Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal


Cultural Lexicon in the Siraman Ceremony of the Javanese Community in Muara Jaya Village, Rokan Hulu: An Ethnolinguistic Study

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to inventory, classify, and analyze the cultural lexicon found in the Javanese Siraman wedding ritual performed by the diaspora community in Muara Jaya Village, Rokan Hulu Regency, as well as to describe its semantic and symbolic meanings.

    Methodology: This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with an ethnolinguistic approach. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews with five purposively sampled key informants (customary leaders, ceremony guides, and bridal makeup artists), and audio-visual documentation of the ritual speech and procedures. 

    Main Findings: The research identified 67 cultural lexicons in the Siraman ritual, classified into eight semantic categories: (1) ritual equipment (12 lexicons), (2) flowers and plants (15 lexicons), (3) water and purification (5 lexicons), (4) actions and procedures (18 lexicons), (5) actors/officiants (8 lexicons), (6) spatial concepts (3 lexicons), (7) time concepts (4 lexicons), and (8) currency/transaction (2 lexicons). Semantic analysis reveals that these lexicons contain philosophical meanings related to fertility, purity, prosperity, harmony, and cosmology. Lexical erosion was found among the younger generation, marked by 60% unfamiliarity with key terms such as dulangan pungkasan, kreweng, and gendhongan.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study is the first to systematically document the ethnolinguistic aspects of the Siraman tradition in a Javanese transmigration community in Sumatra. It contributes to the preservation of endangered Javanese cultural lexicon and offers a model for lexical documentation in diaspora communities.

  • How to cite

    Cultural Lexicon in the Siraman Ceremony of the Javanese Community in Muara Jaya Village, Rokan Hulu: An Ethnolinguistic Study. (2026). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(2), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i2.2792
  • 109
    Abstract views
    148
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. A. Findlay, “A day to remember: Wedding ceremony and cultural change,” Shakespeare, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 411–423, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1080/17450918.2012.731707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2012.731707
    2. N. A. Rehiraky, “Language relations and cultural rituals: an ethnolinguistic study on traditional wedding ceremonies (trang kampung),” RETORIKA J. Ilmu Bhs., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 52–57, 2025, doi: 10.55637/jr.11.1.11014.52-57.
    3. W. Janggo, “Ana dhei dhato: a traditional wedding tradition at Rajawawo village of ende regency,” Ling. Cult., vol. 15, no. July, pp. 85–92, 2021, doi: 10.21512/lc.v15i1.7040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i1.7040
    4. M. Hanif, Parji, E. S. Maruti, and R. S. Wahyuni, “Cultural resilience study: the role of the temanten mandi ritual in Sendang Modo on the survival of the surrounding community,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2304401, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2304401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2304401
    5. S. A. Sakti, S. Endraswara, and A. Rohman, “Revitalizing local wisdom within character education through ethnopedagogy apporach: A case study on a preschool in Yogyakarta,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 10, p. e31370, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31370
    6. Kamariah and N. Saputra, “Symbolic meaning in traditional badudus pangantin Banjar,” LINGIT J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–51, 2020, doi: 10.33258/linglit.v1i1.350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/linglit.v1i1.350
    7. K. Rosidah, A. D. Lutfiana, C. A. Lestari, and M. Nugroho, “Lexical and cultural meaning mitoni tradition of javanese society in plumbungan village, banyudono, Boyolali: An ethnolinguistic studies,” LITE J. Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, vol. 1, no. 15, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.33633/lite.v20i1.10002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v20i1.10002
    8. Ş. Orakcı, “Teachers’ reflection and level of reflective thinking on the different dimensions of their teaching practice,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 117, 2021, doi: 10.51383/ijonmes.2021.88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2021.88
    9. A. J. Utomo, “Love in the melting pot: ethnic intermarriage in Jakarta,” J. Ethn. Migr. Stud., vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 2896–2913, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1585008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1585008
