Ability Analysis of Providing Explanations and Strategies in Learning Science

Keywords: HOTS, Critical Thingking, Science Subject

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This descriptive study aims to analyze science learning based on students' High Order Thinking Skills, which can be seen from the thinking skills of students in junior high schools.

Methodology: This research was conducted at Junior High School State 21 Jambi City using a mixed research method with an explanatory analysis design with two instruments instrument for the quantitative approach and interview sheets for the qualitative approach. The research subjects were 58 students of class VIII. The concept tested is material about lens refraction, divided into ten questions.

Main Findings: Five indicators tested are the ability to provide essential explanations (MPD) and strategies and tactics. After analyzing the student's answers, the average MPD skills were 2.40, and strategy and tactics were 2.48. This critical thinking skill is good because the teacher also provides space for students to be active in learning so that students often ask questions and analyze the material presented in learning science.

Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study is that analyzing HOTS-based science learning can improve students' critical thinking skills so that students can be active in asking questions and analyzing the material. With necessary thinking skills, students can be more open to differences of opinion, and students can still be objective with the sources of knowledge that they have before.

References

I. Krisdiana, T. Masfigatin, and W. Murtafiaha, “The Development Of Research-Based Learning Materials With Problem Solving And Problem Posing Oriented Of Mathematics Statistics,” Al - Jabar, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 147–160, 2018.

R. Putri and A. Ghufron, “The Effectiveness of The Power Of Two Strategy Against Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Education, 3(2), 194-206,” J. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 194–206, 2019.

A. Asrial, D. Kurniawan, and R. Septiasari, “Relationship of Pedagogical Competence and Science Competency of Elementary School Teacher Education Students,” Pedagog. J. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 2019.

Y. Astuti and R. Suciati, “Profile of Biology Teacher Prospective Students’ Ability in Communicating Animal Physiology Practicum Results,” Indones. J. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 115–124, 2017.

A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, and S. E. Septi, “Overview the inquiry learning model: Attitudes, student characters, and student responses what’s the impact?,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2023, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20530.

Jufrida, “Students’ attitude and motivation in mathematical physics,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 401–408, 2019.

S. Asmi, M. Hasan, and R. Safitri, “Project-Based Learning on Temperature and Heat Materials to Improve Process Skills,” J. Indones. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2017.

T. M. Sholihah and B. Lastariwati, “Problem Based Learning To Increase Competence Of Critical Thinking And Problem Solving,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 148–154, 2020.

I. Pratiwi, “The Effect of the Pisa Program on the Curriculum in Indonesia. The Pisa Effect on Curriculum in Indonesia,” J. Educ. Cult., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–71, 2019.

M. D. Ernawati, Asrial, R. Perdana, S. E. Septi, and Rahmi, “Evaluation of Students’ Attitudes and Science Process Skills toward Middle School Science Subject in Indonesia,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 258–274, 2021, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v1.

Astalini, “Evaluation of Student’s Attitude Towards Science in Indonesia,” Open J. Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019.

A. Maghfiroh, A. Lesmono, and B. Supriadi, “The Effect of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Model Accompanied by Three-Dimensional Media on Students’ Creative Thinking Ability and Learning Outcomes in Physics Learning at SMA N 4 Jember,” J. Phys. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 20–36, 2017.

H. Sabil, D. A. Kurniawan, R. Perdana, F. I. Putri, and S. E. Septi, “The Influence of Tarompa E-Module on Peace-Loving Characters,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 12, no. 2, 2023.

M. Hariadi, J. Jumadi, I. Wilujeng, H. Kuswanto, W. Wulandari, and S. Sundari, “Inquiry Training Learning Model Assisted by Google Classroom to Improve Creative Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students,” JPI (Indonesian Educ. Journal), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 198-207., 2019.

R. Pujayanto, Budiharti, Y. Radiyono, N. Rizky, A. Nuraini, D. Putri, HV, Saputro, and E. Adhitama, “Development of a Four-Stage Misconception Diagnostic Test About Kinematics,” J. Educ. Horizons, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 237–249, 2018.

E. Istiyono, W. Brams Dwandaru, and F. Dan Rahayu, “The developing of creative thinking skills test based on modern test theory in physics of senior high schools,” Educ. Horiz., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 190–200, 2018.

M. Arief, L. Handayani, and P. Dwijananti, “Identification of Physics Learning Difficulties in RSBI Students Case Studies at RSMABI in Semarang City,” Unnes Phys. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 5–10, 2012.

U. Salamah and Mursal, “Improving Students’ Science Process Skills Using Inquiry-Based Experimental Methods on Heat Matter,” J. Indones. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 2017.

N. Alamsyah, “Application of a Scientific Approach to Increase Creativity and Student Learning Outcomes in Science Subjects,” J. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 2016.

M. Dogru, T. Gencosman, and A. Ataalkin, “Examination of natural science laboratory perception levels of students at primary education grade 6 and their attitudes towards laboratory practices of natural science course,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2011.

A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and S. Sumaryanti, “Sikap Siswa Terhadap Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN Kabupaten Batanghari,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 59, 2018, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v3i2.694.

F. Setyawan, P. Prasetyo, and B. Nurnugroho, “Developing Complex Analysis Textbook To Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking,” J. Res. Adv. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 2020.

Y. Ariyana, A. Pudjiastuti, R. Bestary, and Zamroni, Learning Oriented Handbook on Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jakara: Ministry of Education and Culture, 2018.

