Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal


Language Function Of Slected Cosmetics Advertisement In Online Media

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This research aimed to find out the types of language function used in advertising cosmetics and describe how to use the language function of cosmetics advertisement in Online Media.

    Methodology: This study used a descriptive qualitative method. Data were collected from twelve selected cosmetics advertisements of brands such as Maybelline, Make Over, and Nyx Professional Makeup, accessed through Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and official websites. The researcher used note-taking and documentation to classify data based on Halliday's language function theory.

    Main Findings: The findings revealed five types of language functions used in cosmetics advertisements: personal, representational, instrumental, imaginative, and interactional. The most dominant type was the personal function, followed by representational and instrumental. Heuristic and regulatory functions were not found. Advertisers used language functions to influence consumers by expressing emotion, conveying facts, and instructing behavior.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers new insight into the specific application of Halliday’s language function theory in Indonesian online cosmetics advertising. It emphasizes how language is strategically employed to build emotional engagement and persuade consumers in a digital marketing context.

  • How to cite

    Language Function Of Slected Cosmetics Advertisement In Online Media. (2025). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1836
  • 218
    Abstract views
    208
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. T. Budiarta, J. Nurkamto, S. Sumarlam, and D. Purnanto, “Expressive Speech Acts of Politeness in The Counselling Process,” Langkawi J. Assoc. Arab. English, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 212, 2021, doi: 10.31332/lkw.v7i2.2961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v7i2.2961
    2. W. Y. Hwang, K. Manabe, D. J. Cai, and Z. H. Ma, “Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning With Recognition Technology,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 946–977, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0735633119893117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119893117
    3. S. K. Watson et al., “Optionality in animal communication: a novel framework for examining the evolution of arbitrariness,” Biol. Rev., vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 2057–2075, 2022, doi: 10.1111/brv.12882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12882
    4. L. Fahrunnisa Hidayati et al., “Analisis Tindak Tutur Direktif dan Ekspresif dalam Teks Ceramah pada Buku Bahasa Indonesia Kelas 11 SMA Kurikulum 2013,” Blaz. J. Bhs. dan Sastra dalam Pendidik. Linguist. dan Pengemb., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45–67, 2024, doi: 10.59841/blaze.v2i1.718 Analisis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59841/blaze.v2i1.718
    5. O. Mailani, I. Nuraeni, S. A. Syakila, and J. Lazuardi, “Bahasa sebagai alat komunikasi dalam kehidupan manusia,” Kampret J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.35335/kampret.v1i1.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/kampret.v1i1.8
    6. R. Listia and E. R. Febriyanti, “EFL Learners’ Problems in Using Tenses: An Insight for Grammar Teaching,” IJET (Indonesian J. English Teaching), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 86–95, 2020, doi: 10.15642/ijet2.2020.9.1.86-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2020.9.1.86-95
    7. N. Sabrin and N. Ernawati, “Upaya Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Siswa Melalui Metode EJA di Kelas Rendah,” PUSTAKA J. Bhs. dan Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 124–133, 2024, doi: 10.56910/pustaka.v4i2.1324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56910/pustaka.v4i2.1324
    8. A. I. Kholid et al., “Analisis Klausa dalam Teks Rekon pada Buku ‘Bahasa Indonesia Tingkat Lanjut Kelas XI SMA Kurikulum Merdeka,’” J. Creat. Student Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 352–377, 2023, doi: 10.55606/jcsrpolitama.v1i2.1873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/jcsrpolitama.v1i2.1873
    9. G. N. K. Putrayasa, “Peran dan fungsi bahasa Indonesia dalam pembangunan bangsa,” J. Ecobisma, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2014, doi: 10.31004/jrpp.v7i3.31293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/ecobi.v1i1.1397
    10. E. Mulyantri, “Pengembangan objek wisata budaya : taman prasejarah leang-leang, Maros, Sulawesi Selatan,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.36276/mws.v16i1.262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36276/mws.v16i1.262