    10. Y. Rahmawati, M. Amri, A. Wahyuni, and M. Nurhidyati, “Integrating sustainability accounting into javanese wedding rituals: a symbolic and financial analysis of the siraman and midodareni processions,” JIAKES, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 729–740, 2025, doi: 10.37641/jiakes.v13i4.3553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v13i4.3553
    11. Y. W. Saputri and B. Setiawan, “Efforts to preserve the siraman gong kyai pradah tradition in the young generation in the disruptive era,” in ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2025. doi: 10.19105/ejpis.v1i.19164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19105/ejpis.v1i.19164
    12. F. Dong, X. Shen, S. Sterling, and K. K. N. Chow, “Design for the speculative future as cultural intermediary: Case study on Chinese Weddings,” Des. Cult., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 89–111, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/17547075.2022.2131164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2022.2131164
    13. N. Nuraini, Y. R. Brata, and A. Budiman, “Values of local wisdom in the traditional tingkeban ceremony among the Jawa-Pangandaran ethnic group,” JAMASAN J. Mhs. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 309–327, 2025, doi: 10.25157/jamasan.v1i3.5533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/jamasan.v1i3.5533
    14. W. Erni, S. Nurlina, E. Setiyanto, B. Darmawati, U. Sidik, and H. Saksono, “Gastrolinguistic cultural semantics of sega creative processed in java’s custom and traditional ceremonies as national value reinforcement,” in P. A. W. Wibowo et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Local Wisdom (Incolwis 2022), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 833, Atlantis Press SARL, 2024. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-224-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-224-8_16
    15. A. Danugroho, R. Rustinsyah, M. Adib, I. Ardyawin, U. Idris, and M. A. F. Habib, “Ritual, ecology, and climate change: An ethnoecological study of agricultural communities in East Java,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 12, p. 102061, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102061
    16. W. H. Lo, “Marketing images of marriage rituals: A cross-cultural analysis of wedding magazine advertising,” J. Int. Consum. Mark., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 128–146, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/08961530.2017.1381871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2017.1381871
    17. Asmayawati, Yufiarti, and E. Yetti, “Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 100233, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233
    18. I. Jones, “Early algebraization: a global dialogue from multiple perspectives,” Res. Math. Educ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 301–305, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1080/14794802.2012.734996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.734996
    19. Mujiburrahman, “Religious conversion in Indonesia: The Karo Batak and the Tengger Javanese,” Islam Christ. Relations, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 23–38, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1080/09596410124564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410124564
    20. Z. Zhang, Z. Dong, and J. Li, “Grain‐size characteristics of dune networks in china’s tengger desert,” Geogr. Ann. Ser. A, Phys. Geogr., vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 681–693, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1111/geoa.12108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12108
    21. A. Stark and F. H. Yahaya, “The paternal side of the family within a matrilineal society: an example of the minangkabau in Indonesia,” IIUM J. Hum. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 54–67, 2021, doi: 10.31436/ijohs.v3i2.208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v3i2.208
    22. J. K. Simonsen, “Migration , marriage rituals and contemporary cosmopolitanism in urban zambia cosmopolitanism in urban Zambia,” A J. Soc. Anthropol. Comp. Sociol., vol. 34, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/00664677.2023.2271674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2023.2271674
    23. S. Teuber et al., “Why do we need interdisciplinary cooperation with anthropologists and archaeologists in soil science ?,” J. Plant Nutr., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 752–765, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jpln.202200120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202200120
    24. T. J. Madigele, “Unveiling the veil of silence: culture, secrecy, and pastoral care in botswana’s naomi/laban showers,” Scriptura, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.7833/123-1-2178 Unveiling. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7833/123-1-2178
    25. N. W. Primayanti and V. Puspita, “Local wisdom narrative in environmental campaign,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2090062, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2090062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2090062
