Improving PISA Reading Literacy: The Effectiveness of KWL Strategy for Middle School Students' Comprehension of Descriptive Texts

  • Mercy Emmanuel Federal University Lokoja Kogi State
  • Torebaeva Firuza Karakalpak State University
  • Jaup Zenuni Kolegji Universitar I Biznezit
  • Aladji Mamadou Sane Université Virtuelle du Sénégal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i1.2723
Keywords: Descriptive text, KWL Strategy, PISA, Reading Comprehension, Reading Literacy

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This classroom action research aimed to investigate whether the Know-Want-Learned (KWL) strategy could improve the reading comprehension of descriptive texts among seventh-grade junior high school students, with implications for addressing the foundational literacy skills measured by international assessments such as PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment).

Methodology: Employing the Kemmis & McTaggart model over two cycles, this study collected data using pre-tests, post-tests, observation sheets, teacher interviews, and student questionnaires. Quantitative data from tests were analyzed by calculating mean scores and the percentage of students passing the Minimum Mastery Criterion (KKM), while qualitative data were analyzed thematically to assess engagement and metacognitive development.

Main Findings: The implementation of the KWL strategy significantly improved student outcomes. The percentage of students passing the KKM increased from 20% in the pre-test to 40% in post-test 1, and further to 80% in post-test 2. Qualitative data indicated increased student enthusiasm, active participation, and the development of metacognitive strategies such as questioning and reflection that align with core PISA reading literacy competencies.

Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides empirical evidence from an Indonesian junior high school context, specifically linking the KWL strategy not only to improved classroom performance but also to the development of higher-order reading skills relevant to PISA frameworks. It demonstrates KWL as a practical, low-tech strategy that can help bridge the gap between daily instruction and the literacy competencies emphasized in global assessments.

References

A. T. Ton-Nu and J. Newton, “‘This is something beyond their capacity’: Teacher educators’ cognition of L2 pragmatics and challenges of its integration into EFL teacher education: An exploratory study in Vietnam,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1–9, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1177/13621688251344894.

D. Sharma, B. Kumar, and S. Chand, “A trend analysis of machine learning research with topic models and mann-kendall test,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 70–82, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.5815/ijisa.2019.02.08..

A. Shakmaeva, “Regulating math anxiety and improving math performance: A review of intervention research,” Przegląd Badań Eduk., vol. 36, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.12775/pbe.2022.011.

Z. Akbari, “Current challenges in teaching/learning english for EFL learners: The case of junior high school and high school,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 199, no. 8, pp. 394–401, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.524.

T. A. Hezam, J. K. M. Ali, S. Imtiaz, M. A. Saifi, and M. Rezaul Islam, “Challenges and problems of reading comprehension experienced by EFL learners,” J. English Stud. Arab. Felix, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 11–21, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.56540/jesaf.v1i2.28.

H. Al-Jarrah and N. S. B. Ismail, “Reading comprehension difficulties among EFL learners in higher learning institutions,” Int. J. English Linguist., vol. 8, no. 7, p. 32, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.5539/ijel.v8n7p32.

F. Avvisati, “The measure of socio-economic status in PISA: a review and some suggested improvements,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40536-020-00086-x.

R. R. Solihin, T. T. D. Susanto, E. P. Fauziyah, N. V. I. Yanti, and A. P. Ramadhania, “The efforts of Indonesian government in increasing teacher quality based on PISA result In 2022: A literature review,” Perspekt. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2024, doi: 10.21009/pip.381.6.

F. Murtiani, U. Rahmi, S. Andriyani, S. Tuty Putri, and L. Annisa Fitriana, “The effect of cycling on endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) on the risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly: Systematic review,” J. Kesehat. Komunitas, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 213–220, 2023, doi: 10.25311/keskom.vol9.iss2.1418.

M. Torppa, K. Vasalampi, K. Eklund, S. Sulkunen, and P. Niemi, “Reading comprehension difficulty is often distinct from difficulty in reading fluency and accompanied with problems in motivation and school well-being,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 62–81, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1670334.

E. Schaffner and U. Schiefele, “The prediction of reading comprehension by cognitive and motivational factors: Does text accessibility during comprehension testing make a difference?,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 42–54, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.003.

R. Muslim and E. D. Ariyanto, “Digital literacy as a catalyst for future workforce: enhancing vocational high school graduates’ employability in the evolving digital economy Evidence from Indonesia,” Lit. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–57, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.52005/literate.v3i1.29.

