SINTA

0.0

Impact

Scholar

6

H-Index

Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation

an Open Access Journal

The Effect of Flash-Based Learning Media on Students’ Achievement in Learning Atomic Structure in Kenyan Senior High Schools

Jairus Bulimo Khamali
Roka Secondary School
Kenya
jairusmali51@gmail.com
Helen Omondi Mondoh
Pwani University ROR
Kenya
Share

  • Purpose of the study: This study aims to investigate the effect of Flash-based learning media on students’ learning achievement in chemistry, particularly on the topic of atomic structure, in Kenyan senior high schools.

    Methodology: The study employed a quasi-experimental research design using a pretest–posttest control group approach. The participants consisted of 84 Grade 10 students from a public senior high school in Kenya, divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group was taught using Flash-based learning media featuring animated visualizations of atomic models, subatomic particles, and electron configurations, while the control group received conventional instruction. Data were collected using a validated chemistry achievement test and analyzed using an independent samples t-test.

    Main Findings: The results showed that students who learned using Flash-based media achieved significantly higher posttest scores than those taught using conventional methods. The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (t = 3.24, p < 0.05), indicating that Flash-based learning media had a positive effect on students’ achievement in learning atomic structure.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides empirical evidence on the effectiveness of Flash-based learning media in chemistry education within the Kenyan context, which remains underexplored. The findings highlight the potential of interactive multimedia to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of abstract chemistry topics and support the integration of digital learning media in secondary science education in developing countries.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    J. B. Khamali and H. O. Mondoh, “The Effect of Flash-Based Learning Media on Students’ Achievement in Learning Atomic Structure in Kenyan Senior High Schools”, Jor. Chem. Lea. Inn, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 186–192, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.37251/jocli.v2i2.2584.

