Cultural Values In Javanese Proverbs: An Ecolinguistic Study Of Flora And Fauna Metaphors

Nadiya Yunianti; Mon Karlo Mangaran; Mahoor Nisar

doi:10.37251/jolle.v2i2.2294

Nadiya Yunianti UIN Syarif Hidayatulla Jakarta
Mon Karlo Mangaran De La Salle University Manila
Mahoor Nisar Iqra University Karachi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i2.2294

Keywords: Cultural Values, Ecolinguistics, Javanese Proverbs, Linguistic Metaphor, Local Wisdom

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to examine how cultural values are represented through flora and fauna metaphors in Javanese proverbs from an ecolinguistic perspective, with particular attention to how natural elements are used to convey cultural wisdom and human–nature relationships in Javanese society.

Methodology: The study employs a descriptive qualitative design with an ethnographic approach. The data consist of 30 selected Javanese proverbs taken from Paribasan Jawa by Johan Argono, comprising 15 proverbs containing flora metaphors and 15 containing fauna metaphors.

Main Findings: The findings reveal that flora and fauna metaphors in Javanese proverbs primarily reflect cultural values related to morality, social relationships, and life guidance. Flora metaphors tend to emphasize ontological meanings, while fauna metaphors more frequently employ structural metaphors to convey social behavior and moral lessons.

Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in its ecolinguistic analysis of Javanese proverbs through a focused examination of flora and fauna metaphors. By highlighting how local ecological symbols encode cultural wisdom, the study contributes to discussions on language, culture, and environmental awareness, particularly in the context of preserving local knowledge and traditional values.

References

[1] L. E. Pradita and J. Jendriadi, “Metafora bahasa lokal Magelang dalam perspektif ekolinguistik,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 466–478, 2024, doi: 10.37985/jer.v5i1.593.
[2] I. P. A. P. Maulana and I. B. G. Dharma Putra, “Metafora konseptual kasta dalam masyarakat Bali: Kajian linguistik kognitif,” Prasi, vol. 16, no. 02, p. 92, 2021, doi: 10.23887/prasi.v16i02.37578.
[3] M. S. Kadwa and H. Alshenqeeti, “Multi-Word Expressions in Jordanian Arabic: An examination of their translation-related issues Falah,” Int. J. Linguist. Lit. Transl., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 55–67, 2020, doi: 10.32996/ijllt.
[4] F. Noviana and A. Saifudin, “Conceptual Metaphors of ‘water’ in Javanese Proverbs from a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 317, 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131702014.
[5] D. Iskandar, Islahuddin, M. Harun, Y. Yusuf, Subhayni, and Nurrahmah, “Metaphors in Indonesian and Acehnese proverbs of similar meanings: Semantic and cultural analyses,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 512–523, 2025, doi: 10.17509/ijal.v14i3.63350.
[6] R. Widawati, N. Darmayanti, D. Indira, and L. M. Roosman, “Unraveling the human characters represented in dutch water proverbs: A cultural linguistic perspective,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 740–747, 2024, doi: 10.17507/tpls.1403.14.
[7] K. Andajani et al., “Exploring terminology of the beauty Jamu and the beauty metaphor of East Java women-Indonesia: An eco-linguistics study,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 10, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2268387.
[8] J. M. Hasayen and N. W. Awajan, “The adaptation of William Shakespeare’s Othello in Nicole Galland’s I, Iago,” J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 274–281, 2025, doi: 10.17507/jltr.1601.28.
[9] A. J. Mulyono, R. Rengganis, and S. Y. Sudikan, “Refleksi-Relasi sejarah dan budaya masyarakat Indramayu dalam karya Kedung Darma Romansha,” Metahumaniora, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 143–152, 2023, doi: 10.24198/metahumaniora.v13i2.47612.
[10] R. J. Ehwi, K. Oti-Sarpong, R. Shojaei, and G. Burgess, “Offsite manufacturing research: a systematic review of methodologies used,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2022, doi: 10.1080/01446193.2021.2007537.
[11] D. A. Jones, “A review and critical analysis of qualitative methodologies and data-Collection techniques used for Code-Switching Research,” Am. J. Qual. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 53–72, 2023, doi: 10.29333/ajqr/12988.
[12] H. Taherdoost, “What are different research approaches? comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations,” J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2022, doi: 10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538.
[13] S. A. Dzogovic and V. Bajrami, “Qualitative Research Methods in Science and Higher Education,” Hum. Res. Rehabil., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 156–166, 2023, doi: 10.21554/hrr.042318.
[14] N. A. Hidayati, A. Darmuki, A. Setiawan, C. Inaayatul, and V. Vita, “Ecoliterary analysis in the oral tradition of Indonesian proverbs,” ICCCM J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 69–76, 2022, doi: 10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i3.9.2022.
[15] A. N. Fitri and E. I. Rini, “Metaphors and cultural values part of plants in Japanese Proverbs,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 359, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202235902012.
[16] P. Jacobetty and K. Orton-Johnson, “Blockchain imaginaries and their metaphors: Organising principles in decentralised digital technologies,” Soc. Epistemol., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02691728.2022.2086086.