I. Aboutajedyne, M. S. Houssaini, A. Aboutajeddine, Y. S. Alj, and M. El Mohajir, “A design model for the development of non-traditional educational activities,” in Colloquium in Information Science and Technology, CIST, 2020, pp. 242–247. doi: 10.1109/CiSt49399.2021.9357317.

N. Yanto and N. Indah Sari, “Exploring scientific literacy in science classrooms: A literature study,” VENN J. Sustain. Innov. Educ. Math. Nat. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 164–173, 2025, doi: 10.53696/venn.v4i3.292.

M. J. Alfaifi, “A suggested model for metacognitive strategy instruction in EFL writing classrooms,” Read. Writ. Q., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 323–339, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569.

I. Safitriani, M. Khasairi, M. Alfan, and A. B. N. Ayni, “Exploring Arabic reading and speaking skills through picture storybooks: Study literature review,” Mantiqu Tayr J. Arab. Lang., vol. 5, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.25217/mantiqutayr.v5i2.6111.

Z. Bazarbayeva, N. Ospangaziyeva, A. Zhalalova, K. Koptleuova, and A. Karshigayeva, “Syllable theory and diachronic phonology: Vocalism and consonantism in Turkic languages,” Eurasian J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 50–59, 2024, doi: 10.32601/ejal.10105.

T. S. Frønes, M. Rasmusson, and J. Bremholm, “Equity and diversity in reading comprehension—a case study of PISA 2000–2018,” in Equity, Equality and Diversity in the Nordic Model of Education, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 305–335. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61648-9_12.

T. N. Hopfenbeck, J. Lenkeit, Y. El Masri, K. Cantrell, J. Ryan, and J. A. Baird, “Lessons learned from pisa: a systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the programme for international student assessment,” Scand. J. Educ. Res., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 333–353, 2018, doi: 10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726.

R. AlAli and Y. Wardat, “Low PISA performance students: Factors, perceptions, and improvement strategies,” Int. J. Relig., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 334–348, 2024, doi: 10.61707/nve8gj33.

S. Sjøberg and E. Jenkins, “PISA: A political project and a research agenda,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2020.1824473.

D. Arroyo Resino, A. Constante-Amores, M. Castro, and E. Navarro, “School effectiveness and high reading achievement of spanish students in PISA 2018: A machine learning approach,” Educ. XX1, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 223–251, 2024, doi: 10.5944/educxx1.38634.

J. Li, E. Xue, and S. Guo, “The effects of PISA on global basic education reform: A systematic literature review,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04403-z.

Ö. C. Karacaoğlu and Y. Kasap, “The effect of reading comprehension skills on mathematics and science according to PISA data,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 623–637, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.24331/ijere.1246885.

D. H. Caro, J. Lenkeit, and L. Kyriakides, “Teaching strategies and differential effectiveness across learning contexts: Evidence from PISA 2012,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 30–41, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.005.

M. Pedaste, A. Baucal, and E. Reisenbuk, “Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: development of items and scales,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 19, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00278-z.

S. P. Worachak, P. S. Damnoen, and D. A. C. Hong, “Analysis of critical thinking skills in problem-based learning and inquiry learning models,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 282–293, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i3.29442.

F. Nur, “Education program based intervention strategies to improve school readiness in early childhood: A systematic review,” TOFEDU Futur. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 4907–4919, 2025, doi: 10.61445/tofedu.v4i8.1205.

M. Farozin, “Counselor professional identity of counselor profession education,” J. Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 104–119, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.21831/cp.v38i1.22515.

S. Alfia Susana and A. Ridho Rojabi, “Enhancing EFL students’ reading proficiency and engagement through the KWL Strategy in descriptive texts,” J. English Acad. Prof. Commun. JEAPCO, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2025, 2025.

R. Olivia, D. Rahmi, S. Yuniati, and A. Kurniati, “Systematic literature review: Students' critical thinking skills reviewed from learning styles,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 896–903, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jipp.v9i2.2167.

N. Usta and M. Yılmaz, “Impact of the KWL reading strategy on mathematical problem-solving achievement of primary school 4th graders,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 343–363, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/00220671.2020.1830017.

I. Kusumaningrum and M. W. Widiyanto, “The use of K-W-L (Know-want-learn) strategy to improve students’ reading skill in descriptive text for the eighth grade students of SMPN 1 pecangaan jepara in academic year of 2017/2018,” ETERNAL (English Teach. Journal), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 24–32, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.26877/eternal.v9i1.2412.

