SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal

Experimental Study: The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on Students' Chemistry Learning Outcomes in Thermochemistry Concepts

Sony Hidayat
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta ROR
Indonesia
snhdytsonyy@gmail.com
Olaitan Abiodun Josiah
Adeniran Ogunsanya College of Education
Nigeria
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the effect of the Problem-Based Learning model on students’ chemistry learning outcomes, specifically on thermochemistry concepts, by comparing the performance of students taught using problem-based learning and those taught using conventional learning methods.

    Methodology: This study used a quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent control group design. The sample was selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using multiple-choice test instruments. Data analysis techniques included Liliefors normality test, Fisher homogeneity test, and t-test at a significance level of 0.05.

    Main Findings: The results showed that there was a significant difference in learning outcomes between students taught using the Problem-Based Learning model and those taught using conventional methods. Students in the experimental group demonstrated higher achievement in thermochemistry concepts compared to the control group after the learning process.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides new insights by applying an experimental design to specifically examine the effect of Problem-Based Learning on thermochemistry learning outcomes. It integrates contextual problem-solving with conceptual understanding, offering a more meaningful learning approach and contributing to the development of innovative chemistry teaching strategies.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    S. Hidayat and O. A. . Josiah, “Experimental Study: The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on Students’ Chemistry Learning Outcomes in Thermochemistry Concepts”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 84–91, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v3i1.2996.

