SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal

Development and Validation of Multimedia-Based Interactive Learning Media to Enhance Students’ Conceptual Understanding of the Periodic Table in Chemistry Education

Wahyu Arfian Saputra
Yogyakarta State University ROR
Indonesia
wahyuarfsap@gmail.com
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to develop and validate multimedia-based interactive learning media to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of the periodic table in chemistry education.

    Methodology: The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, which includes analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The developed media integrates text, images, animations, and interactive features to facilitate meaningful learning experiences.

    Main Findings: The results of expert validation indicate that the media is highly valid, with an average score of 87.5% from media experts and 90.0% from subject matter experts. The implementation results show positive student responses, with an average score of 88.25%, indicating high levels of engagement and usability. Furthermore, the effectiveness test reveals a significant improvement in students’ conceptual understanding, as indicated by an increase in post-test scores and a moderate N-gain of 0.58.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: Novelty of this study lies in the integration of interactive multimedia features with a systematic validation process, specifically designed to address conceptual challenges in learning the periodic table. This study provides an innovative and empirically validated learning solution that contributes to improving the quality of chemistry education.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    W. A. Saputra, “Development and Validation of Multimedia-Based Interactive Learning Media to Enhance Students’ Conceptual Understanding of the Periodic Table in Chemistry Education”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–40, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v3i1.2968.

