Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal


Cultural Values in Javanese Proverbs: An Ecolinguistic Study of Flora And Fauna Metaphors

Share
  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to examine how cultural values are represented through flora and fauna metaphors in Javanese proverbs from an ecolinguistic perspective, with particular attention to how natural elements are used to convey cultural wisdom and human–nature relationships in Javanese society.

    Methodology: The study employs a descriptive qualitative design with an ethnographic approach. The data consist of 30 selected Javanese proverbs taken from Paribasan Jawa by Johan Argono, comprising 15 proverbs containing flora metaphors and 15 containing fauna metaphors.

    Main Findings: The findings reveal that flora and fauna metaphors in Javanese proverbs primarily reflect cultural values related to morality, social relationships, and life guidance. Flora metaphors tend to emphasize ontological meanings, while fauna metaphors more frequently employ structural metaphors to convey social behavior and moral lessons.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in its ecolinguistic analysis of Javanese proverbs through a focused examination of flora and fauna metaphors. By highlighting how local ecological symbols encode cultural wisdom, the study contributes to discussions on language, culture, and environmental awareness, particularly in the context of preserving local knowledge and traditional values.

  • How to cite

    Cultural Values in Javanese Proverbs: An Ecolinguistic Study of Flora And Fauna Metaphors. (2025). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(2), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i2.2294
  • 102
    Abstract views
    73
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. L. E. Pradita and J. Jendriadi, “Metafora bahasa lokal Magelang dalam perspektif ekolinguistik,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 466–478, 2024, doi: 10.37985/jer.v5i1.593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i1.593
    2. I. P. A. P. Maulana and I. B. G. Dharma Putra, “Metafora konseptual kasta dalam masyarakat Bali: Kajian linguistik kognitif,” Prasi, vol. 16, no. 02, p. 92, 2021, doi: 10.23887/prasi.v16i02.37578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/prasi.v16i02.37578
    3. A. F. Awaluddin, “Implementasi nilai - nilai dakwah santri melalui pribahasa Arab Mahfudzat,” Al-Din J. Dakwah dan Sos. Keagamaan, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 138–151, 2020, doi: 10.35673/ajdsk.v5i1.577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35673/ajdsk.v5i1.577
    4. M. S. Kadwa and H. Alshenqeeti, “Multi-Word Expressions in Jordanian Arabic: An examination of their translation-related issues Falah,” Int. J. Linguist. Lit. Transl., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 55–67, 2020, doi: 10.32996/ijllt. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt
    5. F. Noviana and A. Saifudin, “Conceptual Metaphors of ‘water’ in Javanese Proverbs from a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 317, 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131702014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131702014
    6. A. S. EFFENDI, “Nilai - nilai keislaman dalam peribahasa Sunds untuk menggambarkan bahan ajar bahasa sunda berbasis karakter di SMP,” Lokabasa, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–25, 2014, doi: 10.17509/jlb.v5i1.3150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jlb.v5i1.3150
    7. D. Iskandar, Islahuddin, M. Harun, Y. Yusuf, Subhayni, and Nurrahmah, “Metaphors in Indonesian and Acehnese proverbs of similar meanings: Semantic and cultural analyses,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 512–523, 2025, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v14i3.63350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i3.63350
    8. R. Widawati, N. Darmayanti, D. Indira, and L. M. Roosman, “Unraveling the human characters represented in dutch water proverbs: A cultural linguistic perspective,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 740–747, 2024, doi: 10.17507/tpls.1403.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1403.14
    9. D. W. Pujiriyani, “Budaya agraris keterikatan orang Jawa terhadap tanahnya: Studi nilai - nilai kearifan lokal dalam peribahasa Jawa,” Mozaik Hum., vol. 20, no. 2, p. 120, 2021, doi: 10.20473/mozaik.v20i2.21448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/mozaik.v20i2.21448
    10. R. Rahmad, M. T. Supratman, A. Rahman, N. L. Hasanah, and M. Miati, “Nilai - niali religius dalam peribahasa Madura,” Geram, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 124–132, 2022, doi: 10.25299/geram.2022.vol10(2).10627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/geram.2022.vol10(2).10627
    11. M. Nugroho, “Menggali nilai - nilai budaya dalam peribahasa etnis untuk pelajaran muatan lokal bahasa dan sastra daerah dalam pembentukan wawasan keindonesiaan : Perspektif antropologistik,” Mabasan, vol. 2, p. 24, 2022, doi: 10.62107/mab.v2i2.136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/mab.v2i2.136
    12. Slamet, M. A. Alam, and M. Tazam, “Nilai - nilai kepribadian dalam peribahasa Madura sebagai transformasi pendidikan karakter,” Pembang. Sumenep, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2023, doi: 10.37671/sb.v3i2.62.
