Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research

an Open Access Journal

Feminism Reflected in 7 Hati 7 Cinta 7 Wanita By Robby Ertanto Soediskam: A Literary Feminist Analysis

Andi Ilham Ilyas
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar ROR
Indonesia
andiilham@gmail.com
Jean Pauline Trilles- Pocaan
Philippines
Kuliga Tanasavate
Thailand
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to describe the representation of feminism in the film 7 Hati 7 Cinta 7 Wanita directed by Robby Ertanto Soediskam through a literary feminist lens.

    Methodology: This study used a descriptive qualitative method. The main data were collected from the film 7 Hati 7 Cinta 7 Wanita by Robby Ertanto Soediskam, analyzed using feminist literary criticism.

    Main Findings: The film portrays various forms of women’s struggles against patriarchal domination. Each female character reflects a unique aspect of feminist resistance, with Dr. Kartini as the central figure who advocates for women’s rights.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers a feminist interpretation of a contemporary Indonesian film that has not been extensively explored in academic research. It highlights how visual narratives serve as a platform for feminist messages in modern literature and cinema.

  • How to cite

    Feminism Reflected in 7 Hati 7 Cinta 7 Wanita By Robby Ertanto Soediskam: A Literary Feminist Analysis. (2025). Journal of Language, Literature, and Educational Research, 2(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.37251/jolle.v2i1.1663

