Technology-Enhanced Action Research Training for Science Teachers: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Needs Assessment
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aimed to determine the training needs of science teachers in conducting action research and to examine the relationship between their prior research experience and confidence in performing research-related tasks.
Methodology: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used. Data were collected through a validated online survey of 24 science teachers in Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines, followed by semi-structured interviews with eight participants. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rho correlation, and thematic analysis to examine teachers’ perceptions of digital tools and technology-enabled support in enhancing action research competence.
Main Findings: Teachers showed high confidence in identifying research problems but low confidence in technical areas such as data analysis and research writing stages where digital tools could offer substantial support. Prior research experience significantly correlated with confidence in data analysis (ρ = 0.439, p < 0.05). Qualitative findings highlighted barriers such as limited mentoring, time constraints, and lack of institutional structures to support technology based research training. Teachers expressed strong interest in technology enhanced mentoring, online analytics workshops, and digital writing support tools.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study contributes a novel sequential explanatory framework for diagnosing science teachers’ research competencies while integrating technological considerations into professional development design. Unlike prior assessments relying solely on traditional surveys, this study foregrounds how digital platforms, online mentoring, and technology enhanced training models can address persistent skill gaps. The findings offer actionable insights for designing innovative, technology supported research capacity-building programs for science teachers.
References
[2] I. Laudonia, P. Lodeiro, and S. Fensham, “Action research in science education—An analytical review of the literature,” Educational Action Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 480–495, 2018.
[3] M. P. E. Morales, “Participatory action research cum action research in teacher professional development: A literature review,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 156–165, 2015.
[4] S. Tan-Cortes, “Needs assessment on action research competencies of teacher-researchers in Surigao del Sur,” Journal of Educational Innovation, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1–19, 2019.
[5] A. M. P. Walag, J. J. A. Idul, and G. M. Sales, “The LUNTIAN Project: Strengthening collaboration and sustainability mindset in the academic community,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1918–1932, 2025.
[6] S. Kemmis and R. McTaggart, The Action Research Planner, Geelong: Deakin University Press, 1988.
[7] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[8] D. A. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York, NY: Basic Books, 1983.
[9] M. P. E. Morales, M. T. Fajardo, and C. D. Cerna, “Examining teachers’ conception of and needs on action research,” Issues in Educational Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 464–480, 2016.
[10] A. Oancea, R. Perryman, and J. Furlong, “Research capacity-building in teacher education: Quality and diversity,” Oxford Review of Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 98–119, 2021.
[11] M. Nicolas, S. Ignacio, and R. Bautista, “Action research attitude of teacher-researchers in a schools district in Quirino Province, Philippines,” International Journal of Social Science and Humanities, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 106–117, 2023.
[12] S. Tan-Cortes and M. S. Reyes, “Challenges in conducting action research: Experiences from biology teachers of a province in Mindanao,” Journal Pendidikan Progresif, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 151–164, 2021.
[13] H. A. Pineda and I. J. R. Geverola, “Examining competence in action research of basic education teachers in Cebu City,” Journal of Nusantara Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 202–230, 2021.
[14] A. Oancea, T. M. Childs, and J. Saunders, “Research engagement and teacher education: Evidence from England,” British Educational Research Journal, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 589–610, 2018.
[15] C. Teddlie and F. Yu, “Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples,” Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77–100, 2007.
[16] D. A. Schön, Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
[17] D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
[18] A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York, NY: W. H. Freeman, 1997.
[19] E. Wenger, N. White, and J. Smith, Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities, Portland, OR: CPsquare, 2009.
[20] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
[21] D. Mertens, Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods, 5th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2023.
[22] N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
[23] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
[24] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
[25] U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach, 8th ed., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2020.
[26] G. Norman and D. Streiner, Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials, 5th ed., Shelton, CT: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2021.
[27] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 328–352, 2021.
[28] J. J. A. Idul and A. M. P. Walag, “Integrating green chemistry and sustainability principles to a secondary science curriculum: A mixed-methods needs assessment,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 2765–2778, 2024.
[29] R. Bautista, “Teacher inquiry as reflective practice: A case in developing countries,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 23–39, 2023.
[30] A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency,” American Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 122–147, 1982.
[31] D. Kolb and A. Kolb, “Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 193–212, 2005.
[32] C. Rogoff, Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1990.
[33] M. Fullan and A. Hargreaves, Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School, New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2012.
[34] K. Zeichner, “The teacher research movement: A decade later,” Educational Researcher, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 469–480, 2009.
[35] D. Boud, R. Keogh, and D. Walker, Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, London, UK: Kogan Page, 1985.
[36] R. L. Guskey, “Professional development and teacher change,” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 381–391, 2002.
[37] R. Millar, “The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science,” Eur. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2009.
[38] T. Villegas-Reimers, Teacher Professional Development: An International Review of the Literature, Paris, France: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning, 2003.
Copyright (c) 2025 Angelo Mark P Walag, Jason M Madronero, Alyana Grace Q Tapay, Glea Mae G Sales, Naurah M Malawi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