    More Citation Formats

  • 81
    Abstract views
    47
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. M. Reiser, M. Binder, and H. Weitzel, “Effects of design-based learning arrangements in cross-domain, integrated stem lessons on the intrinsic motivation of lower secondary pupils,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14060607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060607
    2. M. A. Martawijaya, S. Rahmadhanningsih, A. Swandi, M. Hasyim, and E. H. Sujiono, “The effect of applying the ethno-stem-project-based learning model on students’ higher-order thinking skill and misconception of physics topics related to Lake Tempe, Indonesia,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v12i1.38703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.38703
    3. Muhammad Al Mighwar and Tariska Andini Nopaulita, “Analysis of government policy towards honorary teachers,” Amandemen J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Stud., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 37–50, 2023, doi: 10.61166/amd.v1i2.31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61166/amd.v1i2.31
    4. A. González, J. M. Gavilán-Izquierdo, I. Gallego-Sánchez, and M. L. Puertas, “A theoretical analysis of the validity of the Van Hiele levels of reasoning in graph theory,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 515–530, 2022, doi: 10.22342/jme.v13i3.pp515-530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i3.pp515-530
    5. J. Holguin-Alvarez, J. Cruz-Montero, J. Ruiz-Salazar, R. L. Atoche Wong, and I. Merino-Flores, “Effects of feedback dynamics and mixed gamification on cognitive underachievement in school,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2025, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/15717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15717
    6. N. Eralita, “Analisis keterampilan proses sains dalam praktikum kimia fisika,” Orbital J. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 187–196, 2023, doi: 10.19109/ojpk.v7i2.19402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v7i2.19402
    7. T. Nyarai, M. Moses, S. Osman, and C. Agnes, “Mobile Technologies Reinventing Teacher Preparation for Education 4.0 Outcomes in Marginalised Communities,” pp. 19–28, 2022, doi: 10.33965/ice2022_202210l003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33965/ICE2022_202210L003
    8. J. C. De Gagne et al., “Exploration of cyberethics in health professions education: A scoping review,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20227048
    9. S. W. Octavia, N. Septiani, F. Sinaga, and N. N. Qoidah, “Analysis of the relationship in learning interest to learning outcomes static fluid material in senior high school,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, vol. 87, no. 1,2, pp. 149–200, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v7i1.26696
    10. A. Azis, S. Utami, L. Cronin, and A. H. Al Sanie, “The influence of the school environment on the formation of children’s character,” J. Basic Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2024, doi: 10.37251/jber.v5i1.850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v5i1.850
    11. L. Hahn and P. Klein, “Eye tracking in physics education research: A systematic literature review,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 13102, 2022, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.013102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.013102
    12. H. Albatti, “A review of intended learning outcomes of english lessons and learning motivation,” Arab World English J., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 205–220, 2023, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol14no2.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no2.15
    13. K. Altmeyer, S. Kapp, M. Thees, S. Malone, J. Kuhn, and R. Brünken, “The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses theoretical background and empirical results,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 611–628, 2020, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900
    14. Y. N. Dewi, M. Zaim, and Y. Rozimela, “Interactive learning using e-learning module in learning english for senior high school: A review of related articles,” JELITA J. Educ. Lang. Innov. Appl. Linguist., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2022, doi: 10.37058/jelita.v1i2.5306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/jelita.v1i2.5306
    15. N. Yanto and N. Indah Sari, “Exploring scientific literacy in science classrooms: A literature study,” VENN J. Sustain. Innov. Educ. Math. Nat. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 164–173, 2025, doi: 10.53696/venn.v4i3.292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v4i3.292
    16. N. S. Herawati and A. Muhtadi, “Developing interactive chemistry e-modul for the second grade students of senior high school,” J. Inov. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 180–191, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v5i2.15424
    17. D. Shah, H. Isah, and F. Zulkernine, “Stock market analysis: A review and taxonomy of prediction techniques,” Int. J. Financ. Stud., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 26, May 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijfs7020026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs7020026
    18. U. SUSWATI, “Penerapan problem based learning (PBL) meningkatkan hasil belajar kimia,” Teach. J. Inov. Kegur. dan Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 127–136, 2021, doi: 10.51878/teaching.v1i3.444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51878/teaching.v1i3.444
    19. A. R. M. Warfa, J. Nyachwaya, and G. Roehrig, “The influences of group dialog on individual student understanding of science concepts,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0142-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0142-3
    20. M. A. Lala, Z. O. Olomowewe, A. T. Adeniyi, and A. Giwa, “Maize cob-derived activated carbon as an adsorbent for the removal of nickel (II) cation from aqueous solution: optimization and kinetic studies,” Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 573–582, 2023, doi: 10.1080/25765299.2023.2266230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2023.2266230
    21. N. S. Sodhi, M. R. C. Posa, T. M. Lee, D. Bickford, L. P. Koh, and B. W. Brook, “The state and conservation of southeast Asian biodiversity,” Biodivers. Conserv., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 317–328, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10531-009-9607-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9607-5
    22. I. S. M. Ramli, S. M. Maat, and F. Khalid, “Digital game-based learning and learning analytics in mathematics,” Pegem Egit. ve Ogr. Derg., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 168–176, 2022, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.13.01.19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.19
    23. N. I. Halil, H. Yawan, A. N. Hasanah, H. Syam, N. H. Andas, and Marhamah, “A new program to foster inclusion: Unraveling language teachers’ pedagogical practices to differentiated instruction,” Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 370–383, 2024, doi: 10.26858/ijole.v8i2.64997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i2.64997
    24. V. Czok, M. Krug, S. Müller, J. Huwer, and H. Weitzel, “Learning effects of augmented reality and game-based learning for science teaching in higher education in the context of education for sustainable development,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 21, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152115313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115313
    25. A. Alvarez-Marin and J. A. Velazquez-Iturbide, “Augmented reality and engineering education: A systematic review,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 817–831, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2022.3144356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3144356
    26. A. Alshehri, M. Rutter, and S. Smith, “Assessing the relative importance of an e-learning system’s usability design characteristics based on students’ preferences,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 839–855, 2019, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.839
    27. S. Jung, M. Son, C. il Kim, J. Rew, and E. Hwang, “Video-based learning assistant scheme for sustainable education,” New Rev. Hypermedia Multimed., 2019, doi: 10.1080/13614568.2019.1678682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2019.1678682
    28. F. Dwidarti, Zamzani, and M. Prabowo, “Multimedia-based dance learning in elementary school,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 515–521, 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21795
    29. M. Ben Ouahi, D. Lamri, T. Hassouni, and E. M. Al Ibrahmi, “Science teachers’ views on the use and effectiveness of interactive simulations in science teaching and learning,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 277–292, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15116a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15116a
    30. N. Rutten, W. R. Van Joolingen, and J. T. Van Der Veen, “The learning effects of computer simulations in science education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 136–153, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
    31. M. Papadopoulou et al., “Bedtime routines in Greek families: Characteristics, barriers, and facilitators for establishing and maintaining optimal routines,” Front. Sleep, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 133–142, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2024.1339561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2024.1339561
    32. G. A. Awuni, J. Gore, M. Tomaso-Peterson, T. W. Allen, D. R. Cook, and F. R. Musser, “Duration of rice stink bug, Oebalus pugnax (F.) infestation impacts the milk stage of panicle development,” Cogent Food Agric., vol. 10, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311932.2024.2368254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2368254
    33. D. Amankwaah, E. Appiah-twumasi, K. D. Ateko, and Y. D. Asamoah, “Efficacy of ADDIE instructional design in promoting conceptual change in electronic concepts at tano-north municipality , Ghana,” vol. 5, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v5i3.1064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v5i3.1064
    34. M. A. Adeoye, K. A. S. I. Wirawan, M. S. S. Pradnyani, and N. I. Septiarini, “Revolutionizing education: Unleashing the power of the ADDIE model for effective teaching and learning,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 202–209, 2024, doi: 10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624
    35. A. G. Spatioti, I. Kazanidis, and J. Pange, “A comparative study of the ADDIE instructional design model in distance education,” Inf., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13090402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402
    36. A. Syawaludin, Gunarhadi, and P. Rintayati, “Development of augmented reality-based interactive multimedia to improve critical thinking skills in science learning,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 331–344, 2019, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12421a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12421a
    37. M. K. Budiarto, Asrowi, Gunarhadi, R. Karsidi, and A. Rahman, “E-learning platform for enhancing 21st century skills for vocational school students: A systematic literature review,” Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 76–90, 2024, doi: 10.34190/ejel.22.5.3417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.5.3417
    38. N. T. Handayani, T. Krobthong, and K. Goodwell, “Descriptive study: Student learning motivation in learning physics of renewable energy materials,” Schrödinger J. Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 98–103, 2023, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v4i4.775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i4.775
    39. S. S. Atmoko, D. E. Kumala, P. Gatsinzi, and U. S. Usman, “Increasing activity and science learning outcomes vibrations, waves and sound matter through STAD model,” Schrödinger J. Phys. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2024, doi: 10.37251/sjpe.v5i1.880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v5i1.880
    40. V. M. Wora, R. Hadisaputro, and S. N. A. Pambudi, “Student improvement by applying the numbered heads together (NTH) approach to basic subjects of vocational competence in a vocational high school in Indonesia,” Discourse Commun. Sustain. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 94–102, 2017, doi: 10.1515/dcse-2017-0018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2017-0018
    41. M. Cockerill, T. Grieveson, S. Bingham, and J. O’Keeffe, “Promoting high achievement for disadvantaged students: co-designing a school self-evaluation process aligned to evidence of successful leadership practice across five english districts,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15010052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010052