Design and Validation of a Contextual Project-Based Organic Chemistry Practicum Module for Undergraduate Learning
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to design and validate a project-based organic chemistry practicum module that integrates a contextual approach, which is designed to facilitate students’ conceptual understanding, practical skills, engagement, learning motivation, and overall learning experience during laboratory practicum activities.
Methodology: This study employed the Research and Development (R&D) method utilizing the ADDIE model specifically for the Analysis, Design, and Development stages. It represents early development phase focused on design and expert validation. Data were collected through interviews and questionnaires. Module validation carried out by subject matter and media validators using Likert scale instruments and Gregory matrix calculations to ensure validity.
Main Findings: This study’s project-based, contextually integrated organic chemistry practicum module operationalizes PjBL through structured stages. Contextual learning integrates authentic phenomena with real-world applications. Validation involved two subject matter and two media validators, yielding Gregory coefficients of 1.00 for both. The module is highly valid, and future studies should test its effectiveness and practicality in enhancing conceptual understanding or 21st-century 4C skills.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study developed an organic chemistry practicum module that systematically integrates contextual phenomena across all PjBL phases. Unlike previous PjBL modules lacking contextual integration or conventional recipe-style modules with limited learning impact. This module addresses gaps in conceptual reasoning, contextual relevance, and competency, while reducing procedural learning and enhancing conceptual understanding, practical skills, 21st-century skills, and integrated science learning.
References
P. Piatanom, “Enhancing the Competitive Capacity of Educational Institutions in the Era of Change,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1620133.
B. Berkat, S. Setinawati, and B. Basrowi, “The role of educational management in enhancing innovation and problem-solving competencies for students towards global competitiveness: A literature review,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1–11, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101280.
A. Dolmaci and F. E. Acar, “Development of a twenty-first century skills curriculum through the flipped learning approach,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05925-2.
B. T. Miller, A. Camarda, M, Mercier, J. M. Burkhardt, T. Morisseau, S. B. Bougrine, F. Vinchon, S. E. Hayek, M. A. Landais, F. Mourey, C. Feybesse, D. Sundquist, and T. Lubart, “Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education,” J. Intell., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–32, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030054.
D. Pontigon and V. Talanquer, “Research and practice chemistry laboratory,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 26, no. 80, pp. 780–793, 2025, doi: 10.1039/d5rp00063g.
G. Asmussen, M. Rodemer, and S. Bernholt, “Blooming student difficulties in dealing with organic reaction mechanisms an attempt at systemization,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1035–1054, 2023, doi: 10.1039/d2rp00204c.
E. B. Vaughan, S. Tummuru, and J. Barbera, “Investigating students’ expectations and engagement in general and organic chemistry laboratory courses,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 271–288, 2025, doi: 10.1039/D4RP00277F.
A. N. Hidayah, U. Usman, and F. Erika, “Hubungan antara kecemasan saat melakukan praktikum kimia organik dengan self-efficacy mahasiswa pendidikan kimia fkip Universitas Mulawarman [The relationship between anxiety when conducting organic chemistry practicum and self-efficacy of chemistry education students at fkip Mulawarman University],” J. Chem. Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 163–169, 2025, doi: 10.30743/cheds.v7i1.11786.
T. A. Knoerzer and T. A. Davis, “Laboratory-Based modules in an organic chemistry classroom,” World J. Chem. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.12691/wice-10-2-3.
I. Tasya, P. Kusumaningtyas, and A. Rahmadani, “Desain dan validitas asesmen kinerja praktikum kimia organik pada percobaan sintesis senyawa kalkon dengan model pembelajaran berbasis proyek [Design and validity of organic chemistry practicum performance assessment in chalcone compound synthesis experiments using project-based learning models],” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran IPA Indones., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 40–51, 2025, doi: 10.23887/jppii.v15i1.90890.
