Enhancing Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Colloidal Systems through Inquiry-Based Chemistry Instruction
Abstract
Purpose of the study: This study aimed to examine the effect of inquiry-based chemistry learning on secondary school students’ conceptual understanding of colloidal systems.
Methodology: A quasi-experimental design employing a pretest–posttest control group was used. Data were collected using a validated conceptual understanding test and a diagnostic questionnaire. The data were analyzed using N-gain analysis and an independent samples t-test at a 0.05 significance level after confirming the assumptions of normality and homogeneity.
Main Findings: The results indicate that inquiry-based learning significantly improved students’ conceptual understanding. A total of 67.5% of students achieved scores above the minimum competency standard, while 92.5% demonstrated a moderate level of conceptual improvement. The t-test results (t₍calculated₎ = 4.84 > t₍table₎ = 2.68) confirmed a statistically significant difference between pretest and posttest scores.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study lies in the application of a contextually adapted guided inquiry model supported by validated diagnostic instruments. This approach provides robust empirical evidence on how inquiry-based learning facilitates students’ construction of chemical concepts, thereby contributing to both theoretical and practical advancements in chemistry education.
References
S. O. Makinde and N. O. Oyeniyi, “The Roles of Emerging Technology in Chemistry Teaching and Learning for a Sustainable Development,” Indones. J. Teach. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 177–188, 2024, doi: 10.17509/ijotis.v4i2.75554.
A. Ncube, S. Mtetwa, M. Bukhari, G. Fiorentino, and R. Passaro, “Circular Economy and Green Chemistry: The Need for Radical Innovative Approaches in the Design for New Products,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 1752, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16041752.
M. A. L. Blackie, “Knowledge building in chemistry education,” Found. Chem., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 97–111, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10698-022-09419-w.
G. Jiménez-Valverde, “Narrative Approaches in Science Education: From Conceptual Understanding to Applications in Chemistry and Gamification,” Encyclopedia, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 116, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia5030116.
G. Renvall and B. Kurtén, “Talking Chemistry in Small Groups: Challenges with Macroscopic, Submicroscopicand Symbolic Representations Among Students,” FMSERA J., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 58, 2024.
H. O. Kapici, “From Symbolic Representation to Submicroscopic One: Preservice Science Teachers’ Struggle with Chemical Representation Levels in Chemistry,” Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 134–147, 2023, doi: 10.46328/ijres.3122.
T. Fatacharmita, T. Hadinugrahaningsih, and I. Irwanto, “Analysis of Students’ Conceptual Understanding on Colloidal Materials Through the Flipped Classroom Learning Model Integrated Peer-Instruction,” J. Comput. Sci. Math. Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79–92, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.70232/thnvb502.
H. Retnawati et al., “The influence of the application of mathematics on students’ difficulties in solving chemical problems: A longitudinal study using national examination data,” EPJ Web Conf., vol. 344, p. 01009, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202534401009.
S. Winarni and S. Syahrial, “Revealing Chemical Misconceptions Through The Microteaching Process in The Era of The Covid-19 Pandemic,” JKPK (Jurnal Kim. dan Pendidik. Kim., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 50, 2022, doi: 10.20961/jkpk.v7i1.55587.
K. Widiastari and I. W. Redhana, “Multiple representation-based chemistry learning textbook of colloid topic,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, p. 012185, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012185.
N. N. S. P. Verawati and N. Nisrina, “Reimagining Physics Education: Addressing Student Engagement, Curriculum Reform, and Technology Integration for Learning,” Int. J. Ethnoscience Technol. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 158–181, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.33394/ijete.v2i1.14058.
K. Kalita and M. Nath, “A Comparative Analysis of Different Teaching Methods on Student Achievement in Mathematics,” Shodhshauryam, Int. Sci. Ref. Res. J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 100–117, 2025.
A. H. Mir, “Learner-Centered Pedagogies: Transforming Education for the 21St Century,” J. Account. Res. Util. Financ. Digit. Assets, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 383–387, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.54443/jaruda.v3i4.217
M. A. Alam, “From Teacher-Centered To Student-Centered Learning: The Role of Constructivism and Connectivism In Pedagogical Transformation,” CONFLUX J. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 154–167, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://cjoe.naspublishers.com
M. B. Thomas, A. Muscat, A. Zuccolo, C. N. Luguetti, and A. Watt, “Navigating Pedagogical Innovation in Higher Education: Education Academics’Experiences with Active and Inquiry-Based Learning in Intensive Teaching,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1917–1943, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10755-025-09807-y.
J. Saheli, “Analysing Constructivist Teaching Approaches to Support Cognitive and Emotional Needs in Mentally Ill Learners,” Bharati Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev., no. July, pp. 277–285, 2025.