F. Rokhim, A. F. Laeli, and F. Mufaridah, “The effect of using k-w-l teaching method on reading comprehension in descriptive text,” SS&H Stud. Soc. Sci. Humanit. (2024), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 103–109, 2024, doi: 10.63232/ssh.v1i2.27.

M. Lamb and H. Coleman, “Literacy in english and the transformation of self and society in post-soeharto Indonesia,” Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 189–205, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.2167/beb493.0.

D. Kumalasari, H. Purwanta, and S. Aw, “Comparative analysis of Generation Z’s digital history literacy in history education majors on Java Island: A study of history digital literacy,” J. Educ. e-Learning Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 90–96, 2024, doi: 10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5342.

Y. Wu, “Scientific literacy in Asia,” Int. J. Asian Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.46966/ijae.v6i1.460.

H. Albatti, “A review of intended learning outcomes of english lessons and learning motivation,” Arab World English J., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 205–220, 2023, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol14no2.15.

H. Albatti, “A review of intended learning outcomes of english lessons and learning motivation,” Arab World English J., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 205–220, 2023, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol14no2.15.

H. Perkins, “Beyond techno-solutionism: Towards critical perspectives in environmental education and digital technology. A critical-hermeneutic review,” Int. J. Child-Computer Interact., vol. 42, no. November, p. 100705, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100705.

E. Ceylan and I. Comoglu, “Action research in initial EFL teacher education: Emerging insights from a CAR project,” Educ. Action Res., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 438–453, May 2024, doi: 10.1080/09650792.2023.2187854.

P. Marvanová, T. Padrtová, R. Opatřilová, J. Pazourek, and P. Mikuš, “Abstracts of the 50th Conference Synthesis and Analysis of Drugs,” Separations, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 30, 2023, doi: 10.3390/separations10010030.

P. Verhalle, “Fighting Disinformation : How to measure the impact of pre- and debunking on dutch primary school children ’ s media literacy ?,” no. 2022, pp. 1–12, 2025.

H.-F. Lu, “Statistical learning in sports education: A case study on improving quantitative analysis skills through project-based learning,” J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ., vol. 32, p. 100417, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100417.

P. Shekhar, M. Prince, C. Finelli, M. Demonbrun, and C. Waters, “Integrating quantitative and qualitative research methods to examine student resistance to active learning,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1–2, pp. 6–18, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1438988.

B. García-Orosa, J. Canavilhas, and J. Vázquez-Herrero, “Algorithms and communication: A systematized literature review,” Comunicar, vol. 30, no. 74, pp. 9–21, 2023, doi: 10.3916/C74-2023-01.

Irene Tsintsadze, “Dimensions of media literacy from the intercultural perspective of digital transformation,” Rev. Commun. Res., vol. 13, pp. 209–228, May 2025, doi: 10.52152/RCR.V13.14.

I. Wayan Santyasa, K. Agustini, and N. W. Eka Pratiwi, “Project based e-learning and academic procrastination of students in learning chemistry,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 909–928, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14353a.

A. M. Alzoebi, M. A. Ghunaimat, and E. A. Alawneh, “The Effects of Flipped Classroom Strategy Based on ‘Addie Model’ for Algebraic Skill Development,” Anatol. J. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 141–158, 2023, doi: 10.29333/aje.2023.8110a.

C. E. Matias, “Do you see the words coming out of that text?: Seeing whiteness in digital text,” Int. J. Multicult. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 14–29, 2020, doi: 10.18251/ijme.v22i2.2411.

A. S. Winn et al., “Applying cognitive learning strategies to enhance learning and retention in clinical teaching settings,” MedEdPORTAL, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1–7, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10850.

M. Valentini, C. Bernardini, A. Beretta, and G. Raiola, “Movement and language development as an early childhood twin strategy: A systematic review,” Sport Mont, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 107–112, 2018, doi: 10.26773/smj.181019.

N. K. Asdi and S. Sumartiningsih, “Systematic literature review (SLR): Teaching at the right level (TARL) approach to improving reading literacy of elementary school studentsr,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 4, 2025, doi: 10.23969/jp.v10i4.35003.

T. Mulyaningsih, H. Hendratno, and H. Subrata, “Literature review: Development of google sites – based multimedia to improve elementary school students’ reading literacy,” Int. J. Emerg. Res. Rev., vol. 1, no. 4, p. 000045, 2023, doi: 10.56707/ijoerar.v1i4.45.

