SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal

Game-Based Learning in Chemistry: Development of “Win Redox” Media on Reduction and Oxidation Reactions

Siti Safitriyani
Walisongo State Islamic University ROR
Indonesia
sitisftryanii21@gmail.com
Anisah Tjakrawati
State Islamic Senior High School 2 Semarang
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the feasibility of chemistry learning media on the main material of the concept of reduction and oxidation reactions.

    Methodology: This study uses the Research and Development development method, with the Sugiyono model which includes potential problems, information gathering, product design, design validation, design revision, product trial, product revision, product. Interactive game-based learning media named the win redox game contains material on the concept of reduction and oxidation reactions. The feasibility test of the win redox game is based on the learning outcomes and understanding of Class X students of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 2 Semarang who have helped in the use of the win redox game and provided feedback on the game.

    Main Findings: The cognitive learning outcomes of students are included in the moderate category with an increase in learning outcomes (N-gain) of 0.67. The affective aspect learning outcomes of 82.33% are included in the very good category, while the results of student responses of 77.40% are included in the good category, so this interactive game is suitable for use as an alternative learning medium.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study presents "Win Redox" as a game-based learning medium specifically designed to enhance understanding of the concept of redox reactions, a concept rarely developed specifically. Unlike previous research, this medium integrates validated pedagogical design with interactive game elements. This research enriches the existing research by producing a learning medium that is not only engaging but also conceptually feasible and effective.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    S. Safitriyani and A. Tjakrawati, “Game-Based Learning in Chemistry: Development of ‘Win Redox’ Media on Reduction and Oxidation Reactions”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 136–146, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v1i2.3069.

