Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal


Speaking Problems Faced By Efl Learners In Individual Presentation

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study was aimed to know speaking problems faced by EFL learners in individual presentation at 4th semester English department students of UIN Walisongo Semarang. The method used in this study was qualitative method with descriptive approach. The data was collected from all members of PBI-4C.

    Methodology: The data were gathered through in-depth interview, observation and documentation. The results of the study were shown in three factors; they are linguistic knowledge point of view (vocabularies, pronunciation, and grammar), psychological point of view (lack of confidence, shyness, nervous, fear of mistake, and confuse) and non-linguistic knowledge (lack of preparation, lack of motivation and teaching vocabulary).

    Main Findings: The findings suggest that the teacher should pay attention more to students’ awareness for speaking ability, moreover, it is in presentation skill which is clearly and understandable. Finally, English speaking problems in this university will decrease and students are able to speak up in front of public and also have better performance in speaking in the future.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers a fresh perspective by focusing specifically on the speaking problems encountered by EFL learners during individual presentations, a context that demands both linguistic competence and performance skills. Unlike general speaking studies, it highlights real-time anxiety, organization, and fluency issues, thus advancing existing knowledge by linking language proficiency with presentation-specific challenges in academic settings.

  • How to cite

    Speaking Problems Faced By Efl Learners In Individual Presentation. (2025). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1837
  • 282
    Abstract views
    220
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. I. Lisnawati, “Speaking learning based on multimedia,” J. Lang. Linguist. Stud., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2046–2056, 2021, doi: 10.52462/jlls.147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.147
    2. T. Binmahboob, “YouTube as a learning tool to improve students’ speaking skills as perceived by EFL teachers in secondary school,” Int. J. Appl. Linguist. English Lit., vol. 9, no. 6, p. 13, 2020, doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.6p.13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.6p.13
    3. A. Mardiningrum and D. Sulistiawan Aditya, “Pelatihan menulis teks naratif bahasa Inggris menggunakan digital storytelling [Narative text writing training using digital storytelling],” J. Character Educ. Soc., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 210–223, 2022, doi: 10.31764/jces.v3i1.10845.
    4. D. Ferris and G. Eckstein, “Language matters: Examining the language-related needs and wants of writers in a first-year university writing course,” J. Writ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 321–364, 2020, doi: 10.17239/jowr-2020.12.02.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.02.02
    5. A. H. Sulha, A. K. Famela, and A. T. A. Harahap, “The Implementation of synchronous and asynchronous learning in english as foreign language setting,” ETDC Indones. J. Res. Educ. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2021, doi: 10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.50
    6. Q. Lu and A. Deignan, “Unconventional metaphor use in the writing of Chinese learners of english,” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241252293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241252293
    7. S. Syafrizal, M. Muhajir, J. Pahamzah, and F. Furqon, “The effects of using whiteboard animation toward Indonesian students’ vocabulary and grammar mastery,” J. Lang. Linguist. Stud., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 783–793, 2021, doi: 10.52462/jlls.55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.55
    8. Y. Hung, “T Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages,” esol Int. J., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–141, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://www.tesol-international-journal.com
    9. R. Calafato, “Charting the motivation, self-efficacy beliefs, language learning strategies, and achievement of multilingual university students learning Arabic as a foreign language,” Asian-Pacific J. Second Foreign Lang. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40862-023-00194-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00194-5
    10. L. Yuliawati, “The Mechanics Accuracy of Students ’ W riting,” Educ. Teach. J. A J. og English Lit. Linguist. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2021, doi: 10.25273/etj.v9i1.8890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v9i1.8890
    11. Y. D. Cahyani and T. Bouakel, “Differences in the ability to write narrative texts using the wattpad application media and without using the wattpad application media in grade VIII junior high school students,” J. Lang. Lit. Ecucational Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–92, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jolle.v1i2.1163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v1i2.1163
    12. D. Silvani, “Learning through watching: using animation movie to improve students’ writing ability,” J. English Lang. Teach. Linguist., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 233, 2020, doi: 10.21462/jeltl.v5i2.418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i2.418
    13. E. Kus Eddy Sartono, R. Ambarsari, and H. Herwin, “Interactive multimedia based on Indonesian cultural diversity in Civics learning in elementary schools,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1192–1203, 2022, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v17i4.7136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i4.7136
    14. M. S. Hadi, L. Izzah, and Q. Paulia, “Teaching writing through canva application,” J. Lang. Lang. Teach., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 228, 2021, doi: 10.33394/jollt.v9i2.3533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i2.3533
    15. T. Pujiani and N. Almustaflikhah, “The development of animation videos for teaching english integrated skills for young learners,” LEAD (Language, Educ. Dev., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 9, 2022, doi: 10.20884/1.lead.2022.2.1.5490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.lead.2022.2.1.5490
