Activating Classroom Interaction through Think–Pair–Share: Evidence from Chemistry Learning
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study is to improve the chemistry learning outcomes of class X students at the Muallimin Muhammadiyah Bangkinang Islamic Boarding School on the main material of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions through the application of the Think Pair Share type cooperative learning model.
Methodology: The subjects of this research were 10th grade students of the Muallimin Muhammadiyah Bangkinang Islamic Boarding School. The number of students was 24 students consisting of 10 male students and 14 female students. The stages passed in the classroom action research were: 1) Planning/preparation of action, 2) Implementation of action, 3) Observation, and 4) Reflection.
Main Findings: Based on the analysis of research results and discussion, it was concluded that the application of the Think Pair Share type of cooperative learning model can improve the chemistry learning outcomes of class X students of the Muallimin Muhammadiyah Bangkinang Islamic Boarding School. This is illustrated by the results of the learning completion obtained by students in accordance with the learning completion requirements set in the class. Student learning outcomes have met the minimum completion criteria as determined, where out of 24 students, 20 students have completed the learning, or are above the classical completion (75%).
Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study is to determine the effectiveness of applying the think pair share type cooperative learning model to improve chemistry learning outcomes in the discussion of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions.
References
U. D. Agwu and J. Nmadu, “Students’ interactive engagement, academic achievement and self concept in chemistry: an evaluation of cooperative learning pedagogy,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 688–705, 2023, doi: 10.1039/D2RP00148A.
F.-Z. Chen et al., “Enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in life sciences: implementing interactive learning environments and flipped classroom models,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 102, May 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00501-x.
Miterianifa, Ashadi, S. Saputro, and Suciati, “A Conceptual Framework for Empowering Students’ Critical Thinking through Problem Based Learning in Chemistry,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1842, no. 1, p. 012046, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012046.
M. Arsyad, S. Guna, and S. Barus, “Enhancing Chemistry Education through Problem-Based Learning: Analyzing Student Engagement, Motivation, and Critical Thinking,” Int. J. Curric. Dev. Teach. Learn. Innov., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 110–117, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.35335/curriculum.v2i3.178.
D. M. Ferreira, F. C. Sentanin, K. N. Parra, V. M. Negrao Bonini, M. de Castro, and A. C. Kasseboehmer, “Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science in the Classroom and Its Repercussion on the Motivation to Learn Chemistry,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 578–591, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00287.
J. Musengimana, E. Kampire, and P. Ntawiha, “Effect of Task-Based Learning on Students’ Understanding of Chemical Reactions Among Selected Rwandan Lower Secondary School Students,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 140–155, 2022, doi: 10.33225/jbse/22.21.140.
C. Ngendabanga, J. B. Nkurunziza, and L. R. Mugabo, “Innovative approaches in chemistry teaching: a systematic review on the use of improvised chemicals for student engagement and performance,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 566–577, 2025, doi: 10.1039/D4RP00302K.
J. W. Reid et al., “Investigating patterns of student engagement during collaborative activities in undergraduate chemistry courses,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 173–188, 2022, doi: 10.1039/D1RP00227A.
C. C. Ceneciro, M. R. Estoques, and J. V. Chavez, “Analysis of Debate Skills to the Learners’ Confidence and Anxiety in the Use of the English Language in Academic Engagements,” J. Namibian Stud., vol. 33, pp. 4544–4569, 2023, doi: 10.59670/jns.v33i.2812.
B. Hajiyeva, “Language Anxiety in ESL Learners: Causes, Effects, and Mitigation Strategies,” EuroGlobal J. Linguist. Lang. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 119–133, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.69760/pn9wgv05.
J. Hao, “Research on the Impact of Competency-Based Curriculum Design on Student Learning Outcomes,” J. Mod. Educ. Theory Pract., vol. 1, no. 2, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.70767/jmetp.v1i2.272.
T. Açıkgöz and M. C. Babadoğan, “Competency-Based Education: Theory and Practice,” Psycho-Educational Res. Rev., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 67–95, 2021, doi: 10.52963/PERR.
K. A. Nguyen et al., “Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 9, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7.
N. Kerimbayev, Z. Umirzakova, R. Shadiev, and V. Jotsov, “A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 61, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8.
M. G. Shaik, “Pedagogical approaches to collaborative learning: An analytical study,” in INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPROACHES IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY: ICIAET-24, 2025, p. 050001. doi: 10.1063/5.0248162.
