Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

1.6519

Impact

GScholar

16

H-Index

Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)

an Open Access Journal

Performance of Islamic Religious Education Supervisors in Central Aceh District

Rasidah Rasidah
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara ROR
Indonesia
rasidahgayo79@gmail.com
Tien Rafida ORCID
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara ROR
Indonesia
Yusuf Hadijaya ORCID
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara ROR
Indonesia
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the performance of supervisors in improving the quality of Islamic Religious Education (IRE) in Aceh Tengah District by examining their roles in academic and managerial supervision, the strategies employed to strengthen teacher performance, and the internal and external factors that influence their success.

    Methodology: This study used a descriptive qualitative method with a field study approach; data were collected from IRE supervisors, school principals, and teachers through in-depth interviews, direct observation, and document analysis, followed by thematic analysis.

    Main Findings: The findings reveal that supervisors play a pivotal role in enhancing learning quality through structured teacher mentoring, support for curriculum development, classroom observation, and performance evaluation. Effective supervisory practices include coaching clinics, collaborative lesson planning, and reflective supervision. However, several challenges hinder optimal implementation, such as limited professional development opportunities, insufficient operational support, constrained supervision coverage areas, and disparities in teachers’ digital competence. Despite these limitations, collaborative strategies involving supervisors, principals, and teachers demonstrate strong potential to resolve supervisory barriers and promote a culture of continuous improvement.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in its formulation of an integrated supervisory performance framework that connects the academic, managerial, and digital supervision dimensions within the context of Islamic education, an area underexplored in previous research. The study recommends strengthening competency-based supervisor training, increasing resource allocation, and enhancing inter-agency coordination to ensure sustainable, systemic improvements in the Islamic Religious Education supervisory ecosystem.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “Performance of Islamic Religious Education Supervisors in Central Aceh District”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1353–1364, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i4.2231.