    13. S. Bastra, “Nilai - nilai religius dalam peribahasa Banjar,” Sirok Bastra, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 2, 2014, doi: 10.37671/sb.v3i2.62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37671/sb.v3i2.62
    14. Y. Rizki, P. Sormin, and A. Purba, “Analisis nilai - niali luhur dan makna peribahasa Jawa masyarakat desa Wonosari kecematan Pantai Labu,” Bahterasia J. Ilm. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 66–72, 2023, doi: 10.30596/jpbsi.v4i1.14258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/jpbsi.v4i1.14258
    15. B. W. D. Prasasti and P. Anggraini, “Nilai - nilai budaya Minangkabau dalam naskah drama Dr. Anda karya Wisran Hadi,” J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 16, pp. 79–88, 2020, doi: 10.25134/fjpbsi.v16i2.2606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/fjpbsi.v16i2.2606
    16. K. Andajani et al., “Exploring terminology of the beauty Jamu and the beauty metaphor of East Java women-Indonesia: An eco-linguistics study,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 10, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2268387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2268387
    17. J. M. Hasayen and N. W. Awajan, “The adaptation of William Shakespeare’s Othello in Nicole Galland’s I, Iago,” J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 274–281, 2025, doi: 10.17507/jltr.1601.28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1601.28
    18. W. Akihary, “Nilai budaya dalam peribahasa KEI tentang pengelolaan wilayah pesisir,” Ling. J. Ilmu Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 6, no. 2, 2012, doi: 10.18860/ling.v6i2.1455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v6i2.1455
    19. A. J. Mulyono, R. Rengganis, and S. Y. Sudikan, “Refleksi-Relasi sejarah dan budaya masyarakat Indramayu dalam karya Kedung Darma Romansha,” Metahumaniora, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 143–152, 2023, doi: 10.24198/metahumaniora.v13i2.47612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/metahumaniora.v13i2.47612
    20. A. Sugianto, “Kajian etnolinguistik terhadap peribahasa etnik Jawa panaragan sebuah tinjauan pragmatik force,” Semin. Nas. Prasasti II Kaji. Pragmatik dalam Berbagai Bid., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 2015, doi: 10.20961/pras.v0i0.69.
    21. Z. Riansyah, A. Mustofa, and R. Prayogi, “Makna mendalam : Peribahasa Lampung sebagai panduan kehidupan sehari -hari,” J. PUNYIMBANG (PENDIDIKAN Bhs. LAMPUNG), vol. 20, no. 1, p. 703475, 2014, doi: 10.23960/punyimbang.v4i1.1123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/punyimbang.v4i1.1123
    22. R. J. Ehwi, K. Oti-Sarpong, R. Shojaei, and G. Burgess, “Offsite manufacturing research: a systematic review of methodologies used,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2022, doi: 10.1080/01446193.2021.2007537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.2007537
    23. D. A. Jones, “A review and critical analysis of qualitative methodologies and data-Collection techniques used for Code-Switching Research,” Am. J. Qual. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 53–72, 2023, doi: 10.29333/ajqr/12988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12988
    24. F. I. Zulaikha and S. Purwaningsih, “Represantasi identitas perempuan dalam ranah domestik sebuah kajian semiotika budaya pada peribahasa Sunda,” Nusa J. Ilmu Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 341, 2019, doi: 10.14710/nusa.14.3.341-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/nusa.14.3.341-352
    25. H. Taherdoost, “What are different research approaches? comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations,” J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2022, doi: 10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538
    26. S. A. Dzogovic and V. Bajrami, “Qualitative Research Methods in Science and Higher Education,” Hum. Res. Rehabil., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 156–166, 2023, doi: 10.21554/hrr.042318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.042318
    27. B. Hadiatmadja, “Nilai karakter pada peribahasa Jawa,” Kawruh J. Lang. Educ. Lit. Local Cult., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–27, 2019, doi: 10.32585/kawruh.v1i1.237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32585/kawruh.v1i1.237
    28. N. A. Hidayati, A. Darmuki, A. Setiawan, C. Inaayatul, and V. Vita, “Ecoliterary analysis in the oral tradition of Indonesian proverbs,” ICCCM J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 69–76, 2022, doi: 10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i3.9.2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i3.9.2022
    29. A. N. Fitri and E. I. Rini, “Metaphors and cultural values part of plants in Japanese Proverbs,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 359, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202235902012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235902012
    30. P. Jacobetty and K. Orton-Johnson, “Blockchain imaginaries and their metaphors: Organising principles in decentralised digital technologies,” Soc. Epistemol., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02691728.2022.2086086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2086086
