SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal


Photodegradation of Methylene Blue Dye Using TiO2/Zeolite with the Addition of Nitrate Ions (NO3-)

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the characterization of TiO₂/zeolite composites and determine the amount of TiO₂/zeolite, NO₃⁻ ion concentration, and optimum irradiation time for the photodegradation process of methylene blue in solution.

    Methodology: This study used X-Ray Diffraction (XRD-6000 Shimadzu), UV-Vis spectrophotometer, UV lamp (Sankyo, 10 W, 352 nm), Teflon type hydrothermal reactor, and photocatalyst reactor (40×40×40 cm). The methods include zeolite activation, TiO₂ dispersion, hydrothermal synthesis, photodegradation test, and data regression analysis.

    Main Findings: The TiO₂/zeolite composite showed characteristic peaks at 2θ = 25.2737°, 37.6855°, and 48.0278° without any change in the crystal structure. The maximum degradation effectiveness of 29.94% was obtained by adding 75 mg of the composite. The optimum NO₃⁻ concentration was 0.5 M with an irradiation time of 100 minutes resulting in an effectiveness of 30.81%. NO₃⁻ has a dual role in the degradation process.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study developed a photodegradation system with a combination of TiO₂/zeolite composite and nitrate ions. The novelty lies in the simultaneous analysis of the effects of catalyst amount, NO₃⁻ concentration, and irradiation time, as well as revealing the dual role of NO₃⁻ in enhancing and inhibiting degradation.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    E. Erwanto, “Photodegradation of Methylene Blue Dye Using TiO2/Zeolite with the Addition of Nitrate Ions (NO3-)”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 155–164, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v1i2.3077.
  • 18
    Abstract views
    15
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Saeed, M. Muneer, A. ul Haq, and N. Akram, “Photocatalysis: An effective tool for photodegradation of dyes—a review,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 293–311, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16389-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16389-7
    2. S. Yadav et al., “A review on degradation of organic dyes by using metal oxide semiconductors,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, no. 28, pp. 71912–71932, May 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20818-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20818-6
    3. F. H. Azhar, Z. Harun, R. Hussin, S. A. Ibrahim, R. A. Raja Ahmad, and M. F. Shohur, “Methylene blue dye wastewater treatment based On tertiary stage of industrial wastewater treatment process: A review,” Emerg. Adv. Integr. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 37–51, 2023, doi: 10.30880/emait.2022.03.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/emait.2022.03.02.004
    4. R. Jayalakshmi, K. Soundaranayaki, and M. Subhash Kannan, “Removal of methylene blue dye from textile wastewater using vertical flow constructed wetland,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 77, pp. 365–370, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.030
    5. P. Zhang et al., “Water quality degradation due to heavy metal contamination: Health impacts and eco-friendly approaches for heavy metal remediation,” Toxics, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.3390/toxics11100828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11100828
    6. S. Singh, S. M. Prasad, and G. Bashri, “Fate and toxicity of nanoparticles in aquatic systems,” Acta Geochim., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11631-022-00572-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-022-00572-9
    7. H. N. C. Dharma et al., “A review of titanium dioxide (TiO2)-based photocatalyst for oilfield-produced water treatment,” Membranes (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.3390/membranes12030345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030345
    8. J. Tomić and N. Malinović, “Titanium dioxide photocatalysis: present situation and future approaches,” Sci. Outreach Artic., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 26–30, 2023, doi: 10.59783/aire.2023.27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59783/aire.2023.27
    9. E. Pérez-Botella, S. Valencia, and F. Rey, “Zeolites in adsorption processes: State of the art and future prospects,” Chem. Rev., vol. 122, no. 24, pp. 17647–17695, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140
    10. G. Dashtpeyma, S. R. Shabanian, J. Ahmadpour, and M. Nikzad, “The investigation of adsorption desulphurization performance using bimetallic Cu Ce and Ni Ce mesoporous Y zeolites: Modification of Y zeolite by H4EDTA-NaOH sequential treatment,” Fuel Process. Technol., vol. 235, p. 107379, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107379
    11. S. Mergenbayeva et al., “TiO2/Zeolite composites for SMX degradation under UV irradiation,” Catalysts, vol. 14, no. 147, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44324-8_1246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14020147