R. Safkolam, S. Madahae, and P. Saleah, “The Effects of Inquiry-based Learning Activities to Understand the Nature of Science of Science Student Teachers,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 479–496, 2024, doi: 10.29333/iji.2024.17125a.
M. Vilela, C. Morais, and J. C. Paiva, “Inquiry-Based Science Education in High Chemistry: Enhancing Oral and Written Communication Skills Through Authentic and Problem-Based Learning Activities,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 334, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15030334.
M. J. Gomez, “The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning in Science Education: A Systematic Review of Student Engagement and Achievement,” J. Educ. Learn. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 353–363, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.69739/jelm.v2i2.1143.
N. Mediana, A. Funa, and R. Dio, “Effectiveness of Inquiry-based Learning (IbL) on Improving Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Science and Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 532–552, 2025, doi: 10.46328/ijemst.4769.
D. L. Morris, “Rethinking Science Education Practices: Shifting from Investigation-Centric to Comprehensive Inquiry-Based Instruction,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15010073.
D. L. Morris, “Rethinking Science Education Practices: Shifting from Investigation-Centric to Comprehensive Inquiry-Based Instruction,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 73, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15010073.
T. Hagos and D. Andargie, “Effects of technology-integrated formative assessment on students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge in chemical equilibrium,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 113–126, 2023, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20630.
A. A. Espinosa, D. Koperová, M. Kuhnová, and M. Rusek, “Preservice Chemistry Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding and Confidence Judgment: Insights from a Three-Tier Chemistry Concept Inventory,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 53–65, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01146.
M. Ncube and K. Luneta, “Concept-based instruction: Improving learner performance in mathematics through conceptual understanding,” Pythagoras, vol. 46, no. 1, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.4102/pythagoras.v46i1.815.
E. Khasawneh, A. Hodge-Zickerman, C. S. York, T. J. Smith, and H. Mayall, “Examining the effect of inquiry-based learning versus traditional lecture-based learning on students’ achievement in college algebra,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, p. em0724, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.29333/iejme/12715.
M. N. Sarwar et al., “Concept mapping and conceptual change texts: a constructivist approach to address the misconceptions in nanoscale science and technology,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1339957.
E. A. Datingaling, “Correlates of Listening Comprehension Towards the Development of An Assessment Tool,” Aloysian Interdiscip. J. Soc. Sci. Educ. Allied Fields, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 18–39, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17422492.
K. M. Jegstad, “Inquiry-based chemistry education: a systematic review,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 251–313, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2023.2248436.
T. Farxod, Sabina, Pardayev, “Inquiry-Based Learning in Chemistry Education Exploring its Effectiveness.pdf,” Integr. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 74–79, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://journal.uzfi.uz/index.php/ISE/article/view/99%0Ahttp://journal.uzfi.uz/index.php/ISE/article/download/99/174
A. Alya and K. Dwiningsih, “Project-Based Interactive Colloidal E-Module in Chemistry Learning to Improve Student’s Science Process Skills and Understanding Concepts,” Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 14, no. 1, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v14i1.17934.
F. Hanum, A. Sebayang, F. Fitriati, E. Tarigan, and L. Tarigan, “Implementing an Inquiry-Based Learning Model to Deepen Students’ Conceptual Understanding,” J. La Edusci, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 946–960, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.37899/journallaedusci.v6i5.2645.
M. Anwar, “Evaluating the Impact of Inquiry-Based Teaching Strategies on the Development of Scientific Thinking, Problem-Solving, and Conceptual Understanding Among High School Students,” J. Soc. Horizons, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 01–10, 2024.
M. A. M. Gabr, W. F. Sleem, and N. S. El-wkeel, “Effect of virtual reality educational program on critical thinking disposition among nursing students in Egypt: a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design,” BMC Nurs., vol. 24, no. 1, p. 874, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03488-w.
I. Amalia, D. Solihat, and E. Darsih, “the Effect of Kahoot Application in Improving Students’ Wirting Skill,” Indones. J. Learn. Instr., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2022, doi: 10.25134/ijli.v5i1.5873.Received.
Ç. Şenyiğit, F. Önder, and İ. Sılay, “An Inquiry-Based Learning Approach for Effective Concept Teaching,” I.E. Inq. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol13/iss1/10/
A.-I. Zourmpakis, M. Kalogiannakis, and S. Papadakis, “The Effects of Adaptive Gamification in Science Learning: A Comparison Between Traditional Inquiry-Based Learning and Gender Differences,” Computers, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 324, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3390/computers13120324.
Copyright (c) 2025 Rajendra Nivrutti Shirsat, Sang Yeon Lee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
