Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

An Analysis Of Students’ Motivation And Their Achievement In Learning English At The Department Of English Education

Eka Nova Putri
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Indonesia
ekanovput@gmail.com
Milad Mahdavi
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Mohammed Sherko Awlqadir
Iraq
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to identify the dominant type of motivation integrative or instrumental among students learning English and to investigate whether these motivation types affect students' academic achievement (GPA).

    Methodology: This quantitative study utilized a survey method involving 89 first-year students from the Department of English Education. Data was gathered using 20 items from Gardner’s Attitude and Motivation Test Battery (AMTB), adapted to identify integrative and instrumental motivation. Statistical analysis was used to examine differences in GPA based on motivation types.

    Main Findings: The findings show that 56.2% of students have instrumental motivation while 43.8% have integrative motivation. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in GPA between the two groups.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study contributes to understanding how different types of motivation (integrative vs. instrumental) relate to academic outcomes in an Indonesian tertiary EFL context.

  • How to cite

    An Analysis Of Students’ Motivation And Their Achievement In Learning English At The Department Of English Education. (2025). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1698

    More Citation Formats

  • 352
    Abstract views
    240
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. B. B. ALrasheedy, A. S. M. Gaballa, K. A. Alshammari, and H. M. Alrashdi, “The effect of blended learning on enhancing motivation for academic achievement in students in the faculties of humanity sciences at hail university,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 255, no. January, p. 104955, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104955
    2. L. Ma and Z. Zhao, “Reading motivation and reading comprehension achievement among English majors in China: A descriptive correlational study,” Heliyon, vol. 11, no. 3, p. e42427, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42427
    3. S. Koivuhovi, A. Jung, E. Kilpi-Jakonen, T. D. Little, and M. P. Vainikainen, “Influence of track placement and teachers’ perceptions of children’s academic schoolwork skills on the development of children’s motivational self-beliefs and achievement,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 153, no. November 2024, p. 104847, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2024.104847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104847
    4. D. W. Putwain, A. Mallaburn, and T. Held, “Science motivation, academic achievement, career aspirations in early adolescents,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 116, no. October, p. 102577, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102577
    5. K. Witte, B. Spinath, and M. Ziegler, “Dissecting achievement motivation: Exploring the link between states, situation perception, and trait-state dynamics,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 112, no. August 2023, p. 102439, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102439
    6. A. J. Martin et al., “A healthy breakfast each and every day is important for students’ motivation and achievement,” J. Sch. Psychol., vol. 104, no. March 2022, p. 101298, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101298
    7. A. J. Martin, R. J. Collie, and L. E. Malmberg, “Exploring the roles of academic, personal, and cultural demands and resources in immigrant students’ motivation, engagement, and achievement,” Learn. Instr., vol. 92, no. February, p. 101903, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101903
    8. S. D. Odermatt, R. Weidmann, F. Schweizer, and A. Grob, “Academic performance through multiple lenses: Intelligence, conscientiousness, and achievement striving motivation as differential predictors of objective and subjective measures of academic achievement in two studies of adolescents,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 109, no. May 2023, p. 104461, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104461
    9. C. Dahlqvist, “Cognitive and motivational qualities of task instruction: Cognitive appraisals and achievement emotions of Swedish primary teacher students,” J. Acad. Librariansh., vol. 49, no. 6, p. 102797, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102797
    10. D. Paumier and J. Chanal, “The differentiated mediation effect of academic autonomous and controlled motivation in the relation between self-concept and achievement,” Learn. Motiv., vol. 83, no. April, p. 101918, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101918
    11. S. Li and J. Zheng, “The effect of academic motivation on students’ English learning achievement in the eSchoolbag-based learning environment,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40561-017-0042-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-017-0042-x
    12. K. Atit et al., “Examining the role of spatial skills and mathematics motivation on middle school mathematics achievement,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00234-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xgkep
    13. D. Michael and L. Kyriakides, “Mediating effects of motivation and socioeconomic status on reading achievement: a secondary analysis of PISA 2018,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40536-023-00181-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00181-9
    14. R. Calafato, “Charting the motivation, self-efficacy beliefs, language learning strategies, and achievement of multilingual university students learning Arabic as a foreign language,” Asian-Pacific J. Second Foreign Lang. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40862-023-00194-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00194-5
    15. T. Heydarnejad, F. Tagavipour, I. Patra, and A. Farid Khafaga, “The impacts of performance-based assessment on reading comprehension achievement, academic motivation, foreign language anxiety, and students’ self-efficacy,” Lang. Test. Asia, vol. 12, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40468-022-00202-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00202-4