M. Zhang, E. L. Day, M. F. H. Boegeman, S. J. Petritis, and M. M. Cooper, “Incorporation of green chemistry into undergraduate organic laboratory using cooperative project-based experiments and case studies,” Green Chem. Lett. Rev., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: 10.1080/17518253.2023.2183781.
S. Mclaughlin, H. Amir, N. Garrido, C. Turnbull, A. R. Swales, M. S. Kwasny, and K. Morgan, “Evaluating the impact of project-based learning in supporting students with the a level chemistry curriculum in Northern Ireland,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 537–546, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01184.
N. Y. O. Olii, M. Choirul, I. Tasya, S. Lestari, and A. Rahmadani, “Student experiences and effectiveness of project-based learning in an organic practicum chalcone synthesis experiments,” Res. Dev. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1408–1417, 2024, doi: 10.22219/raden.v4i2.36737.
S. Xiaoqian, H. Yingcui, and Z. Yuwei, “Design and construction of chemistry curriculum based on outcome-based education and XR technology,” Front. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 42–47, 2024, doi: 10.25236/FER.2024.071007.
S. Wibowo, M. N. Wangid, and F. M. Firdaus, “The relevance of vygotsky’s constructivism learning theory with the differentiated learning primary schools,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 431–440, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21197.
A. G. Spatioti, I. Kazanidis, and J. Pange, “A comparative study of the ADDIE instructional design model in distance education,” Information, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ info13090402.
M. E. E. Abisay and R. Apriliaswati, “Designing instructional materials for teaching and learning writing recount text through edmodo platform,” J. English Educ. Progr., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2021, doi: 10.26418/jeep.v2i1.44378.
S. I. Shakeel, M. A. A. Mamun, and M. F. A. Haolader, “Instructional design with ADDIE and rapid prototyping for blended learning: Validation and its acceptance in the context of TVET Bangladesh,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 7601–7630, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11471-0.
N. M. Asril, D. A. P. Handayani, D. G. F. Wirabrata, N. W. S. Mahayanti, N. K. A. Suwastini, G. R. Dantes, I. K. R. Arthana, K. Nikova, and L. P. A. S. Wahyuni, “The feasibility study of brief cognitive behavioral therapy based on mobile apps in overcoming anxiety in young adults balinese rural area: Mixed methods study,” J. Psikol., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–66, 2025, doi: 10.14710/jp.24.1.47-66 The.
I. M. Sugiarta, I. P. W. Ariawan, I. M. Ardana, D. G. H. Divayana, I. K. G. Sukawijana, and G. A. D. Sugiharni, “Validity and reliability of the discrepancy evaluation instrument for measuring inequality in the online learning,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 3952–3963, 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i6.28106.
E. Susantini, Y. M. Sari, P. V. Asteria, and M. I. Marzuqi, “Proving content validity of android-based higher order thinking skill assessment for science and mathematics preservice teacher,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 551–560, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21207.
D. Dalilah, E. Erlina, E. Mayasari, and S. Salam, “Developing a problem-based learning e-module to enhance students understanding of elements, compounds and mixtures in chemistry,” J. IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 855–871, 2025, doi: 10.4815/jipi.v.v9i3.47368.
S. S. Abadiyah, M. Ahied, A. Y. R. Wulandari, A. Rakhmawan, and A. Fikriyah, “Development of pocketbook based scientific literacy on ecology and biodiversity materials,” Nat. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 2024, doi: 10.21107/nser.v7i2.26381.
P. W. Libriani, I. M. Suarjana, and G. W. Bayu, “Quick response code-based pop-up book media: Plant reproduction systems topic for grade vi elementary school,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 381–389, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jet.v7i2. 60917.
P. Guo, N. Saab, L. S. Post, and W. Admiraal, “A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586.
J. C. Ollero and M. S. Prudente, “A meta analysis on the effectiveness of context based approach in improving the secondary students academic achievement in science,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 954–974, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15475648.