    More Citation Formats

  • 54
    Abstract views
    47
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. T. Sumual, H. Lumapow, and V. Rotty, “The role of human capital investment in improving the quality of human resources (HR) in education in the digital era,” Asian J. Eng. Soc. Heal., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 2520–2528, 2024, doi: 10.46799/ajesh.v3i11.449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v3i11.449
    2. S. Arifin, M. Isa Ansori, and H. Buyung Aulia Safrizal, “Human resources in the era of globalization employee challenges in improving the quality of human resources in the era of globalization,” J. Ilm. Manaj. Kesatuan, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1457–1466, 2023, doi: https://jurnal.ibik.ac.id/index.php/jimkes/article/view/2286.
    3. B. Al-Ajmi and A. Ambusaidi, “The level of scientific argumentation skills in chemistry subject among grade 11th students: The role of logical thinking,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 66–74, 2022, doi: 10.33828/sei.v33.i1.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.7
    4. M. Jamil, T. B. Bokhari, and Q. Zia, “Qualitative content analysis for critical thinking and skill development: A case of chemistry curriculum,” J. Asian Dev. Stud., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 147–155, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.12
    5. R. Laelandi, A. Widodo, and S. Sriyati, “Depth of science learning materials in schools and student concept mastery,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1470–1478, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1706
    6. S. Rahmah and A. H. Lubis, “Problem posing as a learning model to improve primary school students’ mathematics learning outcomes in gayo lues,” J. Indones. Prim. Sch., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 93–104, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v1i4.409
    7. R. R. T. Agustina, A. Afadil, S. Rahmawati, and V. M. A. Tiwow, “Learning difficulties and students’ ability level during pandemic covid-19 on the subject of thermochemistry,” J. Akad. Kim., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2023, doi: 10.22487/j24775185.2023.v12.i1.pp26-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2023.v12.i1.pp26-31
    8. M. A. Barus and J. Purba, “Development of problem-based integrated student worksheets (LKPD) in thermochemistry class XI high school,” J. Multidisiplin Indones., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 212–229, 2025, doi: 10.58344/jmi.v4i3.2244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v4i3.2244
    9. D. T. K. Ng, C. Xinyu, J. K. L. Leung, and S. K. W. Chu, “Fostering students’ AI literacy development through educational games: AI knowledge, affective and cognitive engagement,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 2049–2064, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jcal.13009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13009
    10. E. Byusa, E. Kampire, and A. R. Mwesigye, “Game-based learning approach on students’ motivation and understanding of chemistry concepts: A systematic review of literature,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 5, p. e09541, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09541
    11. A. Suradika, H. I. Dewi, and M. I. Nasution, “Project-based learning and problem-based learning models in critical and creative students,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 153–167, 2023, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39713
    12. K. Smith et al., “Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12100728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
    13. M. S. J. Maftuh, U. S. Lawal, M. Ade, A. V. Lama, and A. F. Adzim, “Understanding learning strategies: A comparison between contextual learning and problem-based learning,” Educ. J. Educ. Learn., vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 54–65, 2023, doi: 10.61987/educazione.v1i1.496 Understanding. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61987/educazione.v1i1.496
    14. M. Mahrusillah and M. A. Ahmad, “Contextual learning strategy : Theoretical analysis and implementation of student-centered learning,” J. Pendidik. dan Pemikir. Islam eISSN, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 513–534, 2025, doi: 10.31869/ruhama.v4i1.2605.1.
    15. A. Abdurahman, A. Asfahani, N. Sudarwati, F. Warwer, and A. Asrijal, “The influence of problem-based learning model on students’ learning outcomes,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2733, no. 1, pp. 247–255, 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0140515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v6i3.226
    16. N. F. Aristin, K. P. Hastuti, D. Arisanty, S. Adyatma, and C. Donna, “Effectiveness of problem-based learning models to improve learning outcomes of geography in the new normal learning era,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 623–632, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v17i4.20834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i4.20834
    17. I. Arifiani, L. NurulH, and S. Rahmawan, “Problem based learning (PBL) learning model for increasing learning motivation in chemistry subject: Literature review with bibliometric analysis,” ASEAN J. Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2025, doi: https://www.ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed/article/view/523.
    18. D. Wahyudiati, “Critical thinking skills and scientific attitudes of Pre-service chemistry teachers through the implementation of problem-based learning model,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 216–221, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1278
    19. M. A. P. Nugraha, J. S. V. Sinolungan, R. Nur, S. Nuridah, N. Nofirman, and D. Cahyono, “Conceptual analysis of problem-based learning model in improving students critical thinking skill,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 466–473, 2023, doi: 10.37985/jer.v4i2.185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i2.185
    20. B. J. Que, I. H. Kusnadi, R. M. P. Silalahi, A. A. Rahman, and A. Kurniawan, “The effect of deep dialogue/critical thinking model on students’ conceptual understanding ability,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 422–431, 2022, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.130
    21. M. Arsyad, S. Guna, and S. Barus, “Enhancing chemistry education through problem-based learning: Analyzing student engagement, motivation, and critical thinking,” Int. J. Curric. Dev. Teach. Learn. Innov., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 110–117, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.35335/curriculum.v2i3.178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/curriculum.v2i3.178
    22. R. Safitri, S. Hadi, and W. Widiasih, “Effect of the problem based learning model on the students motivation and learning outcomes,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 7310–7316, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4772
    23. G. Nicholus, C. M. Muwonge, and N. Joseph, “The role of problem-based learning approach in teaching and learning physics: A systematic literature review,” F1000Research, vol. 12, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.136339.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.136339.2
    24. Q. Zhuo, D. Wang, H. Xu, W. Liu, and L. Gao, “Pore structure and permeability of filter cake in coal slurry filtration,” Int. J. Coal Prep. Util., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 155–170, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1080/19392699.2019.1585830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2019.1585830
    25. R. Rafia, A. Maulidiyah, H. Haeruddin, and M. Jamhari, “The effect of critical thinking ability and learning motivation on IPAS learning outcomes,” J. Reviu Pendidik. Dasar J. Kaji. Pendidik. dan Has. Penelit., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 12–22, 2025, doi: 10.26740/jrpd.v11n1.p12-22.
    26. H. K. Indriyani, D. Purwaningsih, and W. Khaokhajorn, “The effects of problem-based learning on critical thinking, motivation, and learning utcomes in Indonesia: A systematic review,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.23960/jpmipa.v26i3.pp1750-1777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i3.pp1750-1777
    27. D. Y. Asiamah, J. Ekow, M. Amoah, K. A. Hayford, and E. K. Dorman, “Exploring alternative conceptions and learning challenges in thermochemistry: Evidence from ghanaian shs students,” Eur. J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17217282.
    28. D. M. Condong et al., “STEM-integrated problem-based learning as a cognitively aligned framework for enhancing critical thinking in thermochemistry,” Jambura J. Educ. Chem., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 120–128, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jjec.v8i1.37514
    29. C. K. Assuah, G. K. Mantey, and L. Osei, “The effect of think-pair-share learning on junior high school students’ achievement in algebraic expressions: Pre-test-post-test non-equivalent control group design,” Asian J. Probab. Stat., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 46–55, 2022, doi: 10.9734/ajpas/2022/v20i2418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2022/v20i2418
    30. B. H. Mukti, “Methods in health research: Probability and non-probability sampling,” Heal. Sci. Int. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 220–234, 2025, doi: 10.71357/hsij.v3i2.64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71357/hsij.v3i2.64
    31. L. Vankelecom, T. Loeys, and B. Moerkerke, “How to safely reassess variability and adapt sample size? A primer for the independent samples t test,” Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.1177/25152459231212128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231212128
    32. S. Sundararajan, “Hypothesis Testing,” 2025, pp. 113–141. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-0353-5_4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0353-5_4
    33. A. Triyono, R. H. Nuary, N. Permatasari, Y. Yuni, and T. Wibowo, “The level of effectiveness of TPS and conventional methods judging from students’ geometry learning results using the N-Gain test,” AlphaMath J. Math. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 125, 2024, doi: 10.30595/alphamath.v10i1.21530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v10i1.21530
    34. C. Stroumpouli and G. Tsaparlis, “Chemistry students’ conceptual difficulties and problem solving behavior in chemical kinetics, as a component of an introductory physical chemistry course,” Chem. Teach. Int., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 279–296, 2022, doi: 10.1515/cti-2022-0005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0005
    35. P. Karuru, Muta’allim, Suparjo, A. F. Setiawan, and S. Junaida, “Improving students’ higher order thinking skills through a question and answer method,” RETORIKA J. Ilmu Bhs., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 340–349, 2023, doi: https://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/jret.
    36. M. Hala, A. Prof, and N. Xhomara, “The impact of inquiry-based learning on problem-solving skills and conceptual knowledge building,” Psychol. Educ., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 909–921, 2022, [Online]. Available: www.psychologyandeducation.net
    37. J. Zajda, “The Impact of Motivation on Students’ Engagement and Performance,” 2023, pp. 127–138. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42895-1_9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42895-1_9
    38. K. Al-Said, “Influence of teacher on student motivation: Opportunities to increase motivational factors during mobile learning,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 13439–13457, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11720-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11720-w
    39. I. Apriyanti, Leginem, and S. Rahayu, “Efforts to Improve Student Learning Outcomes through the Problem Based Learning Model in Islamic Education Learning at SD Negeri 104325 Kampung Manggis,” J. Indones. Prim. Sch., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 61–68, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.62945/jips.v1i2.346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v1i2.346
    40. A. Islamiati, Y. Fitria, E. Sukma, Yaswinda, E. Fitria, and S. T. Oktari, “The influence of the problem based learning (PBL) model and learning style on the thinking abilities,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1934–1940, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.6219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.6219