Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

Procedure Text Writing Skills Using Silent Film Media In Grade Vii Students Of State Junior High School 10 South Tangerang

Ainun Nisah
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta ROR
Indonesia
ainunnisah@gmail.com
Qammar-Un_Nisa Jatoi
Pakistan
Genjemurat Tleumuratov
Uzbekistan
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study examines the effectiveness of silent film media in improving the procedure text writing skills of Grade VII students at State Junior High School 10 South Tangerang.

    Methodology: The method used in this study is a qualitative scriptive method. The subjects of this study were 31 procedural texts written by students of class VII-4 of SMP Negeri 10 Tangerang Selatan in the 2019/2020 academic year. Data collection techniques in this study were observation, tests, interviews, and documentation. Assessment aspects in writing procedural texts include text content, story sequence, text structure, writing rules, and linguistic features.

    Main Findings: The results indicate that students in the experimental group demonstrated a significant improvement in their ability to structure and elaborate procedure texts compared to the control group. The use of silent films provided visual stimuli that enhanced students’ comprehension and creativity in writing.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in integrating visual-based media into writing instruction, which offers an engaging and interactive learning experience, contributing to the development of innovative teaching strategies for language learning.

  • How to cite

    Procedure Text Writing Skills Using Silent Film Media In Grade Vii Students Of State Junior High School 10 South Tangerang. (2025). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1574