N. Ittihad, R. A. Hamzah, and R. Citra, “Advanced writing instruction in elementary school: A theoretical analysis and proposal,” Masokan Ilmu Sos. dan Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 78–94, 2025, doi: 10.34307/misp.v5i1.143.

D. M. D. putra Nugraha and D. Juniayanti, “Strengthening student literacy in elementary schools in the era of the independent learning curriculum: A systematic literature review,” J. Instr. Dev. Res., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 499–509, 2024, doi: 10.53621/jider.v4i6.407.

K. F. Wijaya, “The implementation of kwl chart strategy to improve worldwide efl learners ’ reading comprehension skills,” E-Jou (English Educ. Lit. Journal), vol. 3, no. 02, pp. 88–99, 2023, doi: 10.53863/ejou.v3i02.853.

D. Widia and D. Pratama, “Exploring the application of kwl strategy towards students’ reading comprehension: Teachers’ perceptions,” J. English Lang. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 185–194, 2021, doi: 10.30870/jels.v6i2.10993.

R. C. Siahaan, Herman, and M. V. R. Munthe, “The effect of applying kwl ( know , want , learn ) strategy on reading comprehension at grade ix in SMP swasta cinta rakyat 3 Pematangsiantar,” EDUCTUM J. Res., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 155–161, 2025, doi: 10.56495/ejr.v4i5.1285.

T. Thi Minh Ly, “The effects of using graphic organizers in english reading comprehension,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Res. Manag., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1–5, 2023, doi: 10.36282/ijasrm/8.5.2023.1891.

Mashur, “Strategy in teaching reading comprehension of descriptive texts: A literature review perspective,” Sci. Educ. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2022, doi: 10.56282/ser.v1i1.69.

H. Albatti, “A Review of Intended Learning Outcomes of English Lessons and Learning Motivation,” Arab World English J., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 205–220, 2023, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol14no2.15.

P. A. Wijaya, J. Sutarto, and I. Zulaeha, “The influence of direct reading thinking activity ( drta ) strategy and know-want to know-learned ( kwl ) strategy on reading comprehension skills,” J. Prim. Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 284–296, 2021, doi: 10.15294/jpe.v10i3.44381.

D. F. Heriyawati, L. Irawati, and A. C. L. T. Haliwala, “The use of kwl ( know , want , learned ) strategy on students ’ reading comprehension,” English Teach. J. A J. English Lit. Linguist. Educ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 94–100, 2021, doi: 10.11591/etj.v9i2.11093.

K. S. Diasti, C. T. Murniati, and H. Hartono, “The Implementation of KWL Strategy in EFL Students ’ Reading Comprehension,” J. English Teach., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 176–185, 2023, doi: 10.33541/jet.v9i2.4676.

S. Moh, Nurdin, and Fitriningsih, “The effectiveness of know-want- learned ( kwl ) strategy in improving reading comprehension of the eight grade students of smp negeri 14 Palu,” Datokarama English Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2020, doi: 10.24239/dee.v1i1.5.

A. Sholeh, N. E. Rosalina, and R. Weganofa, “The implementation of KWL (Know, want to know, and learned) to improve students’ reading comprehension,” Available online IJEE (Indonesian J. English Educ., vol. 7, pp. 22–31, 2020, doi: 10.15408/ijee.v7i1.15541.

F. Rokhim, A. F. Laeli, and F. Mufaridah, “The effect of using k-w-l teaching method on reading comprehension in descriptive text,” SS&H Stud. Soc. Sci. Humanit. (2024), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 103–109, 2024, doi: 10.63232/ssh.v1i2.27.

A. Agung, V. Andari, N. W. Krismayani, I. G. Putu, and A. Pramerta, “Does kwl strategy improve students ’ reading comprehension during distance learning ?,” J. Santiaji Pendidik., vol. 12, no. September, 2022, doi: 10.36733/jsp.v12i2.4592.

I. Jayanti and Y. K. Nasution, “The effectiviness of applying kwl ( know , want , learn ) strategy on reading comprehension at SMP negeri 4 Pematangsiantar,” Biling. J. Pendidik. Bhs. Ingg., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 152–158, 2022, doi: 10.36985/jbl.v4i2.470.

Published
2026-01-25
How to Cite
Emmanuel, M., Firuza, T., Zenuni, J., & Sane, A. M. (2026). Improving PISA Reading Literacy: The Effectiveness of KWL Strategy for Middle School Students’ Comprehension of Descriptive Texts. Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(1), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i1.2723
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): June
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2026 Devi Zelyanti, Torebaeva Firuza, Saraswathy Selvarajan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.