Revolutionizing Hydrocarbon Education: How Concept Maps Improve Chemistry Outcomes

Erni Batu Bara; Majid Shabani  Mahalli

doi:10.37251/jocli.v1i2.1142

Erni Batu Bara Asy-Syafiiyah High School Air Tiris
Majid Shabani Mahalli Mazandaran University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jocli.v1i2.1142

Keywords: Chemistry Outcomes, Concept Maps, Education, Hydrocarbons, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Purpose of the study This is For know There is whether or not improvement results Study students in class chemistry especially on the subject discussion hydrocarbon with use map draft .

Methodology: Subject in study This is students of X Asy-Syafiiyah Air Tiris Islamic High School with amount student as many as 22 people. While object study This is improvement results Study chemistry in the main discussion Hydrocarbons . Subjects studied is lesson chemistry in the main discussion Hydrocarbons . Types of data obtained in study This that is types of qualitative data and quantitative data , which consist of from the result data learning and data on teacher and student activities . Data collection techniques in research This use documentation , observation , and interviews .

Main Findings: Based on results research , use map draft For increase results Study students on the subject discussion hydrocarbons in class X MA Asy-Syafiiyah Watertiris Kampar District , Kampar Regency makes student more active and improving performance students . Data collection with using post test , repeat daily each cycle and documentation . Author give number For every cycle , namely before action 59.00%, Cycle I 67.50%, Cycle II 81.50%.

Novelty/Originality of this study:Concept map-based learning methods revolutionize the way chemistry is taught, making hydrocarbon material easier to understand and apply.

References

R. Rosni, “Kompetensi guru dalam meningkatkan mutu pembelajaran di sekolah dasar,” J. Educ. J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 113, 2021, doi: 10.29210/1202121176.

D. Somantri, “Abad 21 pentingnya kompetensi pedagogik guru,” Equilib. J. Penelit. Pendidik. dan Ekon., vol. 18, no. 02, pp. 188–195, 2021.

A. Akbar, “Pentingnya Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru,” JPG J. Pendidik. Guru, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 23, 2021, doi: 10.32832/jpg.v2i1.4099.

J. Kim, “Leading teachers’ perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 8693–8724, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12109-5.

D. A. Sulthani and I. Thoifah, “Urgency of Stakeholders in Improving the Quality of Education,” Riwayat Educ. J. Hist. Humanit., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 443–451, 2022, doi: 10.24815/jr.v5i2.27600.

M. Situmorang, J. Purba, and R. Silaban, “Implementation of an innovative learning resource with project to facilitate active learning to improve students’ performance on chemistry,” Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 905–914, 2020, doi: 10.5530/ijper.54.4.184.

J. Marshel, Ratnawulan, and A. Fauzi, “Practicality of student worksheets science based on problem based learning models with the theme of the motion in life using integrated connected type 21stcentury learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1876, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012050.

S. N. F. Ramly, N. J. Ahmad, and H. Mohd Said, “The Development of Innovation and Chemical Entrepreneurship Module for Pre-University Students: An Analysis Phase of ADDIE Model,” J. Nat. Sci. Integr., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 96, 2022, doi: 10.24014/jnsi.v5i1.16751.

B. Priemer et al., “A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 105–130, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2019.1600490.

M. D. W. Ernawati et al., “Do creative thinking skills in problem-based learning benefit from scaffolding?,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 399–417, 2023, doi: 10.36681/tused.2023.023.

A. J. Dood and F. M. Watts, “Students’ Strategies, Struggles, and Successes with Mechanism Problem Solving in Organic Chemistry: A Scoping Review of the Research Literature,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 53–68, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00572.

A. Wiyarsi, A. K. Prodjosantoso, and A. R. E. Nugraheni, “Promoting Students’ Scientific Habits of Mind and Chemical Literacy Using the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues on the Inquiry Learning,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, no. May, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.660495.

H. Ye, B. Liang, O. L. Ng, and C. S. Chai, “Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: a systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w.

A. P. Gale et al., “On embracing the concept of becoming environmental problem solvers: the trainee perspective on key elements of success, essential skills, and mindset,” Environ. Rev., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.1139/er-2021-0040.

M. Zamiri and A. Esmaeili, “Strategies, Methods, and Supports for Developing Skills within Learning Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” 2024. doi: 10.3390/admsci14090231.