    More Citation Formats

  • 358
    Abstract views
    225
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. J. Marsot and L. Claudon, “Design and ergonomics. methods for integrating ergonomics at hand tool design stage,” Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2004, doi: 10.1080/10803548.2004.11076591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2004.11076591
    2. E. Mantzourani, R. Deslandes, K. Hodson, A. Evans, L. Taylor, and C. Lucas, “Community Pharmacists’ Views on the Early Stages of Implementation of a National Pilot Independent Prescribing Service in Wales: A Qualitative Study,” Integr. Pharm. Res. Pract., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 11–23, 2023, doi: 10.2147/iprp.s395322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S395322
    3. J. Aguelo, J. M. Aquino, C. Quezon, and S. C. Laguna, “Edu Sportivo,” pp. 46–56, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/es:ijope.2023.vol4(1).11262
    4. A. O. Safitri, P. A. Handayani, and V. D. Yunianti, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa SD,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9106–9114, 2022.
    5. L. A. I. U. Khasanah, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Terpadu Tipe Shared Berbasis Saintifik untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa di SD,” J. Elem. Edukasia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2021, doi: 10.31949/jee.v4i1.3043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v4i1.3043
    6. N. S. Herawati and A. Muhtadi, “Developing Interactive Chemistry E-Modul For The Second Grade Students of Senior High School,” J. Inov. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 180–191, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v5i2.15424
    7. E. D. Chairunisa and A. Zamhari, “Pengembangan E-Modul Strategi Pembelajaran Sejarah dalam Upaya Peningkatan Literasi Digital Mahasiswa,” Criksetra J. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 84–96, 2022, doi: 10.36706/jc.v11i1.16047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36706/jc.v11i1.16047
    8. A. Fedorov and G. Mikhaleva, “Current trends in media and information literacy in research and scientific publications of the early 21st century,” Int. J. Media Inf. Lit., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 153–163, 2020, doi: 10.13187/IJMIL.2020.2.153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2020.2.153
    9. Lukman et al., “Effective teachers’ personality in strengthening character education,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 512–521, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21629
    10. “ADORNO_Theodor_W_and_LEVIN_Thomas_Y_Tran.pdf.”
    11. A. Whitney, “Thinking/Feeling: Emotion, Spectatorship, and the Pedagogy of Horror,” CEA Forum, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 37–61, 2014.
    12. J. Lawler, V. Iturralde, A. Goldstein, and A. Joseph, “Engaging engineering and information systems students in advocacy for individuals with disabilities through a disability film media project,” 2014 Proc. Inf. Syst. Educ. Conf. ISECON 2014, vol. 13, no. July, 2014.
    13. A. Walczak, “Creative description: Audio describing artistic films for individuals with visual impairments,” J. Vis. Impair. Blind., vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 387–391, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0145482x1711100410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1711100410
    14. C. E. Matias, “Do you see the words coming out of that text?: Seeing whiteness in digital text,” Int. J. Multicult. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 14–29, 2020, doi: 10.18251/ijme.v22i2.2411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v22i2.2411
    15. M. R. Fauzi, D. S. Wardhani, R. D. Puspita, D. F. Pratama, and G. D. Septian Rahayu, “Enhancing Narrative Writing Skills of Elementary School Teacher Education Students through Concentrated Language Encounter (CLE) Model Assisted by Short Film Learning Media,” Mimb. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 133–148, 2021, doi: 10.53400/mimbar-sd.v8i2.29464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v8i2.29464
    16. C. Roell, “to Teach English,” 2016.
    17. M. Leonida, “Learning from film to theatre and from theatre to film,” Film Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.14324/fej.04.2.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/FEJ.04.2.05
    18. J. Mateer, “Perceptions of broadcast and film media practitioners in UK higher education,” Film Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–26, 2019, doi: 10.18546/fej.02.1.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/FEJ.02.1.02
    19. M. Alangari, S. Jaworska, and J. Laws, “Who’s afraid of phrasal verbs? The use of phrasal verbs in expert academic writing in the discipline of linguistics,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 43, p. 100814, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814
    20. P. E. Jones and C. Read, “Mythbusters united? A dialogue over Harris’s integrationist linguistics and Gibson’s Ecological Psychology,” Lang. Sci., vol. 97, p. 101536, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536
    21. Y. J. Yong, K. National, and R. Korea, “Cypriot Journal of Educational curriculum by shooting ‘ M ETACLASSROOM ’ in the COIVD19 pandemic era,” vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1603–1621, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i5.7239
    22. M. Reid, “Film education in Europe: National cultures or European identity?,” Film Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 2018, doi: 10.18546/fej.01.1.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/FEJ.01.1.02
    23. T. T. Voorhees and O. Vorobel, “Integrating Qualitative Research into the Community College Linguistics Course: An Autoethnographic Inquiry,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 2, no. June, p. 100053, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053
    24. E. Leivada and E. Murphy, “Mind the (terminological) gap: 10 misused, ambiguous, or polysemous terms in linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 8, p. 100073, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2021.100073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2021.100073
    25. K. U. Isisag, “The efficacy of macro-linguistics in developing reading skills: An integrated lesson plan,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 698–703, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220
    26. C. G. Quan, “Continuing with the Promise of ‘Scratch’ in the Applied Linguistics Classroom,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 103, pp. 245–254, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332
    27. M. A. Candel-Mora and C. Vargas-Sierra, “An Analysis of Research Production in Corpus Linguistics Applied to Translation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 95, pp. 317–324, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653
    28. R. Z. Abid and S. A. Manan, Integrating Corpus Linguistics in Critical Literacy Pedagogy: A Case Study of Lance Armstrong’s Transformation from a Titleholder to a Fraud, vol. 208, no. Icllic 2014. Elsevier B.V., 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189
    29. H. Jalali, “Reflection of stance through it bundles in applied linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 4, pp. 30–39, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001
    30. M. Pikhart, “Human-computer interaction in foreign language learning applications: Applied linguistics viewpoint of mobile learning,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 184, pp. 92–98, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.123
    31. H. Bromhead, “Disaster linguistics, climate change semantics and public discourse studies: a semantically-enhanced discourse study of 2011 Queensland Floods,” Lang. Sci., vol. 85, p. 101381, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381
    32. A. M. Fazilatfar and Z. S. Naseri, “Rhetorical Moves in Applied Linguistics Articles and their Corresponding Iranian Writer Identity,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 489–498, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444
    33. K. Belousov, E. Erofeeva, T. Erofeeva, Y. Leshchenko, and N. Zelyanskaya, “University Teachers of Linguistics and Self-Image of Their Profession,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 214, no. June, pp. 667–676, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667
    34. Z. E. Attia, A. M. Gadallah, and H. M. Hefny, “An Enhanced Multi-view Fuzzy Information Retrieval Model based on Linguistics,” IERI Procedia, vol. 7, pp. 90–95, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015