    12. L. J. Kusumawardani, T. Widdyanti, A. Iryani, U. Hasanah, and N. Nurlela, “Optimization and mechanism elucidation of catalytic photodegradation methylene blue by TiO2/Zeolite coal fly ash nanocomposite under H2O2 presence,” Sains Nat. J. Biol. Chem., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 98–108, 2024, doi: 10.31938/jsn.v14i2.722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31938/jsn.v14i2.722
    13. S. Khan, T. Noor, N. Iqbal, and L. Yaqoob, “Photocatalytic dye degradation from textile wastewater: A review,” ACS Omega, vol. 9, no. 20, pp. 21751–21767, May 2024, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c00887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c00887
    14. A. Ahmadian, S. Ahmadi, and B. A. Goharrizi, “Roles of reactive species in photocatalysis: effect of scavengers and inorganic ions on dye removal from wastewater,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 6433–6448, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13762-023-04908-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-04908-7
    15. W. Yang et al., “Reaction mechanism and selectivity regulation of photocatalytic nitrate reduction for wastewater purification: progress and challenges,” J. Mater. Chem. A, vol. 10, no. 34, pp. 17357–17376, 2022, doi: 10.1039/D2TA04611C. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA04611C
    16. W. P. Utomo, H. Wu, and Y. H. Ng, “Quantification methodology of ammonia produced from electrocatalytic and photocatalytic nitrogen/nitrate reduction,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16010027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010027
    17. M. B. Hussain et al., “Photodegradation and its effect on plant litter decomposition in Terrestrial ecosystems: A systematic review,” Soil Syst., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2023, doi: 10.3390/soilsystems7010006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7010006
    18. P. Li, Z. Lu, S. Zou, and L. Yang, “Marine oil spill photodegradation: Laboratory simulation, affecting factors analysis and kinetic model development,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 197, p. 115729, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115729
    19. A. Ragupathi, V. P. Charpe, J. R. Hwu, and K. C. Hwang, “Oxidative destruction of chlorinated persistent organic pollutants by hydroxyl radicals via ozone and UV light irradiation,” Green Chem., vol. 25, no. 23, pp. 9695–9704, 2023, doi: 10.1039/D3GC02365F. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3GC02365F
    20. D. Zhang et al., “Fast hydroxyl radical generation at the air–water interface of aerosols mediated by water-soluble PM2.5 under ultraviolet a radiation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 145, no. 11, pp. 6462–6470, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c00300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00300
    21. D. Vallejo-Rendón, N. Ramos-Domínguez, P. Nava-Diguero, F. J. Espinosa-Faller, and F. Caballero-Briones, “Factors Affecting Photocatalytic Activity,” 2024, pp. 161–180. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-68464-7_7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68464-7_7
    22. D. Gunawan et al., “Materials advances in photocatalytic solar hydrogen production: Integrating systems and economics for a sustainable future,” Adv. Mater., vol. 36, no. 42, pp. 1–37, 2024, doi: 10.1002/adma.202404618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202404618
    23. D. M. Osorio-Aguilar et al., “Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue in carbon nanotubes: A review with bibliometric analysis,” Catalysts, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1–25, 2023, doi: 10.3390/catal13121480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13121480
    24. N. Desch, A. Rheindorf, C. Fassbender, M. Sloot, and M. Lake, “Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by anatase TiO2 coating,” Appl. Res., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.1002/appl.202300081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/appl.202300081
    25. G. Italiya and S. Subramanian, “Role of emerging chitosan and zeolite-modified adsorbents in the removal of nitrate and phosphate from an aqueous medium: A comprehensive perspective,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 2658–2684, 2022, doi: 10.2166/wst.2022.366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.366
    26. J. Pavlović and N. Rajić, “Use of natural zeolite clinoptilolite in the preparation of photocatalysts and its role in photocatalytic activity,” Minerals, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.3390/min14050508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min14050508
    27. M. Hulupi, K. Keryanti, K. A. Rahmawati, W. T. Dewi, and F. Abdilah, “Validation of methylene blue analysis method in wastewater samples by Uv-vis spectrophotometry,” Equilib. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 9–14, 2023, doi: 10.20961/equilibrium.v7i2.75807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/equilibrium.v7i2.75807
