Experimental Time Series Design for Continuous Assessment in Physics Learning: A Qualitative Exploration of Teacher Perspectives

Authors

  • Umi Nadrah Dharmawangsa Private High School Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v7i3.3404

Keywords:

Continuous Assessment, Experimental Time Series Design, Physics Education, Teacher Perspectives

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study explored teachers’ perspectives on physics learning problems and examined the potential of Experimental Time Series Design for continuous assessment. It also identified opportunities to improve assessment practices through repeated measurements and evidence-based monitoring of students’ learning progress.

Methodology: This study employed descriptive qualitative research. Data were collected through observation and semi-structured interviews involving one physics teacher with twenty-one years of teaching experience at Dharmawangsa Private High School Medan. Observation sheets and interview guidelines were used as research instruments. The data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model, including data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing.

Main Findings: The findings indicated that students experienced difficulties in understanding abstract physics concepts and maintaining learning motivation. Existing assessment practices were mainly based on written tests and focused on final achievement rather than continuous learning development. Digital platforms such as Google Forms, Kahoot, and Quizizz had been utilized, but the resulting data were primarily used for documentation purposes. The participant expressed positive perceptions regarding the potential use of Experimental Time Series Design for supporting continuous assessment and monitoring students’ progress over time.

Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers a new perspective by exploring teachers’ views on the potential implementation of Experimental Time Series Design for continuous assessment in physics learning. Unlike previous studies emphasizing learning difficulties and instructional media, this study highlights repeated measurements as an alternative framework for monitoring learning development and supporting evidence-based assessment practices in physics education.

References

M. G. Wondim and B. A. Dessie, “Continuous assessment: The missing link in Ethiopian Universities,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2404778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2404778

S. Sims, J. Anders, and L. Zieger, “The internal validity of the school-level comparative interrupted time series design: Evidence from four new within-study comparisons,” J. Res. Educ. Eff., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 876–897, 2022, doi: 10.1080/19345747.2022.2051652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2051652

D. A. Kurniawan, A. Astalini, Darmaji, Tanti, and S. Maryani, “Innovative learning: Gender perception of e-module linear equations in mathematics and physics,” Indones. J. Learn. Adv. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 92–106, 2022, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.16610

G. T. Woldetsadik, M. M. Bachore, T. A. Woldeab, and T. H. Gezahegn, “Mobile-based aural oral skill lessons: The effects on EFL teacher trainees’ oral performance,” Cogent Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2022, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2112943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2112943

T. Tanti, D. A. Kurniawan, K. Kuswanto, W. Utami, and I. Wardhana, “Science process skills and critical thinking in science: Urban and rural disparity,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 9, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i4.24139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.24139

T. Tanti, D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and M. Iqbal, “Analysis of user responses to the application of web-based assessment on character assessment,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 356–364, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590

L. Lolli, W. Gregson, A. Pulford, T. Kanope, E. Lopez, and V. Di Salvo, “Immediate effects of Ramadan on objective time asleep in male youth football players from the Middle East: An interrupted time-series study,” Sci. Med. Footb., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 152–162, 2025, doi: 10.1080/24733938.2024.2340112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2024.2340112

T. Tanti, D. Deliza, and S. Hartina, “The effectiveness of using smartphones as mobile-mini labs in improving students’ beliefs in physics,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidik. Fis. Vol 9, No 3 Sept. 2024, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 387–394, 2024, doi: 10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5185

T. Tanti, D. A. Kurniawan, N. Kurniawan, and L. Anggraini, “Attitudes toward science based on analysis and correlation: Learning enjoyment & leisure interest on science,” Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 11, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v11i1.5142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v11i1.5142

J. E. Ewusie, C. Soobiah, E. Blondal, J. Beyene, L. Thabane, and J. S. Hamid, “Methods, applications and challenges in the analysis of interrupted time series data: A scoping review,” J. Multidiscip. Healthc., vol. 13, pp. 411–423, 2020, doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S241085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S241085

T. Zhang, J. Liu, X. Wang, and C. Liu, “County hospital responses to funding reforms in Zhejiang, China: An interrupted time-series analysis,” Heal. Syst. Reform, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23288604.2023.2258770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2023.2258770

E. Triani, M. Maison, and N. Nazarudin, “Diagnosing students’ misconceptions of direct current electrical circuits using a five-tier isomorphic instrument,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 71–86, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v9i1.40469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i1.40469

A. Daniel, D. Gebeyhu, S. Assefa, and T. Abate, “Modified guided-discovery methods in physics laboratories: Pre-service teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge, views of nature of science, and motivation,” Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–38, 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2267937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2267937

S. Kapon and M. Schvartzer, “Guided inquiry into a physics equation,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 159–206, 2024, doi: 10.1080/07370008.2023.2197232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2023.2197232

D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan, and E. Triani, “The effect of science process skills of students argumentation skills,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 78–88, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v8i1.49224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.49224

N. Amalissholeha, J. Rokhmat, and I. W. Gunada, “Analysis of students’ learning difficulties in learning physics at SMAN 1 Kedir,” Empiricism J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 356–364, 2023, doi: 10.36312/ej.v4i2.1387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v4i2.1387