P. Körtesi, Z. Simonka, Z. K. Szabo, J. Guncaga, and R. Neag, “Challenging Examples of the Wise Use of Computer Tools for the Sustainability of Knowledge and Developing Active and Innovative Methods in STEAM and Mathematics Education,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 1–23, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142012991.

E. Sunardi, “Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kimia Dengan Menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran Peta Konsep Pada Siswa Kelas X Atp Smk Negeri 4 Muaro Jambi,” Acad. J. Inov. Ris. Akad., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 119–125, 2023.

A. Ncube, S. Mtetwa, M. Bukhari, G. Fiorentino, and R. Passaro, “Circular Economy and Green Chemistry: The Need for Radical Innovative Approaches in the Design for New Products,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1–21, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16041752.

P. Fantke et al., “Transition to sustainable chemistry through digitalization,” Chem, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 2866–2882, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.09.012.

R. Ghosh, G. Bu, B. L. Nannenga, and L. W. Sumner, “Recent Developments Toward Integrated Metabolomics Technologies (UHPLC-MS-SPE-NMR and MicroED) for Higher-Throughput Confident Metabolite Identifications,” Front. Mol. Biosci., vol. 8, no. September, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.720955.

H. Adenusi, G. A. Chass, S. Passerini, K. V. Tian, and G. Chen, “Lithium Batteries and the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI)—Progress and Outlook,” 2023. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202203307.

A. Abedini, B. Abedin, and D. Zowghi, “Adult learning in online communities of practice: A systematic review,” 2021. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13120.

A. W. Oliveira, A. O. Brown, W. S. Zhang, P. LeBrun, L. Eaton, and S. Yemen, “Fostering creativity in science learning: The potential of open-ended student drawing,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 105, p. 103416, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103416.

A. Sibomana, C. Karegeya, and J. Sentongo, “Factors Affecting Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievements in Chemistry,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 114–126, 2021, doi: 10.26803/IJLTER.20.12.7.

C. O. Nja, R. E. Orim, H. A. Neji, J. O. Ukwetang, U. E. Uwe, and M. A. Ideba, “Students’ attitude and academic achievement in a flipped classroom,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 1, p. e08792, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08792.

M. Almahdawi, S. Senghore, H. Ambrin, and S. Belbase, “High school students’ performance indicators in distance learning in chemistry during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 11, 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11110672.

M. Assalihee, N. Bakoh, Y. Boonsuk, and J. Songmuang, “Transforming Islamic Education through Lesson Study (LS): A Classroom-Based Approach to Professional Development in Southern Thailand,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14091029.

V. Pandya, D. Monani, D. Aahuja, and U. Chotai, “Traditional vs. Modern Education: A Comparative Analysis,” SSRN Electron. J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 172–183, 2024, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4876084.

K. M. F. Mina and C. G. Oraiz, “Unveiling the reasons behind teachers ’ embrace of traditional teaching methods Unveiling the Reasons Behind Teachers ’ Embrace of Traditional Teaching Methods,” no. 8, pp. 1004–1023, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11623971.

F. Fathuddin, N. Nurdin, and R. Rustina, “The Challenges of Teaching Islamic Education In the Millennial Generation Era,” Int. J. Contemp. Islam. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.24239/ijcied.vol5.iss1.66.

A. Hasanah, “Assemblr Edu Analysis and Interpretation as an Interactive Media in Language Learning,” Int. Conf. Islam. Stud., pp. 1195–1202, 2022.

Š. Javornik and E. Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, “Factors Contributing to School Effectiveness: A Systematic Literature Review,” Eur. J. Investig. Heal. Psychol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2095–2111, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13100148.

M. A. Almulla and M. M. Alamri, “Using conceptual mapping for learning to affect students’ motivation and academic achievement,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13074029.

C. T. Machado and A. A. Carvalho, “Concept Mapping: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education,” J. Contin. High. Educ., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 38–53, 2020, doi: 10.1080/07377363.2020.1712579.

F. Y. Li, G. J. Hwang, P. Y. Chen, and Y. J. Lin, “Effects of a concept mapping-based two-tier test strategy on students’ digital game-based learning performances and behavioral patterns,” Comput. Educ., vol. 173, no. July, p. 104293, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104293.

Ö. Polat and E. Aydın, “The effect of mind mapping on young children’s critical thinking skills,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 38, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100743.

D. Astriani, H. Susilo, H. Suwono, B. Lukiati, and A. R. Purnomo, “Mind mapping in learning models: A tool to improve student metacognitive skills,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 4–17, 2020, doi: 10.3991/IJET.V15I06.12657.