    More Citation Formats

  • 30
    Abstract views
    14
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. Y. Rahmawati, H. Dianhar, and F. Arifin, “Analysing students’ spatial abilities in chemistry learning using 3d virtual representation,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–22, 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11040185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040185
    2. E. Nsabayezu, A. Iyamuremye, and J. Mukiza, “Impact of computer-based simulations on students ’ learning of organic chemistry in the selected secondary schools of Gicumbi District in Rwanda,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3537–3555, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11344-6 Impact. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11344-6
    3. A. M. May and J. L. Dempsey, “A new era of LMCT: leveraging ligand-to-metal charge transfer excited states for photochemical reactions,” Chem. Sci., vol. 15, pp. 6661–6678, 2024, doi: 10.1039/d3sc05268k. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC05268K
    4. J. Linnemann, K. Kanokkanchana, and K. Tschulik, “Design strategies for electrocatalysts from an electrochemist ’ s perspective,” ACS Catal., vol. 11, p. 5318−5346, 2021, doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c04118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c04118
    5. H. R. Widarti, D. A. Rokhim, and A. B. Syafruddin, “The developmen of electrolysis cell teaching material based on stem-pjbl approach assisted by learning video: A need analysis,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 309–318, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i3.25199.
    6. C. Zhu, J. Yang, J. Zhang, and H. Pan, “Single ‐ atom materials : The application in energy conversion,” Interdiscip. Mater., vol. 3, pp. 74–86, 2024, doi: 10.1002/idm2.12141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/idm2.12141
    7. E. K. Hokor and J. Sedofia, “Developing orobabilistic reasoning in preservice teachers : Comparing the learner-centered and teacher-centered approaches of teaching,” Int. J. Stud. Educ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 120–145, 2021.
    8. M. A. Alam, “From teacher-centered To student-centered learning: The role of constructivism and connectivism in pedagogical transformation,” CONFLUX J. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 154–167, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://cjoe.naspublishers.com
    9. Z. Liu, Z. A. Shaikh, and F. Gazizova, “Using the concept of game-based learning in education,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 53–64, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14675
    10. A. D. Untari, “Game based learning : Alternative 21 st century innovative learning models in improving student learning activeness,” EDUEKSOS J. Pendidik. Sos. dan Ekon., vol. XI, no. 2, pp. 228–242, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/edueksos.v11i2.11919
    11. M. T. A. Ghani, W. A. A. W. Daud, and K. A. Manan, “Integration of the ARCS motivational model in digital game-based learning for sustaining student engagement in communication,” Int. J. Relig., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 85–93, 2024, doi: 10.61707/sa9ded72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61707/sa9ded72
    12. R. Leitão, M. Maguire, S. Turner, and L. Guimarães, “A systematic evaluation of game elements effects on students’ motivation,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1081–1103, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10651-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10651-8
    13. D. Zhao, C. H. Muntean, A. E. Chis, G. Rozinaj, and G. M. Muntean, “Game-based learning: Enhancing student experience, knowledge gain, and usability in higher education programming courses,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 502–513, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TE.2021.3136914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3136914
    14. G. W. Hodges, K. Flanagan, J. Lee, A. Cohen, S. Krishnan, and C. Ward, “A quasi-experimental study comparing learning gains associated with serious educational gameplay and hands-on science in elementary classrooms,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1460–1489, 2020, doi: 10.1002/tea.21661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21661
    15. D. C. Kristidhika, W. Cendana, I. Felix-Otuorimuo, and C. Müller, “Contextual teaching and learning to improve conceptual understanding of primary students,” Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 71–78, 2020, doi: 10.33292/ter.v2i2.84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33292/ter.v2i2.84
    16. M. S. J. Maftuh, U. S. Lawal, M. Ade, A. V. Lama, and A. F. Adzim, “Understanding learning strategies: A comparison between contextual learning and problem-based learning,” Educ. J. Educ. Learn., vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 54–65, 2023, doi: 10.61987/educazione.v1i1.496 Understanding. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61987/educazione.v1i1.496
    17. B. Ahmed, H. A. N. Yaru, M. Rafiq, and C. Im, “Escaping the boredom trap : Enhancing usability with 3D games in monotonous subjects,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, no. December, pp. 180361–180384, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3434673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3434673
    18. S. Rahmah and L. Y. Risnani, “Development of educational game-based learning media to improve mastery of ecosystem material in high school students,” Pract. Sci. Teach. J. J. Prakt. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 84–98, 2023, doi: 10.58362/hafecspost.v2i2.42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58362/hafecspost.v2i2.42
    19. L. R. Murillo-Zamorano, J. Á. López Sánchez, A. L. Godoy-Caballero, and C. Bueno Muñoz, “Gamification and active learning in higher education: is it possible to match digital society, academia and students’ interests?,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 1–27, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00249-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00249-y
    20. I. Bouchrika, N. Harrati, V. Wanick, and G. Wills, “Exploring the impact of gamification on student engagement and involvement with e-learning systems,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1244–1257, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1623267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1623267
    21. H. Song and L. Cai, “Interactive learning environment as a source of critical thinking skills for college students,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05247-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05247-y
    22. C.-Y. Chang, C.-H. Kao, G.-J. Hwang, and F.-H. Lin, “From experiencing to critical thinking: a contextual game-based learning approach to improving nursing students’ performance in Electrocardiogram training,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1225–1245, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09723-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09723-x
    23. K. Adu-Gyamfi, J. G. Ampiah, and D. D. Agyei, “Participatory teaching and learning approach: A framework for teaching redox reactions at high school level,” Int. J. Educ. Pract., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 106–120, 2020, doi: 10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.106.120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.106.120
    24. E. Byusa, E. Kampire, and A. R. Mwesigye, “Game-based learning approach on students’ motivation and understanding of chemistry concepts: A systematic review of literature,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 5, p. e09541, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09541