    More Citation Formats

  • 85
    Abstract views
    112
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. S. Syamsidar and S. Suyanta, “Students’ chemical literacy ability of senior high school in Gowa Regency,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 4118–4128, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7721
    2. Y. Rahmawati, E. Erdawati, A. Ridwan, N. Veronica, and D. Hadiana, “Developing students’ chemical literacy through the integration of dilemma stories into a STEAM project on petroleum topic,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 376–392, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3926/jotse.2221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2221
    3. B. Chen, S. Chen, H. Liu, and X. Meng, “Examining the changes in representations of nature of science in Chinese senior high school chemistry textbooks,” Sci. Educ., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 327–346, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00383-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00383-7
    4. S. Xue, D. Sun, L. Zhu, H.-W. Huang, and K. Topping, “Comparing the effects of modelling and analogy on high school students’ content understanding and transferability: The case of atomic structure,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 325–341, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.33225/jbse/22.21.325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.325
    5. M. Nkadimeng and P. Ankiewicz, “The affordances of minecraft education as a game-based learning tool for atomic structure in junior high school science education,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 605–620, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10956-022-09981-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09981-0
    6. J. Fielding and K. Makar, “Challenging conceptual understanding in a complex system: supporting young students to address extended mathematical inquiry problems,” Instr. Sci., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 35–61, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11251-021-09564-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09564-3
    7. Y. Rahmawati, Z. Zulhipri, O. Hartanto, I. Falani, and D. Iriyadi, “Students’ conceptual understanding in chemistry learning using PhET interactive simulations,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 303–326, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3926/jotse.1597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1597
    8. D. Gryglik, “Good teaching practices on the example of chemistry teaching in non-chemistry studies,” Beyond Philol. An Int. J. Linguist. Lit. Stud. English Lang. Teach., no. 21/2, pp. 57–77, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.26881/bp.2024.2.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2024.2.03
    9. S. A. Hariyanto, S. Sulistyaningsih, and J. Suprihatiningrum, “Differentiated instruction based on learning styles in chemistry classrooms: A systematic review of models, outcomes, and implementation challenges,” Hydrog. J. Kependidikan Kim., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 611–617, 2025.
    10. Y. D. Damayanti and M. E. Wulanningtyas, “A systematic literature review: Findings of misconceptions in atomic structure chemistry,” Int. J. Act. Learn., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2025, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/ijal DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ijal.v10i1.22211
    11. R. Tustari, M. Herman, D. Sari, E. Mawarnis, and H. Herman, “Analysis of student misconceptions using the Three-Tier diagnostic test on atomic structure class X material at SMA N 1 Lintau Buo,” Hydrog. J. Kependidikan Kim., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 119–129, 2025.
    12. Z. Liu, S. Pan, X. Zhang, and L. Bao, “Assessment of knowledge integration in student learning of simple electric circuits,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 18, no. 2, p. 020102, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020102
    13. M. Del Rosario, H. S. Heil, A. Mendes, V. Saggiomo, and R. Henriques, “The field guide to 3D printing in optical microscopy for life sciences,” Adv. Biol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–22, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1002/adbi.202100994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.202100994
    14. P. Ndiangui, F. K. Mwangi, and J. Zhang, “Enhancing student skills through the integration of online learning in Kenya’s competency-based curriculum (CBC),” Res. Soc. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–35, May 2025, doi: 10.46303/ressat.2025.25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2025.25
    15. E. Micheni, J. Murumba, and J. Machii, “Educational technology and competency- based education in Kenya : Does technology matter ?,” in IST-Africa Institute and IIMC, 2023, pp. 1–11.
    16. J. P. Cayabas and D. A. Sumeg-Ang, “Challenges and interventions in developing instructional materials: Perspectives of public school teachers in basic education,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Stud., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 849–855, 2023, doi: 10.53894/ijirss.v6i4.2059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i4.2059
    17. F. R. Rahim, S. Y. Sari, P. D. Sundari, F. Aulia, and N. Fauza, “Interactive design of physics learning media: The role of teachers and students in a teaching innovation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2309, no. 1, p. 012075, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012075
    18. T. Bedada and K. . Fita, “Causes of poor academic performance in chemistry at primary school students in Chiro Town, Ethiopia,” Eur. J. Educ. Dev. Psychol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 53–72, 2023.
    19. C. Wrigley-Asante, C. G. Ackah, and L. K. Frimpong, “Gender differences in academic performance of students studying Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) subjects at the University of Ghana,” SN Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 12, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s43545-023-00608-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00608-8
    20. E. Staneviciene and G. Žekienė, “The use of multimedia in the teaching and learning process of higher education: A systematic review,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 19, p. 8859, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17198859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198859
    21. F. S. Purnomo, S. Kharisma, and S. Rahmawan, “Enhancing chemistry learning outcomes through interactive learning media to support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A systematic literature review,” ASEAN J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2026, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed
    22. C. Akdeniz, “Effects of cognitive stimulation, physical arrangement of the learning environment, and instructional tendency on student engagement,” Int. J. Curric. Instr., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 492–516, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8647-6055
    23. G. P. Waang, “Maximizing the Potential of multimedia in Indonesia: Enhancing engagement, accessibility, and learning outcomes,” Acad. Soc. Appropr. Technol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 235–245, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.37675/jat.2023.00409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37675/jat.2023.00409
    24. M. Ongor and E. C. Uslusoy, “The effect of multimedia-based education in e-learning on nursing students’ academic success and motivation: A randomised controlled study,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 71, p. 103686, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103686
    25. S. M. Sari, M. Z. Ma’arij, and D. R. Adila, “The effectiveness of multimedia-based learning media on the achievement of health students’ competences: A literature study,” KnE Med., vol. 2023, pp. 25–38, 2023, doi: 10.18502/kme.v3i1.12695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kme.v3i1.12695
    26. D. A. Yonanda et al., “Improving motivation and learning outcomes of elementary school students with multimedia-based interactive media,” Profesi Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 197–210, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.23917/ppd.v11i3.5761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v11i3.5761