A. Nguyen, S. Järvelä, C. Rosé, H. Järvenoja, and J. Malmberg, “Examining socially shared regulation and shared physiological arousal events with multimodal learning analytics,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 293–312, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13280.
H. Silva, J. Lopes, C. Dominguez, and E. Morais, “Think-Pair-Share and Roundtable: Two Cooperative Learning Structures to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills of 4th Graders,” Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2022, doi: 10.26822/iejee.2022.274.
D. Sunandar, “Enhancing Mathematics Education Through Collaborative Learning: A Study of Two Stay Two Stray (Ts-Ts) and Think-Pair-Share (TPS) Models within Realistic Mathematics Education,” Int. J. Enterp. Model., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 130–138, 2023, [Online]. Available: www.ieia.ristek.or.id
H. Rahmawati and H. Haeriah, “Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes through the Implementation of the TPS (Think Pair Share) Cooperative Learning Model,” Prism. Sains J. Pengkaj. Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Mat. dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 836–843, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.33394/j-ps.v11i3.8718.
R. K. | Ahmad, “Enhancing Student Engagement and Performance in Indonesian Language Learning through the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) Model with Question Card Media,” J. Educ. Innov. Curric. Dev., vol. 03, no. 01, pp. 30–37, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://journals.iarn.or.id/index.php/educur/index
L. Niekrenz and C. Spreckelsen, “How to design effective educational videos for teaching evidence-based medicine to undergraduate learners–systematic review with complementing qualitative research to develop a practicable guide,” Med. Educ. Online, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2339569.
T. Shyiramunda, “Group discussions in secondary school chemistry: Unveiling pedagogical alchemy for academic advancement,” J. Pedagog. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–24, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.33902/JPR.202533653.
J. N. Nnoli, “Enhancing Senior Secondary School Students’ Academic Performance in Chemistry Through the Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Strategy,” Soc. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 370–379, 2024, doi: 10.37256/ser.5220244727.
M. Wulansari, M. Hadeli L, and R. Aini, “Implementation of the Think Pair Share (TPS) Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Chemistry Learning Outcomes for Class X TKJ 1 SMKN 2 Palembang Students,” Pedagog. Rev., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 62–68, 2022, doi: 10.61436/pedagogy/v1i2.pp62-68.
M. Nazari, “Plan, Act, Observe, Reflect, Identity: Exploring Teacher Identity Construction across the Stages of Action Research,” RELC J., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 672–685, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1177/0033688220972456.
Yunisa and A. H. Lubis, “Improving Elementary School Students’ Reading Skills Using Picture Word Cards: How is This Possible?,” J. Indones. Prim. Sch., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 9–18, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.62945/jips.v1i2.95.
M. A. Adeoye, “Review of Sampling Techniques for Education,” ASEAN J. Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed
A. Septiyanto, D. Oetomo, and N. Y. Indriyanti, “Students’ interests and attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. , vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 379–389, 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25040.
S. Donkoh, “Application of triangulation in qualitative research,” J. Appl. Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 2023, doi: 10.15406/jabb.2023.10.00319.
A. Cu, S. Meister, B. Lefebvre, and V. Ridde, “Assessing healthcare access using the Levesque’s conceptual framework– a scoping review,” Int. J. Equity Health, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 116, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01416-3.
I. Apriyanti, Leginem, and S. Rahayu, “Efforts to Improve Student Learning Outcomes through the Problem Based Learning Model in Islamic Education Learning at SD Negeri 104325 Kampung Manggis,” J. Indones. Prim. Sch., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 61–68, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.62945/jips.v1i2.346.
M. F. Sya, H. T. Adri, A. Kholik, D. H. Sudjani, Z. K. Latifah, and Uslan, “Indonesian Learning: Towards the Academic Achievement of Communicative Competence,” Indones. J. Soc. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 183–189, 2021, doi: 10.30997/ijsr.v3i3.152.
J.-C. Hsiao, S.-K. Chen, W. Chen, and S. S. J. Lin, “Developing a plugged-in class observation protocol in high-school blended STEM classes: Student engagement, teacher behaviors and student-teacher interaction patterns,” Comput. Educ., vol. 178, p. 104403, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104403.
