The Effectiveness of the Jigsaw Learning Model in Improving Students’ Learning Outcomes in Carbon Chemistry
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the Jigsaw cooperative learning model in improving students’ learning outcomes and learning motivation in carbon chemistry at the secondary school level through a classroom-based instructional intervention.
Methodology: This study employed classroom action research with three instructional cycles. The Jigsaw cooperative learning model was implemented using lesson plans and student worksheets. Data were collected through achievement tests, observation sheets, motivation questionnaires, and attitude questionnaires. Descriptive quantitative analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel.
Main Findings: The results show a consistent improvement in students’ learning outcomes across three cycles, indicated by increased average scores, mastery levels, and absorption rates. Students’ affective aspects and learning motivation also improved, with most students reaching moderate to high motivation levels and showing more positive attitudes toward chemistry learning.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides new empirical evidence on the integrated impact of the Jigsaw learning model on cognitive, affective, and motivational aspects in carbon chemistry. Unlike previous studies focusing mainly on achievement, this research highlights how structured peer collaboration enhances conceptual understanding and learning motivation in abstract chemistry topics.
References
M. Arsyad, S. Guna, and S. Barus, “Enhancing Chemistry Education through Problem-Based Learning: Analyzing Student Engagement, Motivation, and Critical Thinking,” Int. J. Curric. Dev. Teach. Learn. Innov., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 110–117, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.35335/curriculum.v2i3.178.
C. Ngendabanga, J. B. Nkurunziza, and L. R. Mugabo, “Innovative approaches in chemistry teaching: a systematic review on the use of improvised chemicals for student engagement and performance,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 566–577, 2025, doi: 10.1039/D4RP00302K.
S. E and A. E. W. Benjamin, “Studying the student’s perceptions of engagement and problem-solving skills for academic achievement in chemistry at the higher secondary level,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 8347–8368, May 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12165-x.
D. Darsan, P. Endra, and W. Werdining, “Improving Learning Outcomes Through Dialogic Teaching in Collaborative Settings for High School Students in East Java,” J. Educ. Technol. Inov., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 94–105, 2025, doi: 10.31537/jeti.v8i1.2423.
A. Akbar, R. Asmawati, and H. Juanda, “Optimizing Science Learning through a Problem-Based Approach,” ESENSI J. Ris. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2025.
M. Jamil, T. Batool Bokhari, and Q. Zia, “Qualitative Content Analysis for Critical Thinking and Skill Development: A Case of Chemistry Curriculum,” J. Asian Dev. Stud., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 147–155, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.12.
J. Yao, “Exploring Experiential Learning: Enhancing Secondary School Chemistry Education Through Practical Engagement and Innovation,” J. Educ. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 22, pp. 475–484, 2023, doi: 10.54097/ehss.v22i.12508.
K. Vo, M. Sarkar, P. J. White, and E. Yuriev, “Exploring Problem-Solving Scaffolds in General Chemistry: A Systematic Review of Scaffolding Goals and Instructional Approaches,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 1004–1018, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01327.
P. Thongkorn and K. Cojorn, “Enhancing Students’ Collaborative Problem Solving Competency through Creativity-Based Learning Combined with Collaborative Learning in Chemistry Learning,” J. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran IPA, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 78, May 2025, doi: 10.30870/jppi.v11i1.28557.
L. Ruijuan, S. Srikhoa, and N. Jantharajit, “Blending of collaborative and active learning instructional methods to improve academic performance and self-motivation of vocational students,” Asian J. Educ. Train., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 130–135, 2023, doi: 10.20448/edu.v9i4.5211.
P. Doolittle, K. Wojdak, and A. Walters, “Defining Active Learning: A Restricted Systemic Review,” Teach. Learn. Inq., vol. 11, pp. 1–24, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.25.
F. I. Pratama and E. Rohaeti, “Students’ Chemical Literacy Ability on Hydrocarbon Material: A Case of Toxic Compounds in Fried Food,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 6795–6802, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4554.
K. Adu-Gyamfi and I. A. Asaki, “Factors contributing to teachers’ conceptual difficulties in teaching high school organic chemistry,” Eur. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–67, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.30935/scimath/12433.
H. Hulyadi, M. Muhali, and A. Fibonacci, “Identification of Student Conceptions on the Molecular Structure of Organic Compounds Using Question,” Hydrog. J. Kependidikan Kim., vol. 11, no. 3, p. 328, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.33394/hjkk.v11i3.8135.
V. T. T. Hoai, P. N. Son, V. V. D. Em, and N. M. Duc, “Using 3D molecular structure simulation to develop chemistry competence for Vietnamese students,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 19, no. 7, p. em2300, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/13345.
M. A. Lasaiba and D. Lasaiba, “ENHANCING ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF THE 5E LEARNING CYCLE MODEL,” INSECTA Integr. Sci. Educ. Teach. Act. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 71–86, May 2024, doi: 10.21154/insecta.v5i1.8518.
S. H. Rahmia, M. Mutiani, F. Nuraini, S. Triyono, and ..., “Integration of Learning Design and Evaluation in the Implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka: Evidence from Public Junior High Schools in Banjarmasin,” Kalimantan Soc. …, vol. 7, no. October, pp. 98–116, 2025
J. A. Jaison, K. A. Cruz, and Y. Liu, “Investigating Students’ Academic Motivation, Homework, and Academic Achievement in an Online General Chemistry II Course,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 485–494, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00736.
C. Haelermans, “The Effects of Group differentiation by students’ learning strategies,” Instr. Sci., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 223–250, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11251-021-09575-0.
S. K. Gupta et al., “Revolutionizing the way students learn photographic arts through experiential education using AI and AR systems,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-24415-8.
Copyright (c) 2025 Theresia Ita Wijayanti, Steven J Field, Khawla Rashedy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