    More Citation Formats

  • 303
    Abstract views
    340
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. K. S. M. and A. M. S. U.N. Khodjamkulov, “The Issue of Spiritual and Patriotic Education of Young Generation in the Scientific, Political and Literary Heritage of Central Asian Thinkers,” Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 6694–6701, 2020, doi: 10.37200/ijpr/v24i5/pr2020657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR2020657
    2. M. J. Grant and A. Booth, “A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies,” Health Info. Libr. J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 91–108, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
    3. J. F. Ruma, S. Akter, J. J. Laboni, and R. M. Rahman, “A deep learning classification model for Persian Hafez poetry based on the poet’s era,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 4, no. August, p. 100111, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100111
    4. A. N. Anggiamurni, “An analysis of figurative language in poetry by maya angelou,” PANYONARA J. English Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 149, 2020, doi: 10.19105/panyonara.v2i2.3669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19105/panyonara.v2i2.3669
    5. Dede Kharisma Dewi, “Analisis Makna Teks Fabel Karya Jean de La Fontaine ‘la Cigale et la Fourm, le Coq et le Renard, le Lion devenu vieux,’” Sintaksis Publ. Para ahli Bhs. dan Sastra Ingg., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 44–53, 2023, doi: 10.61132/sintaksis.v1i5.257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v1i5.257
    6. A. A. Bin Towairesh, “Translating traditional folk poetry: The perception of translators and translation students and the reality in Saudi society,” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241290010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241290010
    7. Desi Natalia Sihombing, Jihan Aufa Nadira, and Ika Febriana, “Analisis puisi ‘Penglihatan’ karya Adimas Immanuel menggunakan pendekatan ekspresif,” Protas. J. Bahasa, Sastra, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 73–77, 2023, doi: 10.55606/protasis.v2i1.75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/protasis.v2i1.75
    8. A. M. A. Alzoubi, M. F. Mohammad, I. S. Albursan, S. F. A. Bakhiet, and A. A. Alfnan, “The predictive ability of emotional creativity in creative performance among university students,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211008876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008876
    9. M. Laimena and S. R. Que, “MATAI: international journal of languageeEducation website an analysis of figurative language in poems by Laksmi Pamuntjak,” MATAI Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 45–56, 2022, doi: 10.30598/matail.v3i1.7310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/matail.v3i1.7310
    10. A. Taqwiem, “The character of love to the country in the novel ‘5 cm,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Humanit. Res., vol. 274, pp. 5–9, 2018, doi: 10.2991/iccite-18.2018.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/iccite-18.2018.2
    11. Sunarti, M. Yusup, and H. Isnaini, “Nilai nasionalisme dalam puisi ‘Dongeng Pahlawan’ WS. Rendra,” J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 253–260, 2022, doi: 10.22460/parole.v5i4.6878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/parole.v5i4.6878
    12. Yohanes Servulus Krisnal Baruk, “Diksi dan gaya bahasa dalam puisi-puisi facebook karya Tarsy Asmat seri sayap-sayap pembebasan,” Sintaks J. Bhs. Sastra Indones., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 25–31, 2021, doi: 10.57251/sin.v1i2.691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57251/sin.v1i2.691
    13. R. B. Hongzhang Xu, “Multiple forms of knowing in Mathematics: A scoping literature study,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.16921.
    14. N. Haryani, “Memperkuat eksistensi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia di era revolusi industri 4.0,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Progr. Pascasarj., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 609–618, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/Prosidingpps/article/view/2584
    15. A. Nurizka R, N. Putri P, R. H. Prasetyo, and C. Ulya, “Telaah Kesalahan Berbahasa Indonesia Pada Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Negeri Semarang,” J. Edukasi Khatulistiwa Pembelajaran Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 89, 2021, doi: 10.26418/ekha.v4i2.44295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/ekha.v4i2.44295
    16. A. F. Miranti, “Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Bahasa Inggris Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Deskriptif Pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Sastra Inggris Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado),” vol. 19, pp. 1–20, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48144/prosiding.v1i.613
    17. T. Values, W. Silih, A. Silih, A. Silih, and T. Warna, “Metafora : Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal Silih Asih Silih Asah Silih Asuh pada Cerita Rakyat ‘ Telaga Warna ,’” Metaf. J. pembelajaran Bhs. dan sastra, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 247–256, 2024, doi: 10.30595/mtf.v11i2.22809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30595/mtf.v11i2.22809
    18. Ngangga Saputra, Misnawati Misnawati, Siti Muslimah, Anwarsani Anwarsani, Siti Rahmawati, and Nabila Salwa, “Analisis Gaya Bahasa Dalam Cerita Rakyat Oleh Siswa Kelas X SMAN I Damang Batu Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Sastra Di SMA,” Protas. J. Bahasa, Sastra, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 2023, doi: 10.55606/protasis.v2i1.72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/protasis.v2i1.72
    19. M. Z. Wiguna and A. A. Alimin, “Analisis struktural pada cerita rakyat pak aloi berburu kijang sastra lisan Desa Sungai Bakah Kabupaten Melawi,” J. Pendidik. Bhs., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 388–395, 2023, doi: 10.31571/bahasa.v11i2.3416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31571/bahasa.v11i2.3416