    26. H. Schreiber, “Twenty Years of the UNESCO 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage: Experiences from the Implementation of the Convention in Poland (2011–2023) BT - Handbook on Intangible Cultural Practices as Global Strategies for the Future: Twenty Years of the UNESCO Convention on Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage,” C. Wulf, Ed., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 223–238. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-72123-6_13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72123-6_13
    27. S. Lázaro Ortiz and C. Jiménez de Madariaga, “The UNESCO convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage: a critical analysis,” Int. J. Cult. Policy, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 327–341, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10286632.2021.1941914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2021.1941914
    28. C. Bortolotto and B. Ubertazzi, “Intellectual property as a blind spot in the UNESCO Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage,” Int. J. Herit. Stud., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1128–1140, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1080/13527258.2023.2236590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2236590
    29. D. Golontalo, A. Efendi, A. N. I. G. Yotolembah, S. A. Sayuti, H. Supriyadi, and A. Kusmatum, “Mantende Mamongo : Symbolic meaning in the traditional proposal ceremony of the Pamona,” KEMBARA J. Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 251–268, 2023, doi: 10.22219/kembara.v9i1.24015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v9i1.24015
    30. A. R. Putri, N. Sofiana, Y. E. Farida, L. Nugraheni, Y. Sariasih, and R. Y. S. Budiawan, “Developing a BIPA Dictionary Inspired from Rituals in Central Java,” in Proceedings of the Jepara International Conference on Education and Social Science 2024 (JIC 2024), 2025, pp. 265–271. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-483-9_34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-483-9_34
    31. T. Wahyuni and Wiwin Erni Siti Nurlina, “Revealing An Examination of the Javanese People’s Perspective on Uba Rampe of Traditional Marriage in Kendal Regency, Central Java,” Southeast Asian Lang. Lit. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 30–44, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.55981/salls.2025.13086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/salls.2025.13086
    32. A. Hornborg, “Theorizing ethnolinguistic diversity under globalization: beyond biocultural analogies,” Globalizations, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 990–1008, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/14747731.2024.2307090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2307090
    33. S. M. Rasinger, “Ethnolinguistic vitality and language use amongst Eastern European migrants in East Anglia,” J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 287–300, May 2010, doi: 10.1080/01434630903582706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630903582706
    34. S. Machdalena, R. D. Dienaputra, A. S. Suryadimulya, A. Nugraha, N. Katika, and S. Yuliawati, “What’s a name? Uncovering the heortonyms in sundanese ethnicity in west java: an ethnolinguistic study,” J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1739–1748, 2023, doi: 10.17507/jltr.1406.33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.33
    35. Y. Ichasan, E. Mutiara, I. Fauzi, and H. Ma’ruf, “Values of java culture,” Asosiaso Dosen Peneliti Ilmu Keislam. dan Sos., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 294–306, 2022, doi: 10.24952/paedagogik.v13i2#3922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/paedagogik.v13i2.3922
    36. S. Rahmasari and Z. D. A. Shakti, “Linguistic construction and cultural meaning of sinjang and semekan: an anthropological linguistic study,” J. HUMANIKA, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 222–236, 2025, doi: 10.14710/humanika.v31i2.67741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.v31i2.67741
    37. S. Nofrima, S. Sudiar, and E. P. Purnomo, “How javanese culture shaping political ideology (case study of the people in yogyakarta),” J. Ilm. PEURADEUN, vol. 9, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.26811/peuradeun.v9i2.500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i2.500
    38. N. I. Pradhana and I. W. Simpen, “The lexicon of yarn as a representation of divine values in balinese culture: an ecolinguistic study,” Sybold Rep., vol. 17, no. 2020, pp. 1189–1197, 2021, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7472626.
    39. L. Khairani, In the light of cultural studies, the contest of javanese deli cultural identity vs. Local culture. Atlantis Press SARL, 2023. doi: 10.2991/978-2-494069-07-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-07-7_11
    40. P. Hariyanto, S. Nardiati, J. Endardi, R. Sukesti, and N. Heryana, “Linguistic and symbolic meanings in ethnic communities: a case study of tedhak siten traditional ceremony,” Int. J. Soc. Cult. Lang., vol. 12, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.22034/ijscl.2024.2015853.3266.