    25. A. Schabas, “Game-Based Science Learning: What are the Problems with Teachers Practicing It in Class?,” Assyfa Learn. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 89–103, 2023, doi: 10.61650/alj.v1i2.128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v1i2.128
    26. J. Nurnberger-Haag, J. L. Wernet, and J. I. Benjamin, “Gameplay in Perspective: Applications of a Conceptual Framework to Analyze Features of Mathematics Classroom Games in Consideration of Students’ Experiences,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 267–303, 2023, doi: 10.46328/ijemst.2328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2328
    27. Y. Hu, T. Gallagher, P. Wouters, M. van der Schaaf, and L. Kester, “Game-based learning has good chemistry with chemistry education: A three-level meta-analysis,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 1499–1543, 2022, doi: 10.1002/tea.21765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21765
    28. I. Y. V. S. Putri, S. Rahayu, and I. W. Dasna, “Game-based learning application in chemistry learning: A systematic literature review,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.23960/jpmipa/v23i1.pp01-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i1.pp01-12
    29. Iswendi, Iryani, F. I. Sari, and P. Aptriyani, “Development of ludo game based android as learning media on reduction and oxidation reaction material,” J. Pengkaj. Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Mat. dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 625–633, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v12i4.12695
    30. I. J. Fitriyah, M. F. Marsuki, and Y. Affriyenni, “Development of e-learning based on augmented reality (AR) on reduction-oxidation reaction topic,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 151–158, 2022, doi: 10.3991/IJIM.V16I03.28977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i03.28977
    31. I. K. Dewi and A. Lutfi, “Chem-rox games as a learning media for the concept of reduction and oxidation reactions material to increase Students learning motivation,” Chem. Educ. Pract., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 59, 2021, doi: 10.29303/cep.v4i1.2397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i1.2397
    32. A. A. Oktadio and A. N. Pardede, “Development of interactive multimedia learning based on educational games in basic chemistry learning media,” J. Multimed. Trend Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2024, doi: 10.35671/jmtt.v3i1.48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35671/jmtt.v3i1.48
    33. O. Aktan, “Determination of educational needs of teachers regarding the education of inclusive students with learning disability,” Int. J. Contemp. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 149–164, 2022, doi: 10.33200/ijcer.638362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.638362
    34. L. Min Hui, S. Hajar binti Halili, and R. binti Abudal Razak, “Piloting a qualitative interview for Malaysia primary school active learning needs analysis regarding learner control experiences,” Qual. Rep., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1462–1482, 2022, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5464
    35. D. Y. Saputri, I. R. W. Atmojo, and R. Ardiansyah, “Validasi expert multimedia interaktif berbasis game di era digitalisasi untuk siswa sekolah dasar,” J. PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 918–931, 2021, doi: 10.33578/pjr.v5i4.8375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v5i4.8375
    36. W. Wahyuni, I. L. Mariatun, and Y. Sholeh, “Development of quizizz game-based interactive learning Media to improve learning outcomes,” Edunesia J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 143–155, 2023, doi: 10.51276/edu.v5i1.545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i1.545
    37. A. W. Wilsa, A. Rusilowati, E. Susilaningsih, J. Jaja, and V. Nurpadillah, “Validity, reliability, and item characteristics of cell material science literacy assessment instruments,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 177–188, 2023, doi: 10.21831/pep.v27i2.61577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i2.61577
    38. S. Adipat, K. Laksana, K. Busayanon, A. Ausawasowan, and B. Adipat, “Engaging students in the learning process with game-based learning: The fundamental concepts,” Int. J. Technol. Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 542–552, 2021, doi: 10.46328/ijte.169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.169
    39. J. Zhang and Z. Hu, “Advancing game-based learning in higher education through debriefing: Social constructivism theory,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2024, doi: 10.17478/jegys.1394242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1394242
    40. H. T. Hung and H. C. Yeh, “Augmented-reality-enhanced game-based learning in flipped English classrooms: Effects on students’ creative thinking and vocabulary acquisition,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1786–1800, 2023, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12839
    41. H. O. Kapici, “From symbolic representation to submicroscopic one: Preservice science teachers’ struggle with chemical representation levels in chemistry,” Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 134–147, 2023, doi: 10.46328/ijres.3122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3122
    42. H. R. Widarti, “Multiple representations in chemistry learning: A study on teachers’ literacy,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2330, no. 1, p. 20042, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0043360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043360
    43. S. A. Ishak, U. A. Hasran, and R. Din, “Media education through digital games: A review on design and factors influencing learning performance,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13020102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020102
    44. A. I. W. I. Y. Sukmana, A. A. Permana, and I. G. W. Sudatha, “Game based learning interactive multimedia in improving thematic learning achievement of third grade students,” J. Lesson Learn. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 219–227, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jlls.v6i2.60622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i2.60622
    45. L. Yu and Z. M. Zin, “The critical thinking-oriented adaptations of problem-based learning models: a systematic review,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1139987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1139987
    46. A. A. Razak et al., “Improving critical thinking skills in teaching through problem-based learning for students: A scoping review,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 342–362, 2022, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.21.2.19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.2.19
    47. V. G. Zuin, I. Eilks, M. Elschami, and K. Kümmerer, “Education in green chemistry and in sustainable chemistry: perspectives towards sustainability,” Green Chem., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1594–1608, 2021, doi: 10.1039/d0gc03313h. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC03313H
    48. J. G. Hardy et al., “Potential for chemistry in multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary teaching activities in higher education,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1124–1145, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01363
    49. K. H. D. Tang, “Student-centered approach in teaching and learning: What does it really mean?,” Acta Pedagog. Asiana, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 72–83, 2023, doi: 10.53623/apga.v2i2.218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218
    50. E. Berg and M. Lepp, “The meaning and application of student-centered learning in nursing education: An integrative review of the literature,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 69, no. November 2022, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103622