D. Saepuzaman, H. Retnawati, E. Istiyono, and H. Haryanto, “Developing HOTS instruments: Is it difficult for physics teachers?,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1802–1826, 2022, doi: 10.23960/jpmipa/v23i4.pp1802-1826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i4.pp1802-1826

F. Consorti, M. Notarangelo, L. Potasso, and E. Toscano, “Developing professionalism in italian medical students: An educational framework,” Adv. Med. Educ. Pract., vol. 3, pp. 55–60, 2012, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S31228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S31228

V. Mankki, J. Koski, K. Stenberg, and A. M. Poikkeus, “Teaching practicum research in Finland: A scoping review,” Educ. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2025, doi: 10.1080/00131911.2025.2506794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2025.2506794

A. Hasni, F. Bousadra, V. Belletête, A. Benabdallah, M. C. Nicole, and N. Dumais, “Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: A systematic review,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 199–231, 2016, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573

E. Mitchell, “Continuous assessment and legal education: How might a programme-level continuous assessment strategy be implemented and how might it affect student motivation?,” Law Teach., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 295–308, 2023, doi: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2228124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2228124

S. Evans and H. Paddle, “Making connections: Teacher perspectives on interdisciplinarity in physical education and mathematics,” Cogent Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2026, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2026.2644109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2644109

J. Steel, J. M. Williams, and S. McGeown, “Reading to dogs in schools: An exploratory study of teacher perspectives,” Educ. Res., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 279–301, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00131881.2021.1956989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2021.1956989

J. Zhang and M. Yanfeng, “Task engagement in Chinese university EFL classrooms: A comparative analysis of student and teacher perspectives,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2492652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2492652

K. Paesani and M. Menke, “Deconstructing the critical in critical pedagogies: Learner and teacher perspectives,” Crit. Inq. Lang. Stud., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 283–289, 2025, doi: 10.1080/15427587.2025.2530699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2025.2530699

K. A. Akhmad, “The utilization of social media for msme marketing development (A qualitative descriptive study on distros in Surakarta City),” DutaCom J., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2025.

S. Hanyfah, G. R. Fernandes, and I. Budiarso, “The implementation of descriptive qualitative methods for customer data processing applications in car wash services,” Semnas Ristek (Seminar Nas. Ris. dan Inov. Teknol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 339–344, 2022, doi: 10.30998/semnasristek.v6i1.5697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/semnasristek.v6i1.5697

Amirotun Sholikhah, “Descriptive statistics in qualitative research,” Komunika, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 342–362, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v10i2.953

D. S. Ruhansih, “Descriptive qualitative research methods from the perspective of guidance and counseling,” QUANTA J. Kaji. Bimbing. dan Konseling dalam Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2024, doi: 10.22460/q.v1i1p1-10.497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/q.v1i1p1-10.497

I. N. Z. Day, F. M. van Blankenstein, P. M. Westenberg, and W. F. Admiraal, “Explaining individual student success using continuous assessment types and student characteristics,” High. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 937–951, 2018, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1466868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1466868

A. V. Casas Pedrosa and D. Rascón Moreno, “Attention to diversity in bilingual education: Student and teacher perspectives in Spain,” Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1111–1128, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13670050.2021.1997902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1997902

J. H. Sætre and K. Zhukov, “Let’s play together: Teacher perspectives on collaborative chamber music instruction,” Music Educ. Res., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 553–567, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14613808.2021.1979499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2021.1979499

D. Alhasan, M. Fakhraldeen, S. Alqabandi, and M. Alajmi, “High school student cpr training in kuwait: A cross-sectional study of teacher perspectives, willingness, and perceived barriers,” Open Access Emerg. Med., vol. 14, pp. 639–648, 2022, doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S382744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S382744

B. C. H. Turton, “A computer-aided continuous assessment system,” Alt-J Res. Learn. Technol. ISSN, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 48–60, 1996, doi: 10.1080/0968776960040206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0968776960040206

D. Playfoot, L. L. Wilkinson, and J. Mead, “Is continuous assessment inclusive? An analysis of factors influencing student grades,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 938–950, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2022.2150834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2150834

W. Dejene and D. Chen, “The practice of modularized curriculum in higher education institution: Active learning and continuous assessment in focus,” Cogent Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052

T. Paloposki, V. Virtanen, and M. Clavert, “From a final exam to continuous assessment on a large Bachelor level engineering course,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 164–177, 2025, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2024.2334728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2334728

A. Vahed, M. M. Walters, and A. H. A. Ross, “Continuous assessment fit for purpose? Analysing the experiences of academics from a South African university of technology,” Educ. Inq., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 267–283, 2023, doi: 10.1080/20004508.2021.1994687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1994687

B. Schmand, “Why are neuropsychologists so reluctant to embrace modern assessment techniques?,” Clin. Neuropsychol., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 209–219, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1523468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1523468

R. Lu et al., “The cannabis effect on crime: Time-series analysis of crime in Colorado and Washington State,” Justice Q., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 565–595, 2021, doi: 10.1080/07418825.2019.1666903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1666903

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
“Experimental Time Series Design for Continuous Assessment in Physics Learning: A Qualitative Exploration of Teacher Perspectives”, Sch. Jo. Phs. Ed, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 158–164, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v7i3.3404.