    11. I. Lisnawati, “Speaking learning based on multimedia,” J. Lang. Linguist. Stud., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2046–2056, 2021, doi: 10.52462/jlls.147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.147
    12. E. Setiawan, K. Sukesi, K. Hidayat, and Y. Yuliati, “Conservation of natural resource management in the buffer village community of alas Purwo Banyuwangi national park east java Indonesia based on local wisdom,” Local Wisdom J. Ilm. Kaji. Kearifan Lokal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 100–111, 2021, doi: 10.26905/lw.v13i1.5109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/lw.v13i1.5109
    13. N. K. Arismayanti, “Community local wisdom and efforts to create quality marine tourism,” Webology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 243–260, 2021, doi: 10.14704/web/v18i2/web18319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V18I2/WEB18319
    14. T. A. Al Fajri, “Pentingnya Penggunaan Pendekatan Multimodal Dalam Pembelajaran,” WASKITA J. Pendidik. Nilai dan Pembang. Karakter, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 57–72, 2018, doi: 10.21776/ub.waskita.2018.002.01.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.waskita.2018.002.01.5
    15. Y. Ding and J. Zhu, “Mobile based peer feedback in EFL speaking: learners’ motivation, behavioral engagement in feedback provision, and achievement,” Asian-Pacific J. Second Foreign Lang. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40862-024-00314-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00314-9
    16. M. D. H. Rahiem, “The Emergency Remote Learning Experience of University Students in Indonesia amidst the COVID-19 Crisis,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1–26, 2020, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.19.6.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.1
    17. D. Ferris and G. Eckstein, “Language matters: Examining the language-related needs and wants of writers in a first-year university writing course,” J. Writ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 321–364, 2020, doi: 10.17239/jowr-2020.12.02.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.02.02
    18. M. Zifana, I. Lukmana, and D. Sudana, “The portrayal of defamation case defendant in court verdict,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 94–103, 2021, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34672
    19. J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and D. Hansen, “The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
    20. P. Bridgewater and I. D. Rotherham, “A critical perspective on the concept of biocultural diversity and its emerging role in nature and heritage conservation,” People Nat., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 291–304, 2019, doi: 10.1002/pan3.10040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10040
    21. K. Alfiyah and W. Warli, “An ethnomathematics study at Palang fish auction site,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 373, 2024, doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v7i2.19169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i2.19169
    22. A. A. Karim, S. Mujtaba, and D. Hartati, “Mbah Bongkok pahlawan mitologis masyarakat Tegalwaru: Analisis skema aktan dan fungsional cerita rakyat Karawang,” KEMBARA J. Sci. Lang. Lit. Teach., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 40–55, 2023, doi: 10.22219/kembara.v9i1.22746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v9i1.22746
    23. E. Schwartz, T. Shamir-Inbal, and I. Blau, “Teacher prototypes in technology-enhanced instruction in elementary school second language acquisition: Comparing routine and emergency learning in different cultures,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 5, no. November, p. 100155, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100155
    24. Y. W. Astuti and A. Mustadi, “Pengaruh penggunaan media film animasi terhadap keterampilan menulis karangan narasi siswa kelas V SD,” J. Prima Edukasia, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 250, 2014, doi: 10.21831/jpe.v2i2.2723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v2i2.2723
    25. E. Y. R. Pratiwi and M. B. E. Siswanto, “Pengembangan education game berbasis microsoft power point dalam media pembelajaran pendidikan kewarganegaraan,” DWIJA CENDEKIA J. Ris. Pedagog., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 162, 2020, doi: 10.20961/jdc.v4i1.43331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v4i1.43331
    26. M. Z. Hidayatullah, A. Aminah, and M. Mohzana, “Project based learning dalam meningkatkan minat dan kemampuan siswa menulis teks rekon dengan media audio visual,” J. Kaji. Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 212–229, 2023, doi: 10.31539/kibasp.v7i1.6871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/kibasp.v7i1.6871