    16. C. Wang et al., “Competence and autonomous motivation as motivational predictors of college students’ mathematics achievement: from the perspective of self-determination theory,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00359-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00359-7
    17. Y. Ding and J. Zhu, “Mobile based peer feedback in EFL speaking: learners’ motivation, behavioral engagement in feedback provision, and achievement,” Asian-Pacific J. Second Foreign Lang. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40862-024-00314-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00314-9
    18. S. Areepattamannil, O. A. Khurma, N. Ali, R. Al Hakmani, and H. Kadbey, “Examining the relationship between science motivational beliefs and science achievement in Emirati early adolescents through the lens of self-determination theory,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40536-023-00175-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00175-7
    19. S. A. Khozaei, N. V. Zare, H. K. Moneghi, T. Sadeghi, and M. M. Taraghdar, “Effects of quantum-learning and conventional teaching methods on learning achievement, motivation to learn, and retention among nursing students during critical care nursing education,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00198-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00198-7
    20. S. Salchegger, C. Wallner-Paschon, and C. Bertsch, “Explaining Waldorf students’ high motivation but moderate achievement in science: is inquiry-based science education the key?,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40536-021-00107-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00107-3
    21. M. Alangari, S. Jaworska, and J. Laws, “Who’s afraid of phrasal verbs? The use of phrasal verbs in expert academic writing in the discipline of linguistics,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 43, p. 100814, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814
    22. P. E. Jones and C. Read, “Mythbusters united? A dialogue over Harris’s integrationist linguistics and Gibson’s Ecological Psychology,” Lang. Sci., vol. 97, p. 101536, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536
    23. T. T. Voorhees and O. Vorobel, “Integrating Qualitative Research into the Community College Linguistics Course: An Autoethnographic Inquiry,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 2, no. June, p. 100053, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053
    24. E. Leivada and E. Murphy, “Mind the (terminological) gap: 10 misused, ambiguous, or polysemous terms in linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 8, p. 100073, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2021.100073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2021.100073
    25. K. U. Isisag, “The efficacy of macro-linguistics in developing reading skills: An integrated lesson plan,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 698–703, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220
    26. C. G. Quan, “Continuing with the Promise of ‘Scratch’ in the Applied Linguistics Classroom,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 103, pp. 245–254, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332
    27. M. A. Candel-Mora and C. Vargas-Sierra, “An Analysis of Research Production in Corpus Linguistics Applied to Translation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 95, pp. 317–324, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653
    28. R. Z. Abid and S. A. Manan, Integrating Corpus Linguistics in Critical Literacy Pedagogy: A Case Study of Lance Armstrong’s Transformation from a Titleholder to a Fraud, vol. 208, no. Icllic 2014. Elsevier B.V., 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189
    29. H. Jalali, “Reflection of stance through it bundles in applied linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 4, pp. 30–39, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001
    30. M. Pikhart, “Human-computer interaction in foreign language learning applications: Applied linguistics viewpoint of mobile learning,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 184, pp. 92–98, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.123
    31. H. Bromhead, “Disaster linguistics, climate change semantics and public discourse studies: a semantically-enhanced discourse study of 2011 Queensland Floods,” Lang. Sci., vol. 85, p. 101381, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381
    32. A. M. Fazilatfar and Z. S. Naseri, “Rhetorical Moves in Applied Linguistics Articles and their Corresponding Iranian Writer Identity,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 489–498, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444
    33. K. Belousov, E. Erofeeva, T. Erofeeva, Y. Leshchenko, and N. Zelyanskaya, “University Teachers of Linguistics and Self-Image of Their Profession,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 214, no. June, pp. 667–676, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667
    34. Z. Seifoori and J. Fattahi, “The Comparison of the Method Section of Applied Linguistics Articles Written by Native and Iranian Writers in Terms of Grammatical Complexity and Clause Types,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 1698–1705, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.596
    35. T. Popescu, “Developing English Linguistics Students’ Translation Competence through the Language Learning Process,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 1075–1079, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.333
    36. Z. E. Attia, A. M. Gadallah, and H. M. Hefny, “An Enhanced Multi-view Fuzzy Information Retrieval Model based on Linguistics,” IERI Procedia, vol. 7, pp. 90–95, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015
    37. J. M.-H. Lim, J. M. Storey, S.-L. Chang, M. S. Esa, and S. A. Damit, “Preface: Multiple Roles of Language and Linguistics in Society,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 134, no. Iclalis 2013, pp. 1–2, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.217
    38. L. Wang, “Designing and implementing outcome-based learning in a linguistics course: A case study in Hong Kong,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 12, pp. 9–18, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.004
    39. A. V. Tsepilova and L. V. Mikhaleva, “Working with Formulaic Language as a Way to Evaluate and Improve EFL Non-linguistics Students’ Pragmatic Skills in a Culture-specific Contextual Situation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 200, no. October, pp. 550–556, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022