    More Citation Formats

  • 203
    Abstract views
    143
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2023/2024: The Future of Human Development in the Anthropocene. New York: UNDP, 2023.
    2. R. Goldhammer, Clinical Supervision: Special Methods for the Supervision of Teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.
    3. R. Kurniaty, and I. Indrayuda, “Clinical supervision model: Efforts to improve the performance of islamic religious education teachers in Indonesia,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 5483-5496, 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5836
    4. M. R. Romdhoni, and L. Rahman, “Management of academic supervision of IRE supervisor in improving the competence of IRE teachers,” TARBAWY: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 194-208, 2022, doi: 10.17509/t.v9i2.45628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/t.v9i2.45628
    5. A. Masuwai, H. Zulkifli, and M. I. Hamzah, “Self-assessment for continuous professional development: The perspective of Islamic Education,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 19, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38268
    6. PP No. 12 tahun 2007 tentang Standar Pengawas Sekolah/Sekolah, lalu, PMA No. 2 Tahun 2012 juga mengkaji tentang kualifikasi dan kompetensi pengawas PAI/sekolah pasal 6 dan pasal 8.
    7. G. Mutlu‐Gülbak, and S. Akcan, “Empowering mentor teachers for supervision through an online mentor training program,” TESOL Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. e812, 2024, doi: 10.1002/tesj.812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.812
    8. D. Ekawati, I. L. Damayanti, and N. S. Lengkanawati, “Mentoring through lesson study: a collaborative way to support efl teachers’professional development in madrasahs (Islamic schools),” International Journal of Education, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 89-100, 2022, doi: 10.17509/ije.v15i2.32853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v15i2.32853
    9. E. Top, D. Baser, R. Akkus, S. Akayoglu, and M. D. Gurer, “Secondary school teachers’ preferences in the process of individual technology mentoring,” Computers & Education, vol. 160, pp. 104030, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104030
    10. S. Bibi, S. Aziz, and N. Ullah, “Bridging gaps in teaching practicum: Challenges and solutions for university supervisors,” Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1-15, 2025, doi: 10.55737/qjss.vi-iii.25363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.vi-iii.25363
    11. M. T. A. Kusuma, B. Baidi, T. Suharto, C. Amin, D. B. E. T. K. Putra, S. Ikhsan, S. Sabari, and Z. R. Ismudiono, “Supervision in Islamic management,” Educational Studies and Research Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15-27, 2025, doi: 10.60036/3nj65h80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60036/3nj65h80
    12. S. S. B. Surbakti, R. Harahap, and U. Hasanah, “Future perspectives on the islamic personality model: Integrating spiritual, moral, intellectual, social, personal, and behavioral dimensions for holistic development,” Journal on Islamic Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17-35, 2024, doi: 10.35335/7adqms82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/7adqms82
    13. D. Saputra, B. Fawaidi, and A. S. Salabi, “Qur’anic principles of educational supervision: An effort to realize quality Islamic education,” ITQAN: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 190-202, 2024, doi: 10.47766/itqan.v15i2.2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47766/itqan.v15i2.2012
    14. L. Lorensius, N. Anggal, and S. Lugan, “Academic supervision in the improvement of teachers' professional competencies: Effective practices on the emergence,” EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99-107, 2022, doi: 10.35877/454RI.eduline805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline805
    15. O. Sert, A. Gynne, and M. Larsson, “Developing student-teachers’ interactional competence through video-enhanced reflection: A discursive timeline analysis of negative evaluation in classroom interaction,” Classroom Discourse, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 142-171, 2025, doi: 10.1080/19463014.2024.2337184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2337184
    16. P. Martin, L. Lizarondo, S. Kumar, and D. Snowdon, “Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review,” PloS one, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. e0260156, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260156
    17. C. Dimmock, C. Y. Tan, D. Nguyen, T. A. Tran, and T. T. Dinh, “Implementing education system reform: Local adaptation in school reform of teaching and learning,” International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 80, pp. 102302, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102302
    18. A. Sliwka, B. Klopsch, J. Beigel, and L. Tung, “Transformational leadership for deeper learning: shaping innovative school practices for enhanced learning,” Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 103-121, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JEA-03-2023-0049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2023-0049
    19. V. Skrbinjek, M. Vičič Krabonja, B. Aberšek, and A. Flogie, “Enhancing teachers’ creativity with an innovative training model and knowledge management,” Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1381, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14121381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121381
    20. H. Habibullah. Supervisi pendidikan agama Islam di Indonesia [Supervision of Islamic Religious Education in Indonesia]. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
    21. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
    22. J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.
    23. R. C. Bogdan, and S. K. Biklen, Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Boston: Pearson, 2007.
    24. C. Amelia, A. Aprilianto, D. Supriatna, I. Rusydi, and N. E. Zahari, “The principal’s role as education supervisor in improving teacher professionalism,” Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 144-155, 2022, doi: 10.31538/ndh.v7i1.2075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v7i1.2075
    25. H. Hamka, “The role of principals on teacher performance improvement in a suburban school,” QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 371-380, 2023, doi: 10.37680/qalamuna.v15i1.2409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i1.2409
    26. B. B. Wiyono, A. Rasyad, and M. Maisyaroh. “The effect of collaborative supervision approaches and collegial supervision techniques on teacher intensity using performance-based learning,” Sage Open, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 21582440211013779, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211013779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211013779
    27. O. K. T. Kilag, F. T. Uy, M. F. S. Calledo, Y. T. D. Cerna, K. M. Villanueva, and N. A. A. Angtud, “Quality performance of teachers: work environment, work attitude, and principal supervision: Qualitative investigation,” Science and Education, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 415-429, 2023, doi: . DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/baerj.04.01.01
    28. A. Barcaui, and A. Monat, “Who is better in project planning? Generative artificial intelligence or project managers?,” Project Leadership and Society, vol. 4, pp. 100101, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.plas.2023.100101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100101
