Students' Critical Thinking on Thermodynamics: Gender and Conceptual
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze senior high school students' critical thinking skills in thermodynamics and explore gender-based differences in these skills.
Methodology: A quantitative approach was employed with purposive sampling involving 132 students (34.1% male, 65.9% female) who had studied thermodynamics with the same teacher. Data were gathered using five essay questions designed to assess critical thinking components, including analysis, evaluation, inference, deduction, and induction. The collected data were analyzed to determine the level of critical thinking skills and potential differences between genders.
Main Findings: The results showed that students’ critical thinking skills were generally low across all components: analysis (36.2%), evaluation (30.0%), inference (19.8%), deduction (28.3%), and induction (32.0%). While differences in critical thinking skills between male and female students were observed, they were not statistically significant.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides a detailed analysis of students' critical thinking skills in thermodynamics, highlighting specific weaknesses in key components. It offers a new perspective by examining gender-based differences in critical thinking, which are rarely explored in the context of physics education. The findings serve as a foundation for designing targeted educational strategies to address these deficiencies and improve critical thinking skills in science learning.
References
Magolda, Marcia B. Baxter. Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development. Routledge, 2001.
Hilton, Margaret L., and James W. Pellegrino, eds. Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press, 2012.
A. M. D. Pawero, “Arah Baru Perencanaan Pendidikan dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kebijakan Pendidikan,” Dirasah, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–32, 2021, https://doi.org/10.29062/dirasah.v4i1.177
P. a. Facione, “Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts,” Insight Assess., no. ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1., pp. 1–28, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF
Setyorini, U., S. E. Sukiswo, and B. Subali. "Penerapan model problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP." Jurnal pendidikan fisika indonesia 7.1 (2011). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v7i1.1070
J. W. Mareti and A. H. D. Hadiyanti, “Model Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa,” J. Elem. Edukasia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2021, doi: 10.31949/jee.v4i1.3047
A. R. Rachmantika and Wardono, “Peran Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Pemecahan Masalah,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 441, 2019. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/
A. Maksum, “Path Analysis of Self-Regulation , Social Skills , Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Ability on Social Studies Learning Outcomes,” vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 613–628, 2021. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14336a
W. Taufik, L. Lufri, Z. Zulyusri, and F. Arsih, “Meta Analisis Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis,” Bioilmi J. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022, https://doi.org/10.19109/bioilmi.v8i1.12882
Ahmed, Jibril Wushishi. "Problem-Based Learning: A Strategy to Foster 21st Century Critical Thinking and Perseverance in Building Technology Students." BIJOTE-BICHI Journal Of Technology Education 7.1 (2024): 99-111. https://bijote.com/index.php/BIJOTE/article/view/293
Desi Nuzul Agnafia, “analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam pembelajaran biologi,” J. Biol. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 2020, no. 1, pp. 473–484, 2019. https://doi.org/10.25273/florea.v6i1.4369
X. Ren, Y. Tong, P. Peng, and T. Wang, “Critical thinking predicts academic performance beyond general cognitive ability: Evidence from adults and children,” Intelligence, vol. 82, no. July, p. 101487, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101487
C. W. C. and M. Black, “Critical thinking. An introduction to logic and scientific method,” J. Philos., vol. 44, no. 13, p. 361, 1947, doi: 10.2307/2019787.
Aiyub, D. Suryadi, S. Fatimah, and Kusnandi, “Investigation of Watson-Glaser critical thinking skills of junior high school students in solving mathematical problems,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012090
R. H. Ennis, “The Nature of Critical Thinking,” Informal Log., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 1984, doi: 10.22329/il.v6i2.2729.
K. Barcelona, “21-st Century Curriculum Change Initiative: A Focus on STEM Education as an Integrated Approach to Teaching and Learning,” Am. J. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 862–875, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.12691/education-2-10-4.
I. Assessment, “CCTST User Manual and Resource Guide California Critical Thinking Skills Test,” no. 650, pp. 1–85, 2016, [Online]. Available: www.insightassessment.com
A. Onwuegbuzie and N. Leech, “Linking Research Questions to Mixed Methods Data Analysis Procedures 1,” Qual. Rep., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 474–498, 2015, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2006.1663
P. Anyela Pao, “pendekatan client centered untuk membantu mencapai aktualisasi diri peserta didik di SMA Negeri 1 Palangkaraya,” Suluh J. Bimbing. dan Konseling, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 49–53, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.33084/suluh.v5i1.1107.
M. Hasan, Mursalin, and A. H. Odja, “Analysis of student problem solving skills on physics concepts in SMP/MTs through blended learning early teaching during the covid-19 pandemic,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012081.
J. Y. F. Lau, “Metacognitive Education: Going beyond Critical Thinking,” Palgrave Handb. Crit. Think. High. Educ., pp. 373–289, 2015, doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-37805-7_23.
Lai, Emily R. "Critical thinking: A literature review." Pearson's Research Reports 6.1 (2011): 40-41.
S. Marni, M. Aliman, S. Suyono, R. Roekhan, and T. Harsiati, “Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Based on Gender And Knowledge Group,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 544–560, 2020, doi: 10.36681/tused.2020.44.
E. W. Retno, Rochmad, and St. Budi Waluyo, “Penilaian Kinerja Sebagai Alternatif Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa,” Prism. Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat., vol. 1, pp. 522–530, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/20134/9545
Brown, Nathaniel JS, Peter P. Afflerbach, and Robert G. Croninger. "Assessment of critical-analytic thinking." Educational Psychology Review 26 (2014): 543-560
Adams, W. K., et al. "Student Difficulties in Learning Thermodynamics: Implications for Critical Thinking." Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, vol. 25, no. 3, 2020, pp. 45–52, doi:10.1119/PERC2020
Gonzalez, P., and Freire, A. "Exploring Students' Deductive Reasoning in Thermodynamics." European Journal of Physics Education, vol. 12, no. 4, 2020, pp. 267–278, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012567.
Ibrahim, H., and Taylor, S. "The Role of Conceptual Understanding in Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in Thermodynamics." Journal of Physics Education Research, vol. 14, no. 2, 2022, pp. 158–169, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012678.
Swart, R. "Critical Thinking in Physics Education: Barriers and Opportunities." Physics Review, vol. 15, no. 1, 2021, pp. 101–115, www.researchgate.net/publication/341879812.
Xu, Y., et al. "Conceptual Challenges in Thermodynamics: A Study on Students' Understanding of Energy and Entropy." Journal of Science Education, vol. 22, no. 5, 2021, pp. 345–356, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012345
Harjono, A., and Aris Doyan. "Development of Problem-Based Termodynamics Learning Devices to Improve Concept Understanding and Critical Thinking Ability." 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020). Atlantis Press, 2021.
Sari, Lasmita, et al. "Applying Problem-Based Learning in Thermodynamics to Enhance Comprehension of Physics Concepts and Argumentation Skills." Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah 8.1 (2023): 209-220. doi: 10.24042/tadris.v8i1.14607
Copyright (c) 2024 Beta Kurnia Illahi, Irma Rahma Suwarma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