    16. N. Y. Suryani, S. Rizal, T. Rohani, and H. Ratnaningsih, “Improving learners’ english writing skills through digital technology and project-based learning,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–34, 2024, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32506
    17. F. Elfa, “An Analysis of Students’ Writing Compositions Analytical Exposition Text,” Inovish J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 2020, doi: 10.35314/inovish.v5i1.1350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35314/inovish.v5i1.1350
    18. G. B. Chand, “Challenges faced by bachelor level students while speaking english,” IJELTAL (Indonesian J. English Lang. Teach. Appl. Linguist., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 45, 2021, doi: 10.21093/ijeltal.v6i1.853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v6i1.853
    19. S. Maryam, “Pengembangan kemampuan berbicara (maharah kalam) bahasa arab melalui pendekatan behaviorisme,” Bara Aji J. Keilmuan Bhs. Arab dan Pengajarannya Pengemb., vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 83–114, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52185/baraaji.v1i02.395
    20. V. Febiani Musyadad, A. Supriatna, and D. Aprilia, “Media gambar seri untuk meningkatkan kemampuan menulis karangan narasi dalam pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia,” J. Tahsinia, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2021, doi: 10.57171/jt.v2i1.287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57171/jt.v2i1.287
    21. H. W. N. Hilwa Wafin Nur, S. M. Syaiful Mustofa, and U. R. Usfiyatur Rusuly, “Implementasi metode role-play dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara bahasa arab di sekolah islam,” Reslaj Relig. Educ. Soc. Laa Roiba J., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1656–1666, 2024, doi: 10.47467/reslaj.v6i4.772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v6i4.772
    22. Miftahul Jannah, “Perkembangan otak pada masa anak usia dini: kajian dasar neurologi dan islam,” Bunayya J. Pendidkan Anak, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 171–180, 2023, doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.56.1.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/bunayya.v9i1.18499
    23. F. A. Setiawati and Nai’mah, “Mengenal konsep-konsep anak berkebutuhan khusus dalam Paud,” Progr. Stud. PGRA, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 193–208, 2020, [Online]. Available: file:///C:/Users/Coco/Downloads/635-Article Text-1336-1-10-20200728.pdf
    24. T. Nelly Dinar Sitompul, “kemampuan membedakan teks observasi dan teks deskripsi oleh siswa kelas IV SDN 064007 Medan nelly,” TERPADU J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 228–235, 2024, doi: 10.61132/sintaksis.v1i5.257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v1i5.257
    25. X. Tian, A. E. Griffith, Z. Price, K. E. Boyer, and K. Tang, “Investigating linguistic alignment in collaborative dialogue: a study of syntactic and lexical patterns in middle school students,” Lang. Speech, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00238309241234565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nbw8x
    26. S. May, “Linguistic racism: Origins and implications,” Ethnicities, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 651–661, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14687968231193072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968231193072
    27. F. R. Utami, N. Rohayati, and T. Hidayat, “Peningkatan kemampuan menulis teks anekdot dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran mind mapping (peta pikiran) di kelas X Ips Ma Plus Mandalawangi,” Diksatrasia J. Ilm. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 9, 2024, doi: 10.25157/diksatrasia.v8i1.11372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/diksatrasia.v8i1.11372
    28. U. Hidayatika, D. Aprilia, N. N. Rifa, and M. Fitriyah, “Keterampilan menulis puisi siswa dengan menggunakan media video kartun,” Didakt. J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.33096/didaktis.v2i1.592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33096/didaktis.v2i1.592
    29. L. P. Ayu, S. Deliani, and H. N. Hj. Nurhayati, “Kemampuan aplikasi canva untuk meningkatkan pembelajaran menulis puisi,” War. Dharmawangsa, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1630–1638, 2023, doi: 10.46576/wdw.v17i4.3815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v17i4.3815
    30. S. Rindiani, S. Deliani, and S. Muliatik, “Kemampuan menulis puisi dengan pendekatan kontekstual,” J. Bhs. Indones. Prima, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 150–156, 2023, doi: 10.34012/bip.v5i2.3530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34012/bip.v5i2.3530
    31. R. Listia and E. R. Febriyanti, “EFL learners’ problems in using tenses: an insight for grammar teaching,” IJET (Indonesian J. English Teaching), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 86–95, 2020, doi: 10.15642/ijet2.2020.9.1.86-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2020.9.1.86-95
    32. Y. Ding and J. Zhu, “Mobile based peer feedback in EFL speaking: learners’ motivation, behavioral engagement in feedback provision, and achievement,” Asian-Pacific J. Second Foreign Lang. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40862-024-00314-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00314-9
    33. H. Sundari and R. H. Febriyanti, “The analysis of indonesian EFL argumentative writing using toulmin’s model: the structure and struggles from the learners,” Scope J. English Lang. Teach., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 67, 2021, doi: 10.30998/scope.v5i2.8544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v5i2.8544
    34. I. G. Riadil, “A study of students’ perception: identifying EFL learners’ problems in speaking skill,” Int. J. Educ. Lang. Relig., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 31, 2020, doi: 10.35308/ijelr.v2i1.2256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/ijelr.v2i1.2256
    35. A. V. Tsepilova and L. V. Mikhaleva, “Working with formulaic language as a way to evaluate and improve EFL non-linguistics students’ pragmatic skills in a culture-specific contextual situation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 200, no. October, pp. 550–556, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022