    35. Z. Seifoori and J. Fattahi, “The Comparison of the Method Section of Applied Linguistics Articles Written by Native and Iranian Writers in Terms of Grammatical Complexity and Clause Types,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 1698–1705, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.596
    36. J. M.-H. Lim, J. M. Storey, S.-L. Chang, M. S. Esa, and S. A. Damit, “Preface: Multiple Roles of Language and Linguistics in Society,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 134, no. Iclalis 2013, pp. 1–2, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.217
    37. L. Wang, “Designing and implementing outcome-based learning in a linguistics course: A case study in Hong Kong,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 12, pp. 9–18, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.004
    38. A. V. Tsepilova and L. V. Mikhaleva, “Working with Formulaic Language as a Way to Evaluate and Improve EFL Non-linguistics Students’ Pragmatic Skills in a Culture-specific Contextual Situation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 200, no. October, pp. 550–556, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022
    39. Y. Wang and J. Soler, “Investigating predatory publishing in political science: a corpus linguistics approach,” Appl. Corpus Linguist., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 100001, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100001
    40. Astalini, Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, and S. W. Octavia, “Assembler Edu E-Modules: Improving Argumentation Skills, Perseverance, and Curiosity in Physics Learning,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 550–562, 2024, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.37238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.37238
    41. M. Aizinsh, S. W. Oktavia, R. Firmansyah, and Ruttinawati, “EXPLORATIONOF THE CHARACTER OF COOPERATION IN PHYSICS,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 139–147, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.26526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.26526
    42. H. Mansyur, S. W. Oktavia, Andriyanto, and Susbiyanto, “EduPhysics : Journal of Physics Education Volume 9 Number 2 , August 2024,” EduPhysics J. Phys. Educ. Vol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 2024, doi: 10.59052/eduphysics.v9i1.32656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v9i2.32656
    43. S. W. Oktavia, A. Astalini, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Identifikasi Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik Kelas XI Pada Materi Dinamika Gerak Lurus: Identification of Class XI Students’ Science Process Skills in the Dynamics of Rectilinear Motion,” Edu-Sains J. Pendidik. Mat. dan Ilmu Pengetah. Alam, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jmpmipa.v13i1.29751
    44. A. M. Nawahdani, E. Triani, M. Z. Azzahra, M. Maison, D. A. Kurniawan, and D. Melisa, “Hubungan Minat dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa terhadap Mata Pelajaran Fisika,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jppp.v6i1.41986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v6i1.41986
    45. M. Kennedy-Martin et al., “Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines,” Eur. J. Heal. Econ., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1245–1257, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8
    46. S. Schallert, Z. Lavicza, and E. Vandervieren, “Merging flipped classroom approaches with the 5E inquiry model: a design heuristic,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1528–1545, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1831092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1831092
    47. J. Castellví, C. Escribano, R. Santos, and J. Marolla, “Futures education: Curriculum and educational practices in Australia, Spain, and Chile,” Comunicar, vol. 30, no. 73, pp. 45–55, 2022, doi: 10.3916/c73-2022-04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C73-2022-04
    48. R. Munro, “Co-creating film education: moments of divergence and convergence on Queen Margaret University’s Introduction to Film Education course,” Film Educ. J., vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.14324/fej.06.1.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/FEJ.06.1.04
    49. H. Xu, “Cultivating film appreciation and creativity: the development of public film education in mainland China,” Film Educ. J., vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.14324/fej.06.1.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/FEJ.06.1.03
    50. S. Glotov and S. Glotov, “Finnish visual art teachers ’ perspectives,” vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2023-15-1-3
    51. D. Sochorova and M. Kubiatko, “the Influence of Selected Factors on the Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Media Education,” Probl. Educ. 21st Century, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 702–714, 2023, doi: 10.33225/pec/23.81.702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.702
    52. J. Chambers, R. Munro, J. Ross, and M. Wimmer, “Vernacular cinema, self-concept and the perceptual–conceptual shift: exploring conversations between film education and developmental psychology,” Film Educ. J., vol. 6, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.14324/fej.06.2.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/FEJ.06.2.02
    53. J. Aketema and C. Avorkliyah, “Documentary film practice at the Institute of Film and Television, Ghana: truth claims, oral histories and documentary strategies,” Film Educ. J., vol. 6, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.14324/fej.06.2.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/FEJ.06.2.04
    54. M. T. Mustafa and I. Setiawan, “Analysis of Body Shaming Construction on Women in the Film " Imperfect ”,” vol. 9, no. November, pp. 289–303, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v9i2.1712
    55. C. Hurdle, L. Greenhaw, and R. Biderman, “Does Autonomy Improve Satisfaction and Performance? A Case on Learner Choice,” NACTA J., vol. 68, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.178
    56. X. Tian, A. E. Griffith, Z. Price, K. E. Boyer, and K. Tang, “Investigating Linguistic Alignment in Collaborative Dialogue: A Study of Syntactic and Lexical Patterns in Middle School Students,” Lang. Speech, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00238309241234565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nbw8x
    57. F. Dwidarti, Zamzani, and M. Prabowo, “Multimedia-based dance learning in elementary school,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 515–521, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21795
    58. S. May, “New Zealand is ‘racist as f**k’: Linguistic racism and te reo Māori,” Ethnicities, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 662–679, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14687968231192037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968231192037
    59. J. P. Craig et al., “TFOS DEWS II Tear Film Report,” Ocul. Surf., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 366–403, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.03.006.TFOS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.03.006
    60. S. May, “Linguistic racism: Origins and implications,” Ethnicities, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 651–661, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14687968231193072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968231193072
    61. I. Lenart, I. Markovina, and O. Endrody, “Age-related differences in Russian and Hungarian linguistic pictures of the world,” J. Eurasian Stud., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–73, 2023, doi: 10.1177/18793665231221551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665231221551
    62. R. Kopečková, U. Gut, M. Wrembel, and A. Balas, “Phonological cross-linguistic influence at the initial stages of L3 acquisition,” Second Lang. Res., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1107–1131, 2023, doi: 10.1177/02676583221123994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221123994
    63. A. F. Khan et al., “When linguistics meets web technologies. Recent advances in modelling linguistic linked data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 987–1050, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-222859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-222859
    64. J. Bosque-Gil, P. Cimiano, and M. Dojchinovski, “Editorial of the Special Issue on Latest Advancements in Linguistic Linked Data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 911–916, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-223251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223251
    65. A. L. R. Schuster, N. L. Crossnohere, N. B. Campoamor, I. L. Hollin, and J. F. P. Bridges, “The rise of best-worst scaling for prioritization: A transdisciplinary literature review,” J. Choice Model., vol. 50, no. May 2023, p. 100466, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100466