    40. Y. Wang and J. Soler, “Investigating predatory publishing in political science: a corpus linguistics approach,” Appl. Corpus Linguist., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 100001, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100001
    41. S. Pesina and T. Solonchak, “Concept in Cognitive Linguistics and Biocognitive Science,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 192, no. 3519, pp. 587–592, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.100
    42. A. L. R. Schuster, N. L. Crossnohere, N. B. Campoamor, I. L. Hollin, and J. F. P. Bridges, “The rise of best-worst scaling for prioritization: A transdisciplinary literature review,” J. Choice Model., vol. 50, no. May 2023, p. 100466, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100466
    43. T. A. Shiryaeva, A. A. Arakelova, E. V. Tikhonova, and N. M. Mekeko, “Anti-, Non-, and Dis-: the linguistics of negative meanings about youtube,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 12, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05763
    44. N. V. Semenova and A. N. Sitsyna-Kudryavtseva, “About the Term ‘Dependent Taxis’ in Modern Linguistics,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 200, no. October, pp. 149–156, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.036
    45. M. Brooke, “‘Feminist’ in the sociology of sport: An analysis using legitimation code theory and corpus linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 7, p. 100068, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2020.100068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2020.100068
    46. M. Pikhart, “New Horizons of Intercultural Communication: Applied Linguistics Approach,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 152, pp. 954–957, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.349
    47. H. Van Pham, P. Moore, and B. Cong Cuong, “Applied picture fuzzy sets with knowledge reasoning and linguistics in clinical decision support system,” Neurosci. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 100109, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100109
    48. A. Schilling et al., “Analysis of continuous neuronal activity evoked by natural speech with computational corpus linguistics methods,” Lang. Cogn. Neurosci., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 167–186, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1803375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1803375
    49. S. Rezaei, D. Kuhi, and M. Saeidi, “Diachronic corpus analysis of stance markers in research articles: The field of applied linguistics,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2021.1872165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1872165
    50. D. Khairiah, S. Fatinah, J. Endardi, Nursyamsi, and D. Atmawati, “Genetic relationship between Kaili and Pamona languages: a historical comparative linguistics study,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2409517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2409517
    51. M. Diko, “Harmonizing Africa’s linguistic symphony: navigating the complexities of translating African literature using a postcolonial theory,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2411871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2411871
    52. R. Nhongo and L. Siziba, “Intellectualising African languages in literature and linguistics at selected Zimbabwean higher learning institutions,” South African J. African Lang., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 223–230, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02572117.2024.2385262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2024.2385262
    53. R. Iye, I. W. Simpen, I. N. Sedeng, I. M. Netra, I. M. Said, and F. I. N. Abida, “Language contextualization in public space in Maluku Province: A landscape linguistics study,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2247648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2247648
    54. N. Soleimani and E. Mohammadkhah, “Meta-discourse markers in the book reviews published in ISI and non-ISI journals of applied linguistics,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2020.1807677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1807677
    55. I. Mukahal and M. M. Idrus, “Negation Forms in the Poetry of Philip Larkin,” Comp. Lit. East West, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 207–220, 2024, doi: 10.1080/25723618.2024.2395216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2024.2395216
    56. L. Fontaine, “On prepositions and particles: A case for lexical representation in systemic functional linguistics,” Word, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 115–135, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00437956.2017.1309029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2017.1309029
    57. Hendrokumoro, F. Darman, N. Nuraeni, and N. K. Ma’shumah, “The genetic relationship between Alune, Lisabata, Luhu, and Wemale (Western Seram, Indonesia): a historical-comparative linguistics approach,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2306718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2306718
    58. D. A. S. El-Dakhs, L. Mardini, and L. Alhabbad, “The persuasive strategies in more and less prestigious linguistics journals: focus on research article abstracts,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2325760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2325760
    59. L. Zhao and P. Issra, “Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) research articles unpacked: a systemic functional linguistics (SFL) elemental genre approach,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2317617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2317617
    60. C. Yue, “We make viewpoints in different ways: the use of stance adverbials across academic levels and disciplines,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2435169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2435169
    61. M. P. Di Buono, H. Gonçalo Oliveira, V. Barbu Mititelu, B. Spahiu, and G. Nolano, “Paving the way for enriched metadata of linguistic linked data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1133–1157, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-222994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-222994
    62. J. Bosque-Gil, P. Cimiano, and M. Dojchinovski, “Editorial of the Special Issue on Latest Advancements in Linguistic Linked Data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 911–916, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-223251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223251