M. Y. Ruamba, Y. L. Sukestiyarno, R. Rochmad, and T. A. N. Sri, “The impact of visual and multimodal representations in mathematics on cognitive load and problem-solving skills,” Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 164–172, 2025, doi: 10.21833/ijaas.2025.04.018.
E. S. Oztay, S. A. Gunbatar, and B. E. Kiran, “Assessing chemistry teachers needs and expectations from integrated STEM education professional developments,” J. Pendagogical Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 29–43, 2022, doi: 10.33902/JPR.202213478.
Y. D. Prasetyo, S. Syahmani, and Z. C. A. Dalu, “Development of ethnoscience-based organic chemistry practicum e-module to improve students problem solving ability,” J. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 21–29, 2023, doi: 10.26714/jps.11.2.2023.21-29.
K. A. Rakhman, N. Sugrah, I. S. W. Mauraji, S. Umar, and A. A. Kiswandono, “Design and validation of a practicum module for gravimetric analysis techniques in project-based learning,” Orbital J. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 119–131, 2024, doi: 10.19109/ojpk.v8i2.24096.
N. Naifa, A. Zuhrudin, A. Alfurochmatin, W. N. Lathifah, and M. Mudrofin, “The development of a digital module on the concept and application of the kurikulum merdeka in madrasas based on problem-based learning,” J. Bhs. Arab, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 398–412, 2025, doi: 10.29240/jba.v9i1.12260.
N. O. Wulandari, S. Sutrio, A. Doyan, and S. Rahayu, “The influence of project based learning model on creative thinking skills and physics learning outcomes,” J. Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 10660–10669, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9738.
H. Abuhassna and S. Alnawajha, “Instructional design made easy instructional design models, categories, frameworks, educational context, and recommendations for future work,” Eur. J. Investig. Heal. Psychol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 715–735, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ ejihpe13040054.
M. Maier, “The role of graphic design in educational projects: enhancing learning effectiveness through visual element,” J. Arts Humanit., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2025, doi: 10.18533/journal.v14i1.2515 The.
E. Staneviciene and G. Zekiene, “The use of multimedia in the teaching and learning process of higher education: A systematic review,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1–26, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ su17198859.
M. Wienand, T. Wulfert, and H. Hoang, “Design principles for e learning platforms featuring higher education students enterprise systems end user training,” Discov. Educ., vol. 3, no. 82, pp. 1–31, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00165-z.
N. Rehman, X. Huang, A. Mahmood, M. A. M. Algerafi, and S. Javed, “Project-Based learning as a catalyst for 21st-century skills and student engagement in the math classroom,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 23, pp. 1–17, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988.
S. M. H. Amiri, “Project-based learning pedagogy: Bridging theory and practice for real-world impact,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 24, pp. 3810–3831, 2025, doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0274.
O. P. U. Gumay, I. Susanti, and W. Arini, “Development of contextual based science module,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 713–721, 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.11282.
D. R. Sari, S. Syahana, L. Asmiati, E. Pujiana, and S. Suyanta, “Exploring the revolutionary potential of contextual approach in increasing students’ interest in learning chemistry,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 285–293, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.4710.
S. R. García and S. R. Cózar, “Enhancing project-based learning: A framework for optimizing structural design and implementation — a systematic review with a sustainable focus,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 49, pp. 1–24, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17114978.
W. Wahyudi, D. Indrapangastuti, and R. Rokhmaniyah, “Pembelajaran penelitian tindakan kelas melalui model project-based learning pada calon guru sekolah dasar [Classroom action research learning through project-based learning models for prospective elementary school teachers],” Dwija Cendekia J. Ris. Pedagog., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 575–588, 2024, doi: 10.20961/jdc.v8i3.90773.
E. I. Chris, “The development phase in instructional design putting instructional elements together,” Int. J. Innov. Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 267–278, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17581384.
N. Mariliaty and T. Suhery, “Optimization of basic chemistry learning validation of stem-based problem-based learning materials for chemical equilibrium,” Asian J. Collab. Soc. Environ. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 30–45, 2024, doi: 10.61511/ajcsee.v2i1.2024.1001.