    41. N. C. Idham, “Javanese islamic architecture: adoption and adaptation of javanese and hindu-buddhist cultures in Indonesia,” J. Archit. Urban., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2021, doi: 10.3846/jau.2021.13709 JAVANESE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2021.13709
    42. J. Iskandar and B. S. Iskandar, “The Sundanese Traditional Ecological Calendar and Socio-cultural Changes: Case Study from Rancakalong of West Java, Indonesia BT - Case Studies in Biocultural Diversity from Southeast Asia: Traditional Ecological Calendars, Folk Medicine and Folk Names,” F. M. Franco, M. Knudsen, and N. H. Hassan, Eds., Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022, pp. 79–103. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-6719-0_4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6719-0_4
    43. G. Dekeyser and O. Agirdag, “Determinants of emotional language use preferences of ethnolinguistic minority children in Antwerp, Belgium,” Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 892–908, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1080/13670050.2018.1523866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1523866
    44. I. Ulva and U. Istianah, “Getting to know the terms of month in the javanese calendar in javanese community life: ethnolinguistic study,” Realis. Ilmu Pendidikan, Seni Rupa dan Desain, vol. 1, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.62383/realisasi.v1i3.201 Mengenal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62383/realisasi.v1i3.201
    45. J. A. Tazami and Nurhayati, “The symbolic relation between human and nature in Palembang traditional marriage of suap-suapan and cacap-cacapan,” in E3S Web of Conferences, 2021. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf /202131701009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131701009
    46. Y. Mijianti, “Educational values in the diversity of javanese traditional ceremonies among pendalungan community,” Javanologi Int. J. Javanese Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 955–975, 2021, doi: 10.20961/javanologi.v5i1.67949EDUCATIONALEDUCATIONAL. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/javanologi.v5i1.67949
    47. E. De Caluwé, J. Vergauwe, M. Decuyper, S. Bogaerts, D. C. Rettew, and B. De Clercq, “The relation between normative rituals/routines and obsessive-compulsive symptoms at a young age: A systematic review,” Dev. Rev., vol. 56, p. 100913, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2020.100913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100913
    48. M. N. Al Hashas, M. H. Ubaidillah, and A. Alfaridzih, “Acculturation of islamic values in siraman javanese and bugis wedding traditions: a comparative study,” An-Nur J. Stud. Islam, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 324–339, 2025, doi: 10.37252/annur.v17i02.1952.
    49. Y. K. Amri, “The symbolic meaning of culture in the seven-monthly ceremony: cs. Peirce’s semiotic perspective,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. PROFESI GURU, vol. 8, pp. 307–318, 2025, doi: 10.23887/jippg.v8i2.102114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v8i2.102114
    50. J. J. Miera, “The Great Heuberg: An Iron Age ritual landscape on the Swabian Jura, SW Germany,” J. Archaeol. Sci. Reports, vol. 34, p. 102652, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102652
    51. G. Shao, J. Zhang, L. Bu, and J. Wang, “Cross-Cultural Perceptual Differences in the Symbolic Meanings of Chinese Architectural Heritage,” 2025. doi: 10.3390/buildings15193506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193506
    52. K. E. N. Janag, “Repositioning javanese traditional local culture ‘siraman’: the philosophy and trends,” in Isolec International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture Volume, 2020, pp. 135–141. doi: 10.18502/kss.v4i4.6476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i4.6476
    53. M. Rohul, A. Vai, and M. I. Rahmatullah, “Persepsi masyarakat terhadap permainan tradisional gasing sebagai ciri khas budaya melayu yang ada di desa Sejati Rokan Hulu,” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 7525–7536, 2025, doi: 10.31004/innovative.v5i3.19786.
    54. L. O. L. Banda, C. V. Banda, J. T. Banda, and T. Singini, “Preserving cultural heritage: A community-centric approach to safeguarding the Khulubvi Traditional Temple Malawi,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 18, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37610
    55. S. Gwerevende and Z. M. Mthombeni, “Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage: exploring the synergies in the transmission of Indigenous languages, dance and music practices in Southern Africa,” Int. J. Herit. Stud., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 398–412, May 2023, doi: 10.1080/13527258.2023.2193902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2193902
    56. R. Semwal, “Enhancing Cultural Sensitivity and Safeguarding Heritage Sites,” Oct. 14, 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1108/978-1-83797-979-020241013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-979-020241013
    57. M. Mualimin, R. Pamungkas, N. Khoirunnisa, A. Nareswari, and K. Febriyantiningrum, “Ethnobotanical knowledge in Javanese Rituals as contextual resources for biology education,” JPBI (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol. Indones., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 797–810, 2025, doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v11i2.40943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v11i2.40943
    58. H. G. Selçuk and S. Aydın, “The effects of using learning management systems on writing motivation Hatice,” Eurasian J. Lang. Teach. Linguist. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, 2024.
    59. S. Dwijonagoro, A. Efendi, B. Winantaka, and X. Yue, “An ethnopoetic analysis of master of ceremonies’ vocal beauty in Javanese weddings,” Diksi, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 189–208, 2024, doi: 10.21831/diksi.v32i2.71846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v32i2.71846
    60. L. Wang, “The motivational dynamics of learning a foreign language of limited ethnolinguistic vitality during a study abroad,” Int. J. Multiling., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 932–949, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/14790718.2021.1960357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1960357