    27. S. W. Tarigan, “Use of computer-based educational media to improve the learning ability of industrial engineering students in chemistry,” J. Sist. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput. Prima(Jusikom Prima), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 218–223, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.34012/jurnalsisteminformasidanilmukomputer.v7i1.3968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34012/jurnalsisteminformasidanilmukomputer.v7i1.3968
    28. K. Afni and R. Silaban, “Development of computer-assisted chemistry learning media with the macromedia flash program to measure problem-solving abilities,” Mahir J. Ilmu Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–33, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.58432/mahir.v2i1.785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58432/mahir.v2i1.785
    29. N. Pandey, H. de Coninck, and A. D. Sagar, “Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries,” WIREs Energy Environ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–25, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1002/wene.422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.422
    30. N. S. M. N. Izam, Z. Itam, W. L. Sing, and A. Syamsir, “Sustainable development perspectives of solar energy technologies with focus on solar photovoltaic—A review,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 2790, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15082790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082790
    31. M. A. M. Gabr, W. F. Sleem, and N. S. El-wkeel, “Effect of virtual reality educational program on critical thinking disposition among nursing students in Egypt: a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design,” BMC Nurs., vol. 24, no. 1, p. 874, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03488-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03488-w
    32. G. Hwang, C. Yang, K. Chou, and C. Chang, “An MDRE approach to promoting students’ learning performances in the era of the pandemic: A quasi‐experimental design,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1706–1723, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13208
    33. M.-H. Liao, “Cultivating pro fi cient and ef fi cacious L2 English speakers via VoiceThread-mediated self- and peer assessments,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1277, pp. 1–15, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05674-2
    34. Q. N. Nguyen and D. T. H. Doan, “ChatGPT’s effects on EFL learners’ autonomy and self-efficacy in self-regulated learning contexts,” JALT CALL J., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–31, 2025, doi: 10.29140/jaltcall.v21n2.102968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v21n2.102968
    35. Z. L. Buchin and N. W. Mulligan, “Retrieval-based learning and prior knowledge.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 22–35, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1037/edu0000773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000773
    36. A. Bittermann, D. McNamara, B. A. Simonsmeier, and M. Schneider, “The landscape of research on prior knowledge and learning: A Bibliometric analysis,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 35, no. 2, p. 58, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9
    37. H. Hairida, R. Rasmawan, R. P. Sartika, and M. Masriani, “Educators’ perception of the utilization of Information and Communication Tecnology (ICT) in chemistry learning,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 9105–9024, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4375
    38. R. W. Saputra and M. Mitarlis, “An action research for enhancing student understanding of science literacy in stoichiometry by using flash-based learning media,” J. Pijar Mipa, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 394–399, May 2022, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v17i3.3498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i3.3498
    39. M. P. Sari and R. E. Putri, “Science student teachers’ understanding about atom: An investigation on prior knowledge,” 2023, p. 110001. doi: 10.1063/5.0125322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0125322
    40. S. Lateef, E. Echeverri-Jimenez, and M. Balabanoff, “Characterizing epistemic atomic modeling knowledge,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 137–150, 2026, doi: 10.1039/D4RP00360H. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RP00360H
    41. F. M. Penggabean and E. Siboro, “Comparing student activity and outcomes in problem based learning and guided inquiry on atomic structure,” J. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 196–209, 2025.
    42. Y. Ayyıldız, L. Tarhan, and A. Gil, “Comparing the effectiveness of the learning material and the learning method in students’ achievement in chemistry lesson on chemical changes,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1372–1393, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2022.2086535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2086535
    43. N. Kohan, N. Navabi, M. K. Motlagh, and F. Ahmadinia, “Designing and evaluating ECG interpretation software for undergraduate nursing students in Iran: a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design,” BMC Nurs., vol. 23, no. 1, p. 827, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02472-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02472-0
    44. N. Lailiyah and Z. Zuhri, “The effectiveness of the application M3 board learning media (Mean, Median, and Mode) in Class VIII statistics materials at lekok NU middle school,” Noumerico J. Technol. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–22, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.33367/jtme.v2i1.4189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33367/jtme.v2i1.4189
    45. F. R. Rasyid, T. A. R. Puja Kesuma, and Karsiwan, “Design and development of Flash-based learning media for enhancing students’ learning interest,” Digit. Learn. Soc. Sci. Life-course Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 52–67, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.70211/disolife.v1i1.259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70211/disolife.v1i1.259
    46. L. Marfuah, Y. Franita, and Z. R. Hendrastuti, “Development of flash-based learning media to improve critical thinking ability of grade VII middle school students,” Union J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 191–199, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.30738/union.v11i2.13290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v11i2.13290
    47. A. Dion Bahrudin and C. Insjaf Yogihati, “Development of interactive learning media as an alternative to improve students’ conceptual understanding and motivation on the temperature and heat topics,” Int. J. Educ. Teach. Zo., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 132–145, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.37
    48. N. Aswita, W. Widiawati, and I. Widyaningrum, “The impact of macromedia flash utilization in cone material on class IX students’ Conceptual Comprehension,” Mathline J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1107–1117, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.31943/mathline.v9i4.683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v9i4.683
    49. S. Shimojo and Y. Hayashi, “Age-related differences in explanatory activities during collaborative learning with concept maps: experimental investigation using epistemic network analysis,” Int. J. Comput. Collab. Learn., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 491–518, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11412-025-09456-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-025-09456-5
    50. M. Septiani, “Utilizing interactive learning media based on augmented reality to improve concept understanding in science learning,” Indones. J. Teachingand Learn. Educ., vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 15–22, 2025.
    51. J. E. Oh, Y. K. Chan, A. Kong, and H. Ma, “Animation students’ engagement and motivation through peer teaching: online flipped classroom approach,” Arch. Des. Res., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 7–23, 2022, doi: 10.15187/adr.2022.02.35.1.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2022.02.35.1.7
    52. N. Ningsi and H. Hartono, “Developing interactive learning media to enhance elementary school students’ learning motivation,” Educ. J. Prim. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 81–96, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.35719/educare.v6i1.291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35719/educare.v6i1.291