M. D. Fuentes, “The development and validation of instructional materials for theories and practices on master in public administration,” Int. J. Environ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 21, pp. 4681–4685, 2025, doi: 10.64252/2f666n0.
L. Wijnia, G. Noordzij, L. R. Arends, R. M. J. P. Rikers, and S. M. M. Loyens, “The effects of problem based , project based , and case based learning on students’ motivation ,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3.
S. Lertsakulbunlue and A. Kantiwong, “Evaluating the dependability of peer assessment in project based learning for pre clinical students: A generalizability theory approach,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 25, no. 260, pp. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06772-0.
C. Y. Lin and H. K. Wu, “Effects of different ways of using visualizations on high school students’ electrochemistry conceptual understanding and motivation towards chemistry learning,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 22, no. 56, pp. 786–801, 2021, doi: 10.1039/d0rp00308e.
M. K. Seery, H. Y. Agustian, V. C. Frederik, B. Gammelgaard, and R. H. Malm, “10 guiding principles for learning in the laboratory,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Open, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 383–402, 2024, doi: 10.1039/d3rp00245d.
J. A. G. G. Perrenoud, F. Geese, K. Uhlmann, A. Blasimann, F. L. Wagner, F. B. Neubauer, S. Huwendiek, S. Hahn and K. U. Schmitt, “Mixed methods instrument validation : evaluation procedures for practitioners developed from the validation of the Swiss instrument for evaluating interprofessional collaboration,” BMC Health Serv. Res., vol. 23, no. 83, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09040-3.
E. Anghel and M. Von Davier, “The highlighting divide: Does highlighting strategy help explain international gaps in reading achievement?,” Large Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1–19, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40536-025-00241-2.
F. Chen and G. Chen, “Learning analytics in inquiry based learning: A systematic review,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 2131–2161, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11423-025-10507-9.
K. E. Zhang and J. Jenkinson, “The visual science communication toolkit: Responding to the need for visual science communication training in undergraduate life sciences education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 296, pp. 1–29, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14030296.
M. G. Acantilado, “Development and validation of interactive e-learning materials in science 5,” Stud. Technol. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 82–95, 2025, doi: 10.55687/ste.v4i1.167.
A. B. Benedicto, “Development, validation, and acceptability of instructional module in organization and management,” Int. J. Sci. Manag. Stud., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 96–114, 2025, doi: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v8i4p107.
B. Carcamo and B. Pino, “Developing EFL students’ multimodal literacy with the use of infographics,” Asian Pacific J. Second Foreign Lang. Educ., vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40862-025-00322-3.
T. F. Haq and N. Z. Madany, “Visual media on language learning: How different visual aids affect comprehension and retention,” J. Pendidikan, Sos. Hum., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 671–686, 2025, doi: 10.61104/jq.v3i2.1081.
N. M. Sakinah, S. Sudarmin, and S. Saptono, “Development of project-based science learning materials using a culturally responsive teaching approach to enhance collaboration skills and conceptual understanding,” Int. J. Act. Learn., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 65–73, 2025, doi: 10.15294/ijal.v10i2.31591.
I. W. Subagia and A. A. I. A. R. Sudiatmika, “Project-Based learning implementation in fundamental chemistry courses to meet the 21 st century learning target,” J. Pendidik. Kim. Indones., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 79–86, 2024, doi: 10.23887/jpki.v7i2.70368.
H. Hidayah, S. Wardani, and W. Sumarni, “Chemistry in education a project-based learning student worksheet based on STEM and green chemistry to improve students’ conceptual understanding and 21st century competencies,” Chem. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 92–100, 2025, doi: 10.15294/chemined.v14i1.29100.
Copyright (c) 2026 Pino Ramadani, Maasje Catherine Watulingas, Farah Erika, Agung Rahmadani, Fitriah Khoirunnisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Integrated Science Education Journal is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
