarmin, A. Asrial, H. Haryanto, M. Z. Azzahra, and E. Triani, “A study of attitude and interest in the student’s lessons,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1901–1913, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7484.
A. Syamsuddin, R. Babo, Sulfasyah, and S. Rahman, “Mathematics learning interest of students based on the difference in the implementation of model of thematic learning and character-integrated thematic learning,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 581–591, 2021, doi: 10.12973/EU-JER.10.2.581.
M. I. A. Umar, D. W. Fitri, and N. Lizelwati, “Pengembangan Modul Gejala Pemanasan Global Berbasis Pendekatan SETS untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Fisika Kelas XI SMAN 7 Sijunjung,” SAINSTEK J. SAINS DAN Teknol., vol. 12, no. 2, 2020.
Copyright (c) 2023 Anggi Angelia, Sarvar Q. Muminov, Deborah TA Obafemi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