    28. M. D. Permana et al., “A simple methods for determination of methylene blue using smartphone-based as digital image colorimetry,” Trends Sci., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.48048/tis.2023.5149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2023.5149
    29. V. Sodha, S. Shahabuddin, R. Gaur, I. Ahmad, R. Bandyopadhyay, and N. Sridewi, “Comprehensive review on zeolite-based nanocomposites for treatment of effluents from wastewater,” Nanomaterials, vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 1–19, 2022, doi: 10.3390/nano12183199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12183199
    30. I. Khan et al., “Review on methylene blue: Its properties, uses, toxicity and photodegradation,” Catal. from A to Z A Concise Encycl. 4 Vol. Set, vol. 1–4, pp. 1759–1759, 2013, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-096701-1.00198-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096701-1.00198-1
    31. M. Jamil et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye and electrocatalytic water oxidation over copper(II) complex with mixed ligands,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., vol. 446, p. 115095, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115095
    32. S. Zheng et al., “Current progress in natural degradation and enhanced removal techniques of antibiotics in the environment: A review,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 17, pp. 1–31, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710919
    33. A. Al Miad, S. P. Saikat, M. K. Alam, M. Sahadat Hossain, N. M. Bahadur, and S. Ahmed, “Metal oxide-based photocatalysts for the efficient degradation of organic pollutants for a sustainable environment: a review,” Nanoscale Adv., vol. 6, no. 19, pp. 4781–4803, 2024, doi: 10.1039/d4na00517a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NA00517A
    34. Y. Li, X. Gao, and Y. Li, “Strategic pathway selection for photocatalytic degradation: roles of holes and radicals,” Inorg. Chem. Front., vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 8183–8211, 2024, doi: 10.1039/D4QI01635A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4QI01635A
    35. T. Wang et al., “Generation mechanism of hydroxyl free radicals in micro–nanobubbles water and its prospect in drinking water,” Processes, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–31, 2024, doi: 10.3390/pr12040683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040683
    36. A. N. Tuama, L. H. Alzubaidi, M. H. Jameel, K. H. Abass, M. Z. H. bin Mayzan, and Z. N. Salman, “Impact of electron–hole recombination mechanism on the photocatalytic performance of ZnO in water treatment: A review,” J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 792–806, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10971-024-06385-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-024-06385-x
    37. A. U. Hasanah, M. S. Ikbal, and D. Tahir, “Advances in rare earth‐doped ZnO photocatalysts: Enhancing photogenerated electron‐hole pairs for radical atom generation,” ChemBioEng Rev., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 595–612, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1002/cben.202300058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202300058
    38. Y. Lu et al., “Application of biochar-based photocatalysts for adsorption-(photo)degradation/reduction of environmental contaminants: mechanism, challenges and perspective,” Biochar, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42773-022-00173-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00173-y
    39. S. Zhong, J. Yang, H. Zhou, C. Li, and L. Bai, “Performance and mechanism of adsorption during synergistic photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline in water under visible (solar) irradiation,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, vol. 238, p. 111646, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.111646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2022.111646
    40. V. G et al., “Exploring the efficacy of biosynthesized cupric oxide nanoparticles from Jasminum sambac flower extract in wastewater treatment: Experimental investigations and potential applications,” Desalin. Water Treat., vol. 319, no. June, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100570
    41. K. Ahlawat, R. Jangra, and R. Prakash, “Environmentally friendly UV-C excimer light source with advanced oxidation process for rapid mineralization of azo dye in wastewater,” ACS Omega, vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 15615–15632, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c00516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c00516
    42. W. Zhao et al., “A critical review on surface-modified nano-catalyst application for the photocatalytic degradation of volatile organic compounds,” Environ. Sci. Nano, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61–80, 2022, doi: 10.1039/d1en00955a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EN00955A
    43. D. Hantoko et al., Carbon–neutral hydrogen production by catalytic methane decomposition: a review, vol. 22, no. 4. Springer International Publishing, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10311-024-01732-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-024-01732-4