    31. N. Kamila, S. Banis, N. Hakki, and A. Amalia, “Teori belajar multiple intelegensi,” Cogn. J. Pendidik. DAN PEMBELAJARAN, vol. 1686, pp. 1–14, 1983, doi: 10.61743/cg.v2i2.78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61743/cg.v2i2.78
    32. Fitriani, Fajaroh, Ramadhani, and Oktara, “Kecerdasan dan kemampuan belajar,” J. Psikol. Pendidik. dan Pengemb. SDM, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.37721/psi.v13i2.1654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37721/psi.v13i2.1654
    33. S. Waljinah, K. Dimyati, H. J. Prayitno, and P. W. Anggoro, “Symbolic deixis in persuasive discourse: Review of learning media with forensic linguistic perspective,” in Proceedings of the 5th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference (PFEIC 2020), 2020. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.201015.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201015.023
    34. D. Nugraha, “Perkembangan sejarah dan isu-isu terkini dalam sastra bandingan,” Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163–176, 2021, doi: 10.30872/diglosia.v4i2.135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i2.135
    35. A. N. Saputro, “Studi literatur tentang integrasi kearifan lokal dalam pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia,” J. Pengabdi. Masy. dan Ris. Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 12000–12008, 2025, doi: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i2.3944 ARTICLE.
    36. A. Fani and N. S. Setyawati, “Pemerolehan bahasa kedua pada anak usia dini: Tinjauan sistematis tentang pengaruh lingkungan keluarga dan komunitas,” JSPAUD J. Stud. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 61–69, 2025, doi: 10.58540/jspaud.v1i2.989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58540/jspaud.v1i2.989
    37. A. Isti’anah and Suhandano, “( Re ) defining ecolinguistics in Indonesia ’ s research : A systematic review,” J. Appl. Stud. Lang., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–127, 2023, doi: 10.31940/jasl.v7i2.117-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v7i2.117-127
    38. Jismulatif, Dahnilsyah, and M. Sinaga, “An ecolinguistics analysis of Indonesian pop music lyrics on environment:A review of two nature songs,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012129
    39. S. N. Abed, “Reflections on pedagogical ecolinguistics: A systematic review,” An Int. Multidiscip. Online J., vol. 4, no. 9, 2024, doi: 10.55454/rcsas.4.09.2024.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55454/rcsas.4.09.2024.006
    40. U. Sadiq, R. Alam, and A. A. U. Rahman, “Ecolinguistic analysis of environmental discourse in pakistani print and digital media,” Crit. Rev. Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3495–3505, 2025, doi: 10.59075/pr64q758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59075/pr64q758
    41. M. Umiyati, “Lexicon distinctiveness used in ‘awig-awig’ text in tenganan village bali: An ecolinguistics study,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 13, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.17507/tpls.1304.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1304.29
    42. S. Ge and S. S. V. Danarajan, “Ecolinguistics: A thematic review of past 53 years (1971-2024),” Pakistan J. Life Soc. Sci., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 14467–14479, 2024, doi: 10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001039
    43. M. Shubhi, “Structural analysis of cilinaye tale: A study of revealing local wisdom of Sasak,” MABASAN, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 69–84, 2012, doi: 10.62107/mab.v6i2.231.
    44. D. Koswara, D. Haerudin, and R. Permana, “Nilai-nilai pendidikan karakter bangsa dalam khazanah sastra Sunda klasik: transformasi dari kelisanan (orality) ke keberaksaraan (literacy) carita pantun mundinglaya di kusumah (kajian struktural-semiotik dan etnopedagogi),” J. Penelit. Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.17509/jpp.v14i2.3114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v14i2.3114
    45. E. T. Satibi, “Babad Panjalu (kajian struktural, semiotik, dan etnopedagogik),” LOKABASA J. Kaji. Bhs. sastra dan pengajarannya, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2025, doi: 10.17509/jlb.v6i1.3168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jlb.v6i1.3168
    46. A. Verawati, S. Ovi, O. Kresensia, and S. Pretty, “Analisis makna dalam adegan film toba dream dengan pendekatan semiotika dan kaitannya dengan kearifan lokal,” J. Kewarganegaraan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 401–409, 2024, doi: 10.31316/jk.v8i1.6206.
    47. B. M. Fadli and M. Yani, “Representasi nilai budaya dalam cerita rakyat Bima: Kajian struktural dan semiotik,” BAHTRA J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 5, no. 01, pp. 31–37, 2024, doi: 10.56842/bahtra.v5i01.706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56842/bahtra.v5i01.706
    48. D. I. Kecamatan and B. Kabupaten, “Nilai kearifan lokal dalam upacara adat ritus tiwu panganten di kecamatan Babakan kabupaten Cirebon (analisis struktural-semiotik),” LOKABASA J. Kaji. Bhs. sastra dan pengajarannya, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 112–121, 2013, doi: 10.17509/jlb.v4i2.3133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jlb.v4i2.3136