    27. P. A. C. Dinata, Rasidah, and V. W. Wardhana, “The validity of electronic practicum module based on scientific argumentation for practicum media during covid-19 pandemic,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1805, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012022
    28. P. Manurung, “Multimedia Interaktif Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19,” Al-Fikru J. Ilm., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.51672/alfikru.v14i1.33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51672/alfikru.v14i1.33
    29. M. A. Nopita, S. F. Zahara, and S. Muliatik, “Pengaruh Media Kartu Gambar terhadap Keterampilan Menulis Teks Anekdot di Kelas X SMK Melati Perbaungan Tahun Ajaran 2023-2024,” J. Pendidik. Tembusai, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9791–9807, 2024, doi: 10.31004/jptam.v8i1.13873.
    30. N. Hamida and N. R. Utami, “Development of Android-Based E-Module Media through Problem Based Learning on Enviromental Change Material to Improve Critical Thinking,” J. Biol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–90, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ujbe/article/view/4105
    31. K. Saddhono, “Wacana Khotbah Jumat di Surakarta: Suatu Kajian Linguistik Kultural,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 433–446, 2011, doi: 10.24832/jpnk.v17i4.39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v17i4.39
    32. A. A. Faradi, “Kajian Modalitas Linguistik Fungsional Sistemik Pada Relevansinya Dengan Pembelajaran Wacana Di Sekolah,” RETORIKA J. Ilmu Bhs., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 233–249, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/jret DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.1.2.31.233-249
    33. R. Prasetya, “Kesalahan Berbahasa Taksonomi Kategori Linguistik Dan Kompetensi Gramatikal Surat Lamaran Kerja Dalam Bahasa Inggris Pada Mahasiswa Akademi Sekretari Budi Luhur,” Serasi J. Sekertari dan Adm., vol. 18, pp. 25–33, 2020, doi: 10.36080/js.v18i1.1039.
    34. S. Arimi, M. Adelawati, U. G. Mada, J. S. Humaniora, K. Malang, and D. I. Yogyakarta, “Kasus hukum Ahmad Dhani : Kajian linguistik forensik,” Suar Betang, vol. 19, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.26499/surbet.v19i1.14995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v19i1.14995
    35. A. Kusno, “Kesantunan Linguistik Kalimat Imperatif Oleh Guru Dan Pengasuh Kepada Anak Didik Di Taman Penitipan Anak (Tpa) Sanggar Rubinha Samarinda (Linguistic Politeness of Imperative Sentences By Teachers and Caregivers To Learners At Tpa Rubinha Studio Samarinda),” J. Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 295, 2014, doi: 10.20527/jbsp.v4i2.3703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v4i2.3703
    36. I. Indrayani, R. Hendaryan, and S. Mulyani, “Kesantunan berbahasa dalam tuturan imperatif guru bahasa indonesia dalam pembelajaran bahasa indonesia di sma negeri 1 ciwaringin kabupaten cirebon,” Diksatrasia J. Ilm. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 433, 2023, doi: 10.25157/diksatrasia.v7i2.11202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/diksatrasia.v7i2.11202
    37. S. Mislikhah, “Kesantunan tuturan,” Ar-Raniry Int. J. Islam. Stud., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 285--296, 2014, doi: 10.22373/jar.v1i2.7384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20859/jar.v1i2.18
    38. A. G. Mahmudi, L. Irawati, and D. R. Soleh, “Kesantunan berbahasa siswa dalam berkomunikasi dengan guru (kajian pragmatk),” Deiksis, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 98, 2021, doi: 10.30998/deiksis.v13i2.6169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v13i2.6169
    39. M. Hasbullah Ridwan and N. Khamidah, “Kesantunan Berbahasa Dewan Juri Ragam Acara �Beraksi Di Rumah Saja� Di Indosiar (Kajian Sosiopragmatik),” J. PENEROKA, vol. 1, no. 02, p. 223, 2021, doi: 10.30739/peneroka.v1i02.986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30739/peneroka.v1i02.986
    40. I. Mustika, “Mentradisikan kesantunan berbahasa: upaya membentuk generasi bangsa yang berkarakter IKA,” Anal. Biochem., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59379-1%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420070-8.00002-7%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2018.1441103%0Ahttp://www.chile.bmw-motorrad.cl/sync/showroom/lam/es/
    41. C. Rasyikin, “Penyimpangan Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa Indonesia Di Lingkungan SMP Negeri 2 Desa Tampiala Kecamatan Dampal Selatan Kabupaten Tolitoli,” J. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1–10, 2018.