    29. W. C. Coates, J. Jordan, and S. O. Clarke, “A practical guide for conducting qualitative research in medical education: Part 2—Coding and thematic analysis,” AEM education and training, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. e10645, 2021, doi: 10.1002/aet2.10645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10645
    30. L. I. González-Pérez, and M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, “Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1493, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
    31. K. Khoiruddin, W. N. Nasution, and M. Syukri, “Optimising the role of madrasah supervisors in implementing merdeka belajar policy to improve academic quality,” EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 425-442, 2024, doi: 10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.1606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.1606
    32. D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, T. Tanti, and S. Maryani, “Innovative learning: Gender perception of e-module linear equations in mathematics and physics,” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), vol. 4, no. 2, pp, 92-106, 2022, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610
    33. N. N. Sari, “Managerial supervision and performance of school/madrasah principals in improving education quality,” PPSDP International Journal of Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 338-351, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v2i2.134
    34. S. Sermal, and M. Yunus, “Bridging technology and pedagogy: a study on virtual academic supervision for teacher professional growth,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1844-1853, 2025, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.7207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.7207
    35. T. Tanti, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, D. Darmaji, T. O. Puspitasari, and I. Wardhana, “Attitude for physics: The condition of high school students,” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 126-132, 2021, doi: 10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.18919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.18919
    36. R. Rasdiana, B. B. Wiyono, A. Imron, L. Rahma, N. Arifah, R. Azhari, ... and M. A. Maharmawan, “Elevating teachers’ professional digital competence: synergies of principals’ instructional e-supervision, technology leadership and digital culture for educational excellence in digital-savvy era,” Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 266, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14030266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030266
    37. O. F. Sitorus, T. Handayani, and S. Astuti, “Implementation of Digital-Based approaches in early childhood education supervision amidst the COVID-19 pandemic,”. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 6085-6100, 2023, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i5.5398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i5.5398
    38. D. E. C. Dewi, and E. Lubis, “The role of principal academic supervision in optimizing independent curriculum implementation,” JTP-Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 27(1), 119-136, 2025, doi: 10.21009/jtp.v27i1.53866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v27i1.53866
    39. M. Amin, A. Idi, and S. Annur, “Madrasah principals as academic supervisors: Advancing teacher professionalism through merdeka curriculum implementation at state Madrasah Aliyah,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1026-1039, 2025, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6348
    40. T. Tanti, D. Deliza, and S. Hartina, “The effectiveness of using smartphones as mobile-mini labs in improving students’ beliefs in physics,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 387-394, 2024, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185
    41. N. B. D. Kurniadi, and B. Ismanto, “Evaluation of merdeka teaching platform (PMM)-Based academic supervision in enhancing the implementation of the merdeka curriculum and teacher performance in elementary schools,” Jurnal Kependidikan, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 167-178, 2025, doi: 10.33394/jk.v11i1.14045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i1.14045
    42. R. L. Gorni, D. Nurdin, and A. Komariah, “Leveraging technology for remote supervision: Overcoming challenges in supervising geographically dispersed student teachers,” International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9-20, 2024, doi: 10.58418/ijeqqr.v3i1.95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v3i1.95
    43. T. Tanti, W. Utami, D. Deliza, and M. Jahanifar, “Investigation in vocation high school for attitude and motivation students in learning physics subject”, Jor. Eva. Edu, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 479-490, 2025, doi: 10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i2.1452
    44. B. Lal, Y. K. Dwivedi, and M. Haag, “Working from home during Covid-19: doing and managing technology-enabled social interaction with colleagues at a distance,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1333-1350, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10182-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10182-0
    45. I. Buonomo, C. De Vincenzi, M. Pansini, F. D’Anna, and P. Benevene, “Feeling supported as a remote worker: the role of support from leaders and colleagues and job satisfaction in promoting employees’ work–life balance,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 770, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21060770
    46. T. Tanti, D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and M. Iqbal, “Analysis of user responses to the application of web-based assessment on character assessment,” Journal of education technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 356-364, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590
    47. I. C. Igwebuike, O. A. U. Nnedum, and S. O. Nnatu, “Relationship between moral leadership and work-family conflict: The moderating role of loyalty to supervisor,” Nnadiebube Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1-31, 2024.
    48. N. Azizah, L. P. Sari, and A. Setiani, “Digital transformation in islamic education: Curriculum merdeka-based learning strategies to enhance student autonomy and innovation,” AL-ADABIYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol.. 6, no. 2, pp. 75-83, 2025, doi: 10.35719/adabiyah.v6i1.947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35719/adabiyah.v6i1.947
    49. S. Nahid, N. Muzaffar, and M. Abbas, “Impact of teachers’ motivation on students' performance,” Global Educational Studies Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 444-453, 2023, doi: 10.31703/gesr.2023(VIII-II).40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2023(VIII-II).40
    50. X. Zhang, W. Admiraal, and N. Saab, “Teachers’ motivation to participate in continuous professional development: relationship with factors at the personal and school level,” Journal of education for teaching, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 714-731, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2021.1942804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1942804
    51. N. Merdiaty, and S. Sulistiasih, “Empowering learning: The mediating role of teachers in enhancing students’ Intrinsic motivation,” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 5163-5172, 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.6430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.6430