    20. S. Famsah and A. Ambarwati, “Pemanfaatan anekdot dalam membuat komik strip bertema sosial bagi peserta didik SMK bidang Animasi : Kajian sastra interdisipliner ( The use of anecdotes in making social-themed comic strips for students of SMK in the field of Animation : An interdiscipli,” Kembara J. Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 303–316, 2022, doi: 10.22219/kembara.v8i2.21721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i2.21721
    21. N. Chaerunnisa, A. Adam, and S. Rahayu, “Keefektifan Penggunaan Model Project Based Learning dalam Pembelajaran Keterampilan Menulis Puisi Siswa,” Didakt. J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2024, doi: 10.33096/didaktis.v2i1.580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33096/didaktis.v2i1.580
    22. W. Nuraeni, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Menulis Teks Prosedur Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Batik Cianjur dengan Menggunakan Media Powtoon,” Alinea J. Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 14, 2022, doi: 10.35194/alinea.v11i1.1769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/alinea.v11i1.1769
    23. W. Kusuma, D. A. Raihan, F. H. Alia, and D. S. Hidayat, “Analisis kesalahan berbahasa teks deskripsi kelas X-11 SMAN 2 tasiknalaya dalam kategori linguistik,” J. Bima Pus. Publ. Ilmu Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 167–181, 2023, doi: 10.61132/bima.v1i4.358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61132/bima.v1i4.358
    24. M. Alangari, S. Jaworska, and J. Laws, “Who’s afraid of phrasal verbs? The use of phrasal verbs in expert academic writing in the discipline of linguistics,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 43, p. 100814, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814
    25. P. E. Jones and C. Read, “Mythbusters united? A dialogue over Harris’s integrationist linguistics and Gibson’s Ecological Psychology,” Lang. Sci., vol. 97, p. 101536, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101536
    26. T. T. Voorhees and O. Vorobel, “Integrating Qualitative Research into the Community College Linguistics Course: An Autoethnographic Inquiry,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 2, no. June, p. 100053, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100053
    27. K. U. Isisag, “The efficacy of macro-linguistics in developing reading skills: An integrated lesson plan,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 698–703, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.220
    28. C. G. Quan, “Continuing with the Promise of ‘Scratch’ in the Applied Linguistics Classroom,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 103, pp. 245–254, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.332
    29. M. A. Candel-Mora and C. Vargas-Sierra, “An Analysis of Research Production in Corpus Linguistics Applied to Translation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 95, pp. 317–324, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.653
    30. R. Z. Abid and S. A. Manan, Integrating Corpus Linguistics in Critical Literacy Pedagogy: A Case Study of Lance Armstrong’s Transformation from a Titleholder to a Fraud, vol. 208, no. Icllic 2014. Elsevier B.V., 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.189
    31. H. Jalali, “Reflection of stance through it bundles in applied linguistics,” Ampersand, vol. 4, pp. 30–39, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2017.06.001
    32. M. Pikhart, “Human-computer interaction in foreign language learning applications: Applied linguistics viewpoint of mobile learning,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 184, pp. 92–98, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.123
    33. H. Bromhead, “Disaster linguistics, climate change semantics and public discourse studies: a semantically-enhanced discourse study of 2011 Queensland Floods,” Lang. Sci., vol. 85, p. 101381, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381
    34. A. M. Fazilatfar and Z. S. Naseri, “Rhetorical Moves in Applied Linguistics Articles and their Corresponding Iranian Writer Identity,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 489–498, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444
    35. K. Belousov, E. Erofeeva, T. Erofeeva, Y. Leshchenko, and N. Zelyanskaya, “University Teachers of Linguistics and Self-Image of Their Profession,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 214, no. June, pp. 667–676, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.667
    36. T. Popescu, “Developing English Linguistics Students’ Translation Competence through the Language Learning Process,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 1075–1079, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.333
    37. Z. E. Attia, A. M. Gadallah, and H. M. Hefny, “An Enhanced Multi-view Fuzzy Information Retrieval Model based on Linguistics,” IERI Procedia, vol. 7, pp. 90–95, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.015
    38. A. V. Tsepilova and L. V. Mikhaleva, “Working with Formulaic Language as a Way to Evaluate and Improve EFL Non-linguistics Students’ Pragmatic Skills in a Culture-specific Contextual Situation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 200, no. October, pp. 550–556, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.022
    39. X. Tian, A. E. Griffith, Z. Price, K. E. Boyer, and K. Tang, “Investigating Linguistic Alignment in Collaborative Dialogue: A Study of Syntactic and Lexical Patterns in Middle School Students,” Lang. Speech, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00238309241234565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nbw8x
    40. S. May, “New Zealand is ‘racist as f**k’: Linguistic racism and te reo Māori,” Ethnicities, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 662–679, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14687968231192037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968231192037