I. Nofitasri and Y. Sihombing, Description of Participants’ Learning Difficulties in. Jakara, 2017.

G. Rahayuni, “The Relationship between Critical Thinking Skills and Scientific Literacy in Integrated Science Learning with the Pbm and Stm Models,” J. Sci. Res. Learn., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 131–146, 2016.

D. Ritdamaya and A. Suhandi, “Construction of Critical Thinking Skills Test Instruments Related to Temperature and Heat Material.,” J. Res. Dev. Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87–96, 2016.

H. Pratama and I. Ningrum, “The Influence of Project Based Learning Learning Model Assisted by Micro Hydro Power Plant Learning Media on Critical Thinking Ability,” J. Phys. Res. Its Appl., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 44–50, 2016.

K. Kamid, S. Sutrisno, D. A. Kurniawan, K. . Anwar, E. . Triani, and S. E. Septi, “ZPD Technological Learning Environment in Learning Computational Thinking Skill-Based Mathematics,” J. Pedagog. Dan Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JP2/article/view/57920.

A. Sarwi, Rusilowati., and S. Khanafiyah, “Wave Experiment Model Implementation Open-Inquiry To Develop Critical Thinking Skills Of Physics Students,” J. Indones. Phys. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2012.

S. Ramli, R. Novanda, M. Sobri, E. Triani, and S. E. Septi, “The Effect of Student Responses on Environmental Care Characters and Student Learning Outcomes,” Eurasian J. Educ. Res., vol. 99, pp. 112–126, 2022, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2022.99.007.

Y. Ramalisa, S. E. Septi, and F. I. Putri, “Comparison of Two Learning Models on Students ’ Process Skills in Elementary School,” vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 446–457, 2022.

J. W. Creswell, Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2013.

Kamid, R. Theis, Sufri, S. E. Septi, and F. I. Putri, “Kamid, Roseli Theis, Sufri, Sabila Eka Septi, & Fhadira Insani Putri. (2022). Comparison of Two Learning Models on Students’ Process Skills in Elementary School. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(3), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i3.48681,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 446–457, 2022.

M. Naswir, H. Haryanto, and F. Wati, “Analysis of the Implementation of the Guided Inquiry Learning Model for Material Colligative Properties of Solutions and Their Effect on the Creative Thinking Ability of Class XIII Ipa SMA Islam Al-Falah, Jambi City,” J. Indones. Soc. Integr. Chem., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 43–51, 2017.

A. Hermawan and H. Yusran, Quantitative Approach Business Research. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

F. I. Putri, F. Masda, M. Maison, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Analisis Hubungan Karakter Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa Terhadap Minat Belajar Fisika di SMAN 11 Kota Jambi,” J. Phi J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Fis. Terap., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 19, 2022, doi: 10.22373/p-jpft.v3i2.13226.

Alfauzan Amin, A. Alimni, D. A. Kurniawan, E. Triani, and S. E. Septi, “INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS ON STUDENT DISCIPLINE: ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS LEARNING,” Lentera Pendidik. J. Ilmu Tarb. dan Kegur., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 135–152, 2023.

K. Wardany, Sajidan, and M. Ramli, “Assessment Development To Measure Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills,” Inq. J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2017.

M. Muttaqin and Kusaeri., “Development of a written test assessment instrument in the form of a description for problem-based PAI learning on Fiqh material,” J. Tatsqif, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2017.

Pradana, S. Parno., and Handayanto., “Development of Critical Thinking Ability Tests on Geometry Optical Materials for Physics Students,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 51–64, 2017.

T. Mairisiska, Sutrino, and Asrial., “Development of Tpack-Based Learning Devices on Material Colligative Properties of Solutions to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Edu-Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2014.

Maison, Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and L. R. Sholihah, “Deskripsi Sikap Siswa Sma Negeri Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika,” J. Eduasains, 2018.

A. Putri, M. Maison, and D. Darmaji, “Cooperation and cohesiveness of students in learning physics in class Xi Mipa SMA Negeri 3 Jambi City,” Eduphysics J. Phys. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 32–40, 2018.

H. Harris and R. Budiarti, “Development of Practicum Teaching Materials and Assessment Instruments Based on Science Process Skills in the Mycology Course, the Biology Education Study Program, Jambi University,” Biodik, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 102–112, 2017.

H. Haryanto, H. Harizon, and N. Ratih, “Development of Assessment Instruments for Process Skills and Scientific Attitudes on Thermochemistry Materials for Xi Mia Class, State Senior High School 10, Jambi City,” Integr. Chem., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 50–62, 2016.

S. E. Septi, D. Deswalman, M. Maison, and D. A. Kurniawan, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN 10,” J. Phi J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Fis. Terap., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 6–13, 2022.

A. Fujika, E. Anggereini, and R. Budiarti, “Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability of SMA N 5 Jambi City Students Through Problem-Based Learning on the Concept of Environmental Pollution,” Environ. Pollution. Biodic, vol. 1, no. 1, 2015.

H. Herlina, A. Lukman, and M. Maison, “Abstract and Random Abstract Sequential Type Students’ Creative Thinking Process in Biological Problem Solving,” Edu-Science J. Math. Nat. Sci. Educ. Univ. Jember, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016.

Published
2023-07-31
How to Cite
[1]
L. Kartina, N. Nurmeimana, I. Abamba, and A. J. Aswad, “Ability Analysis of Providing Explanations and Strategies in Learning Science”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 88-94, Jul. 2023.
Section
Articles