M. M. Chusni, S. Saputro, S. B. Rahardjo, and S. Suranto, “Student’s Critical Thinking Skills Through Discovery Learning Model Using E-Learning on Environmental Change Subject Matter,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1123–1135, 2020.
R. Rachmadtullah, B. Setiawan, A. J. A. Wasesa, and J. W. Wicaksono, “Elementary school teachers’ perceptions of the potential of metaverse technology as a transformation of interactive learning media in Indonesia,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 128–136, 2023, doi: 10.53894/ijirss.v6i1.1119.
E. M. Pupah and U. Sholihah, “Enhancing EFL students’ reading learning process in COVID-19 pandemic through Nearpod,” Englisia J. Lang. Educ. Humanit., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 17–31, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.22373/ej.v9i2.10400.
L. Misqa, W. Oviana, Z. Hayati, and M. Jannah, “Improving Student Learning Outcomes in Mathematics Learning through a Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach in Elementary Schools,” J. Indones. Prim. Sch., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 19–26, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.62945/jips.v1i2.34.
S. Basri and J. Jahara, “Improving Indonesian Language Learning Outcomes through the Demonstration Method among Eighth-Grade Students at SMPN Batu, Polewali Mandar Regency,” Austronesian J. Lang. Sci. Lit., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 75–88, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.59011/austronesian.4.2.2025.75-88.
S. Kartikasari and A. Abudarin, “STEM-Project Based Learning with Learning Guides on Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solutions to Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills of High School Students,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1214–1223, 2022, doi: 10.23960/jpmipa/v23i3.pp1214-1223.
T. M. Sihombing, M. Rusdi, and A. Afrida, “Development of Contextual-Based Interactive Learning Videos Assisted by Edpuzzle on Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution Materials,” ALACRITY J. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 402–409, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.52121/alacrity.v5i1.636.
Y. Chen and R. Techawitthayachinda, “Developing deep learning in science classrooms: Tactics to manage epistemic uncertainty during whole‐class discussion,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1083–1116, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1002/tea.21693.
A. Fakoya, M. Ndrio, and K. J. McCarthy, “Facilitating Active Collaborative Learning in Medical Education; a Literature Review of Peer Instruction Method,” Adv. Med. Educ. Pract., vol. 14, pp. 1087–1099, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S421400.
A. I. Chinedum, S. A. Danladi, and C. O. Okoro, “Comparative Analysis Of Jigsaw And Think-Pair- Share Instructional Strategies On Academic Achievement In Civic Education Among Secondary School Students In Rivers State,” Int. J. Innoative Psychol. Soc. Dev., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 25–39, 2024.
H. T. Nennig et al., “Exploring social and cognitive engagement in small groups through a community of learners (CoL) lens,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1077–1099, 2023, doi: 10.1039/D3RP00071K.
F. Nurlaika, S. Sahade, and A. Rijal, “The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Think Pair Share (TPS) on Student Learning Outcomes,” Golden Ratio Data Summ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 641–653, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.52970/grdis.v4i2.648.
I. Irmayani and A. Adriana, “Implementation of the Think-Pair-Share Cooperative Model to Improve Reading Comprehension Skills of Fifth Grade Students at MIN 25 Pidie,” J. Media Learn. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2025.
N. R. Mishra, “Constructivist Approach to Learning: An Analysis of Pedagogical Models of Social Constructivist Learning Theory,” J. Res. Dev., vol. 6, no. 01, pp. 22–29, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3126/jrdn.v6i01.55227.
S. Gannar and C. Kilani, “Contextualized Learning and Social Constructivism: Implementing a Project-Based Approach in Information Systems Development Education,” J. Sci. Learn., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2025, doi: 10.17509/jsl.v8i1.72667.
S. Irshad, M. F. Maan, H. Batool, and A. Hanif, “Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD): An Evaluative Tool for Language Learning and Social Development in Early Childhood Education,” Multicult. Educ., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 234–242, 2021, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4940172.
A. V. Kolly-Shamne, “The Concept of Zone of Proximal Development and its Derivatives: Problems and Prospects of Modern Interpretations,” Sci. Bull. Mukachevo State Univ. Ser. “Pedagogy Psychol., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 81–95, 2022, doi: 10.52534/msu-pp.8(3).2022.81-95.
Copyright (c) 2025 Roswati Roswati, Iin Wahyuni, Romi Afriani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and acknowledge that the Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation is the first publisher licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
.png)