    41. S. May, “Linguistic racism: Origins and implications,” Ethnicities, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 651–661, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14687968231193072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968231193072
    42. I. Lenart, I. Markovina, and O. Endrody, “Age-related differences in Russian and Hungarian linguistic pictures of the world,” J. Eurasian Stud., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–73, 2023, doi: 10.1177/18793665231221551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665231221551
    43. R. Kopečková, U. Gut, M. Wrembel, and A. Balas, “Phonological cross-linguistic influence at the initial stages of L3 acquisition,” Second Lang. Res., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1107–1131, 2023, doi: 10.1177/02676583221123994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221123994
    44. A. F. Khan et al., “When linguistics meets web technologies. Recent advances in modelling linguistic linked data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 987–1050, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-222859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-222859
    45. J. Bosque-Gil, P. Cimiano, and M. Dojchinovski, “Editorial of the Special Issue on Latest Advancements in Linguistic Linked Data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 911–916, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-223251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223251
    46. D. Gromann et al., “Multilinguality and LLOD: A survey across linguistic description levels,” Semant. Web, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1915–1958, 2024, doi: 10.3233/SW-243591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-243591
    47. K. Bromberek-Dyzman, R. Jończyk, M. Vasileanu, A. G. Niculescu-Gorpin, and H. Bąk, “Cross-linguistic differences affect emotion and emotion-laden word processing: Evidence from Polish-English and Romanian-English bilinguals,” Int. J. Biling., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1161–1182, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1367006920987306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920987306
    48. S. Alshihab, M. I. M. Ibrahim, M. Al-Zaidan, and M. A. Hadi, “A consolidated framework for implementation research (cfir) guided exploration of key informant perspectives on establishing a pharmacist-led anticoagulation service in primary care: a qualitative study,” Int. J. Clin. Pharm., vol. 4, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01830-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01830-x
    49. A. C. Eldh, L. Årestedt, and C. Berterö, “Quotations in qualitative studies: reflections on constituents, custom, and purpose,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 19, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1609406920969268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920969268
    50. F. Nur’ Ajmiy and N. Khoirul Umam, “Keterampilan menulis puisi bebas pada mata pelajaran bahasa Indonesia kelas IV MI,” J. Elem. Edukasia, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1654–1667, 2023, doi: 10.31949/jee.v6i4.6984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v6i4.6984
    51. Z. S. Nakrowi, “Revitalisasi Nilai Kearifan Lokal melalui Pembelajaran Debat Bahasa Indonesia,” J. Onoma Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 301–318, 2022, doi: 10.30605/onoma.v8i1.1726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v8i1.1726
    52. G. Mujianto, “Piranti Kohesi dalam Wacana Tulis Guru SMA/SMK Muhammadiyah Kabupaten Malang,” KEMBARA J. Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 210–233, 2017.
    53. M. P. Di Buono, H. Gonçalo Oliveira, V. Barbu Mititelu, B. Spahiu, and G. Nolano, “Paving the way for enriched metadata of linguistic linked data,” Semant. Web, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1133–1157, 2022, doi: 10.3233/SW-222994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-222994
    54. C. Yue, “We make viewpoints in different ways: the use of stance adverbials across academic levels and disciplines,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2435169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2435169
    55. L. Zhao and P. Issra, “Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) research articles unpacked: a systemic functional linguistics (SFL) elemental genre approach,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2317617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2317617
    56. D. A. S. El-Dakhs, L. Mardini, and L. Alhabbad, “The persuasive strategies in more and less prestigious linguistics journals: focus on research article abstracts,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2325760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2325760
    57. Hendrokumoro, F. Darman, N. Nuraeni, and N. K. Ma’shumah, “The genetic relationship between Alune, Lisabata, Luhu, and Wemale (Western Seram, Indonesia): a historical-comparative linguistics approach,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2024.2306718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2306718
    58. L. Fontaine, “On prepositions and particles: A case for lexical representation in systemic functional linguistics,” Word, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 115–135, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00437956.2017.1309029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2017.1309029
    59. I. Mukahal and M. M. Idrus, “Negation Forms in the Poetry of Philip Larkin,” Comp. Lit. East West, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 207–220, 2024, doi: 10.1080/25723618.2024.2395216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2024.2395216
    60. S. Rezaei, D. Kuhi, and M. Saeidi, “Diachronic corpus analysis of stance markers in research articles: The field of applied linguistics,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2021.1872165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1872165